When I was a senior in high school, I would get dozens of credit card offers in the mail each week. With college looming, I knew I would need a card so I set aside all of the offers for a week and then researched which of them was the best deal. I finally picked a Visa card from Capital One; the low credit limit -- $500 -- was attractive to me, because I knew I couldn't get into too much trouble with it. As my income and credit history developed, I got bumped up to a platinum card with a much higher credit limit and lower interest rates but have stuck with the same account through several expirations and renewals as my sole credit card ever since. Like many of you, I pay it off every month and never carry any interest. If they introduced an annual fee, I would probably switch though, impact on my credit score be damned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Micah Cohen 
Using credit wisely is having a great resource at your fingertips. I don't understand why the credit card companies are ruining this.
When credit cards were introduced, they replaced lines of credit (or "tabs") between induvidual businesses and customers. For the priviledge of moving the liability from themselves to the banks, induvidual businesses paid a small fee for each credit card transaction (and still do). During this early period, the banks sought to make money off transaction fees; customers who carried a balance month to month were charged interest as a way to discourage carrying a balance. Over time, the banks realized they were making more money on the interest from those spending more than they could afford than they were from the transaction fees paid by the businesses that accepted credit cards. Thus the business was retooled to target college students and other market segments that were unlikely to pay the full balance at the end of each month. The increasingly levels of personal debt were parceled off to third-parties, so that the banks didn't see any downside from the business.
And then the latest recession struck. The interest-based business model assumed that
some customers would default. What it didn't assume was that a huge percentage of customers would default in a relatively short span of time. The banks suddenly found themselves overexposed. The worrying prospect that so many customers could default that the banks would no longer be able to absorb the losses loomed. Now they are in full CYA mode: cover your ass. Until the banks get a handle on how bad their losses are going to really be from bankruptcies, foreclosures, and defaults they're not taking any chances -- even if it means turning down responsible borrowers that would potentially very profitable for them. Until the lending institutions feel confident that they can absorb the worst case scenario again, you're not going to see credit markets unfreeze. And something tells me that credit will never again flow quite as freely as it did the last couple decades.