And don't forget, while the quality may not always represent this, at least ALPHA and VCI release
pressed discs and at a fraction of the cost WB is charging for Archive titles. What is the difference between them? While Alpha and VCI deal mainly with public domain films and presumably don't have to pay for rights, WB doesn't either, they
own all the titles that are in the archives. How can lowly ALPHA afford to make pressed DVDs of what are often essentially unknown and forgotten films and charge relatively little for them, yet WB can't for such titles as THE STRAWBERRY BLONDE, which are certainly more established and revered? If it's not gouging fans, then what is it?
I apologize in going off topic for the purposes of this specific thread, but I am responding to the quote below, which was originally posted herein.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MarcoBiscotti 
Broadcast quality is fine for Television and companies like Alpha Video, VCI, etc. but not for new DVD releases from a major studio.