HOUSE OF DRACULA (**1/2) -- Definitely the lowest ebb and last gasp for all the classic Universal monsters, but still a good time.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Featured Reviews
-
Man on a Ledge plummets onto Blu-ray this week with an edition that presents the picture and sound as well as possible, along with a minimum of special features. The movie itself is hard to...
-
The most infamously unsuccessful movie at the box-office thus far in 2012 (though Battleship and Dark Shadows may give it some competition), Andrew Stanton’s John Carter mixes elements of...
-
What can I say? I love 3D! From the moment I began watching 3D content in my home I quickly discovered that I needed more content. I suspect that those of you just purchasing...
-
Smokey and the Bandit drives onto Blu-ray in a nice edition that can really take the viewer back to 1977 for 90 minutes of sheer moviemaking fun. The Blu-ray comes with the same HD transfer...
-
Monika Eriksson is one of the first antiheroines in the filmography of Ingmar Bergman. In Summer with Monika, she’s brash, effervescent, and completely captivating, that is, until the realities...
Track the Films You Watch (2010) - Page 13
- 42nd Street Freak
- Dave
- Location: Uk, England
- offline
- Joined: August 2007
- Posts: 636
- Select All Posts By This User
Yeah...not much of anything really. But i remember the great 70's location work of NY.
I listed all the little Griundhouse gems on show for an old review;
A veritable treasure trove of cult/trash and porn.
As the camera pans from a car around the streets we have such titles as Pekinpah's 1974's "Bring me the Head of Alfredo Garcia", 1976 hardcore porn flick "The Love Slaves", 1974 trashy killer shark soap opera "Tintorera", 1977's hardcore "7 into Snowy" and the Lee Van Cleef 1974 Spaghetti Western/Martial Arts oddity "The Stranger and the Gunfighter".
All along the same damn street!
- Tarkin The Ewok
- Brandon Harbeke
- Location: Arizona
- online
- Joined: April 2004
- Posts: 641
- Select All Posts By This User
Hoffman turns in a brilliant performance, pulling off both roles equally well. The comedy is mildly amusing but never laugh out loud funny. Some story elements have lost their relevance over time. Besides the performances, the best reason to watch the movie is the send-ups of soap operas and the theatre business.
- Martin Teller
- Martin Teller
- Location: Portland, OR
- offline
- Joined: August 2006
- Posts: 2,370
- Select All Posts By This User

I have to agree - Martin's list of Film Noirs is like a greatest hits package - 'Kiss of Death', 'Nightmare Alley', 'In a Lonely Place' are all personal favorites and 'The Set-Up' is just one more searing example of why Robert Ryan is the King of Noir for my money. See also: 'Clash by Night' and 'House of Bamboo' for killer Ryan performances.
I'm an Orson Welles fanatic also and I think 'The Lady from Shanghai', though admittedly compromised and a bit of a mess, is one of his very best films. Like all of his movies, it definitely improves and unfolds its many layers with repeated viewings.
I've got 25 more noirs on deck (I really went crazy on Amazon and DeepDiscount), including a revisit for Clash by Night. I didn't pick up House of Bamboo... I do like it, but not enough to see it again. I can be kind of puritanical about how I like my noir, and color usually kills the mood for me. Anyway, The Street With No Name is better IMO.
Eventually I plan to conquer the entire 250 Quintessential Noirs list.
- TravisR
- Location: The basement of the FBI building
- online
- Joined: November 2004
- Posts: 17,479
- Select All Posts By This User
- Martin Teller
- Martin Teller
- Location: Portland, OR
- offline
- Joined: August 2006
- Posts: 2,370
- Select All Posts By This User
- 42nd Street Freak
- Dave
- Location: Uk, England
- offline
- Joined: August 2007
- Posts: 636
- Select All Posts By This User
.5Meh...Not having a good time with many first time viewing films at the moment.
We start off in a very groovy fashion with a rain soaked Samurai sword fight that drips cool.
But a warning sign of the slump to come was shown here also, when a vital plot point of a woman being blinded by a sword stroke from Meiko Kaji is played out by the sword swipe very obviously not being anywhere near her at all!
From here on we enter a world of chaotic plotting, muddled all to hell ideas, dubious translations and redundant characters.
By the opening we are expecting Meiko Kaji ("Lady Snowblood") to be a tough woman with an agenda.
Instead the rest of the film, right up until the last 10 minutes, has her do absolutely nothing at all except cry a lot!
Bad comic relief? Oh yes. How about a guy in a bowler hat and a smelly red nappy? You got it.
What else stinks here?
Well the big Blind Woman's revenge sub-plot plays out with her actually doing nothing at all (despite her joining up with a group of bad guys) until the very end...and then she simply does nothing all over again!
The only person who does anything is her grotesque hunchback assistant...who then gets told off by her for doing something!
The plot is a jumbled mess of schemes, double-crosses and betrayals that are played as secrets one minute and then played out openly the next.
Despite a stew of sub-plots (clan rivalry, cat curses, blind woman revenge, hunchback murders, mysterious stranger pop ups) and the various groups of bad guys to choose from (who simply end up tripping over each other) nothing much happens in the film at all. Ever.
It's purely down to the horror tinges (an utterly deranged traveling 'spook show' carnival) and that loony hunchback that anything remotely interesting happens in the movie at all.
This real mess of a mass of nothing has the odd great moment of bloody violence (total screen time 5 minutes max) a smattering of sleaze and nudity (one hellish dope/prostitution den scene) and some theatrical horror visuals...but this is a case of a needle in a tedious haystack.
And worse of all is the end.
After a huge, muddled, sludge slow trek we have a wonderful few seconds of sword gore before we finally get to the big revenge pay-off as the blind woman actually does something for once as she squares off against Meiko Kaji (who has herself has also finally done something in the film).
But what happens now?
Once again nothing! And yes I am going to reveal the end of the film to save you my pain.
In the end...blind woman decides she can't take revenge after all against Meiko Kaji because Kaji has a good heart!!
She promptly walks off and leaves Kaji and the audience staring off into space in utter confusion!
Before she walks off blind woman just so happens to sum up my thoughts.
"Seems as though I have wasted my life on this meaningless goal"
Change "goal " for "movie" and you have my thoughts exactly!
John Nesbitt’s Passing Parade No.64: Goodbye, Miss Turlock (1948) (short) Dir: Edward L. Cahn
Production: MGM
Sentimental nostalgia piece lamenting the demise of the one-room schoolhouse caused by the rise of the giant union schools, themselves made possible by rural highways and busing. Nesbitt takes us back to the turn of the century and his warm remembrances of his fellow students, with names like ‘Irish’ and ‘Stinky’, and the stern but understanding schoolmarm that taught them, Miss Turlock. Miss Turlock represents the kind of teacher many of us fondly appreciate long after the fact; strict, but knowing just how far to go before the student could get resentful, and her acknowledgments could always manage to evince gratitude and respect. Evocative and sweet, if not particularly dynamic storytelling.

