Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2010)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Track the Films You Watch (2010) - Page 19

post #541 of 1166
Manpower - Early, highly melodramatic take on the two guys, pals for life, and one baaaaad goil who comes between 'em routine. In this case, Edward G. Robinson and George Raft play the working stiffs who tangle with giant-headed Marlene Dietrich as a sad-luck dame who brings them nothing but trouble. Eddie G. is a hot headed sap who wants to save the girl by marrying her even though he knows she has no feeling for him. His buddy Raft tries to watch out for his pal but ends up falling for the girl himself. Raft and Dietrich are both so wooden and devoid of personality that they generate very little heat and, in a perfect world, would be allowed to go off and make boring little babies with giant heads. EGR and a host of Warner's character all-stars try hard to keep things bubbling along to the final 'Shocking' conclusion with not much to work with save sheer personality. Maybe they should have called it 'Starpower' instead. 

Men in War - Extremely grim little picture about a single small troop of combat soldiers who are behind enemy lines during the Korean war and their attempt to get back to their own side of the fighting. Robert Ryan plays the battle scarred lieutenant who leads his men, most of whom are raw recruits, through treacherous fields of enemy snipers and guerrilla fighters. He gets help from Aldo Ray as an equally weary sergeant trying to get his shell-shocked colonel to safety. This is another later period Anthony Mann film, where he seemed to go back to making small intimate films. You get a real feel for the pressure and fear these men are constantly subjected to and how death can come from many directions at once. Mann does a good job here showing what grim trials these men are subjected to on a daily basis without making a an outright anti-war film. It'd definitely be enough to discourage me from climbing into any foxholes. 

Many Rivers to Cross - Rambunctious western about a tough but cute frontier gal who sets her cap for a he-man trapper who's passin' through town on his way to the great northern wilderness. When he tells the gal that he just ain't the marryin' kind, all manner of hijinks ensue, as she tries to trap him like a possum up a 'simmon tree. I'm not always so big on Western comedies, especially romantic comedies, but, with the exception of Eleanor Parker channeling Lucille Ball as the girl, they manage to keep the wackiness and cornball antics to a slow simmer. It's nice to see Victor McLaglen as the girls hard drinking father, and both the Professor and the Skipper from 'Gilligans Island' pop up in small early roles. This is a Robert Taylor vehicle and he is an actor who hasn't really made a huge impression on me. He seems a bit of a dude to be wearin' all that buckskin and he gives off a whiff of vague distaste during the love scenes. Like I said though, Western romantic comedies really aren't my thing. 

Morning Departure - Even grimmer little picture about a submarine on a routine training mission that hits a leftover land mine and lays dead at the bottom of the ocean. Only  small number of the officers and crew survive the incident and this film is largely about them keeping themselves together as rescue efforts proceed topside. This is a rather unique entry in the Submarine film genre, in that it is largely a vehicle for showing why a stiff upper lip is necessary in times of crisis. The acting is well done and features several familiar faces of British film, including a very young Richard Attenborough. Apparently this was taken from a true story, and if I ever had any inclination before to go down into a submarine, this movie definitely cured me of that. 
post #542 of 1166
The Mummy’s Tomb  (1942) -

http://www.beardyfreak.com/rvmumtomb.php


Moving along at a much faster pace, with far more mummy action, than the previous film, “The Mummy’s Hand”, this is a ridiculously maligned sequel,  and this lowly status is quite simply unjustified.

Getting rid of every single scrap of dated comedy that held up proceedings in the previous film, this movie is not only far more entertaining from a ‘rampaging mummy’ point of view, but far darker (and unusually brave) enterprise that plays far more like a true horror movie than its predecessor.

Much of the criticism the flashback footage is as unjustified as the general negative comments the film gets lumbered with.
Yes, it does take 10 minutes out of the 60 odd minute running time of the film, but in fact this re-cap in “Tomb” still leaves us with far more time left in the film for ‘mummy action’ than the three times as long build-up to any action in “Hand”!

That’s not to say the film does not have faults.
You do have to wonder why it took a massive 30 years to get this revenge plot sorted out for one.
But this is still one of the most surprising sequels ever made due to the ruthless attitude towards it’s stock heroic characters and the startling change in tone from the film it followed on from.

Lon Chaney as Kharis lacks the creepiness the mummy had in the previous film but his fire scarred eye is quite effective and  otherwise he’s as much of a physical (if a bit fatter!) presence.
And he certainly gives Kharis an air of unstoppable power.

The attack scenes themselves are more energetic and injected with a bit more action than "Hand" too.

After much atmospheric mummy action and some surprisingly calculated deaths of popular characters (that still seems astonishingly unusual, and would only really be repeated with such brutal efficiency 48 years later in “Maniac Cop 2”) it all culminates in an enjoyable, fire-filled, finale.

Overall then what we have in “The Mummy’s Tomb” is a second sequel that fixes most of the faults the first sequel had, takes a very different and much darker attitude to proceedings and takes some unusual and brave narrative decisions.
post #543 of 1166
 "Teeth" -

Wonderful little horror film that delivers some great black comedy, some well executed gore and gross-out sequences and benefits big time, in the longish build-up to the main plot device of a toothy fun tunnel, from the brilliant performance by Jess Weixler as the teenage girl with a big problem.

The mixture of the comic and the serious is well handled and although you have to wait (though it's a perfectly fine 'n' dandy wait thanks to the script and the lead performance) the penis armageddon the plot idea hints at is delivered in full blooded, shaft separated, close-up and the finale is a grotesque gem of black comic cock carnage.

Predictable for sure (although thankfully this means we don't have a stupid non-sensical twist to mess the film up as the credits roll) but that does not mean "Teeth" isn't wildly entertaining and satisfying.
Highly recommended.
post #544 of 1166
Thread Starter 

Marked for Death (1990)
 

Dwight H. Little
 

If you're wanting smart and interesting character development then this here certainly isn't going to be your cup of tea.  Steven Seagal plays DEA agent who returns home from a deadly mission that killed his partner so he retires.  Things take a turn for the worse when he's visiting his family and a Jamaican drug lord named Screwface (Basil Wallace) puts a hit out on them.  Sure enough ol' Seagal takes vengeance.  There's no doubt that this is an extremely stupid movie with one stereotype character after another but it's that type of dumb action film that is nearly impossible not to love.  Yes, everything here is stupid but the film will at least keep you entertained, which is a lot more than many films do.  What works so well is that we're given that DEATH WISH-type story of a good guy who has his family hurt by a bunch of scumbags and we want to see those scumbags crushed.  That basic plot can keep just about any movie entertaining and Seagal perfectly fits the bill as this agent.  His fighting here is at the top of his game and he also gets a nice supporting cast to work with.  Keith David plays his best friend and the two share some good chemistry together.  Wallace is a lot of fun as the drug dealer and we also get a young Danielle Harris from the HALLOWEEN movies playing Seagal's niece.  The movie might offend some people from Jamaica but I doubt anyone is going to take the film serious enough to believe all people from there are like what we see here.  We get silly stereotypes that are at least fun to view and some of the dialogue will have you laughing out loud.  The action scenes are pretty well directed and we get plenty of the red stuff in some of the more violent shoot outs.

Rebel Rousers, The (1970)
 

Martin B. Cohen
 

Silly but mildly entertaining biker flick about a man (Cameron Mitchell) who travels to a small town to try and get back his pregnant wife (Diane Ladd) but while the two are talking he's beaten and she's kidnapped by a biker gang led by Bruce Dern.  The battered husband manages to make it back to town where he tries to find someone to help him.  The highlight of this film is the wonderful cast as we get not only Mitchell, Dern and Ladd but supporting performances by Jack Nicholson and Harry Dean Stanton.  As far as biker films goes this one here is a long way away from titles like EASY RIDER and THE WILD ANGELS but there's enough mild charm here to make this worth viewing.  The film runs a fairly short 78-minutes and I do wonder if there's some stuff on the cutting room floor as there are a few side plots that never really add up to much and we even get some questionable moments from start to finish.  We're told that Mitchell and Dern played football together but this never really adds up to anything.  We get the escape scene with Mitchell taking off yet it's never quite clear why his wife doesn't try to escape with him.  Probably because if she had then the movie would have ended right there.  The kidnapping leads to a pretty good ending when some Mexican guys with rakes show up to get back Mitchell's wife as well as one of their daughters who was delivering tacos to the bikers!!!  Mitchell is a real head-scratcher here as he pretty much sleepwalks through the role and his scenes crying are pretty funny as there's obviously no real emotion behind them.  Ladd is charming as the wife and it's always fun seeing Stanton no matter how small the role is.  Dern clearly steals the show as the "mature" biker who is always saying the right thing even though it's hard to trust what he's saying.  Finally, there's Nicholson wearing some zebra colored pants that are a real hoot.  Fans of the genre will want to check this one out but others should see the classics first. 
 

Glory Stompers, The (1968)
 

Anthony M. Lanza
 

AIP biker film has Black Souls member Chino (Dennis Hopper) beating the pulp out of a Glory Stomper (Jody McCrea) and stealing his girlfriend (Chris Noel).  They think the Glory Stomper is dead but he eventually comes seeking revenge.  As far as biker flicks goes this one here certainly isn't at the top of the group but it's a decent entry.  There are enough plot holes here that you might find yourself laughing when you're not suppose to.  One such moment happens early on after they beat up McCrea.  For whatever reason they think he's dead but they never check a for a pulse or anything else.  This here is why he's able to come after them as they didn't finish the job or even check to see if they did.  Another such moment is when Hopper tells everyone that they'll never find the biker's body because they hid it yet all they did was put him and his bike under a tree where everyone could see it.  It's that type of goofiness that gives this film its charm as well as other scenes including one where there's a mass orgy of body painting.  There's some silly sex scenes thrown in but everyone keeps their clothes on and just rolls around in the dirt.  Hopper is at his very best here playing a real nut who is constantly coming up with silly things to say and always threatening someone.  McCrea doesn't have his father's acting ability but he's fun enough in the role.  I didn't care too much for Noel as I found here way too bland for the character even though she is playing the goodie type.  Robert Tessier, with hair, has a pretty good role as the muscle-bound thug and most will remember him from his bald roles in HARD TIMES and THE LONGEST YARD.  Casey Kasem and Lindsay Crosby (Bing's daughter) also appear.  The movie moves along quickly enough and there's enough charm to make it worth viewing if you're a fan of the genre.  There's certainly nothing terrific or ground breaking here but Hopper is a lot of fun and makes it worth checking out.

