Quote:
Originally Posted by
Steve Christou 
instant "forum defence" mode
I believe (in fact, I'm sure I said) that I was giving "strictly a
personal" view -- and I don't think you've described it accurately, but never mind. If I'd wanted to give a "forum" defense, I could have just have quoted
Rule 20.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DaveF 
And I hope that those making design and feature decisions keep this in mind too: that when they try to "speak on behalf of the members" with design ideas, that they keep in mind the 94,000 members who have to live with it, good and bad.
That's word play, and it's a poor analogy. Huddler and the owners aren't "speaking" on behalf of the members. They own the forum, pay for the hosting, go out and get the advertising, and do the daily maintenance to keep the place running. Without them, no forum. And before someone zooms in with the facile riposte: "Yeah, but without the members, no forum either!", let's keep things in perspective. HTF is owned and operated by Ron, Parker, Adam and Huddler; if they shut it down tomorrow, who would step in and restart it? Now reverse the situation, and assume that every single person who has registered a vocal complaint in a Feedback thread over the last four months withdraws from HTF permanently. Same result? Hardly.
Of course they're going to try to make the best design decisions they can. What incentive do they have to do anything else? I have nothing but admiration for Ben's professionalism in his continuing open dialogue here with interlocutors who don't always reciprocate in kind.
Let me stress once again that every observation offered here and in my previous post is that of an individual member, nothing more. I have no more say over platform features or design than any of the rest of you. My suggestions go into the same box.
Edited by Michael Reuben - 10/31/09 at 7:29am