out of 4
A Pete Smith Specialty: Ice Aces (1948) (short) Dir: David Barclay
Production: MGM
Pete takes us backstage at the Ice Capades where we see the whole all-star roster in action practicing their routines, including stars Donna Atwood and Bobby Specht, Eric ‘The Comedy Cut-Up’ Waite, Alan Konrad, “icedom’s daffy duo” of Lynam and Jackson, Chuck Slagel and Johnny Flanagan. Yes, I said Johnny Flanagan!! Okay, I have no idea who these people are, but the Ice Capades was big business back in the day so give them their due. Atwood was known for her speed in cross-foot spinning and a typical spin of hers is broken down here in slo-mo to reveal an average of 240 spins per minute, or 4 per second. Specht was the Men’s National Champion of 1942 and here he skates opposite Atwood in a pairs act. Konrad was known for his acrobatics which he displays. Waite and the team of Lynam and Jackson provide slapstick skating stunts. For my money, the star of this show is Slagel, who does his trick skating (jumping tables, etc.) on 18-inch high stilt skates. He also teams up with Flanagan on some dangerous moves. I normally don’t have any time for figure skating but I can’t say I was unentertained by this. 

out of 4
By Indian Post (1919) (short) Dir: John Ford
Production: Universal Film
13 minute fragment of a John Ford two-reeler whose existence, according to the R2 compilation set it’s included in, is allegedly owed to a single collector. Not only did said collector ‘save’ the film, he supposedly also trimmed the first seven minutes to make the film play better (!!). Silent film cowboy star Pete Morrison plays Jode McWilliams, the foreman of the Circle O ranch, who finds himself in the dangerous position of being in love with Peg Owens (Magda Lane), his boss’s (frequent Ford actor Duke Lee) daughter. Pa Owens does not approve of the union. When a mischievous Indian takes a love letter of Jode’s, after it was posted for delivery by his fellow ranch hands unbeknownst to him, and brings it to Miss Peggy, Pa finds out. This sets up a showdown involving Jode, Peg, Pa, a helpful parson and some quick thinking from Jode’s pal, Chub (played by another silent star, Hoot Gibson).
Not especially distinguished, and the missing footage obviously leads to an occasional awkwardness in the story, but Morrison is a somewhat enjoyable presence, there’s a funny moment or two, and there is a nice backward tracking shot of Jode and his crew on horseback in pursuit of the ‘thief’.
out of 4
“Hollywood”: Episode 1: Pioneers (1980) (TV) Dir: Kevin Brownlow and David Gill
Production: Thames Television
Filmmaker/historian Kevin Brownlow teamed up with David Gill to produce this 13 hour series that expounded on his landmark book on American silent film, The Parade’s Gone By. The idea was to document the silent era with interviews of many of its surviving participants; actors, directors and craftsmen. Another idea, presumably, was to make you seek out and watch silent films, which you will want to do after watching this. Narrated by James Mason.
The series begins by trying to challenge your perception of what ‘silent film’ means. To many people, it is a poor print, jerky sped-up action, “slightly absurd” as Mason says, a twinkling piano accompaniment--in other words, a poor presentation. But that was not the experience for the silent film audience. To prove it, we are plunged into a stunning and thrilling sequence, set to a stirring orchestral score, from the 1926 film, THE FIRE BRIGADE. And we are told, this isn’t a classic, it’s just a regular release from a big studio. Then we take a tour through a typical movie palace, a place where many of the people who saw THE FIRE BRIGADE would have seen it, something the likes of which can hardly be imagined today. Next we are shown an aerial sequence from WINGS (1927), a sea battle from BEN-HUR (1925), an ingenious stunt from the early 2-strip Technicolor film, THE BLACK PIRATE (1926), the climatic scene from THE WIND (1928) and the incredible spectacle of the flood from NOAH’S ARK (1928). You are ready to forgive some of the interviewees for their assertions that film took a large step backwards with the invention of sound. Actually, you are ready to believe them.
After this lengthy introductory segment, the episode gets into some history. We start with the origins of film, with loops like ANNABELLE BUTTERFLY DANCE (1894) which played in little boxes at arcades. Then, just when it seemed like a fad on the way out, comes the phenomenon of THE GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY in 1903 and its importance as a 12-minute long film. American cinema soon falls into a rut, however, and its product is distinguished only by its relative crudity compared to the sophisticated and technically advanced cinemas of Italy, England and France (as seen in the 1907 Pathé Frères production, THE RED SPECTRE). Another important event is Sarah Bernhardt’s role in QUEEN ELIZABETH (1912), which helped abolish some of the stigma of acting in ‘flickers’ compared to the stage. It is the work of D.W. Griffith, with his cameraman Billy Bitzer, at Biograph that eventually puts American film on the map (as we see by the editing in THE MUSKETEERS OF PIG ALLEY (1912), AN UNSEEN ENEMY (1912) and the same year’s THE GIRL AND HER TRUST) and inspires other filmmakers to match him and devise their own innovations (noted is the cutting and split-screens of Lois Webber’s SUSPENSE, 1913). Griffith would eventually be influenced by the success of the Italian epics (like QUO VADIS?, 1912) into attempting his own longer features. A difference in philosophy over this at Biograph lead to Griffith going his own way, and eventually producing THE BIRTH OF A NATION (1915) himself. This episode ends with a contextual look at Griffith, BIRTH, and its reception and impact.
The lifeblood of this series is the interviews, and we get some great ones here. In addition to King Vidor, Jackie Coogan, Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., Lillian Gish, Blanche Sweet, Viola Dana, Anita Loos and Adela Rogers St. John, there is famous theater organist Gaylord Carter talking about the movie palaces; BEN-HUR art director Arnold Gillespie describing how they bought and skinned two goats to serve as some kind of flesh to be seen for a shot where a Roman soldier is tied to the bow of a ship that rams through the hull of another ship; Hal Roach tells a hilarious story about trying to secure the use of a house for Laurel and Hardy to basically destroy for BIG BUSINESS (1929); Byron Haskin talks about seeing Michael Curtiz direct the flood scene in NOAH’S ARK and watching him throw stuff at the extras to stop them from panicking or freezing; Dolores Costello describing the same film and seeing a bloodied extra leaning against a wall and telling her he wasn’t hurt enough to make the first 39 ambulances on the scene; ‘Broncho Billy’ Anderson talks about his roles in THE GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY and how the crowd reacted when he saw it in a theater; and Karl Brown, an assistant cameraman on BIRTH, talks about opening night and how he knew something different was happening when he saw the Los Angeles Philharmonic in the orchestra pit. There’s even an archival clip of Griffith in 1930 reflecting on BIRTH. It’s all quite priceless, Carl Davis’ score included.