Disaster on the Coastliner (1979)
 

Richard C. Sarafian
 

Lloyd Bridges, Raymond Burr, William Shatner, Pat Hingle, E.G. Marshall, Robert Fuller and Paul L. Smith headline this made-for-TV disaster pic that contains some good suspense even though the actual story is perhaps the dumbest of the genre.  A man (Smith) wants to prove that a derailment six years earlier was covered up so he hijacks a train, rigs all the computer controls and is prepared to crash the train into another one that just happens to be carrying the Vice President's wife.  I love disaster films and anyone who does will probably want to check this thing out, although there's no question that the actual story might be the dumbest I've ever seen.  Now, I'll admit that I'm no railroad expert but the bad guy had way too easy of a time getting his plan carried out and it seems like the good guys had way too much trouble trying to stop the train.  We get a few reasons as to why they can't stop the train but these here are just incredibly silly and quite often had me laughing pretty hard.  One of the stories is that the bad guy is communicating with the other engineer and tells him that terrorists are trying to take the train over.  There are other small gimmicks that the bad guy uses to try and pull this off and they're just as silly.  Half-way through the picture we get the reason that the bad guy is doing all this stuff and the film tries to make us feel sorry for him but this little plot point didn't work even though Smith gives the best performance in the film.  Shatner gets to play a bad guy with a heart of gold.  Burr pretty much just stays seated but he's at least entertaining.  Bridges is a real hoot playing a government guy at the trains main station and seeing him pull out of gun twice in the film will give you a guaranteed laugh.  As silly as many of the plot points are, there's no question that the movie also has some very tense moments.  The entire lead-up to the disaster are very well directed and I thought the final fifteen-minutes were extremely tense.  It's a real shame that a lot of these tense moments as well as some nice action pieces are letdown due to a rather weak screenplay.  With that said, if you enjoy these made-for-TV movies then you might as well check this one out.

Terror on the Beach (1973)
 

Paul Wendkos

Interesting, if at times frustrating, made-for-TV thriller has Dennis Weaver (DUEL) taking his family to the beach for a couple days of camping but the family comes under attack by some hippies.  The father wants to play everything cool hoping that the thugs will just leave them alone but one attack after another happens until the family must do something to protect themselves.  At just 73-minutes there's really no room for any sort of character development but that's not a major negative.  What does hurt the film is that the movie would pretty much be over at the ten-minute mark but the only way it can keep going is by characters being complete idiots.  The father here has to take the top award for dumbest movie dad in the history of cinema because all of the terror his family goes through could have been avoided.  After the first two attacks it would be clear to anyone to leave but not this dad.  He keeps his family there for a third, fourth and even more attacks until it becomes too late to try and escape.  This is the part of the film that is rather frustrating.  In terms of a thriller there are a few very good moments including the first night scene when the family learns that they're not alone.  The dark beach makes for a very good setting and the director is able to milk some nice suspense out of the scene.  Weaver turns in a pretty good performance even though at times the screenplay doesn't benefit him any.  His "good guy" act at times seems to be an impersonation of W.C. Fields but the actor is believable in the role.  Estelle Parsons (BONNIE AND CLYDE) plays the wife, Kristoffer Tabori the son and an extremely cute Susan Dey is the daughter.  I do wonder which films influenced this one.  It does have a lot in common with HOT RODS TO HELL but it also has a similar theme to "revenge" movies like STRAW DOGS.  It's interesting that the father here refuses to fight back in hopes that everything will work out and this does make for an interesting decision towards the end of the film.  Those wanting violence are going to be pretty disappointed as the film tries to be the opposite of stuff like STRAW DOGS and THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT.  I'd also wonder how much of an influence this had on Wes Craven's THE HILLS HAVE EYES as the two films share quite a bit.  With that said, fans of TV movies or thrillers will probably want to check this one out if they have some time to kill.  It's certainly not a masterpiece but there are enough interesting ideas to make it worth viewing.
 

post #545 of 1166
 "Marked for Death" certainly droops in-between the violence.  But the violence is so stunningly crunchy and nasty that all is mostly forgiven.
Some great arm snapping here.



"House of Wax" - (1953) -

I was surprised at how wrong I got the first half of this film.
I've not seen it for many years and I forgot that Vincent Price is shown disfigured and going around killing people so early on.
I could have sworn the disfigured face was a big finale reveal (under the rather stupidly realistic wax mask that *shock* looks and moves exactly like Price's face) but I was wrong....and sure enough this first half of the film is by far the best. 

The film goes from fast paced disfigured psycho flick to slow, achingly obvious, horror drama and the shift in tone is dramatic. Thankfully Price is in good form here so it makes the obvious plotting more entertaining to sit through and at least the finale ups the macabre, even if Price's demise is rather blink and you miss it.

What really stands out here though is how great the film looks and how genuinely macabre as far as the attitude to corpses goes. Dead bodies are joked over, they're carted, carried, dumped and abused with grotesque abandon and the film does benefit from this macabre playfulness.

So it gets a bit bogged down and obvious later on but it still holds up, still entertains, Price is good and overall it's certainly recommended.
post #546 of 1166
"The Mummy’s Ghost" (1944) - .5

http://www.beardyfreak.com/rvmumghost.php


This third sequel to the original “The Mummy” (or the 2nd sequel to the later re-boot) once again ups the pace, ups the mummy action and darkens the mood in comparison to “The Mummy’s Hand” but it’s not quite as dark, well paced or generally as good as the previous “The Mummy’s Tomb”.

It’s certainly very nice to see that ‘Universal’ have used the ongoing story of Kharis in an interesting way with some pretty good continuity that truly turns these four films into an epic tale when combined.

As far as the screenplay goes, the film does stop dead now and again though for lethargically staged exposition scenes and
the mixture of general rampage plot and the re-incarnation idea also means the film is weighed down with more plotting and exposition in its main portion than either “Hand” or “Tomb”.

The romance sub-plot is cliché and saccharine but at least this romance angle serves a purpose where the previous drippy love clichés become the bedrock of the darker elements to come.
Without the sweetness the bitter would not register as well.

Aside from a suitably cadaverous and menacing John Carradine, and even Lon Chaney, none of the acting here is very good though.

Chaney’s Kharis is played slightly different, here the mummy seems to have more human traits in how he acts which are obviously put there to make the ‘ageless love’ aspect of the tale carry weight as we now see Kharis’ human side show through the monster he now is.
That’s not to say he’s not still a full-on throttling machine though and the numerous stalk ‘n’ strangle scenes are effective enough.

The film is also just as delightfully cold-blooded as “Tomb” in the way it treats returning characters, but “Ghost” is also ruthless (and again damn brave for the time) towards it’s new characters, resulting in a wonderfully surprising (if muddled in the details a bit) finale that goes against all you would expect from a film of this style and era.

Overall then “The Mummy’s Ghost” is better than “The Mummy’s Hand” as far as action, pacing and plot goes, but not as good as “The Mummy’s Tomb” as far as action, pacing and plot goes.
And that’s a wrap.
post #547 of 1166
Thread Starter 

I've had a burning desire to run through some horror films lately and TEETH had been on my radar for quite sometime now.  Mario and Dave finally made me put it at the top of my Netflix queue and it's certainly horror done right unlike the other one listed here.


Train (2008)
 

Gideon Raff
 

Originally this thing went into production as a remake of TERROR TRAIN but somewhere along the lines it turns into yet another HOSTEL rip-off.  A group of American wrestlers are in a foreign country when they get on a train, which of course turns out to be ran by a bunch of nuts.  These nuts kidnap foreigners and kill them in order to supply their organ transplant company.  This thing has earned the fake title of HOSTEL ON A TRAIN as we're served yet another "torture porn" flick that has very little imagination outside of ways to torture and mutilate someone.  If you're into that type of thing then you might find something worthy here but if you like good filmmaking or brains then more than likely you'll be out of this one by the forty-minute mark.  This movie tries hard to be as sick as possible as we get countless scenes of bloody violence but we also get a gang rape sequence and another one where a guy is raping a dead person.  Oh yeah, we also get a scene with two of the creeps peeing on a guy to wake him up.  There's no doubt that the screenplay is extremely weak because it offers up nothing new and there's one major plot hole after another.  It gets so bad that you really have to wonder if there was a screenplay at all.  We also have the bad screenplay trademark of characters poorly written and unlikeable.  I'm not sure what's happened to the horror genre over the past ten years or so but does anyone else remember when we liked the characters we're watching?  The cast is pretty much forgettable but it is somewhat shocking to see Thora Birch playing in a film like this.  If you can buy her as a wrestler then I guess you'll enjoy her performance.  Those wanting gore are going to find a lot of it here.  The MPAA slapped an NC-17 rating on this thing before it's theatrical release fell through and it went straight to DVD.  There's no question that's the right rating as we get some pretty graphic stuff.  The opening sequence shows us a guy getting skinned before being ripped apart.  There's all sorts of violence and gore that will appeal to gore hounds.  The horror genre has been full of rips from the the 1930s and on so there shouldn't be anyone shocked that producers are lining up to rip something like HOSTEL.  It seems each week we're getting some sort of rip and this one here went straight to DVD for a reason.

