Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Other Diversions › Photography › Never doubt the power of a DSLR for movies again
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Never doubt the power of a DSLR for movies again

post #1 of 98
Thread Starter 
Just Beautiful:
http://www.vimeo.com/5606758?hd=1

Hint: download the full size 720p original!
post #2 of 98
 Very nice.
post #3 of 98
 Up 10 days and it's been viewed over 446 thousand times!  And they stopped the download option.  Too bad.
post #4 of 98
Thread Starter 
I have it saved if anyone wants it, send and email to me at sposten@gmail.com before midnight tonight. I'll be away tomorrow.
post #5 of 98
Wow, that was just beautiful, thanks for the share Sam.
post #6 of 98
Yeah HD video capability is now making its way into quite a few new DSLR models. The only thing keeping me from updating my XSi (aside from price) is the poor on-the-fly-while-in-motion focusing of the video on DSLRs. Sam's video is wonderful, but is also taken from a completely stationary (and likely tri-pod'd) perspective. As soon as DSLR videos can be moved around while still quickly dynamically focusing like a camcorder, I'll be one of the first in line. I'm thinking it's not going to be more than a generation or two away (so 18-36 months).
post #7 of 98

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlo Medina View Post

Yeah HD video capability is now making its way into quite a few new DSLR models. The only thing keeping me from updating my XSi (aside from price) is the poor on-the-fly-while-in-motion focusing of the video on DSLRs. Sam's video is wonderful, but is also taken from a completely stationary (and likely tri-pod'd) perspective.

 
Agreed.  It's really not ready for prime time yet for regular consumer use.
 

As soon as DSLR videos can be moved around while still quickly dynamically focusing like a camcorder, I'll be one of the first in line. I'm thinking it's not going to be more than a generation or two away (so 18-36 months).
 

You're probably more optimistic than me.  Getting continuous AF to work well on a DSLR for shooting video will probably be *MUCH* tougher than on camcorders due to the much shallower DoF (as a result of the lens/sensor diff) *AND* the need to bypass use of the dedicated AF sensor (which is what's needed for fast, accurate AF).  And frankly, I don't think camcorder AF (on most camcorders anyway) works that great either.

_Man_
post #8 of 98
Man,

I agree there are a lot of obstacles. But I remember it was just one generation of DSLRs ago that the companies were insistent that video wouldn't be possible on a DSLR, at least at a reasonable price range, and that's already been proven to be a myth. All it takes is for one company to figure out how to do it, and the rest will follow suit very quickly.

DSLRs are being updated at a crazy rate now (nearly annually). Whereas before you'd have the same model for 2 years (or more, with the high-end DSLRs). I guess that's why I remain hopeful that it will happen within the next year and a half to three years.

I agree that a lot of camcorder AFs aren't that great, but they're certainly miles better than what you can get on the initial HD video implementation on this gen of DSLRs. They just need to get close to current camcorder video AF to entice me to lay down the funds again and upgrade.
post #9 of 98
Thread Starter 
The one reason I am optimistic about htis is because, believe it or not, Face Detection REALLY WORKS on modern consumer camcorders. Pop that on a DSLR and bob's your uncle if you want people in focus!
post #10 of 98
Thread Starter 
Still experimenting and having fun! 


post #11 of 98
Thanks for the update on your HD video on DSLR journey! I admit I'm starting to get interested in this. I have the Canon XSi, but the recently announced 7D has piqued my interest. If the focus while recording video has improved on that model, I may jump into the pool! (as long as standard PQ hasn't decreased)
post #12 of 98
Thread Starter 
The 7D looks fantastic but I have heard not so kind things about its high ISO performance, tho I cannot find that link currently.  POTN has a discussion on it.
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?p=8677536

Philip Bloom however compared the video performance with the 5D2 and it has its pros and cons:
http://philipbloom.co.uk/2009/09/23/5dmkii-or-the-7d/

I cannot believe it, but I think my next camera might be the D3S if the rumored specs are true:
http://nikonrumors.com/2009/09/26/nikon-d3s-bits-and-pieces.aspx
http://nikonrumors.com/2009/09/26/scratch-that-nikon-d3s-now-99-probability.aspx

ISO 12 frigging thousand NATIVE, ISO 100,000 in 'high' mode.  1.3 and 1.6 crop modes for high speed shooting, up to 14FPS.  Yes, both would most definitely help with night football under the lights.  And put a 'real' video mode into it that matches up with the 5Dm2?  I'd be in heaven...  Of course, at a rumored price of around $5k I'd need to sell a kidney to get it...  But it would make my investment in the 14-24 f2.8 and 24-70 f2.8 really sing =)

post #13 of 98
Ugh, with all the tradeoffs made by the "pixel race" (i.e. more pixels crammed on the same size sensor resulting in more noise and relatively poorer low light performance) maybe I should just suck it up and get a Leica S2 and be damned with video capability! 