out of 4
I can never finish off lists so I usually don't bother with them. It seems everytime I sit down to try and complete one my interests just move to something else so my brain wonders off. I do think they're great for a starting off point but then I always try and tell people to venture off on their own. Whenever people ask me about the AFI list I usually tell them it's good to start there but don't think there aren't better movies out there.
Pete, what set is that Ford film in? I never knew this one was still around but I'd love to see it (until the asshole collector out there releases the full thing, which is probably not going to happen until he is dead and gone).
I've been waiting for HOLLYWOOD to be released on DVD but it doesn't seem like it's going to happen. I'm going to eventually buy the VHS as I've been looking forward to see this documentary. Having seen a lot of the films you mentioned, I too agree that a strong point could be made that sound actually hurt movies or at least made them a lot dumber for a few years.
It is included on the RETOUR DE FLAMME Vol. 5 set. I'm pretty sure this is available at Amazon UK. There is a small blurb on the set here.
This first episode makes the point that in the silent era, film was truly a universal language. Films made anywhere could play in any country. The consequences of sound, in relation to this point, are still felt obviously today. How many people who watched the Oscars could you get to watch the 'Foreign Language' winner, EL SECRETO DE SUS OJOS, much less the other nominees? Less than 1% of the audience?
Home from the Hill - I must admit, I'm a bit ambivalent about these big sweeping melodramas about powerful men and their dysfunctional families and how these powerful men always get their comeuppance that leaves them changed, empty or dead. It seems that Hollywood just cranked these movies out in the 50's and 60's and my favorite was probably 'Cat on a Hot Tin Roof', just because Tennessee Williams made sure to make everyone as dysfunctional as possible. This one is directed by Vincent Minelli, so naturally, it is as soapy and sudsy as can be, but somehow it works, thanks largely to the presence of Robert Mitchum as the big man of the county. He plays an arrogant SOB who knows he's an arrogant SOB and this self awareness along with that patented Mitchum world-weariness gives the character a lot of soul. George Peppard and George Hamilton are also very good as Mitch's two sons, one a bastard and the other a defiant mamas boy. Another entertaining aspect of this movie is that it's front-loaded with old Hollywood character actors like Everett Sloan, Dub Taylor, Denver Pyle and even Guinn 'Big Boy' Williams, who seemed like he was in just about every western ever made in the 40's and who's likeness to George W. Bush is both uncanny and hilarious.


















Edited by Mario Gauci - 3/19/10 at 11:06am
“Hollywood”: Episode 2: In The Beginning (1980) (TV) Dir: Kevin Brownlow and David Gill
Production: Thames Television
“In the early years, film companies clustered together in one small town,” intones narrator James Mason. “It was said to be the most glamorous spot in the county,” he goes on, “and its name was…Fort Lee, New Jersey.” This drollery sets up the premise of the second episode, which parallels the rise of the city of Hollywood with the influence and impact of the idea of Hollywood. Back to Fort Lee. When a virtual gang fight, replete with gangsters fighting for both sides, broke out amongst the independent producers and the allied big boys in the Motion Picture Patents Company (Edison, Biograph, etc.), the independents, getting the worst of it, started looking west for some relief. Distance not only meant safety, they also found the weather in California agreeable. These companies scattered all over California, Hollywood was just another place where a crew drove to in the morning, filmed, and then left at night (Griffith’s FAITHFUL, 1910, shows the earliest known film of Hollywood), much to the consternation of the staid, conservative populace. It is in 1911, only after the ban of liquor in town causes a drop-off in business at a local roadhouse forcing the owner to sell his land to a New Jersey film studio, that the motion picture industry settles in Hollywood. Within a few years Cecil DeMille and the Lasky Feature Play Company make the first feature in Hollywood, THE SQUAW MAN (1914). The film highlights all the different types of location that can be reached within driving distance of Hollywood. As Hollywood grew, so did the resentment of the long time residents--they dub the picture people ‘movies’ for their invasive comings-and-goings. This tension was even made into a film, THE EXTRA MAN AND THE MILK-FED LION (1916). While the industry had gained some momentum--you know you’re somewhat established when you start parodying yourself, such as the Gloria Swanson film, TEDDY AT THE THROTTLE (1917), does with the melodramas of the time--it was still thought of as a temporary enterprise that could go away or at least move away, at any time.
Once again, it is D.W. Griffith who is credited with creating a kind of permanency. His INTOLERANCE (1916) is the most expensive film to date, it is shot in Hollywood and so it is said to have established a new confidence in the psyche of the fledgling industry. We get a look at the outrageous sets which usher in a new vogue for grandeur and spectacle, as seen in DeMille’s JOAN THE WOMAN (1916). When WWI brings foreign film industries to a halt, Hollywood fills the void. Hollywood stars become the preferred attractions around the world, and the city of Hollywood becomes recognizable from all the filming done in its streets. This causes a real estate boom. Everything gets bigger. The sets on ROBIN HOOD (1922) are bigger even than those of INTOLERANCE. THE THIEF OF BAGDAD (1924) just as big. Stars homes become popular post-cards, none moreso than ‘Pickfair’ (or its inhabitants Douglas Fairbanks and Mary Pickford). Hollywood’s attempt to tap the roaring twenties-jazz age market, FLAMING YOUTH (1923), makes its star, Colleen Moore, the first ‘flapper girl’ and a trendsetter with her short hair and bangs. Her petite frame becomes the new ideal of beauty. Hollywood is now setting styles in fashion, cosmetics, perfumes. This episode finishes up with a nice look at perhaps the greatest phenomenon of them all--Mary Pickford (The Beatles know nothing of popularity compared to Mary, the episode says, and seeing a frightened Pickford on her husband's shoulders in the midst of a massive crush of people in a London appearance, you believe it). We see her in HEART O’ THE HILLS (1919), SUDS (1920) and an amazing clip of a riot in Moscow during her visit there in 1926 (which was the basis for an amusing looking Russian comedy, A KISS FROM MARY PICKFORD, 1926).
The interview star of this episode is Allan Dwan, who basically lived the whole history of film, starting out in the East, moving out to Hollywood and working there into the 60’s. He tells a great story about a Patents detective coming out to California to try and intimidate him and his crew into not working. It ends with Pete, Carl and Chick Morrison and their Winchester rifles escorting the man out of town. Then they made a film out of that. Dwan also tells of how he convinced Douglas Fairbanks to do ROBIN HOOD by first doing the escape down the curtain stunt in front of him, knowing Fairbanks couldn't resist it. Other interviews include Byron Haskin, Lillian Gish (about the perils of open air shooting--you could block out the sun with canvas, but then the wind would blow a tablecloth or something), editor William Hornbeck (talking about how surprised his uncle was when he was paid in paper money for work on SILENT HEROES, 1913), Agnes de Mille (describing the unspoiled Hollywood that her family first arrived in), Leatrice Joy, Henry King (about the collegial atmosphere of the early days), stuntman Harvey Parry, Viola Dana, Anita Loos (the 'movies' anecdote), Colleen Moore and Lord Mountbatten, probably just before his assassination (talking about his and other dignitaries visits to ‘Pickfair’).
Another great episode, it really captures the rapid rise of Hollywood, from a kind of freewheeling, fly-by-night business to the single biggest cultural influence in the world. Agnes de Mille, in one of her interviews, relays something her father William (Cecil’s brother) told her: it was a time, not quite of great artistry just yet, but of excitement where each new discovery helped lay the foundation for great art to eventually emerge.



out of 4Return to Horror High (1987) 