Teeth (2007)
 

Mitchell Lichtenstein
 

The story here is pretty simple but it's the acting and execution that makes this horror film something very special.Jess Weixler plays Dawn, a high school virgin who belongs to a club that makes one promise to stay pure until marriage.  Dawn begins hanging out with a boy and soon her feelings start to grow but after he sexually assaults her she learns that she doesn't know her body very well because her vagina has teeth.  The more graphic side of the story is going to have people tuning in expecting some sort of graphic and bloody exploitation film but what we have here is much more than that.  Yes, we get some rather gory shots but these here almost seem out of place in a way because it's the rather tender subject matter of sexuality that really works here.  The movie is being sold as a horror film and it certainly has many of those elements but it's also a rather interesting lose of sexual innocence tale.  I'm sure some people might take something away in terms of sexuality but just take a look at the sequence leading up to the first attack.  We get the two kids playing around in the water, slowly exploring each others body and this is handled in such a way that you can't help but feel as if you're watching some sort a love story.  In fact, I'd say there's more passion in this sequence than any love story of recent memory.  The film deals with sexuality in a variety of ways and that includes some black comedy, as that's something this story would have to have.  This here can be seen in a trip to a gynecologist that works perfectly well.  Then, once again, the sexual tone changes when Dawn meets her next victim.  Director Lichtenstein does a terrific job at building these various emotions and feelings but his screenplay also deserves a lot of attention for how well drawn out the character of Dawn is.  Weixler is absolutely magnificent as this character and no matter what she does we believe every bit of it.  We believe her as the virgin and we can believe everything that's happening to her.  Weixler really brings this character to life and she handles the drama, sexuality and subject matter perfectly.  I'm really not sure how anyone could see her here and not fall in love.  The supporting cast handles their roles just fine but there's no question this thing belongs to Weixler.  The director and star have certainly created something very memorable and one can't help but be interested in whatever they do next.  This film could have been a disaster in so many ways but I think it proves once again that story and acting can destroy gore, violence and torture anytime.

 

post #548 of 1166
 Nice....Glad you liked "Teeth" Mike.  Like you I took a long time to see it (picked it up for £3 about $5) but was happily surprised.

"Train" sounds nasty nasty nasty...but not that good away from being nasty.  Which is why I have not picked it up as I've not found it cheap enough yet to risk it (i'm not a renter).
Passed uncut by the BBFC as far as I know as an '18'.  Shows how much things have changed over here.
post #549 of 1166
The Sadist - Nothing in Arch Hall Jr's brief film career hints at the performance he gives in this movie. He postures, makes ridiculous faces, swings wildly from acting like a complete doofus to a feral cunning; everything is over the top and broad as can be, and yet it works. Somehow, Arch Jr., the 'Wild Guitar' himself, transforms into a ruthless hillbilly psychopath and makes you believe it. There really isn't much to this movie - a group of teachers on the way to a baseball game have car trouble and stop at a seemingly abandoned garage in hopes of finding a new fuel pump. What they find instead is Arch and his mute babydoll girlfriend, who proceed to torture the group and subject them to all manner of sadistic humilities. It's kind of amazing, given Arch's track record, just how effective this movie is the. The tension and suspense are unrelenting and just keep getting ratcheted up and up as the film progresses. It's a real testament to how effective low budget film making can be. This is not only Arch Jr's best film, but one of the best exploitation films to come out of that early 60's period.

A note on the Blu-Ray transfer - It's very interesting to me that Johnny Legend has taken it upon himself to release this film on Blu-Ray. It makes me wonder if other enthusiasts will follow suit with obscure gems that would otherwise never get the Hi-Def treatment. Being a fan of bad and crazy lo-fi cinema from the 50's and 60's, I've wondered if it would actually be worth upgrading some of these movies to Blu. 'The Sadist' is a good test case - this is not in any way a restoration, just a high definition transfer of a 35mm print - and it's pretty rough in some places - lots of specs and dirt and noise, but even with all that, the image is better than it has ever looked, with good contrast and sharpness that highlights the excellent cinematography. Needless to say, it's 100% better than my old Alpha Video copy, so I would say, even without the requisite restoration, doing the Hi-Def transfer was worthwhile. The extras are kind of low-rent, but Johnny Legend does give a rambling tribute to Arch Jr. and seems to make a vague promise that the rest of Arch's films will be getting the Blu treatment at some point soon also. Now if only someone would start doing the same for Russ Meyer...
post #550 of 1166
"The Sadist" appeared on an off the wall UK digital channel and I've got it recorded to watch and move to DVD-R.
Still not got around to it though, but I only here good things about it.
post #551 of 1166
"Warlock" - .5

Richard Widmark, Henry Fonda and Anthony Quinn star in Edward Dmytryk's epic, multi-layered, multi-plot strand Western that boasts some superbly crafted, three dimensional, characters all expertly played.

The action is sparse but effective and the clever, ever twisting, plot keeps you intrigued and guessing at exactly what will happen and just as importantly...how it will happen.

A streak of 50's melodrama (and some crappy sweeping strings on the soundtrack during the occasional - most dated aspect of the film - romantic interludes) goes against the astute, dark and intelligent screenplay now and again but overall this is stunning stuff.

And it features a truly fascinating portrayal of a driven, noble but ruthless gunslinger, now at a loss at what to do with his life as he and The West ages,  by Fonda.
You can certainly see aspects here of his majestic, steely-eyed, complex performance as Frank in "Once Upon a Time in the West" as his Marshall character here could well be the noble flipside of Frank.

There's also a really unusual male bonding aspect between Quinn and Fonda too, that truly is a platonic love story about two men who literally need each other to stay alive.

An intelligent, astute, layered and superbly played Western classic.



"Ministry of Fear" - .5

Fritz Lang's Nazi spy ring thriller starring Ray Milland is something Lang himself never liked due to his disapproval at the screenplay adaptation of Graham Greene's novel (which he liked).

It's certainly a bit all over the place in tone, going from dark and serious thriller/drama to frothy comedy thriller at the flip of a scene.
But it often looks impressive (of course, it's Lang) and has bags of atmosphere and some nice plotting.
The final scene gives us a rather abrupt, overly comic, ending to the film but overall this is pretty good stuff that benefits from Fritz Lang's artistic eye.



"The Human Jungle" -

One of those gritty 50's Noirish cop thrillers that falls between two stools as far as a modern audience's perceptions go.

It hints at prostitution, it contains murder, features crime syndicates, petty hoods, street bums and brutal women killers.
And it goes out and films all this on the actual mean streets and drapes all the seedy alleyways in deep shadow.

And yet...because of the obvious censor constraints of 50's cinema (despite the slowly changing aspects that this film does highlight) and general mores of 50's society all this grit and darkness still plays out like a cozy, retro, viewing experience as all the shadows are just that bit lighter than they should be and all the dirt a little to shiny.
This is gritty urban crime drama with no sex, no nudity, no blood, no real on-screen violence no swearing. 
As such it's a strange , though still highly enjoyable, creation and it would really take the 70's to fully catapult gritty crime cinema right into that dirt and grime and absolute darkness that "The Human Jungle" exists in, uses, but is never truly honest about.

A good cast features a young Chuck Connors as a slimy murderer and a still up and coming Claude Akins as a Mob heavy but the real acting honours here go to Gary Merrill as one of the most driven, uncompromising, tough as fucking nails Police Captains ever put on screen.
So good stuff, nice retro viewing for lovers of 50's thrillers...but it never truly gets under the concrete skin of that urban jungle it takes its name from.
post #552 of 1166
 The acting in Warlock is terrific all around and I thought Anthony Quinn was particularly good in it. He is one of those actors that kind of needs to be reigned in sometimes, as he can be quite a hambone, but when he works with a director who can get him to dial it back a bit and show some restraint, he can be very powerful. Great movie! 
post #553 of 1166
04/26/10: DR. GOLDFOOT AND THE GIRL BOMBS (Mario Bava, 1966) 

With this film, I unceremoniously brought my Mario Bava retrospective – commemorating the 30th anniversary of his passing – to a rather undignified close due to personal familial difficulties. Incidentally, having watched – and been appalled by – it years ago on late-night Italian TV, I had actually added this title to the Bava mini-marathon at the eleventh hour (in fact, I only acquired it a couple of days before viewing!); with this in mind, I regret not keeping the VHS recording of that broadcast since I now have had to make do with a vertically stretched copy which boasts forced English subtitles to boot! The film is a genuine oddity in that a sequel is made not merely by hands other than the original’s but by a different country altogether (though it still featured the same star and would be distributed, post-dubbing, by the company behind the first film anyway), considering that the titular figure is not a brand name a` la Tarzan, Zorro or, for that matter, Fu Manchu – where, for instance, the fourth and fifth entries in the Christopher Lee/Harry Alan Towers series of the 1960s eschewed British directorial involvement for that of notorious Spaniard Jess Franco (to the franchise’s ultimate detriment, I might add)! To cut to the chase, I have to admit that I was not as intolerant towards the film as I had been on that preliminary viewing: ironically, I used to lap up vehicles by the comic duo of Ciccio (Ingrassia) & Franco (Franchi) as a kid but, somehow, I could not picture them in the same frame as horror icon Vincent Price or ‘submitting’ to the direction of a technician and master stylist like Bava (in any case, their work has not withstood the test of time all that well, pretty much in the way of the Abbott & Costello comedies – with the one most readily given to mugging, Franco, even supplying the rather noisy song over the opening credits)!; having perhaps checked out the just-as-campy original (called DR. GOLDFOOT AND THE BIKINI MACHINE [1965], by the way) in the interim may have softened my opinion of the sequel to a certain extent (though it is still a toss-up with the horrendous make-over job that became THE HOUSE OF EXORCISM [1975] in constituting the nadir of the Bava canon). The film sees Goldfoot (flanked by a Chinese acolyte named “Hardjob”, in clear emulation of Harold Sakata’s character from the James Bond extravaganza GOLDFINGER [1964]) upping the ante by being intent on world domination (with the female robots turning combustible, hence the U.S. title – since the Italian original is a parody of John Le Carre`’s “The Spy Who Came In From The Cold”, brought to the screen the previous year, and puts the emphasis on the movie’s star comedians!) rather just misappropriation of funds as in the first entry. To be honest, one is still embarrassed to associate the picture with either Price (especially when disguising himself in a nun’s habit!) or Bava (and it is particularly lamentable that the two only managed to collaborate on material clearly below their standards and talents!) but, taken on its own merits (if such a term can be applied here), there are certainly some mild pleasures to be derived from the ensuing concoction – with the most inspired ideas being Ciccio & Franco picking up artillery items from the F.B.I. arsenal as if they were on a supermarket spree, the fact that the voice artist assigned to dub their burly and flustered Chief (remember that Italian films at this time were generally shot M.O.S.) is the same one who does Oliver Hardy in the Laurel & Hardy vehicles (I wonder how it sounded in the English-dubbed version?), and a rather brief reprise of the classic mirror gag devised by Max Linder (albeit most famously adopted by The Marx Bros.’ DUCK SOUP [1933]) involving Price and Ingrassia! In the same vein, the finale partly recreates the conclusion of DR. STRANGELOVE: OR, HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE BOMB (1963); for what it is worth, then, soon-to-be erotic diva Laura Antonelli plays the obligatory-but-insignificant damsel-in-distress here (alongside Fabian’s straight-man hero, who fares somewhat better).