Of course, I could also spend all that money on a down on a house, or pay for a moderately priced car in cash. 
post #14 of 98
Thread Starter 
The way I justify it is to remember that photography costs a FRACTION of what owning even a meager sized boat does =)

And agreed on the megapixel foolishness.  I'd like to thwap all the people calling for the D3's replacement to have MORE megapickles, 12 is plenty for even 16x24 sized prints, and that size and larger has got to be 1/100000th of what ever gets made.  And by keeping it at 12 they can really ramp up the IQ especially at high ISO.
post #15 of 98
That looks pretty nice, Sam. I've been contemplating upgrading to the D90 for the video, but my current D80 is still doing a nice job (albeit without video), so it's hard to justify the cost. The cheaper D5000 is an option, but I think I might just wait for the next generation version. Things can only get better.
post #16 of 98
Thread Starter 
If you are looking at upgrading ONLY for video features I agree, skip this generation and wait on the next.  As you are happy with the D80 for stills going to a D90 or D5000 just to get video is only going to disappoint you when Nikon REALLY makes Video 'just work' the way it's supposed to.  Nikon's DSLR video works in a pinch now but it's not something I would count on for serious stuff.  There's so much more to come on that front!

And that's what I'm looking to see out of the D3s.   Giving small tweaks over what is possible today is not going to cut it when compared to the 5D2.  We need major major fixes and features just to match up.
post #17 of 98
Thread Starter 
Got a heads up on this one via google alerts this morning, seems interesting.
http://www.dslrnewsshooter.com/2009/10/01/shooting-chinas-60th-anniversary-parade-with-the-7d-5dmkii-and-nikon-d700/
post #18 of 98
Thread Starter 
post #19 of 98
Again, maybe some day...

But for now, I'm fine w/ my D200 -- although I certainly wouldn't mind having the improvements of the D300, let alone the D3...   But I've got mouths to feed and all afterall...   And one of them just started taking photography class too at her new middle school, so I now gotta feed that as well (w/ a nice used Nikon FM2n off eBay) alongside the other $$$ stuff (like the family's violin ventures on top of whatever HT-related stuff)...  

Well, at least on this front, I now get to play around some w/ a neat little, full manual film SLR classic (in the FM2n) in between my kid's school projects.  I never actually got into film before (nor taken an actual photog class), so it's nice to finally have something like that around (and also have yet another common interest to share w/ my kids).  Interestingly, apparently, most/all her photog classmates went w/ the (cheaper) Pentax K1000 -- seems to be a popular choice for a budget used camera for beginners (as recommended by their teacher).  That might mean she'll have easier access to borrowing whatever Nikon lenses available in the school's inventory since most others went w/ Pentax.

Meanwhile, I'm now looking into picking up some decent manual lenses cheaply off the used market both for her uses and for my own enjoyment.  Maybe I'll finally pick up another manual macro lens (to go w/ my Nikkor 55 f/2.8 AIS micro), a fisheye and/or a Lensbaby for instance...

No video features here of course (though I'd love to hear about a video back/upgrade to swap into an old FM2n or my D200, if that sorta pipe dream ever comes true), so sorry if I'm raining a bit on your parade...  

BTW, while checking out some used manual Nikon lenses on eBay, I noticed that used market seems to have partially turned into a DSLR video market w/ some cross-brand/mount lens adapters thrown in to boot probably due to the current need to go w/ manual focusing when shooting video combined w/ doing it in FF mode perhaps (though I don't really know, but am just guessing).  For instance, are there really that many Canon shooters using Nikon lenses w/ a mount adapter on their 5DMk2 to shoot video now?  Just curious as I seem to spot the occasional eBay auction suggesting at least some are trying (or selling) that.

Anyhoo...

_Man_
post #20 of 98
Thread Starter 
Yep, just remember those old Nikkors with the aperture rings?  Those are PERFECT for video needs.  Those old AIS gems are starting to creep up in price again believe it or not.  Never had a FM2n but the F3HP is my favorite film camera of all time.  It's a TANK.  No raining here sir, any time we wanna reminisce about the glory days of film (aka about 4 lousy years ago) pile it on.
post #21 of 98

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Posten View Post

Yep, just remember those old Nikkors with the aperture rings?  Those are PERFECT for video needs.  Those old AIS gems are starting to creep up in price again believe it or not.  Never had a FM2n but the F3HP is my favorite film camera of all time.  It's a TANK.  No raining here sir, any time we wanna reminisce about the glory days of film (aka about 4 lousy years ago) pile it on.
 