Bill Froehlich
Long before SCREAM and SCARY MOVIE we had this slasher/spoof that seems to be hated by pretty much everyone and misunderstood by even more. A movie crew shows up at a high school to film a movie based around the real life murders where of course the real killer was never captured. Soon more bodies begin to pile up but is it connected to the real events or is it just a movie? Just about every review you watch is going to really lay into this film but I didn't find it nearly as bad as its reputation. Yes, it's incredibly stupid but that's somewhat the point as it is making fun of the slasher genre. Do all the jokes work? Of course not but there were some minor good moments that make it a lot better than many of the films it spoofs. I think what does work is how the movie never really lets you know whether you're watching something real or if you just seeing a scene being shot. There were a couple moments that really caught me off guard as I thought I was watching something real but it turned out to be just part of the movie being filmed. This is naturally a cheat but it makes for some cheap fun. Another plus is seeing Marsha Brady (aka Maureen McCormick) playing a nutty cop who feels herself up a few times. There's also some mild charm of seeing a young George Clooney getting butchered in front of our eyes. He certainly doesn't show any signs of being a future Oscar-winner but we all have to start somewhere. There's also quite a bit of blood that got past the MPAA since (I'm guessing) many of the death scenes are done in a spoof way. What doesn't work is that the film runs way too long coming in at 91-minutes and much of the charm begins to wear thin after the first hour. Another problem is that none of the main characters are all that interesting with the exception being the director trying to make a classic film and the producer wanting gore and nudity to make money. Those who hate horror films certainly aren't going to change their minds with this film but fans of the genre can get a few cheap laughs here.
Lonely Sex, The (1959) 

Richard Hilliard
Bizarre film about a sex maniac stalking the streets who is apparently messed up due to his first sexual encounter being with a prostitute. He eventually kidnaps a woman and keeps her locked up in a shack in the woods as her friends try to find her. It's very important to keep in mind that this film beat PEEPING TOM and PSYCHO into theaters by a year so this film probably deserves to be better known among movie fans. Director Hilliard is best known for directing VIOLENT MIDNIGHT and writing the cult classic THE HORROR OF PARTY BEACH so it's interesting to see such an early cash-in on the sex maniac that would become more popular a decade or two later. This film has an ultra-low budget that doesn't allow for too much on the technical side but there are a few nice moments including one sequence in front of the mirror as the killer tries to "paint" over his face. The low-budget nature works in some ways as it gives the film a more documentary-like feel and this certainly helps in the scenes with the killer quietly stalking the women. What doesn't work too well are the performances, which are far from bad but none of them are good enough to really carry the movie. Another problem is the screenplay that never really gets too deep so don't expect anything psychological like the future Hitchcock film. Running a brief 58-minutes there's really not too much time to dig into any real issues with the killer so everything is pretty much just skipped in order to keep the film moving. We do get some brief nudity and a rather violent scene where the killer stones a woman to death but the blood level remains at zero. This certainly isn't a good movie but fans of the genre will probably want to check it out just to see something made before Norman Bates.
Mind Reader, The (1933) 


Roy Del Ruth
Excellent performances highlight this Warner drama about a con man (Warren William) and his assistant (Allen Jenkins) who travel town to town with a circus doing various acts to bring in money. They then notice that the mind reader gag will bring in the most and soon the alias "Chandra" starts pulling people in but there's going to be a price to pay. I had heard so many positive things about this movie that it quickly became one that I searched out and thankfully got to see due to a recent TCM showing. Fans of classic cinema should certainly keep their eyes open for this one as it lives up to its reputation and also delivers some incredible performances. The film is pretty much divided into two halves with the first one dealing with various cons being performed by William. I found all of these games to be incredibly entertaining due in large part to William being able to push them over. It's very important that we believe these cons could actually be pushed over on people and William is so good here that it's never a problem. He slides into this role and never looks back and there's no a single frame in the film where we don't believe what he's doing and saying. Constance Cummings plays the woman he eventually falls in love with and the two share some great moments together and really make their love story believable. The underrated Jenkins does a very good job as well as he has several nice comic moments. The biggest surprise comes from future Bogart wife Mayo Methot who nearly steals the film as a young woman who is given bad advice and comes to let William know about it. I won't spoil what happens but it's pretty unforgettable and she really nails the part. I think the film begins to lose some of its power during the final twenty-five minutes with the last scam starts to be too big and of course there's going to be a moral lesson to pay. Up until then the film is extremely fast, fun and most important features some terrific acting. This film certainly deserves to be better known and hopefully TCM will start to show it more often.
Becoming Charley Chase D3:
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Poor Fish, The (1924) 


Leo McCarey
Jimmy Jump (Charley Chase) and his wife (Katherine Grant) get into a heated fight only to make up after they realize it's their jobs causing the stress. They then agree to switch places with her going out to work and Jimmy staying home to do housework. Of course he thinks staying at home is easier but soon the truth hits. This 10-minute Hal Roach short really isn't anything overly ground breaking but there are enough funny bits to make it worth viewing. Some of the highlights happen before the actual switch as the two actors have some nice chemistry together and their fighting is extremely funny and especially all the breaking of the dishes. When they finally do the switch all of the jokes are pretty routine but some of them manage to get laughs like the bathing of the canary. Another funny sequence happens when 'Tonnage' Martin Wolfkeil shows up as a salesman only to get a laugh out of seeing Jimmy dressed like a woman.
Rat's Knuckles, The (1925) 

Leo McCarey
Jimmy Jump invents a humane mouse trap that he plans on selling so that he and the girlfriend (Martha Sleeper) can become millionaires. This is a pretty disappointing entry in the Charley Chase series for a number of reasons. The biggest one is that the screenplay is incredibly weak without very many jokes. It's not that there are a lot of jokes that simply don't work. It's worse because there just aren't many jokes that are even attempted for. The first portion of the film deals with a fantasy sequence with Chase and Sleeper acting rich and posing for a variety of pictures. There are a couple marginal laughs to be had with this sequence as they're obviously spoofing rich folks who do good things just for the cameras. After this things get too weak as we see Chase trying to sell this trap, which eventually leads to us getting to see how the thing actually works. At 9-minutes the thing moves along well enough but just don't expect very many laughs. Certainly one of the weaker entries in the series.
Hello Baby! (1925) 


Leo McCarey
Charley Chase arrives home late from partying and quickly tries to sneak pass the wife (Katherine Grant) but she's already up and waiting. The two don't have time to get into a fight as they hear something out on the porch, which turns out to be a baby. The couple bring it in to raise as their own but they don't know what to do once he starts crying. The premise of this thing is actually better than the actual film but we do get some pretty funny gags scattered through. The best gag happens when Chase gets caught on a sewer top in the middle of a dark road when he sees headlights approaching. This gag has two different versions here and I won't ruin them but both are very funny. The stuff dealing with the never really gets any laughs as all the obvious jokes are gone for and the "reason" for them rushing out to get a doctor isn't that funny either and I'm sure most will see it coming. There's a final gag of them taking a glove and turning it into a nipple that is rather charming because it appears to have been shot on the fly and Chase's reaction to what the baby does is rather priceless as it seems real and not scripted.
Fighting Fluid (1925) 