04/26/10: SHINDIG!: THE WILD, WEIRD WORLD OF DR. GOLDFOOT (Mel Ferber, 1965; TV) 
 
At the same time as DR. GOLDFOOT AND THE GIRL BOMBS (1966; see above), I also managed to get hold of this rare TV program which actually served to introduce the dastardly character to U.S. audiences as a sort of teaser for his first official ‘vehicle’. In keeping with the times and the studio (AIP), all three Goldfoot movies feature youthful male leads then at the height of their popularity: after Frankie Avalon in DR. GOLDFOOT AND THE BIKINI MACHINE (1965), then, but before Fabian from GIRL BOMBS, here we have blond Tommy Kirk. Incidentally, while I do not recall the first film very well (despite having watched it not too long ago, which suggests that is rather forgettable!), I have a feeling that the plot of this one is basically a condensation of it (running a half-hour rather than one-and-a-half, though it is still padded-out with dated adverts by the various sponsors!). Apart from star Vincent Price, we have two other cast members of BIKINI MACHINE: Susan Hart (in much the same part of leading Girl Robot) and Harvey Lembeck (only a “guest star” in the film proper but here given the sizeable role of Goldfoot’s buffoonish henchman, making up for his mistakes by flattering the boss with such magnanimous designations as “King Of Evil” and, most hilariously, “Wizard Of Rottenness”). Needless to say, given its modest origins and lack of color, the effort all feels a bit half-hearted in this case – then again, one might argue that being shorter than the others, it is easier to digest!
post #554 of 1166
 "Valley of the Gwangi" - .5 (for the elephant eating and the floppy hats)

Meh....Time lies to you about what you thought was once good.

The film is half over before the dino even appears, as such we have to sit through 45 minutes of needlessly complex plot shenanigans to eventually get the cowboys into the dino valley in the first place.

Mixed in with all those said shenanigans is a tedious love triangle sub-plot (to say my 5 year old daughter was asking where the dinosaurs are should come as no surprise) that bogs the swamp down until 1 point on the triangle is suddenly eaten, with hardly a reaction to the loss, as the film carries on as if the guy we have just spent 45 tedious minutes with had never existed.

The dino action is pretty good, but either the mostly dodgy (though certainly not always) matte work has dyed Gwangi blueish grey or Harryhausen and co choose a weird ass colour scheme for him.
Not that the block blue colour is stable anyway as it flips from grey to brownish and back to blue with wild abandon.
Again, crappy matte or bad colour timing?

The eventual finale sees Gwangi at last doing something more interesting as it munches on elephants, chases cowboys and scares lots of Mexicans in their floppy hats.
Sadly though scaring the Mexicans is about all Gwangi does, as only one unfortunate is actually killed, the rest just look over their shoulders in fear as Gwangi ignores them. *sigh*

It all ends in a farcical fire that sees one tiny little pot of thrown burning embers (that Gwango decides not to simply walk away from) set an entire cathedral on fire in 20 seconds flat.

A nice idea poorly executed I'm afraid. Harryhausen's pretty solid stop motion work deserved a better script, better execution and more damn screentime.
post #555 of 1166
Thread Starter 

Scandal (1950)
 

Akira Kurosawa
 

This Kurosawa picture is pretty much a protest again the media and I'm sure plays much better today than in 1950.  In the film, an artist (Toshiro Mifune) is away on vacation when he happens to meet an actress (Shirley Yamaguchi).  Neither know it but a picture is taken of them together and placed in a gossip magazine that pretty much ruins their reputations.  They decide to sue and hire a crackpot lawyer (Takashi Shimura) who might not be much better than the magazine.  This isn't considered a very good film from the legendary director but I found enough great moments here to kill off some of the badness, which there is quite a bit of.  I'll start with the bad stuff and that's some of the most over dramatic moments as there's no doubt this film is bias against the media and in the end the film turns out to be a major propaganda piece against them.  There's nothing wrong with this but it doesn't get to be too much at times and the screenplay, for whatever reason, loses focus of the actual scandal during the second half and turns all of the attention onto the lawyer.  This here is where some of the more over dramatic moments come into play and this is where the film loses a bit of steam but at the same time it leads to a rather powerful final ten-minutes.  What does work are the performances, which are all terrific.  I found Yamaguchi to be incredibly charming in her role even though it's probably the weakest written.  Shimura gets handed many of the over dramatic moments but he still manages to nail most of the scenes he's in.  His drunken scene with his sick daughter were quite touching as were his final few moments in the film.  Then we have Mifune who once again turns in a great performance.  The more and more I see from this guy the more amazed that I am as it really seems like he could do no wrong and had the ability to blend into any role and make us believe the character.  There wasn't a single frame that I didn't believe I was seeing a private artist struggling with this scandal and Mifune nailed every bit of the drama but also the lighter bits of comedy and even more importantly some terrific scenes with the lawyer's daughter.  The story of the media doing innocent people wrong is probably a lot more relevant today than it was when this film was released and I felt this gave the film another plus.  This certainly isn't the greatest film from Kurosawa but it's easy to see and feel that he had a strong hatred for the media and it's in every inch of this film.  While some of the subject matter is a bit over the top, at the same time you can't get away from the terrific performances and great ending. 
 

Power of the Press, The (1928)
 

Frank Capra
 

Nice comedy/drama from Capra.  Clem Rogers (Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.) is a cub reporter who gets his big break covering the murder of a District Attorney.  One the scene Rogers sees the daughter (Jobyna Ralston) of an upcoming Mayor leaving the house and soon it's all over the news that she was involved in her death.  She claims she's innocent so the reporter sets out to see if she really is and soon uncovers a dark political plot.  This Columbia film runs a brief 64-minutes and while it doesn't feature anything ground breaking, it does manage to keep you entertained with a smile on your face.  The best thing going for the film are the performances with Fairbanks coming off very charming.  He's very believable as the rather dumb reporter yet when it's time to be serious he can manage this as well.  Fairbanks can play both the comedy as well as the drama and his energy helps keep the film moving.  Ralston is also very good as the daughter and the chemistry with Fairbanks comes off very well.  Mildred Harris is terrific as the mystery lady who might know a lot more than anyone else and Philo McCullough and Wheeler Oakman turn in fine performances as well.  The movie is so short that we really don't get any sort of character development or a well drawn out story but I really don't think the point was to make some sort of grand mystery.  The movie was clearly meant to be light entertainment and that's what it is.  Capra's direction perfectly handles the lighter moments as well as the romantic moments but he also handles the suspense quite well.  There's a terrific scene where Fairbanks plays drunk to try and find some information from a bootlegger that works perfectly and what really happened to the D.A. is good as well.  Fans of Capra and Fairbanks will certainly want to check this out even though it's rarely talked about when people discuss either man.

Criminal Code, The (1931)
 

Howard Hawks
 

Terrific acting highlights this pre-code prison-drama about an overbearing D.A. (Walter Huston) who sidelines an innocent man (Phillips Holmes) into prison where he learns the "criminal code" way of doing things.  The D.A. eventually becomes the prison warden where he runs into contact with many of the men he sent away including the innocent one who will once again find himself at the wrong place during the wrong time.  There's no question this Columbia film was made to cash in on the previous years THE BIG HOUSE but that doesn't mean we get a watered-down copy.  Instead director Hawks takes a pretty simple storyline and adds various dimensions simply by showing the stuff in a raw and realistic detail.  THE BIG HOUSE is certainly a classic but to me this is the better film of the two.  What makes this film work so well are some amazing performances with Huston leading the way.  There was no one in Hollywood better for a role like this and God knows that Huston played his fair share of hot-tempered, "my way only" type of characters.  He brings a lot of energy to the role and manages to make the character very memorable with a performance that many would copy in the future.  Another major plus is the supporting performance of Boris Karloff who pretty much steals the film.  Karloff has an uncanny and natural performance that brings a certain rawness as well as a coldness that is a real joy to watch.  He's the type of bad guy here you just want to love.  Constance Cummings plays Huston's daughter and she's pretty good even though the screenplay offers her very little except to be a love interest for Holmes.  As for Holmes, I think he gives a good performance but I'd say he's several notches below both Huston and Karloff.  Again, it's a fine performance but at the same time if they had someone on the same level as the other two men the film might have been even better.  Hawks makes the film as realistic and as raw as he can, which I guess you could say was a trademark during this early portion of his career.  I think the film gets off to a somewhat slow start but picks up at the twenty-minute mark and pretty much sails home.  The final thirty-minutes are pure Hawks magic and are the most powerful of these early prison films.
 

