Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › Official HTF Blu-ray Reviews › HTF Blu-ray Review: IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE (not recommended)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HTF Blu-ray Review: IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE (not recommended)

post #1 of 24
Thread Starter 
  
 
It’s a Wonderful Life (Blu-ray)
 
 
Studio: Paramount
Rated: NR
Film Length: 131 minutes
Aspect Ratio: 4:3
HD Encoding: 1080p
HD Codec: AVC
Audio: English, French, Spanish DD 2.0 mono
Subtitles: English; English SDH; French; Spanish; Portuguese
MSRP: $29.99
Disc Format: 2 50GB
Package: Keepcase
Theatrical Release Date: Dec. 25, 1946
Blu-ray Release Date: Nov. 3, 2009
 
 
 
Introduction:  
 
This is a film that needs no introduction; so let me use this space to convey some related information. Mr. Potter has settled in at Viacom (Paramount’s corporate parent), and he’s severely cut back on review copies for internet sites like HTF. When they do get sent, they often arrive on or after street date; hence the date on this review. Not only did the disc arrive late, but I also pushed it to the bottom of my pile, because I give top priority to discs from studios that still care about having their discs reviewed before they’re in stores.
 
Why is any of this relevant? Because, as readers of Robert Harris’ posts already know, Paramount hasn’t yet achieved the kind of reliable Blu-ray output we’re seeing from Sony and Warner, and, sadly, this disc is an example. It’s an example of a disc that needs to be reviewed before street date, preferably by more than one or two sites, because the problems may not be obvious on all displays or to every set of eyes. They’re substantial nevertheless.
 
 
 
The Feature:
 
There’s a legal doctrine known as res ipsa loquitur, which is Latin meaning “the thing speaks for itself”. As I contemplated the utterly pointless task of summarizing It’s a Wonderful Life, it occurred to me that the concept applies perfectly here. So without further ado:
 
 
You are now in Bedford Falls.
 
A lot of people asking for help for a man named George Bailey.

If you’re going to help a man, you want to know something about him, don’t you?
 
“Help, George, help!” “Hang on, Harry!”
 
George Bailey, I’ll love you till the day I die.
 
It’s a good face. I like him. I like George Bailey.
 
I want to do something big, something important.
 
This town’s no place for any man unless he’s willing to crawl to Potter.
 
George, come home, your father’s had a stroke.
 
Just remember this, Mr. Potter, that this rabble you’re talking about, they do most of the working and paying and living and dying in this community. Well, is it too much to have them work and pay and live and die in a couple of decent rooms and a bath? Anyway, my father didn’t think so.
 
They’ve appointed George here Executive Secretary to take his father’s place. . . . But George, they’ll vote with Potter otherwise.
 
Ruth Dakin Bailey, if you don’t mind. . . . My father owns a glass factory in Buffalo. He wants to get Harry started in the research business.
 
Did you know that Mary Hatch is back from school? Came back three days ago. . . . Nice girl, Mary. Kind that’ll help you find the answers, George.
 
You know what we’re going to do? We’re going to shoot the works. A whole week in New York, a whole week in Bermuda, the highest hotels, the oldest champagne, the richest caviar, the hottest music and the prettiest wife!
 
Don’t look now, but there’s something funny going on over at the bank, George. I’ve never seen one, but that’s got all the earmarks of being a run.
 
Don’t you see what’s happening? Potter isn’t selling, he’s buying!
 
But it’s your own money, George.
 
320 Sycamore?
 
Welcome to Bailey Park.
 
President Decorates Harry Bailey
 
Aren’t you going to make a deposit? It’s usually customary to bring the money with you.
 
We’ve got to find that money! . . . You realize what this means? It means bankruptcy and scandal and prison!
 
You’re worth more dead than alive.
 
I’m your guardian angel. . . . You’ve got your wish. You’ve never been born.
 
Each man’s life touches so many other lives, and when he isn’t around, he leaves an awful hole, doesn’t he?
 
You see, George, you really had a wonderful life. Don’t you see what a mistake it would be to throw it away?
 
Help me, Clarence! Get me back! I don’t care what happens to me. Get me back to my wife and kids! Help me, Clarence, please! I want to live again! Please, God, let me live again!
 
Mary did it! She told some people you were in trouble, they scattered all over town collecting money. Didn’t ask any questions, just “George is in trouble?” You never saw anything like it!
 
To my big brother, George, the richest man in town.
 
Remember, George, no man is a failure who has friends.
 
 
(For anyone suffering from an excess of holiday sentiment, I recommend the so-called “lost ending” to It’s a Wonderful Life purportedly found by writers from Saturday Night Live and available on their DVD collection of Christmas sketches. If nothing else, it offers the singular pleasures of Dana Carvey’s great Jimmy Stewart impression and of Dennis Miller attempting to act.)
 