Leo McCarey
Charley Chase plays the type of character he does best, which is a weak nerd who is constantly letting people push him around. This happens at his work when a co-worker sneaks off with the boss's daughter who just happens to be the crush for Charley. After accidentally getting loaded on bootleg whiskey, Charley gets some courage and goes out to get his woman. This is a pretty politically incorrect little comedy that just shows women as targets for men but as long as you don't take it too serious then you should get a few laughs out of it. The sequence with Chase being drunk and busting into his loves house is pretty funny as is a later sequence when he thinks her leg has fallen off. Running just over ten-minutes this short really doesn't get to expand into too much story but what's here isn't bad and it's a tad bit darker than a few of the earlier Chase movies.
Should Husbands Be Watched? (1925) 


Leo McCarey
Charley Chase comes home and tells his wife (Katherine Grant) that he's been given a raise in pay so she can quit cleaning the house because they're going to hire a maid. This maid (Olive Borden) turns out to be incredibly sexy, which doesn't sit too well with the wife when she thinks Charley takes a liking to her. This is yet another decent short from Hal Roach that doesn't have too much plot and goes for the simple laughs. This normally wouldn't be a good thing but since the films runs only 9-minutes it's not too bad. The best moments of the film are early on when the new "rich" couple aren't sure how to act with someone else doing all their dirty works. This leads to a couple good gags that are followed up with a nice sequence of a burglar going after them and Chase pretty much paying him to act like he's scared. The three performers all do nice work and Borden certainly fits into her vamp role. Not the greatest film out there but fans of Chase will want to check it out.
Is Marriage the Bunk? (1925) 


Leo McCarey
Charley Chase plays a husband who is happily married to the woman (Katherine Grant) he loves but her family hates him. Chase's sister-in-law is married to a rich man and the family thinks that's what his wife deserves so he sets out to prove that he can provide his wife with nice things. I've read several reviews that stated this was among Chase's worst films but I wouldn't go that far. There really aren't enough laughs here to keep the film moving but there are a few good things. The highlight of the film happens at the start when Chase is doing various impersonations for his family. These impersonations includes one of Chaplin, which is pretty hilarious as Chase nails the Tramp walk and famous cigarette kick. This sequence alone makes this film worth checking out but everything that follows pales in comparison. One problem is that the supporting cast really doesn't add anything to the film as the relatives are all rather boring and routine. Chase himself really doesn't get to do anything overly impressive outside the Chaplin act and even Grant comes off appearing bored here.
Big Red Riding Hood (1925) 


Leo McCarey
The Swedish government asks bookworm Jimmy Jump (Charley Chase) to translate Little Red Riding Hood for them. Jimmy needs the extra money but he's actually never read the story so he must try to do so no matter what might get in his way. This one-reeler comes in a period where Chase had moved onto two-reelers so it's somewhat interesting that he would do a film like this when it's pretty clear that someone else might have been better for the job. I'm not saying Chase is bad here because he isn't but at the same time the material really isn't the strongest. The biggest problem is that the entire story idea is more interesting than funny. The idea that a cheap bookworm would do whatever it takes to read the story without having to buy the book is neat but we just don't get any laughs. The end of the story turns into a Buster Keaton like production as we have some bigger stunts than we normally see from Chase and this includes a sequence where he's attached to the car reading and not realizing that he's about to go over a cliff. We also get a fantasy sequence where the actual story is acted out and this here is pretty surreal and has a few laughs especially when Chase is trying to cut down some trees.
Looking for Sally (1925) 


Leo McCarey
Far-fetched but funny two-reeler from Hal Roach has Jimmy Jump (Charley Chase) returning from Europe after nearly two decades where he plans on marrying his childhood sweetheart Sally (Katherine Grant). She is waiting for him at the peer but he sees an ugly woman thinking it is her so he decides to stay away. He ends up meeting another woman at the peer, the real Sally, and spends the rest of the film trying to track her down. This is a pretty routine story built around the mistaken identity scenario that is hard to believe but there are enough big laughs to make this worth viewing. What really worked here is the maniac performance by Chase in his final billing as Jimmy Jump. He does a great job at showing off his comic timing and has many opportunities to play different types of comedy. Early on it's hilarious seeing his facial gestures when he thinks his true love is now a dog. Even funnier is towards the end when he's pretending to be a homeless drunk to meet his woman only to then go into a stage act of being crazy. Chase is wonderful but so is Grant as the woman he loves. Noah Young, a veteran Roach player, is also very good as a dumb detective trying to bust Chase for just about anything. The drunken flashback sequence really doesn't contain enough laughs to make it worth being included in the film but it will remind some of the early Keystone films. Fans of Chase will certainly eat this thing up but it's also a good one to show people who aren't familiar with the actor.
No Father to Guide Him (1925) 


Leo McCarey
Going by the title you'd think this Charley Chase film was a serious drama but it's actually a comedy about the funny topic of kidnapping. In the film, Charley and his wife split up because his mother-in-law hates him. She also keeps him from seeing the son he loves so one day Charley and the boy run off for a day at the beach. This is a pretty bizarre little gem that manages to take kidnapping and child abuse and make a comedy out of them. I wasn't really sure where this movie was headed early on but within a few minutes the laughs started flowing and didn't stop. The majority of this two-reeler deals with Chase jumping into the ocean only to lose his bathing suit and he must try and get back to safety without everyone seeing him naked. This entire sequence contains one major laugh after another as each time you think he's going to reach safety something else goes wrong. The second half of the film deals with revenge on the mother-in-law and the detective she has hired. The outcome to both parties are extremely funny. Chase is at the top of his game here showing that he was a genius at playing this type of guy who can't have anything good happen to him. Katherine Grant plays the ex-wife but doesn't have too much to do. Duke Kahanamoku plays a lifeguard here as most people will remember him for the various medals he won in the Olympics with his swimming. The scene between he and Chase works extremely well.
- Russell G
- Russell
- Location: Deadmonton
- offline
- Joined: September 2002
- Posts: 7,993
- Select All Posts By This User
03/06 The Hurt Locker (2009) 4/5 - Worth all the praise and awards it's gotten. On top of being incredibly tight, I loved that it didn't moralize, it just played out honestly and let you make up your own mind. Too bad more Hollywood movies can't show the same restraint.
03/06 Paranormal Activity (2009) 4/5 - Repeat viewing and it still freaked me out. :(
03/12 The Crazies (2010) 2/5 - Some ok effects and a car wash don't elevate this messy remake from being boring. So I guess that makes it faithful to the original messy movie...
03/13 Green Zone (2010) 3.5/5 - The plot has holes, the trailer tells the movie and the camera is so shaky it's mostly out of focus. I still liked it though, moves at a good pace and doesn't overstay it's welcome.
03/14 The White Stripes: Under Great White Northern Lights (2010) 3.5/5 - A documentary on their concert tour where they played every province and territory in Canada. A few too many shots of the pair walking around in slow motion in B&W for my liking, but on the whole, it's a fun doc with some great concert footage. I doubt it'll make you a fan though if you're not one already.
Predator II - I think it was a minor stroke of genius to create a sequel with the same basic premise but set in a completely different time and environment. This movie does kind of scream 90's action cinema, what with the mere presence of Maria Conchita Alonzo and Bill Paxton doing an early version of his rough tough goofball schtick, but once it settles into the main story of the Predator vs. Danny Glover, it's very entertaining indeed. It's fun to see Glover in a straight up action flick without all the annoying Lethal weapon tomfoolery and he does a good job appearing to kick him some Predator ass. I'm surprised they didn't try this scenario in few more settings, like maybe explaining where that Blunderbuss came from that DG received at the end of the movie. It would have been a lot more interesting than those Predator/Alien flicks, I theenk.
- 42nd Street Freak
- Dave
- Location: Uk, England
- offline
- Joined: August 2007
- Posts: 636
- Select All Posts By This User


