I've seen the movie, a few years ago. My wife hasn't. We'll probably watch it this weekend. I assume it represents where the show meant to go over a five year series. I was confused the first several episodes of Firefly since the movie starts with River
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
being an elite fighting machine
and in the show she's just a messed up girl. The ending of the show started showing how she might go somewhere (besides crazy), but was a long ways off from there.
To me the show that accomplished what Firefly meant to was "Journeyman" -- a character drama framed in a sci-fi context. I think the cowboy themeing put me off a bit from Firefly -- it never felt quite right to me. But I'm not a fan of Westerns, anyway. If that's a style you like, then I can see Firefly being a breath of fresh air compared to sci-fi of the past 20 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mattCR 
They kind of explained that; light speed travel: not possible; not even near light speed. But rocketry starting from a space based point, possible.. and so yes, time between planets in the show was measured in "weeks" whereas, say, we figure months for a shot from here to the closest planets..
[geekery]Which is why all TV sci-fi is doomed to be Star Trekkian in its travel: the nearest extra-solar star is 4 light years from Earth. There is no "weeks" of travel from planet to planet without FTL. Serenity would have needed crew hibernation and decades to hop ports between colonies.[/geekery]
Unless this government is all within our solar system? Or some other region of space where the planets are chockablock on top of each other? I didn't get that, but perhaps it was mentioned at some point.