New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Tron Legacy - Page 5

post #121 of 168

Thanks Jim. I won't see a converted 3D film so this one I will being that it is shot in 3D.

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #122 of 168

 

Quote:

I was surprised by the casting of the Sam's Encom "rival".  The minute he came into the picture I said "Hey, I didn't know he was in this." to no one in particular.  I was equally surprised when

 


Warning Spoiler! Click to hide

they did absolutely nothing with the character.  This was one of a few subplots I expected to see, that never materialized.  Was it trimmed, or did the writers just forget about all the additional cool stuff they could have done?   If you're going to hire Cillian Murphy, do something with him!

Yeah, that was one of my biggest nagging questions.

 

Checked it out today on IMAX 3D. Not great, but enjoyable enough where I didn't regret making the trip to see it. Flynn's son was the typical somewhat douchey rebel/"fuck the establishment"/"I play by my own rules" type (why does Hollywood keep churning out these type of characters). Although, I did find the scene where him and Bridges "Catch up with each other" on the Solar Sailer to be well acted (of course Bridges could handle that in his sleep).

There was some parts with quasi Religious/Philosophical techno-babble that pretty much went right through one ear and out the other.

The digital "De-aging" effect to make Bridges look young, I though varied at different points during the movie, but overall looked good enough (although they still have some work to to get the mouth movement down).

There certainly did appear to be a fair share of plot holes. The other thing that made me wonder the most though was

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
 
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Why didn't 1989 Flynn leave behind some kind of note someone could find that said something like "If I should ever go missing, here's what you need to do to open up the portal again"
post #123 of 168

Tron Legacy is one of the best and worst special effects films I've seen.  Best regarding the world of Tron.  Worst regarding the de-aging effects of Jeff Bridges' characters Kevin Flynn/CLU.  The world of of Tron was simply fantastic to look at.  It was light years ahead of the effects in the original Tron.  The biggest distraction in this film, however, was the de-aging effects used to make Kevin Flynn/CLU look young.  It looked so obviously CGI unlike the way Magneto or Professor X looked in X-Men 3.  I think they definitely could have used ILM's or Weta Digital's help in this.

 

As for the 3D, it didn't stand out for me.  The only time I felt it was when Sam Flynn entered the Tron world.  After that it felt flat.  Plus while watching it in IMAX-3D, I was distracted by the many aspect ratio changes.

 

Overall it was entertaining but it could have been better.  Also,

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


Tron's change of heart just didn't come through for me as he was always behind a mask so his sudden change in allegiance just felt "WTF!"

post #124 of 168

There were some flaws in the script -- certain elements needed to be fleshed out more, pacing and tension needed work ... but I'll be honest, in my opinion this is one of the best "big budget" science fiction experience I've had since the original Matrix. 

 

It obviously draws a lot on films like Blade Runner, The Matrix, and of the original Star Wars, but fuses that into the world of Tron. 

 

Daft Punk's score is incredible, it gives the film a weight and style entirely unto its own. 

 

The main character, Sam ... his attitude/acting is what Lucas badly needed for Anakin in the Star Wars prequels. Cocky with an independent streak without coming off as too damn whiny. 

 

Olivia Wilde is a like a neo-Tinkerbell, her character comes off the prerequisite bad ass pixie, but also sweet and naive. They could've fleshed her out a bit more. 

 

I think the main problem with the film is there are large stretches where there isn't a lot of tension (even leading up to the climax). 

post #125 of 168

 did they deyoung bridges or was it motion cap ala avatar and just built a digital version of him based on the tron 1 version  and place on a actors body? i was assuming it was an entire digital creation like they did the avatars.

post #126 of 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane D View Post

 did they deyoung bridges or was it motion cap ala avatar and just built a digital version of him based on the tron 1 version  and place on a actors body? i was assuming it was an entire digital creation like they did the avatars.

They built a digital head and placed it on an actor's body. Got to admit at times it looks entirely convincing. Other times you could tell something wasn't quite right.
 

post #127 of 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jose Martinez View Post

Tron Legacy is one of the best and worst special effects films I've seen.  Best regarding the world of Tron.  Worst regarding the de-aging effects of Jeff Bridges' characters Kevin Flynn/CLU.  The world of of Tron was simply fantastic to look at.  It was light years ahead of the effects in the original Tron.  The biggest distraction in this film, however, was the de-aging effects used to make Kevin Flynn/CLU look young.  It looked so obviously CGI unlike the way Magneto or Professor X looked in X-Men 3.  I think they definitely could have used ILM's or Weta Digital's help in this.