 
 
Video:
 
The following comments relate only to the black-and-white version. I’m sure there are people who will enjoy the colorized version, but I don’t write reviews for them.
 
At 72", my screen is not nearly as large as Mr. Harris’, but it’s big enough to show me when an image isn’t film-like. Paramount has given us a transfer that is clean, shows lots of detail and, to that extent, may please a number of viewers, especially on smaller screens. And since the film itself is so absorbing, it’s possible (at least at the size at which I was watching) to look past the image and simply lose oneself in the story and the performances, which are so good that they don’t get old even after innumerable viewings.
 
But one can’t escape the reality that this is a flattened, heavily processed, electronic image. There is never any of the sense of the depth and texture that we know Blu-ray is capable of reproducing from black-and-white films from the 1940s and which must have been there at some point to have produced the amount of detail that survives in the image on this disc. Someone went wild with the various forms of electronic manipulation available to the modern telecine operator, and the damage is obvious. In fact, this disc could be the source of a new Christmas drinking game. Every time George Bailey’s tie “sparkles” (from electronically induced video noise), take a drink. By the time Uncle Billy staggers out of Harry Bailey’s welcome home/wedding celebration, you’ll be as drunk as he is.
 
At the approximately 1:55:00 mark, a vertical flickering line appears at the extreme right edge. It becomes pronounced and distracting at about 2:01:00 and remains so until nearly the end of the film. To my eye, it resembled electrical interference more than print damage, but I couldn’t be sure. (On 4:3 displays, it may be hidden by overscan.)
 
 
 
Audio:
 
The DD 2.0 mono track has been encoded at 384kbps, which is twice the bitrate usually found on DVD for tracks of this sort. The fidelity is good, within the limitations of the source material. Certainly one would not want to see it tampered with for some sort of remix. Whether a lossless presentation would provide any audible improvement is debatable.
 
 
 
Special Features:
 
The special features are on the same disc as the black-and-white version.
 
The Making of It’s a Wonderful Life (22:45) (4:3 SD). This 1990 TV special hosted by Tom Bosley has been included on previous DVD editions and it does not appear to have been retransferred for Blu-ray. It remains an entertaining and informative supplement.
 
Trailer. The original theatrical trailer in what appears to be a hi-definition transfer. The source material is in somewhat rough shape, but it still looks better than most trailers from this era.
 
 
 
In Conclusion:
 
A disappointment. If one is satisfied with one’s DVD version, I wouldn’t bother to upgrade. Watch the upconverted DVD and hope for a better version down the line.
 
 
 
 
 
Equipment used for this review:
 
Panasonic BDP-BD50 Blu-ray player
Samsung HL-T7288W DLP display (connected via HDMI)
Lexicon MC-8 connected via 5.1 passthrough
Sunfire Cinema Grand amplifier
Monitor Audio floor-standing fronts and MA FX-2 rears
Boston Accoustics VR-MC center
SVS SB12-Plus sub

Edited by Michael Reuben - 12/3/10 at 2:56pm

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #2 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben View Post
 
The following comments relate only to the black-and-white version. I’m sure there are people who will enjoy the colorized version, but I don’t write reviews for them.

Michael; as much as one can with bad news, I enjoyed your review, and that quote induced a genuine laugh out loud...
post #3 of 24

Michael, I guess you could call this one IT'S not A WONDERFUL BLU-RAY. 
 

post #4 of 24
It's too bad you didn't receive a review copy earlier, Michael. This review, along with Mr. Harris' comments, would have saved me $20 had they been out earlier. Thanks for the candid, honest review.
Edited by Scott Merryfield - 11/11/09 at 1:24pm
post #5 of 24
Quote:
The DD 2.0 mono track has been encoded at 384kbps, which is twice the bitrate usually found on DVD for tracks of this sort. The fidelity is good, within the limitations of the source material. Certainly one would not want to see it tampered with for some sort of remix. Whether a lossless presentation would provide any audible improvement is debatable.

It may or may not have resulted in any audible improvement, but it still should have been a lossless encode. I've always thought this film was overly sentimental, but it is still a perenial favorite for a lot of people. This film is a gauranteed money maker for Paramount hands down. The least they could have done is provide a treatment that does it justice in every department. To me that means using the best available video and audio encoding. Instead we are given a lazy treatment which includes a poor transfer and a compressed soundtrack. What is worse is the colourised version seems to have gotten the headline in their advertising, whike the the true version seems to have been included as an afterthought.