http://www.beardyfreak.com/rvelsa.php
"Salon Kitty" on a choo choo.
Welcome to the world of Eurociné!
If many (though certainly not all) horror/exploitation flicks of this time were low-end rehashes of the current American cinematic trend…Eurociné were making rehashes of those rehashes!
“Elsa” opens with upbeat classic music playing over stock footage of Hitler shouting a lot and his armies goose-stepping merrily along.
After this we are thrown into even more cheap padding footage taken from newsreels of various battles before the movie jerks into the film proper as we see a handful of bored, skinny, extras in baggy (and rather dubious looking) German uniforms shuffling down the road.
Almost all the extras in this are awful though. They either stand there slouching and looking bored (not good when dressed as a soldier) or staring at the camera with a look that says “how long till the lunch break”.
Thankfully the look and production design of the film improves a bit after the opening as we enter a chaotic Nazi headquarters in a mansion which is of course complete with multiple swastika flags, Hitler photos and a smug git (with a gloriously theatrical twitch) in a groovy looking Black and silver SS uniform (I’ll say it once again…say what you want about those damn Nazis, but the bastards sure knew how to dress) who sets the plot up.
So if nothing else we at least have some essential iconography on display.
After this scene setting sequence we have the ever essential ‘medical check-up sequence’ to pick the prostitutes.
The luckiest actor in the film?
The guy who plays the examiner who spends his time opening the women’s legs (as they lie down naked on his table) and getting right in there with his beady little eyes to check that all Nazi vagina’s are up to snuff. Or sniff.
So far so trashily good.
As we move onto the train all the delightful Naziploitation cliché components are here, from much groping in stiff uniforms, sexual humiliation (only mild though here), preening Nazis, shifty spies, theatrical fanaticism and a spot of Dietrich like singing involving piano perching, see-through lingerie and a big feathery boa.
But then unlike the train, the film loses steam as we watch numerous extras get bloodlessly shot in the head for saying nasty things about Adolf with their trousers down.
The dead direction, amateur staging, laboured dubbing and repetitiveness of it all starts to make the mind wander.
Thankfully Elsa’s rather magnificent breasts (Malisa Longo is no Dyanne Thorne but she looks damn hot and is willing to let it all hang out, and get zoomed in on, for the cause) bring our minds back to the movie.
It’s not long though before we’re back to a slow crawl again and get hit with blatant padding when we get to spend time with wimpy Frantz (dubbed over by someone doing an impression of James Mason. But even at his lowest career ebb I don’t remember James Mason licking the boots of a sadistic Nazi bitch with no knickers on!)
Sadly we have now come to the conclusion that, despite the high camp value and genuine ‘so bad their good’ moments, the film is often very slow, lacking energy and mired in too many flat dialogue scenes.
We do get a few dialogue gems though.
Frantz: To spy while making love! Disgusting! But no one compels you to have orgasms”!
We have a little bit of violence to liven things up slightly that comes in the form of some rather mild torture (a bald old guy) and a brief bit of naked woman flogging.
The various shootings are ridiculously bloodless though and the weapons mostly sound like cap guns.
And boy! The action scenes are bad.
Those bored looking extras I mentioned just stand around in the open pointing guns in a confused manner pointing their cap guns and going ‘pop’.
Then occasionally one of them will clutch their chest and slowly and carefully fall to the ground in what passes as the horrors of war.
The lack of any real bloodshed, inventive torture (I know, I know, but we are talking Naziploitation here) or general sadism (I know, I know, but we are talking Naziploitation here) in “Elsa: Fraulein SS” is a let down as far as good old fashioned cheap thrills go and we only have the frequent nudity (and its lovely collection 70’s pubic bushes) to keep our interest up , away from the more unintentional joys of course at the sheer wonderful badness of it all.
And as for the end, well, what can one say except…Heh?
Worst stock footage explosion ever leads into a bizarre open-ended finale that seems to hint at a damn sequel! As if! Talk about wishful thinking.
Definitely one for Naziploitation completists (and fur lovers) only.
- Martin Teller
- Martin Teller
- Location: Portland, OR
- offline
- Joined: August 2006
- Posts: 2,370
- Select All Posts By This User
The Dead (rewatch) - Another break from the noir to revisit a recent acquisition. John Huston did direct a couple of pivotal noirs, but for my money his finest achievement is his last. I wrote pretty extensively about this last time, I don't have much to add. I like it even more now. It just seems to be a thing of perfection. No doubt much of the credit belongs to Joyce but the cinematic aspects are a quiet masterpiece of restraint and nuance, joy and heartache. It sweeps you along without your being aware of how it has cast its spell over you. Rating: 10
Big Fan - I've been listening to Patton Oswalt's stand-up all day, so I figured this would be a good selection for tonight. Of course, I knew the movie had nothing to do with Oswalt's comedy. There is some humor to it, though, and as a black comedy about an obsessed misfit, it's mildly comparable to the recent Observe and Report. But where that movie had problems of tone, going too far in both the "black" and "comedy" directions, this one gets the balance right. It's amusing enough and keeps you compelled enough... it's not great or anything, but it's pretty good. My only real complaint is that I thought it was a bit condescending to Oswalt's character, going overboard in making him pathetic. Do we really need to see him masturbating? I don't think so. Rating: 7
The Wrong Man (rewatch) - This review is written in extreme frustration. My PS3 died last night, and they're fucking sold out EVERYWHERE. I checked with at least 10 different places. The Sony store told me they'd be hard to find until May, so I bit the bullet and ordered one off Amazon, even though it's $70 more than it would be anywhere else (plus $15 shipping). Oh well. I bought a cheapo DVD player to tide me over in the meantime... it's a piece of shit, but it'll do. It's been kind of a shitty week. But not as shitty as the time Henry Fonda has in this movie. This is one of Hitchcock's grimmest works. His "wrong man" stories are usually a thrilling adventure, with a pretty, sassy girl and a lot of jokes. But this story, based on true events, is not fun at all. It's a concentrated ball of tension, frustration, misery and despair. This rubs most Hitchcock fans the wrong way, but for a noir fan it's gold. The film's dark feel in enhanced by the European influence in the cinematography, and Herrmann's often dissonant score. I don't even mind Vera Miles' performance so much. The transformation does seem a bit sudden, which in turn makes it a little hokey, but overall she does a pretty good job. Rating: 8