post #556 of 1166
Decoy - Cheap as dirt, over-the-top pulp with an insane premise but a lot of spunk. The score is overbearing, the script is a bit creaky, and the cinematography is entirely unremarkable. But Jean Gillie (who died tragically young) is so vicious, and even gleefully giddy, as the femme fatale that she elevates the entire picture. This really could have been something special with a little more care, but as it is it's an entertaining, hard-boiled diversion. Rating: 7


Illegal - Meh. A legal melodrama with very little that I would call noir. From a play that had been previously adapted for the screen in 1932 and 1940, and it definitely seems to belong more to that time. Edward G. Robinson is good (hardly one of his defining roles, though) and there's one or two interesting beats, but mostly it's a rather dull story, and told without much flair. Some rather questionable interpretations of the legal process as well. Look for early appearances by Jayne Mansfield and DeForest "Bones" Kelly. Rating: 5


The Big Steal - Again, I must protest that a film being marketed as noir is not very noir at all. Robert Mitchum and Jane Greer are teamed up again after Out of the Past, but where that movie is absolutely teeming with noir elements, this one has maybe 5 minutes worth. For the most part, it's a screwball chase flick/romantic comedy, taking place almost entirely in bright daylight (the whole movie takes place in one day, except the coda). However, just because I've been obsessively focused on noir for a while doesn't mean I can't like anything else. And it's sufficiently entertaining to be worth the brief running time. It's actually pretty funny, clips along at a great pace, and Mitchum and Greer have nice chemistry together. The other performances are all good too, like William Bendix as the hapless heavy and Ramon Navarro as the crafty inspector. The movie makes excellent use of Mexican locations, and is very respectful towards the Mexican people. There are significant plotting problems (nothing Bendix does make any sense, given the ending) but it's a fun, breezy ride. Rating: 7


They Live By Night (rewatch) - A blurb on the DVD case says "one of the most unforgettable noirs ever made" and I have to agree. I tend to forget a lot of details about movies, but two years after my first viewing, much of this film stuck with me. My opinion of it is much higher as well. I think before I was too preoccupied with comparing it to Thieves Like Us, and for some reason felt compelled to call Farley Granger "boring". Now he seems perfect for the role, with his haunted innocence. The film has a thick aura of bleakness about it, and even the happier moments between Granger and Cathy O'Donnell are overcast with dread. Their doomed relationship is tremendously affecting and makes for not only one of the most unforgettable noirs, but one of the most romantic and lyrical. I'm really surprised by how much it's grown on me, it's now my favorite by Nicholas Ray. Rating: 9


Side Street (rewatch) - The second Granger/O'Connell noir also comes out better on the second viewing, although not quite enough for me to raise my rating. Voice-over is a common noir trait, but here it's done so horribly and is so entirely unnecessary that it becomes a drawback. Also, O'Connell really has to nothing to do except act clingy and concerned. But that's made up for by Jean Hagen, who is just wonderful as the boozy lounge singer. The film is really brutal at times, and perfectly captures the story of a guy who can't catch a break and always seems to do the wrong thing. The use of New York locations is utterly fantastic, highlighted by outstanding photography by Joseph Ruttenberg. The dingy streets, the hallways with peeling wallpaper, and of course the brilliant final chase, shot from high above the action. As a whole, the movie doesn't stand up as a complete masterpiece, but there are some exhilirating elements. Rating: 8


Where Danger Lives - Another middling noir by John Farrow, who has previously failed to knock my socks off with The Big Clock and His Kind of Woman. The casting is good... Faith Domergue is intriguing as an unusual femme fatale, Robert Mitchum is always great (his role here a bit similar to the one in Angel Face) and there's a fantastic brief appearance by Claude Rains. But the film moves in fits and starts. The first act does the requisite set-up work, but after that there's a lot of treading water. Mitchum and Domergue on the run, bouncing from one sticky situation to another, but the tension doesn't ratchet up that much (the late "big reveal" is easily guessed). It's only in the last 15 minutes that things really start cooking. Those 15 minutes are dynamite, though, with some glorious lighting and long takes. Rating: 7


Tension - Very uneven. For a movie called "Tension", there isn't very much of it, and the overall tone is oddly low-key. Richard Basehart's motivations are also strange, and it takes him way too long to figure out what a bad idea his scheme is... not to mention how poorly thought-out it is, with his Clark Kent-style disguise. The whole thing feels clumsy and misguided, and yet it has a compelling forward motion to it. Femmes fatale are not as common in noir as one might think, but when there is one, she's usually the best part of the movie. Audrey Trotter does not disappoint, dominating every scene she's in, and her character is delightfully rotten. Also worth noting is Barry Sullivan as a cop who's unscrupulous in a way you don't see very often. The ambiguity to his character adds a little spice. I definitely didn't LOVE this movie, but I got a few kicks from it. Rating: 7


Saraband (rewatch) - 10 months ago, I started revisiting Bergman, watching one movie per week. And now, I'm finally at the finish. It's been a terrific journey. A few not quite as good as I remembered, a number that were better than I remembered, and a lot of masterpieces along the way. And we end with his final masterpiece, a triumphant last return to cinema after a long absence. Although Liv Ullmann was the primary character in Scenes from a Marriage, here she takes on more of a casual observer/narrator role, despite having more scenes than anyone else in the film. She's a witness to a family severely damaged by the loss of a loved one... whose recurring image is tellingly that of Bergman's deceased wife, Ingrid. I do wish Ullmann had a little more prominence in this movie, as she's my favorite member of the cast. Nonetheless, it's a beautiful and often very powerful work. It's funny how I remembered it only as a series of conversations plus the bookends, and forgot the number of unusual inserts that occur. They make for some of the film's most intriguing and striking moments. Rating: 9


Lynch (One) - A behind-the-scenes look at the making of Inland Empire (part two appears on the I.E. DVD), directed by a former associate of Lynch's who goes by the enigmatic name of "blackANDwhite". Lynch is a fascinating character, and this documentary accomplishes pretty much everything you would want. It gives you insight into his creative process, it's very entertaining (he's a funny guy), it makes you want to revisit all his movies, and it inspires your own creativity. I was particularly taken with how Lynch was both afraid and intrigued by his own make-it-up-as-you-go-along methods for Inland Empire. "blackANDwhite" sometimes gets annoying with certain quirky tricks, but for the most part he manages to capture the spirit of David Lynch. Rating: 8
post #557 of 1166
APRIL RECAP

39 new viewings (plus 7 shorts)
17 revisits

Best new discoveries: Sudden Fear, The Magnificent Seven, They Made Me A Fugitive, The Strange Love of Martha Ivers, Le Doulos
Worst new discovery: Lady in the Lake


Another really good month.  I'm probably gonna slow down in May.  My stack of "to be watched" discs is low, and my stack of "to be played" games is high.
post #558 of 1166
 April was a light month for me - only 30 movies watched, but I did actually go to a theater for the first time in 2010, much as I regreted the experience. I'm sure I'll have to gird my loins for a few more trips, given the summer season is upon us. Ho hum. 
 
Higlights: 
Not one but TWO excellent Burt Lancaster movies - The Kentuckian
and Lawman.
The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp 
Malpertuis
Latitude Zero - Best badfilm I've seen in awhile. 
Getting to see 'The Sadist' on Blu-Ray.
post #559 of 1166
April Recap

Good month of viewing, though I'm getting frustrated by the amount of movies at the top of my netflix queue that are out of stock. Our Dish died and Dish wanted $100 to come fix their own equipment so we had to send our DVR back resulting in me trying to get stuff I recorded off TCM watched. The wife also got me hooked on The Office, so we've been watching that.  Once I get signed up with DirectTV, the NBA playoffs will be another distraction from movie watching.

Movies Watched: 24

Best New Viewing: Summer Hours

Honorable Mentions: Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans, The Men Who Tread on the Tiger's Tail, Sergeant York, I Am a Fugitive From a Chain Gang, The Big Combo, Dillinger is Dead, Showboat

2009 Films Seen in 2010 (NY/LA Release Date)

2012 (2009, Roland Emmerich) (DVD Rent) - C+
Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans (2009, Werner Herzog) (DVD Rent) - B+
Brothers (2009, Jim Sherdan) (DVD Rent) - B-
Five Minutes of Heaven (2009, Oliver Hirschbiegel) (DVD Rent) - B
The Lovely Bones (2009, Peter Jackson) (DVD Rent) - C+
The Men Who Stare at Goats (2009, Grant Hezlov) (DVD Rent) - C+
Summer Hours (2008, Olivier Assayas) (DVD Rent) - A-



Pre-2009 Films

Beyond the Valley of the Dolls (1970, Russ Meyer) (DVD Rent) - B+
The Big Combo (1954, Joseph H. Lewis) (DVD Rent) - B+
The Cameraman's Revenge (1912, Wladyslaw Starewicz) (Netflix Streaming) - B+
Dillinger is Dead (1969, Marco Ferreri) (DVD Rent) - B+
Duel in the Sun (1946, King Vidor) (DVD Rent) - B+
Frogland (1922, Wladyslaw Starewicz) (Netflx Streaming) - B
I Am a Fugitive From a Chain Gang (1932, Mervyn LeRoy) (DVD Rent) - B+
In Vanda's Room (2000, Pedro Costa) (DVD Rent) - D
The Insect's Christmas (1913, Wladyslaw Starewicz) (Netflix Streaming) - B-
The Lovers of the Arctic Circle (1998, Julio Medem) (DVD Rent) - B-
The Man in the Moon (1991, Robert Mulligan) (DVD Rent) - B
The Men Who Tread on the Tiger's Tail (1945, Akira Kurosawa) (DVR TCM) - B+
The Most Beautiful (1944, Akira Kurosawa) (DVR TCM) - B
Ossos (1997, Pedro Costa) (DVD Rent) - D
Sergeant York (1941, Howard Hawks) (DVD Rent) - B+
Show Boat (1936, James Whale) (DVR TCM) - B+
Yes (2004, Sally Potter) (DVD Rent) - B
post #560 of 1166
April Recap

36 films seen, 28 for the first time.