All around, this release just looks like Paramount has a complete lack of respect for one of its most famous properties. 
post #6 of 24
I'm glad you kicked butt rather just nod and say Perry Mount did good enough.
post #7 of 24
In regards to Paramount, it's no secret that of the major studios they are one of the worst with catalog titles. This is their first BD release for a film before the 1970s, which is easily lagging behind the likes of Sony, Warner, Fox and even Disney (with their limited catalog). Only the late-out-of-the-BD-gate Universal is doing worse. They don't seem to know how to take advantage of their classic catalog properly

Now, personally this isn't a situation that will prevent me from making a purchase, but I don't already own the film. I can see the hesitation for those who may already have the DVD.

Makes one wonder what The African Queen will look like....
post #8 of 24
Thank you for the review, Michael!

Quote:
When they do get sent, they often arrive on or after street date; hence the date on this review. Not only did the disc arrive late, but I also pushed it to the bottom of my pile, because I give top priority to discs from studios that still care about having their discs reviewed before they’re in stores.

I'm curious about this statement, though. I appreciate the SENTIMENT you're trying to get across, but who exactly are you affecting by doing this? I'd think waiting is only helping the studio by keeping relevent information from the purchaser longer than would otherwise be the case. Actively choosing to wait on performing the review is kind of like a double whammy for those of us who are looking for a respected opinion on a disc in this situation, rather than actually impacting the studio in any way - heck, I'd argue they BENEFIT from this action.

Anyway, you're the reviewer, not me :) I was just genuinely curious as to why you chose this particular method for determining how a delayed disc gets attention.
post #9 of 24
Too bad I had my reasons to get it in time. It arrived yesterday.

Well, perhaps I will watch it on my 46" TV. Or just the colorized version. 

Joking.
Thanks for the fine review, Michael. I will put it below the new BD of A Christmas Carol, which we will watch in December.

It's sad, after that beautiful restoration of The Godfather, I was trusting Paramount to be able to do it right. The late shipping of review discs seems out-of-character as well.


Cees
post #10 of 24
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane Kelley View Post


 


I'm curious about this statement, though. I appreciate the SENTIMENT you're trying to get across, but who exactly are you affecting by doing this? I'd think waiting is only helping the studio by keeping relevent information from the purchaser longer than would otherwise be the case. Actively choosing to wait on performing the review is kind of like a double whammy for those of us who are looking for a respected opinion on a disc in this situation, rather than actually impacting the studio in any way - heck, I'd argue they BENEFIT from this action.
 

I'm not sure how "respected" my opinion is, but thanks for the thought!

My thinking is primarily utilitarian: If it's past street date, the disc is already in circulation, and there are plenty of people out there who are qualified to comment on it. Thus, the value of anything I might have to say plummets immediately. So if I have two review discs sitting on my table, one of them already past street and one of them not, priority goes to the one that hasn't streeted yet, regardless of the order of arrival.

To the extent there's any "message" to studios to be gleaned here, it's that some of them have enough confidence in their product to put copies in reviewers' hands in advance of street date. For the rest, caveat emptor.
post #11 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon Conway View Post

In regards to Paramount, it's no secret that of the major studios they are one of the worst with catalog titles. This is their first BD release for a film before the 1970s, which is easily lagging behind the likes of Sony, Warner, Fox and even Disney (with their limited catalog). Only the late-out-of-the-BD-gate Universal is doing worse. They don't seem to know how to take advantage of their classic catalog properly

Now, personally this isn't a situation that will prevent me from making a purchase, but I don't already own the film. I can see the hesitation for those who may already have the DVD.

Makes one wonder what The African Queen will look like....

Paramount has always had issues with their catalog. Heck, they sold most of it in the 1950s! In the laserdisc days there were a ton of Panavision movies that were only available in Pan and Scan discs from the early 1980s, never remastered in widescreen until DVD. I remember hearing that they replaced a guy who openly stated his hatred for musicals with a woman who openly stated her hatred for westerns. Now unless it has John Wayne or Audrey Hepburn, it will probably never be seen again. The African Queen has been "coming next year" for 10 years now. Universal has the excuse of probably being sold to Comcast soon.

I bought this disc the day it came out because A) I absolutely love this movie and B) I only had the old Artisan DVD. But Warner Bros. would never treat the movie like this (after Robert Harris's revelation I'd settle for a $90 box o' junk with Zuzu's petals, a bell that rings when an angel gets its wings, and a wet copy of Tom Sawyer because I know the movie itself would be done justice); RKO distributed it originally, but they never owned a piece of it. Liberty Films was bought by Paramount, who sold its library to National Telefilm Associates, who later became the second incarnation of Republic Pictures, who reclaimed the copyright because the story the film was based on was still under copyright; Republic got bought out by Aaron Spelling's company, which ended up at Viacom.
post #12 of 24
Very valid point, Michael :) Thanx for chiming in!
post #13 of 24
I'm not sure what it is about this movie, but it takes very little for it to make me start crying. It's so bad that just reading Michael's selected excerpts from the script got me misty.