Edited by Mario Gauci - 3/19/10 at 12:54pm
- 42nd Street Freak
- Dave
- Location: Uk, England
- offline
- Joined: August 2007
- Posts: 636
- Select All Posts By This User
"Point Break" is garbage. Boring and rather unpleasant as far as Reeve's giving more of a damn about Swayze than his dead partner, dead thanks to Swayze. The 'surf to your destiny' finale is vomit!
I've been wanting to check out POINT BREAK for a while now and hope to eventually get to it soon. I saw STRANGE DAYS in the theater after various critics (including Ebert) called it a masterpiece. I thought it was decent but nothing great.
Double Agent 73 (1974) 
Doris Wishman
I guess the only thing you really need to know about star Chesty Morgan is that her measurements are 73FF-32-36. If you must know about the plot to this sexploitation pic then Chesty plays an undercover agent who is trying to clean out some mean heroin dealers. The plot twist here is that Chesty has a camera inserted into her boob so that she can squeeze them and take a picture of the people she's killing. Why that plot twist? So she can walk around topless of course. If you're looking for any type of quality then you've obviously never seen a film from exploitation master Wishman as anything good really isn't her cup of tea. There's no question that this is a horrid movie but it's somewhat like a car wreck because no matter how brutal or ugly it gets you still can't turn your head away. As for Chesty I guess it goes without saying that she's a horrible actress. For the life of me it seems like she's incredibly unhappy or confused about being in this movie as she looks as if she's in pain or perhaps drugged. Either way, her performance is pretty bad as are her dubbed lines (apparently her Polish accent was too rough). We're not here to see her act though as everyone is coming to see her 73FF friends and I must admit that they did nothing for me. I can't say I found them erotic, sexy or interesting. I just saw them as freaks in a freak show. The film appears to have been shot silent with all the voices added in post-production, which is something Wishman did quite often in her films. The low-budget nature of the film actually helps it as everything from the music score to the editing to the direction is pretty bad. This is pure exploitation so I'm sure people will enjoy sitting around with their friends and making fun of everything that's going on.
Deadly Weapons (1974) 

Doris Wishman
Crystal (Chesty Morgan aka 73FF-32-36) plays a lovely young woman who has to suffer a major heartache when gangster kill her blackmailing boyfriend. She goes after the men (one played by Harry Reems) to seek her vengeance with the deadly weapon being her rather large boobs. You have to give Wishman credit for knowing how to exploit someone and that's pretty much all this film has going for it. It's certainly much better than DEADLY AGENT 73 but that's really not saying too much. The reason this film works better is that the story is mildly better even though there's no doubt that the most creative thing that went into the thinking of this movie was how to use Morgan's enormous breasts. As with the companion film, Morgan certainly can't act but once again I couldn't help but feel bad for her as it seems like she was in some incredible pain. Apparently not much is known about her so I'd love to hear about how she's doing today. Reems is about what you'd expect from the adult superstar as he at least brings some good charm to the movie. The rest of the cast are pretty much just the type of throw aways you'd expect in a movie like this. I think part of the charm of this movie is that Wishman actually tries to pass this thing off as a real revenge/drama, which gives the film some campy grin moments. The scenes with Chesty crying were incredibly fake looking and as bad as everything is here you can't help but at least give them credit for being so silly. In terms of women with FF-breasts, there's no doubt Chesty is on top but in terms of entertainment there's really not too much here. If you must see these FF's in action then this is the movie to go with.
Becoming Charley Chase D4:
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Rolling Stone (1919) 
Charley Chase
Billy West is either loved or hated depending on how you feel about impersonators. West became very famous and perhaps very rich because of his impersonation of Chaplin's Tramp character and that's the character being played in this short. Here his Tramp gets thrown into prison after he's mistaken for a crazy bomber. That's pretty much all we have here in a story written by West and one I'd question if he actually wrote at all or if he just stood around and filmed a variety of scenes. I had seen bits and pieces of West and his Chaplin act but this was my first time viewing an entire short and I must admit that it was rather painful getting through this two-reeler. I'm not going to say West was a horrible actor since I haven't seen enough but this film here is at least on a very bad level. I might not have minded this short too much had it ran 9-minutes but stretched out to over twenty is a big problem as I started looking at the clock on my DVD player minutes into the film. I guess the impersonations are pretty spot on but to me that really doesn't matter for a couple reasons. For starters, nothing we see here is funny. We are given a certain brand of humor that is identifiable with Chaplin yet it's never funny here. The second problem is why would one want to watch an impersonator when the majority of Chaplin's films are out there in countless forms to view? This entire movie just struck me as being really, really bad and that includes the direction by Charley Chase (who also has a cameo). Chase was capable of being a good director and this short has none of his touches so I'm curious to know if West wasn't calling the shots here as well.
Flirts, The (1919) 
Charley Chase
After Chaplin impersonator Billy West left the comedy series, he hand picked Harry Mann (no jokes, that's his name) to take over his role as the Tramp. In this film Mann and Jimmie Adams play a couple losers who stalk out women in a hotel and constantly flirt with them. That's pretty much the entire story to this two-reeler that runs about two reels too long. Perhaps I'm just not a Chaplin impersonator type but I found this film to be less annoying than ROLLING STONE but that isn't saying too much. This here is just 20-minutes of pure boredom as we really don't see anything funny and the comic acts are rather bland from start to finish. Mann's Chaplin act is somewhat spot-on but, like West, he just doesn't have that certain magic touch or timing to get any laughs. I found the film to move very slowly as we just pretty much got the same thing over and over as the two men had to fight one another off to get to the latest women and then there's the hotel detective that they must get around.
Dumb-Bell, The (1922) 

Charley Chase
A small-time movie studio keeps falling behind schedule because the director can't keep his cool. He's constantly going crazy causing the film to fall behind schedule but the managers are scared to fire him so they tell an actor ('Snub' Pollard) that he can direct the film as long as he fires the guy. I'm sure directors and producers would sit around and tell a story like this and they'd find it to be insanely funny but whatever was going on in the writers head failed to make it to the screen because this really isn't all that funny. Pollard has never really worked for me as I usually find him rather tiresome and unfunny and that's part of the problem here but blaming the entire film on him would be a mistake. Chase, the director, must also take some of the blame because he really never makes anything here too funny. The film just strikes me as an inside joke that a few people are going to laugh at but everyone else will just sit there bore.
Soft Pedal (1926) 

Ray Gray, Charley Chase
Paul Parrott, Charley Chase's younger brother, plays a con-man here who runs said con with the help of a black boy (Ernie 'Sunshine Sammy' Morrison from Our Gang) where the kid would run from a roof with a water device and make people think it's raining when Parrott would then sell them an umbrella. Later in the film Parrott is asked by a lovely woman to help her father by breaking into her house. This is a pretty mixed bag because the first half of the film gets a few charming laughs but the second part pretty much falls on its face. I liked the first few gags of the film because the "con" isn't all that funny but it does mildly work because you know the film is ripping off Chaplin's THE KID (this short was filmed in 1921 but not released until '26). The second part of the film had me scratching my head more than anything and the humor it does go for just doesn't work. Not a horrible film but not one really worth watching either.
Courtship of Miles Sandwich (1923) 