Best films seen for the first time (out of )

Food Inc.  1/2
Panic in the Streets  1/2
Dr. Bronner's Magic Soapbox  1/2
Julie and Julia
Moon
Cool Air
Jenifer
Edited by Sandro - 5/5/10 at 7:16pm
post #561 of 1166
 No idea how you all remember what you watched!


"Death Hunt" - .5

Starring the mighty man stew of Charles Bronson and Lee Marvin and featuring a support cast of well known Canadians and Americans (all directed by an Englishman) this excellent, if slightly flabby, mixture of fact (the legendary 1930's Canadian Mountie manhunt of 'The Mad Trapper') and fiction (Bronson's wronged man on the run plot) is a violent slice of Western-tinged entertainment that deserves a much bigger following.

Inanely criticised at the time for not sticking to the facts of the real case this does in fact simply, openly, use the 'Mad Trapper' case only as background material (as Bronson is not the 'Mad Trapper', just wrongly labelled as such, and the actual Mad Trapper is a completely separate character in the film) to base an fictional story on.
Indeed this fiction uses the fact as a delicious slice of irony for the finale...despite the old hat 'based on a true story' blurb that appears at the start, the movie itself never pretends to be the real story.

Anyway, Bronson is in top stoic form (though he sadly - as in "Chato's Land" - is given no dialogue in the second half of the film) and Marvin gives an astute, tough, layered performance as the grizzled Mountie on his trail.

Some excellent early shootout/siege scenes pile on the blood and death before we settle down to an extended, snowy, manhunt that takes in some stunning scenery.

You could have lost the extended cameo by Angie Dickinson as Marvin's off and on bed companion to tighten the pace up, but overall this is a fine, bloody, action film with some excellent support performances (by the likes of Ed Lauter, Carl Weathers, Maury Chaykin and Andrew Stevens - who would team-up with Bronson 2 years later for the outrageously sleazy "10 to Midnight") and spot on lead turns by two tough as nails old pros doing what they do best!



"Today it's me...Tomorrow it's you" -


This popular Argento scripted Spaghetti Western is easily one of the most out and out enjoyable and straightforward examples of the genre out.

Brett Halsey gets 4 mercenaries for hire (including Bub Spencer) to join him on his quest for vengeance against the outrageously theatrical, what the fucking hell was HE doing here, Tatsuya Nakadai who killed his wife and set him up for a 5 year prison term.

Packed with action and pretty violent the soundtrack is filled with those gloriously unique Spaghetti Western electronic gun shots as dozens and dozens of bad guys get blasted by our merry band (who all have specific styles and weapons of choice, including a great sawn-off Winchester repeater) before and extended, guerilla warfare, finale in the woods where the Nakadai's gang are bumped off throughout the day and night be knife, noose and bullet.

Performances are all fun but the 'WTF Award' has to go to the eye-popping, teeth baring, trippy as all hell turn by Nakadai...who plays nothing less than a racist psycho who just happens to be a Japanese cowboy!
Anyone who has only seen Nakadai giving his masterful turns in Akira Kurosawa's masterful Samurai dramas "Ran" and "Kagemusha" in the '80's will be bowled over at the sight of him here with his 'outlaw chic' clothes and insane grin.

It all ends with a wonderfully ruthless and cold-blooded killing before the cheesy score (which pops up whenever out heroes ride, in a macho line, towards the camera) brings up the abrupt 'fine'.
Nothing like art here...but as no-nonsense, action packed, Spaghetti fun it's a winner.
post #562 of 1166
And so to May...

The Man who could Cheat Death
- More like 'The Man who could BORE You to Death'. Hammer takes a shopworn premise - Scientist discovers life giving formula - and turns it into a turgid period drama with endless scenes where people sit in elegant drawing rooms and talk and talk and talk and talk about how 'teddible teddible' it all is. The premise is actually pretty good. A doctor prolongs his life indefinitely by having his partner replace a specific gland every ten years, but the partner is getting old where he is not and has become unable to perform the surgery due to a stroke. So now he must find someone he can convince to perform the surgery without revealing his teddible secret, and, to make matters worse, he must take a special serum to keep him alive in the meantime that apparently turns him into a murdering psychopath for brief periods of time. Anton Diffring plays the doctor and he is a shameless ham - It's like watching an SS officer trying to emote, but even that would be okay if they would have just moved things along a little more crisply. All exposition and no action makes Anton a dull boy. The best thing about this movie is getting to see Hazel Court display her magnificent bosom in the grand Hammer tradition. Hazel was not only a stalwart Hammer Girl but starred in a fair number of other classic genre films of the era and finally retired to Lake Tahoe USA, my home town. Even poor Hazel though couldn't save this dud. 

Moontide - This is one of those movies that's a bit hard to classify - is it truly a Film Noir, or is it more of  straight melodrama with Noir elements? I think maybe it's the presence of Jean Gabin as the lead character and how he chooses to play the role that brings this into question. Bobo is a roughneck merchant seaman who likes to get blind drunk and raise hell, but never remembers what he has done. His partner, Tiny, takes advantage of this to blackmail Bobo into providing him with enough money so that he himself doesn't have to work. All is well for Tiny until Bobo rescues a beautiful young girl from drowning and begins to contemplate settling down and building a life for himself. With his meal ticket in danger, Tiny threatens to spill the beans on a murder that Bobo may or may not have committed while drunk. Describing the plot certainly makes it sound like a Noir, but much of the actual film is given over to Bobo's ruminations about whether he is ready to give up his gypsy ways and become a 'peasant'. Gabin is just terrific as Bobo, naturally bringing a strong European sensibility to the film, and the rest of the cast is equally great. A very young Ida Lupino plays the girl with a lot of soul and Claude Rains is a wonderfully eccentric character called Nutsy, who acts as confidant and conscience to Bobo. Thomas Mitchell is a bit of a revelation as Tiny - Mitchell usually plays such stalwart and stand up parts and yet here he is a great heel, both pathetic and menacing, often at the same time. The moody cinematography makes the most of the waterfront setting and adds tremendously to the overall atmosphere also. Whether it classifies as Noir or not, this is a very effective little picture. 

Monkey Business - It's kind of interesting to see how Howard Hawks screwball comedies evolved over the years. His earlier films had a breakneck energy that the later films lacked and I think this is what made them more enjoyable and the absurdity of the situations more effective. Also, I think there were more eccentric characters to drive things along, where the later movies relied more on the star power of a few major players. I ruminate on this because, after seeing 'I was a Male War Bride' and finding it to be kind of a dud, I was wondering if 'Monkey Business' would be more of the same. I am pleased to report that it is much better than 'Male War Bride' but still lacks that spark of earlier films. Cary Grant basically plays the same character he did in 'Bringing up Baby', an absent-minded scientist who is working on a formula that will turn back the biological clock. When a laboratory chimp accidentally hits on the formula and dumps it into the laboratory water cooler, all heck breaks loose as Cary and everyone else begin to act like teenagers. It's all very silly and a bit labored and relies very heavily on the chemistry between Cary Grant and Ginger Rogers, which, fortunately, is very good. Marilyn Monroe is a scene stealer, as she often was in her early days, as a voluptuous secretary who gets her big ass sprayed with a water hose. There are a couple of big laughs but overall, I found this to be more amusing than funny. In the end though, I have to say I was entertained by it. 
Edited by Holer - 5/2/10 at 1:01pm
post #563 of 1166
Behind Locked Doors - When a crooked judge is suspected of hiding out in a sanitarium, a private detective gets himself committed to uncover the truth. A little lightweight and unsophisticated, but a fun "poverty row" quickie noir. If you've seen Shock Corridor, it's pretty much the same setup but without as much social commentary. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Fuller drew some inspiration from this film. The actors and the dialogue are a bit clunky, but not too bad. Features Tor Johnson in a small role, most famous for his work in Plan 9 from Outer Space, among other Ed Wood films (I'm ashamed to say I've never seen any of them... perhaps the most egregious gap in my cinematic education). Rating: 7


Railroaded - Standard frame-up story. Not much about it stood out. There's some very good lighting, although I don't think Mann really made the most of it. And there's amusing scene where John Ireland spies on Sheila Ryan (by the way... YUM) and Jane Randolph having a catfight with a perverted smirk on his face. On the negative side, Ireland makes some insane decisions that just don't add up. Other than that there isn't much memorable about it at all, but I get such a kick out of this type of movie. I guess a noir has to really stink for me to give it a bad rating. Godard famously said, "all you need to make a movie is a girl and a gun". He might be on to something there. Rating: 7


Hangmen Also Die! - Well, I'll be damned. A movie where I DON'T hate Walter Brennan's guts. As opposed to his usual Western persona (the doddering, cranky, heavily mannered, oafish, unfunny comic relief who looks like he smells very, very bad) here he's quite dignified. The film is a grim wartime political thriller based on the true story of a Reich official assassinated in Czechoslovakia. Based VERY loosely, however, as the events in the movie have little to do with reality. Directed by Fritz Lang and written by Bertolt Brecht, their hearts are in the right place. But if we're going call out movies for being overly propagandistic, we can't exclude those we happen to agree with. This is really heavy-handed, black/white, good/evil stuff. The camerawork is sophisticated, the script is not. Still, it's a solid thriller that manages to be sufficiently gripping despite its lengthy running time. Lang pulls off some marvelous shots. And besides, it's hard to get too worked up about anti-Nazi propaganda, no matter how ham-fisted. It's closer to the truth about Nazis than most other movies from the same period. Rating: 7