Thank you for the candid review Michael.
post #14 of 24
I thought the film looked great. I'm pleased that Paramount released this in time for my celebrations this year. I'll be having friends over to watch it!
post #15 of 24
Quote:
Just remember this, Mr. Potter, that this rabble you’re talking about, they do most of the working and paying and living and dying in this community. Well, is it too much to have them work and pay and live and die in a couple of decent rooms and a bath? Anyway, my father didn’t think so.

 

Well, this is one quote that rings true. It is amazing how many people in government, corporate, and financial circles have forgotten this truism.
post #16 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben View Post
 
(For anyone suffering from an excess of holiday sentiment, I recommend the so-called “lost ending” to It’s a Wonderful Life purportedly found by writers from Saturday Night Live and available on their DVD collection of Christmas sketches. If nothing else, it offers the singular pleasures of Dana Carvey’s great Jimmy Stewart impression and of Dennis Miller attempting to act.)
 

Under the circumstance, perhaps, I should try to secure me a copy of that particular DVD instead of this BD.

Although I had already read RAH's scathing review beforehand (and was aware that you concurred more or less), I'm still glad to have dropped by here and checked out your review to glean little nuggets such as this.

Thanks for another worthwhile review, Michael, despite the rather disappointing PQ of the reviewed title itself...

_Man_
post #17 of 24
I'm glad, too, that Paramount released it BD.  I doubt the studio will be re-releasing it again next year as an ultimate edition, unless there is great $$$ potential.  Has this movie been a cash cow for Paramount???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Scott Richard View Post

I thought the film looked great. I'm pleased that Paramount released this in time for my celebrations this year. I'll be having friends over to watch it!
post #18 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbailey100 View Post

I'm glad, too, that Paramount released it BD.  I doubt the studio will be re-releasing it again next year as an ultimate edition, unless there is great $$$ potential.  Has this movie been a cash cow for Paramount???
 


 

Considering Paramount double dipped this film on DVD, with the B&W/Colorized combo being released 1 year after the 60th Anniversary Edition I'd say the $$$ potential is definitely there.
post #19 of 24
Thanks for the honest review, Michael.  This was on my list "To buy" list, but not anymore.  I'll stick with the DVD.
post #20 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben View Post

Paramount has given us a transfer that is clean, shows lots of detail and, to that extent, may please a number of viewers, especially on smaller screens.

My experience exactly.  Watching on a small 26" HD 16:9 CRT left me amazed by how perfect this film looked.  Not a scratch or bit of debris to be found anywhere.  Clear and crisp and...just terrific.

Even if I upgrade to a 32" LCD sometime, I'm sure this BD will still serve me well. 

One of the blessings of an HT-on-a-budget is that so many imperfections are lost on me. 

And there is always that amazing crescendo at the end of the film which climaxes with the reading of Sam Wainwright's telegram that gets me everytime... 
post #21 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Frezon View Post

Watching on a small 26" HD 16:9 CRT left me amazed by how perfect this film looked.  Not a scratch or bit of debris to be found anywhere.  Clear and crisp and...just terrific.

Even if I upgrade to a 32" LCD sometime, I'm sure this BD will still serve me well. 
 

That's good to hear Mike. I'm sure it'll look good to these 'untrained' eyes too.

I'm buying it closer to Xmas so I can watch it then.

Good review Michael. I see the same old featurette is included. Doesn't this super famous film merit a commentary? Or an indepth documentary?
post #22 of 24
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Christou View Post


Good review Michael. I see the same old featurette is included. Doesn't this super famous film merit a commentary? Or an indepth documentary?

 

There's certainly more material out there. The Republic DVD version I have includes the "Personal Remembrance" with Frank Capra, Jr. and Jimmy Stewart. But as always with such matters, I'm sure there are rights issues.

Mike, I'm thrilled that someone noticed there was some nuance in my video evaluation. I try to write these things for a broad audience, but it gets tricky when you're dealing with issues where technical expertise and subjective perception overlap to such a huge degree. That's why I hate grades or star systems or ratings. They don't leave room for the kinds of distinctions that make a disc like this a worthwhile release for you but not so much for others.
Edited by Michael Reuben - 11/16/09 at 11:41pm
post #23 of 24
 Happy with BRD, as have never picked up the DVD.
post #24 of 24
hi Michael,

i think BDs encode 4:3 material with black pillars on left and right.

so even on a 4:3 display, it'll actually shrink and become tinier =P. i still have a 4:3 front projector and see the left and right pillars when playing blu-rays shrinking the actual image even further. the only way to eliminate this is going w/widescreen completely, which is what these older aspect ratio films are being shown on. FYI =)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben View Post
(On 4:3 displays, it may be hidden by overscan.)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Official HTF Blu-ray Reviews

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › Official HTF Blu-ray Reviews › HTF Blu-ray Review: IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE (not recommended)