Charley Chase
It's Thanksgiving and a young boy asks his father ('Snub' Pollard) what the holiday is about. We then have his story told as some folks land in the country, make it off the boat and try a few "first" before meeting some Indians for dinner. This movie is spoofing 1923's THE COURTSHIP OF MYLES STANDISH with Charles Rey, which ended up costing around one-million only turning out to be a complete disaster and nearly costing the star everything he was worth. That film is lost sadly but this one here probably worked pretty good as a spoof even if the actual film isn't all that good. There are a few very funny scenes but just not enough to carry the twenty-minute running time. The best sequence happens when Pollard is fighting with another man (James Finlayson) and they decide to go skiing. One of the men gets a rope tied to him and a tree as he goes down the mountain with a very funny finish. Another good gag includes the smoking of the peace pipe that doesn't go as planned. Both Pollard and Finlayson are good in their roles but one wishes there were more laughs to carry the picture. Not a disaster but it's doubtful too many will be searching this one out.
Jus' Passin' Through (1923) 


Charley Chase
Three-reel comedy from Hal Roach features Will Rogers in his first major role. In the film he plays the tramp Jubilo who shows up in a small town where hobos aren't allowed. It's the day before Thanksgiving and when he hears that those in jail are getting a free meal, he gets himself arrested by the hobo hating Sheriff (Noah Young). Soon the sheriff's daughter (Marie Mosquini) takes a liking to him as his quest for food continues. This was an extremely entertaining little gem that had the perfect blend of comedy and sentimental aspects. What works best, of course, is Rogers who is in fine shape and it's easy to see why he would become a star with this picture. He perfectly fits the role of the tramp and he just has a certain charisma that makes him jump off the screen in a loveable type of way. He just seems like an overgrown teddy bear and he perfectly makes you want to see him be able to get some food after going through all the trouble that he does. Young is very good as the tough sheriff and Mosquini does a fine job with her role. The movie runs just short of 30-minutes but it never feels long and in fact I wouldn't have mind had it ran a couple more reels. One of the highlights includes a scene where Rogers is trying to sneak back into jail after being released as well as a perfectly directed sequence where he's about to eat but must keep passing the plate to the person next to him.
Dear 'Ol Pal (1923) 


Charley Chase
Funny one-reeler has best friends ('Snub' Pollard, James Parrott) constantly fight over anything and then making up moments later. Soon both men are trying to help a woman (Marie Mosquini) they love but can't do so over fighting to be the one to help. This is a pretty funny short that manages to be quite charming while everything going on could be looked at as being annoying. I had recently gone through some Pollard and Parrott short where it seemed neither actor had enough timing to make the comedy wok but that's just the opposite here as both hit a perfect stride together and really deliver on the laughs. The laughs are pretty simple as we normally see the two men asking one another if they want to do something, both agree and then both can't agree to which one should go first, which in return leads to a fight. This simple premise gets quite a few laughs due to the chemistry between the men and their timing. The wild, over-the-top and down on the ground fist fights are funny enough to make this film worth viewing by fans of silents.
- TravisR
- Location: The basement of the FBI building
- online
- Joined: November 2004
- Posts: 17,479
- Select All Posts By This User
I caught The Runaways this afternoon and enjoyed it. Kristin Stewart and a creepily sexed up Dakota Fanning are both very good in their roles. I haven't seen Twilight but I think Stewart is a very talented actor. Hopefully, her good turns in this and Adventureland will stop her from being typecast as the girl in Twilight.
The second movie seemed to be TRYING to be campy and just didn't work as well. I have to agree also, Chesty is pretty hard to look at. Any guy who gets a rise out of looking at a gal like that has one very specific fetish going...
I had planned on watching DW first but both movies were on a "short wait" at Netflix and I had been waiting for them for over a month. They finally shipped this week but DW arrived cracked so I had to go with the other one first. I know Wishman has a rather big following but I've found most of her films to be downright awful.
- 42nd Street Freak
- Dave
- Location: Uk, England
- offline
- Joined: August 2007
- Posts: 636
- Select All Posts By This User


Liked it.
But it was perhaps just too long especially when the film is ultimately only existing to get to the twist(s).
Nice turns, looked great, stupidly unsubtle music though and some good atmosphere.
You can see what's coming though (though where you pick it up I know varies) and only the VERY end was a real surprise.
And this little bit (listen to the final sentence said in the film) saved the film from just being ho hum. As it was a nice little idea and added a real poignancy to the final moments.
You have to love ol' Chesty!
Bad films, but so of a time and a kind I have to forgive
I checked my weather beaten copy of 'Incredibly Strange Films' - Deadly Weapons came first and her acting was so bad in that one, they dubber her voice in Double Agent 73. I agree though, like many exploitation filmmakers of the period, Wishman made a small handful of eccentric, interesting films and a lot of unwatchable crap. Most of her later films are just tedious softcore porn.
- Track the Films You Watch (2010)
Recent Discussions
- › What are some options for good inexpensive rear speakers? 44 seconds ago
- › Criterion: Anatomy of a Murder $20.99 (47% off) 1 minute ago
- › Mad Men: Season Five 8 minutes ago
- › Weekly RoundUp 5-29-2012 12 minutes ago
- › Sanctuary Season 4 24 minutes ago
- › Awake (Jason Isaacs) 26 minutes ago
- › Star Trek Trivia (Series and Films) 29 minutes ago
- › SPHE Press Release: Footnote (Blu-ray) 37 minutes ago
- › SPHE Press Release: Footnote (DVD) 37 minutes ago
- › A few words about...™ Smokey and the Bandit -- in Blu-ray 38 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Man on a Ledge [Blu-ray] by Kevin EK
- › The Woman in Black (+ UltraViolet Digital Copy) [Blu-ray] by Richard Gallagher
- › John Carter (Four-Disc Combo: Blu-ray 3D/Blu-ray/DVD + Digital Copy) by MattH.
- › Journey 2: The Mysterious Island (Blu-ray 3D / Blu-ray / DVD /... by Ronald Epstein
- › Smokey and the Bandit [Blu-ray + DVD + Digital Copy]... by Kevin EK
- › Summer with Monika (The Criterion Collection) [Blu-ray] by MattH.
- › The Jungle Bunch: The Movie by Kevin EK
- › Chronicle (Two-Disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo +Digital Copy) by MattH.
- › Coriolanus [Blu-ray] by MattH.
- › Andrew Lloyd Webber's Love Never Dies [Blu-ray] by Kevin EK
New Articles
- › Harman Kardon Introduces a New Sound Bar... by nickvalluri
- › TruGreen by brand46
- › HTF Oscar Chat Prize List by Adam Gregorich
- › HTF AWARDS 2011 by Ronald Epstein
- › 2012 Home Theater Forum Meet Information by Ronald Epstein
- › HTF Official Blu Ray Review Archive Part 2 by Ronald Epstein
- › Robert Fowkes, HTF Moderator, 1942-2011 by Ronald Epstein
- › Blu-ray Previously Released Listing: #-D by Robert Crawford
- › Blu-ray Previously Released Listing: E-I by Robert Crawford
- › Blu-ray Previously Released Listing: J-P by Robert Crawford
About Home Theater Forum | Join the Community | HTF Chat | HTF Events | Advertise
© 2012 Home Theater Forum is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map