Hmmm...  Are you suggesting one can actually safely change the aperture (via the ring) on those old Nikkors while shooting video?  That use hadn't occurred to me before since I didn't really/seriously look into shooting video w/ a DSLR (yet).  I was only aware of the need for manual focusing -- and it's definitely (usually) nicer to MF using lenses originally designed for MF use (vs AF lenses w/ minimal MF capability, eg. quality operation/action of the focus ring).

BTW, I did take a quick look into the F3HP while shopping for my kid's photog class.  Seems nice, but looks like there are actually some things more desirable in the FM2n, if certain auto features are not needed.  The used market for film cameras does seem kinda odd now(?) because of the niche that remains leftover, eg. photog class students, DSLR videographers (for manual lenses), etc.  Your much loved F3HP doesn't seem to fetch any more than the FM2n -- it probably even fetches less at times depending on which actual FM2n (as there's one w/ the old Titanium honeycomb-patterned shutter blades and the newer, more common one w/ Aluminum blades as well as some special limited/collector's edition titanium-bodied one that probably still fetches serious $$$).

_Man_

Edited by ManW_TheUncool - 10/2/09 at 2:32pm
post #22 of 98
Thread Starter 
Yep, my first SLR was a Titanium Body F3HP from the US Army.  It was built like a tank and could be rolled over by one!  It weighed a TON but was AWESOME.

And yes, that's exactly what I mean about the aperture ring.  On the new Nikon Movie Modes it likes to dynamically alter the aperture, unless you have a lens that locks it down like the classics do.

Sam


post #23 of 98

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Posten View Post

Yep, my first SLR was a Titanium Body F3HP from the US Army.  It was built like a tank and could be rolled over by one!  It weighed a TON but was AWESOME.
 


Ooooh...  I bet you can fetch a pretty penny for such a titanium bodied F3HP considering what sellers are asking for a titanium FM2n on eBay (and probably elsewhere).

Nice thing about the FM2n though is one can shoot it w/out any battery power w/ full functionality, except for the light meter (which of course requires some battery power).  Still, if one is good at using the Sunny f/16 rule, etc. to guesstimate exposure (or simply has some other light meter handy), the FM2n will work perfectly fine w/out battery power.  Plus it's light/compact and sturdy/reliable enough to serve as a nice (film-based) backup, especially in remote locations where (lack of) battery power can become an issue, not that I anticipate being in such situations myself... 
 

And yes, that's exactly what I mean about the aperture ring.  On the new Nikon Movie Modes it likes to dynamically alter the aperture, unless you have a lens that locks it down like the classics do.
 

Hmmm...  But is it safe to manually adjust aperture (via the ring) in the midst of video capture though, not just lock it on some desired setting to prevent any undesirable auto mode hazards?  IOW, is it safe to adjust aperture (for whatever effect, exposure change, etc) in the middle of a take w/out stopping that take?

On 2nd thought, maybe that's kinda moot, even if safe to do, since doing so would inevitably introduce a fair bit (if not a lot) of camera shake, etc. which would generally be undesirable in the middle of a take...

_Man_
post #24 of 98
Thread Starter 
I sold the F3 in roughly 1995 for over double what I paid for it.  We moved to the lighter but more full functioned Nikon 8008s which was my workhorse until I left that kit with my Mother and went to the Canon 20D.  I only bought 3 lenses for the Canon, hoping Nikon would get their heads out of their digital butts.  When they did so with the D3 and D300 announcement I swapped back and never looked back....
post #25 of 98
hi guys

I have a BUNCH of Nikon AIS stuff
and a Canon 5D with lenses that I would love to sell
post #26 of 98
Thread Starter 
Greg PM me about your AIS lenses!  I'm pretty short on liquid cash right now but if theres some gems in there I might be tempted to sell a kidney or something!  Ya never know.

You are selling a 5D or a 5Dm2?
post #27 of 98
5D with 3 lenses...about 1000 pictures taken on it.
post #28 of 98
Gregg,

What Nikon AIS lenses do you have for sale?  And what condition are they in?  I might be interested.

Thanks.

_Man_
post #29 of 98
Thread Starter 
Oooh, a bidding war!  =p
post #30 of 98
Gregg,

Which lenses do you have with the Canon 5D? Depending on lens and price, I may be interested.

Full frame becomes more tempting...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Photography
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Other Diversions › Photography › Never doubt the power of a DSLR for movies again