The Long Night - When I saw Le jour se lève I was rather unimpressed. Same for this American remake. Nearly a shot-for-shot duplication at times, it differs greatly in the ending, which is (surprise, surprise) far more upbeat. Seeing this cop-out conclusion actually makes me like Carne's original more. I do think the postwar disillusionment makes for a more interesting context, but in essence it's the same dull, rambling story with characters you don't care much about. The leads (Henry Fonda, Barbara Bel Geddes, Vincent Price, Ann Dvorak) are all pretty good... too bad their performances have to compete with Dimitri Tiompkin's horribly bombastic score. Rating: 5


Armored Car Robbery - Tight little heist-gone-wrong flick starring noir icon Charles McGraw and Hitch-Hiker baddie William Talman. It could use a little more zip and atmosphere, but it plays along nicely and manages to keep your interest engaged. You can see little echoes of this film in later noirs. Pretty much the exact same heist plan is pulled off in Kansas City Confidential, and the ending is kind of like the end of The Killer, except much grislier. Nothing too special here, nothing to complain about it either. Good times. Rating: 7
post #564 of 1166
Thread Starter 

After the horrid NIGHTMARE remake I decided to stop by Redbox and rent a couple other remakes that I hadn't gotten around to seeing.  I also started my mini French/horror festival, which got off to a pretty solid start with me, for the first time, questioning what type of person actually enjoys watching horror movies.  I guess if people feel American horror is watered down and dead then they can just look to France.  One down and three more to go but if any of them are as wild as the first then I'm not sure if my brain will take it.

Anyhow...


Stepfather, The (2009)
 

Nelson McCormick
 

Remake of the 1987 cult film has Michael (Penn Badgley) returning home after a year in Military school and learning that his mother (Sela Ward) is living with a new man named David (Dylan Walsh).  Michael tries to be open in regards to David but soon he and others start to wonder what all he's actually hiding.  If you're familiar with the original film then you know he's hiding the fact that he likes to go around marrying women and killing them and their children.  As far as remakes go this one here is pretty much in the middle.  The movie isn't far from great but it's also far from being bad.  I was never a huge fan of the original movie or its sequel, although it's been years since I last saw them.  This one here does follow the same storyline and it doesn't offer anything new but at the same time it's well-made and features some pretty good performances.  I think the film would have benefited from some editing because at 100-minutes it takes a while to get to where we know it's going to end.  The film could have cut out many of the needless scenes of Michael and his girlfriend either kissing, talking or flirting around.  I'm really not sure what was up with all these scenes but they add very little except for eye candy at the girlfriend who is usually in a bikini.  The movie is a little watered down from the previous movie but the PG-13 rating doesn't hurt it too bad and especially since it tries to deliver more than just gore and violence like a lot of the recent remakes.  The biggest plus are the actual performances with Walsh stepping into the role and doing a nice job with it.  Walsh has always been a fine character actor so it was nice getting to see him play the lead and he does all he can do with it.  I thought he was believing in the role as he worked well as the caring guy but also as the psycho.  The real stand out for me was Ward who really shines and gives a complete and complex performance.  Badgley, Amber Heard and Jon Tenney aren't too bad either.  The plot of a woman moving someone she doesn't know into the house only to learn he's crazy wasn't original in 1987 and it's certainly not any more original in 2009.  The movie is a long way from being a classic but there's enough here to warrant a $1 rental at Redbox.


It's Alive (2008)
 

Josef Rusnak

Remake of Larry Cohen's cult classic has parents Lenore and Frank (Bijou Phillips, James Murray) happy to welcome in a baby boy but there seems to be something wrong.  During the C-Section everyone in the delivery room was murdered with the exception of mommy and baby.  Soon others start to go missing and you just know it has something to do with the baby.  This film, co-written by the original film's director and screenwriter, ended up going straight-to-DVD here in the U.S. and that's pretty understandable because this film is pretty so-so from start to finish.  I'd imagine this one here would have been a tough sell as not too many people want to watch a movie about a killer baby and even if they did this film doesn't offer up too much.  I think the biggest problem here is the screenplay.  For starters, we're suppose to connect with the mother yet the screenplay doesn't do her any favors by making her rather stupid and someone we really can't care for.  She begins helping the baby by covering up the murders, which some might say a lot of parents would but at the same time she never stops and thinks about the thing being a killer.  Another problem is that all of the violence is kept off screen and we never get to see the baby doing any of the killings.  I'm sure this was done so that the film might have a chance of getting released but this makes the film rather bland especially when compared to the original.  The screenplay does add a few good touches including keeping the baby normal looking instead of the mutant from the original film.  We also get a rather interesting reason as to what's wrong with the kid and why he's doing all the killings.  I think it would have helped the film had this been brought up at the start so that we could have known this going through the film and they could have done more with it.  I thought both Phillips and Murray were fine in their roles with the supporting players doing fine work as well.  No one is going to win an Oscar for their work but it's good enough for this type of film.  In the end this movie really doesn't work but it's not a complete failure either.  The movie is just here and there's really nothing special or bad about it.  I'm not sure who it will appeal to other than those who need to see every horror movie out there or those who just want to compare it to the original.

Sherlock Holmes (2009)
 

Guy Ritchie

Updated version features Robert Downey, Jr. in the role of Sherlock Holmes and Jude Law as his best friend and assistant Dr. Watson.  In the film, a man (Mark Strong) dealing in black magic is hung and pronounced dead but soon he rises from the grave with plans that will change the world.  Holmes and Watson are on the case along with an old flame (Rachel McAdams) of Holmes'.  The character of Holmes has gone through so many changes since the silent days that there's no question people are going to have their own opinion on what the character should or shouldn't be.  I personally thought this updated version was pretty good and it at least delivered a character that we haven't seen in any of the dozens of previous films.  I enjoyed the visual style that Ritchie brought to the film and I think for the most part he nailed the atmosphere.  In a lot of these recent movies that take place in the past, it seems like we just get CGI and no atmosphere but that wasn't the case here.  The dark and gloomy look of the film is like something we would have seen from the Universal series of the 40s and that is a plus.  There are a couple major problems with the film and the first being the running time.  I'm really not sure why so many movies need to run over two-hours these days but a good fifteen-minutes or so could have been trimmed here and we wouldn't have lost anything.  Another problem is that the actual story takes a back seat to the visuals, fast editing and loud sound effects.  The case involving this man coming back to life was very interesting and when the film centers on this is works very well.  The problem is that we get so many distractions that don't work like Watson's upcoming marriage.  This woman plot never works and I'd say nothing with McAdams character works either.  There's no question she's a fine actress but her role here was pretty worthless.  I think Law works out very good as Watson as he has the ability to fit into the character good enough for us to believe he's this smart guy.  Downey also manages to fit into the role quite nicely and I think the two men share some good chemistry together and help keep the film moving a lot better than it probably should have.  For my money it's Strong who steals the show as the bad guy.
 

post #565 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott View Post

 I'm really not sure why so many movies need to run over two-hours these days but a good fifteen-minutes or so could have been trimmed here and we wouldn't have lost anything. 


Exactly. I think it's because these days people seem to feel "quantity = quality", and they feel like "they want their money's worth" for the price of a movie ticket, which is just absurd. I'm reminded of times where certain DVDs are released and some movie fans say "I'm not paying $XXX for a movie that only runs 70 minutes!", as if the length of a movie determines its worth. 

By the way, are you still going to be watching the Bowery Boys movies? I'm still interested in your reviews. I just watched ANGELS' ALLEY for the first time, which was bizarre to say the least in the way it juggled comedy and drama. 

post #566 of 1166
 Last Action Hero - Hmmm. A 'parody' of 80's-90's action films made by the very same people who actually created those films in the first place? A massively ego-driven vanity production that mocks the massive egos of Hollywood action stars? I think the snake is eating it's own tail here. Maybe it was this absurd lack of perspective that made this movie such a convoluted mess of cornball antics and really juvenile jokes. Yeah, I can still manage to put my brain in park and actually sit back and enjoy this thing - I have a fairly infinite capacity for enjoying even the worst action films, and some parts do actually work and are very funny. It's just that the parts that don't work are sooooo baaaad. Still, it was a very ambitious thing to take on. Like his term as the Governator, it may ultimately be a failure, but you've got to give Ahnold some credit for having the balls to take it on in the first place. In it's way, this is probably the closest Arnold will ever come to making a self-referential expose on his psyche and public personae, ala JCVD, albeit with fart jokes. 

Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li - This low budget martial arts actioner really reminded me of the old Golan Globus days, except with much hotter chicks and Matrix-style fighting flourishes. A beautiful concert pianist chica who's father was kidnapped when she was a child, is recruited by the Order of the Web or the Spider of the Web or something like that and trained to fight while controlling her anger and to create giant balls of energy that look like Ikea lighting fixtures. An evil industrialist named Bison is buying up all the slums in Bangcock and displacing all the po' folks and must be stopped. He is also the man who kidnapped the girl's daddy and he keeps antagonizing her by being the cruelest, most sadistic son-of-a-bitch on the planet, so you just know they're headed for a showdown. The fight scenes are fun, even though they are a little too CG'd up, and this movie comports itself fairly well for what it is, a video game/comic book flick, light on character and story and heavy on slicked up action. The guy who plays Bison does a great job of being a villain, Michael Clark Duncan shows up as a henchman who laughs constantly as he is mangling people, and, like I said, the chicks are hot. Really, what else do you need? 
post #567 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott View Post

I'm really not sure why so many movies need to run over two-hours these days but a good fifteen-minutes or so could have been trimmed here and we wouldn't have lost anything. 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi View Post


I think it's because these days people seem to feel "quantity = quality", and they feel like "they want their money's worth" for the price of a movie ticket, which is just absurd. I'm reminded of times where certain DVDs are released and some movie fans say "I'm not paying $XXX for a movie that only runs 70 minutes!", as if the length of a movie determines its worth.
 



A good quote is worth repeating.
post #568 of 1166
Thread Starter 
Joe, I'm still watching them but haven't posted last weeks viewing yet.  I'll probably watch ANGELS tonight and post them together.  Somewhat hard to believe there are still 40 damn movies to go!!! 

As for HOLMES, it's funny that this movie ran just about as long as two of the Rathbone films would have and yet it contained less plot than any of them.  I'm not sure the reasons behind this but at least the horror genre hasn't gone this route and made everything 2+ hrs.  I have the Asylum version of HOLMES at home but thankfully it's a lot shorter. 
post #569 of 1166
Flight of the Intruder - I really have to wonder if this movie was intended as a way for John Milius to respond to Oliver Stone's 'Platoon'. The thrust of the film seems to be that we could have won the war in 'Nam if the God Damn Bureaucrats had just let our boys do their God Damn jobs. When a Navy Lieutenant gets fed up with flying meaningless missions that keep getting his fellow pilots killed for no reason, he takes it upon himself to organize a bombing raid right up the gut in downtown Hanoi. I can't remember the name of the guy who plays the lieutenant, but he looks just like Tom Berenger and Willem Dafoe, not a look-alike, plays his all-to-eager partner in crime. After the bombing raid, they are saved from a court-martial when President Nixon gets angry about failed peace talks and decides to resume bombing of North Vietnam, thus making him something of a hero in the context of the film. And later, when their chief, Danny Glover, is shot down behind enemy lines, our boys are given another chance to prove that they too are heroes and if the God Damn politicians would just let them do their God Damn jobs, etc. etc... The first twenty minutes of this film plays like Milius was dared to try and squeeze in every hackneyed 80's military movie cliche' that he could think of and he even manages to make Rosanna Arquette look really homely. Once he gets back on the carrier though, it's all flag waving do or die, kill the Gooks and make them cry. None of that weird, dope smokin' homoerotic grab-assin' like they had in 'Platoon'. This is about men who were willing to die for the pride of the military and the good old USA, or at least I think that's what it's about. It's a bit of a mess really (sort of like this review) and I'm probably reading way too much into it, but then again, I can't help thinking Milius had something more on his mind here than just picking up a paycheck. Ultimately entertaining popcorn fodder, but with kind of a weird point of view.  
Edited by Holer - 5/5/10 at 5:43am
post #570 of 1166
Thread Starter 

Well, I had planned on watching four of those French films this week but have decided to give up after three.  I'll catch the fourth one at a later date once my stomach calms down and after a few dozen showers.  HAUTE TENSION is credited with being "graphic" yet that film really can't compare to the trash that is MARTYRS and INSIDE.  I'm not one to say horror fans are sick, disturbed people but I would have to join the ranks of various women's groups and even Siskel and Ebert and question what "entertainment" people get from films like this.


Martyrs
(2008)
 

Pascal Laugier
 

Bitterly disgusting and rather vile French film has a young girl named Lucie escaping from a hell where he she held captive and tortured day after day.  Fifteen years later Lucie (Mylene Jampanoi) with the help of friend Anna (Morjana Alaoui) seek revenge against those who did the torture.  That's pretty much what the back of the DVD case will tell you but that's pretty much the first fifteen-minutes and you've got a lot more rather ugly and disturbing stuff to go through.  Those who thought the French film HAUTE TENSION pushed to new levels will find that film to be like a Disney movie compared to this one.  I've got really mixed emotions about this film because on a technical level it's very impressive.  I highly enjoyed the ugly atmosphere built up by director Laugier and he has a certain visual style, which isn't all fast edits and quick cuts.  He's not afraid to just let the camera role, pick up what action he can and milk it for every emotion imaginable.  Another major plus were the performances with both female actresses coming off so real and powerful that at times you will forget that you're actually watching a movie.  Both women are so focused and so into their roles that it really makes certain scenes very hard to watch.  The movie starts off on an ugly page but then gets a little cleaner as we're introduced to a family but what happens next really threw me for a loop and it will take you by such surprise that you'll know that anything can happen in this film and anything almost does.  Another major plus are the special effects, which are quite brutal and very realistic.  We get non-stop violence and gore and most of it goes beyond the "torture/porn" stuff we've come to watch the past several years.  The special effects range from bullet holes to wrist cutting to other major scenes of disgust that I won't give away to avoid spoilers.  I won't mention the exact effect but what remains at the end is one of the most brutal and memorable scenes from any horror film that I can think of.  Earlier I said that this film left me with mixed emotions.  I've said all the great stuff and now it's time to look at the bad.  I personally find "torture/porn" movies like SAW, HOSTEL and various others to be fairly weak stuff.  They want to shock young viewers but to me they aren't the strongest stuff out there.  This film is being sold as the same type of thing but this here is a lot more as the film tries to be disturbing even without the graphic violence.  With that said, as a die-hard horror fan for life I started to ask myself who would enjoy watching something like this?  I mean seriously, the final thirty-minutes we get to see someone abused, tortured, pee herself and various other vile things and what for?  I don't believe in taking some sort of high road or moral preacher but this is the first time that I can remember asking myself what on Earth any of this was for and what appeal this stuff could have.  The movie is well-made, disturbing and immoral and it's certainly unlike many others.  I'd say 100% of people will turn this off after ten-minutes.  Perhaps 90% of horror fans will hang in there until the end and I can't say I'd blame anyone for turning it off.

Them (2006)
 

David Moreau, Xavier Palud
 

Intense French film has teacher Clementine (Olivia Bonamy) going to the country to visit her boyfriend Lucas (Michael Cohen) for the weekend.  Everything starts off fine but when the sun goes down the couple finds themselves under attack by unknown people.  Those seeking gore in a horror movie has countless films to pick from but trying to find one with suspense is a lot harder to do but this is one.  The movie is extremely well-made from start to finish and it manages to be very memorable without a single special effect.  The storyline is pretty simple as we've seen countless movies like this before.  Having a couple or a group of people trapped and being stalked by maniacs isn't anything new but you really don't have to have anything fresh and original as long as you have some good filmmakers putting their own style on the subject.  Directors Moreau and Palud do a terrific job in terms of keeping the tension rising.  We get a very good opening sequence that milks every inch of tension that it can.  Again, something we've seen before (broken down car on spooky road) is did with some good style and it pays off in the end.  The film really picks up steam during the middle section when the couple find themselves running from one room to the next trying to avoid whoever it is that has broken into the house.  This leads to a terrific sequence where Clementine goes to see if there's a way out and her "journey" through some clear tarps has some very intense moments and a great pay off.  The film has a lot of terrific atmosphere as you can pretty much smell the wetness of this country side and you can feel every noise in the woods.  The directors do a great job at building up the atmosphere and once again milking everything out of it that they can.  Wes Craven once said a great director knows how to milk a scene yet not milk it too long because the viewer will finally grow tired of waiting for the "jump" sequence.  That doesn't happen here as the men know exactly when the pull the trigger on the jump.  Both Bonamy and Cohen do a very good job in the acting department.  They come off as a real couple so it's easy to believe them together and their terror scenes come off real and very effective.  We're told at the start that this film is based on a true story but we've been told this in hundreds of horror films so who knows how much of it is real.  I must admit that I was a little letdown when the identity of the killers is shown.  When I learned who they were I really didn't believe it and to me it brought down the final seven minutes or so but if this is all true then I guess it can be overlooked.  Even with that minor issues, this is a very effective horror film that deserves to be checked out. 
 

Inside (2007)
 

Alexandre Bustillo, Julien Maury
 

Yet another incredibly ugly horror film from France with this one centering on Sarah (Alysson Paradis), a woman expecting her first child who loses her husband in a car wreck.  The day before she's suppose to deliver the child a bizarre woman (Beatrice Dalle) breaks into her house with plans of cutting the baby out.  It seems ever so often people ask when does a film go too far and I'm sure we've reach that with this vile piece of garbage.  A part of me wanted to give this thing a BOMB rating but I couldn't as there's no doubt there are some very effective moments but at the same time how on Earth could anyone actually enjoy this?  I'm sure a smart movie could have been made about a disturbed woman wanting to steal another woman's unborn child but this thing here isn't trying to be smart.  It was to exploit an ugly subject matter by throwing as much violence and gore that it can possibly fit into the 82-minute running time.  I knew going into the film that we were dealing with an ugly subject matter so I can't fault the film for its ugliness.  I can fault the film for turning incredibly stupid after the first thirty-minutes with one dumb event following another.  The film was working very well, if ugly, when it deals with the two women but then the screenplay makes the mistake of bringing other people into the house.  We get a mother, a boss and several cops and all of these folks lead to eye-rolling scenes of dumbness.  I can buy this deranged woman working over a pregnant woman but how the others are dealt with was just extremely stupid and not for a second did I believe any of it.  The big twist at the end of the film isn't that much of a twist and what ends up happening to Sarah isn't that surprising either yet what follows the scene and how she gets there is yet another thing that will make you scream stupid.  The only reason these other people are brought into the film is for them to be slaughtered in a wild, bloody fashion.  I honestly can't think of another film that contains so much blood.   Trust me, when someone gets cut, stabbed or sliced here they bleed a lot.  There's a lot of this going on so the gore level is extremely high and most of the violence is quite graphic as well, although there are about three really bad scenes of very fake looking CGI.  People questioning the moral value of a movie like this would have plenty of reasons to point at this and say it crosses the line.  There's certainly no good taste here and there's no question that it's extremely ugly, repulsive and downright brutal.  There's no "entertainment" value to get from a picture like this so who do you recommend it to?  Seeing a pregnant woman beaten, stabbed, cut and worse isn't any type of entertainment but what's even worse is how stupid events in this film turn.  There's no doubt that it's well made and features two great performances but those aren't enough to make one want to sit through this thing.
 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2010)