 

As for the 3D, it didn't stand out for me.  The only time I felt it was when Sam Flynn entered the Tron world.  After that it felt flat.  Plus while watching it in IMAX-3D, I was distracted by the many aspect ratio changes.

 

Overall it was entertaining but it could have been better.  Also,

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


Tron's change of heart just didn't come through for me as he was always behind a mask so his sudden change in allegiance just felt "WTF!"


I think your experience would have been better in a traditional RealD 3D theater versus IMAX.  Unless a movie is shot entirely in IMAX I don't think it makes all that much sense to go see it.  The 3D scenes were very blatant to me but in a good way and almost slightly annoying when they would switch back to 2D.  I couldn't agree more with your assessment of Tron's sudden change.  WTF?  Minor grip however for what led to a fantastic film experience in my opinion.  Who cares about plot holes, weak story, etc etc blah blah...  My attention was in the movie 100% of the time and I couldn't wait to see what was going to happen next!

post #128 of 168

 only issue i had with CLU was his mouth sometimes. other than that it was very believable. and im hoping there is some cut footage with the tron subplot, seems like we were ripped off with it.

 

i saw this in a normal 3d theater that was built in the last 2 years and i was very meh on it. most of the time you couldnt tell it was in 3d. the trailer for pirates looked really good, but everything else live action fell flat. Im one of those in the camp of i hope 3d dies quickly.

post #129 of 168

Which theater did you go to?  Reason I ask is because I could not disagree more..

 

I went to an ICON theater which was built in 2010. 

post #130 of 168

One other observation I had.

 

Minor Spoiler

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Was Sam's apartment, the shack that said "DUMONT" on it supposed to be the "garage" that the Barnard Hughes character from the original film mentions as the place he started Encom in while speaking with Dillinger?

If so, kind a neat callback to the original.

post #131 of 168

Is it more or is Daft Punk's score the best of the year?  I mean, Zimmer's score for Inception is aces.  But, this score by Daft Punk is on another level.  Every track just flat out rules.  I'm recalling images from the film just from the score at home.  It's damn near making me want to see the film for a third time...

post #132 of 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory S. View Post

Is it more or is Daft Punk's score the best of the year?  I mean, Zimmer's score for Inception is aces.  But, this score by Daft Punk is on another level.  Every track just flat out rules.  I'm recalling images from the film just from the score at home.  It's damn near making me want to see the film for a third time...



Easily has to be the best of the year.  Light years ahead of it's time.

post #133 of 168

 the only thing that sucks about the soundtrack is the 8 or so missing tracks. a uk special edition has a 2nd disk of 5 tracks, amazon has 1 bonus and itunes has 2 and somewhere else had another. although you can buy the amazon and itunes ones for 99¢, luckily they aren't 'album only' purchases

post #134 of 168

Perry,

 

Totally agree.  WAY AHEAD of it's time.  God, if this film gets a sequel and they come back to do the score for that one?!  I'm salivating at the thought...

post #135 of 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane D View Post

 the only thing that sucks about the soundtrack is the 8 or so missing tracks. a uk special edition has a 2nd disk of 5 tracks, amazon has 1 bonus and itunes has 2 and somewhere else had another. although you can buy the amazon and itunes ones for 99¢, luckily they aren't 'album only' purchases


The Nokia Ovi player, available outside of the US. You can find the track online if you're willing to search.

 

I have to figure that Disney's going to release some sort of uber-edition next year, considering the chart success so far.

post #136 of 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perry Jonkheer View Post





Easily has to be the best of the year.  Light years ahead of it's time.



 



I wouldn't go that far. I do think it is the best of the year, but How To Train Your Dragon is quite good, and the best single track of the year is still Flow Like Water by James Newton Howard for the abominable The Last Airbender. But the score for Tron is easily the best thing about the movie.
post #137 of 168
As someone who finds the original 'TRON' flawed, but nevertheless both interesting and likable, I thought this was a great sequel. Its glitches in clarifying some story points are similar to the first film...it's just that, visually, this one is everything the original wanted to be. Once they were on the Grid, it was one damn amazing, unique spectacle after another, and for a first-time feature director, I thought Kosinski did a great job. Instead of going hyperkinetic, he handled the action with fluidity and grace, showing off the beauty of the environments and allowing you to stay oriented.

The leading kid I thought was solid enough...not the most charismatic, but he at least wasn't annoying, and had some decent interaction with Bridges, whose dual roles I enjoyed a lot. It was a good move to segue Flynn into the Obi-Wan/wise old guru role, which allowed him a few fun Lebowski moments here and there. As CLU, I felt the de-aging effects were effective about 85% of the time...certainly not a 'Benjamin Button'-level job, but in the context of the all-CG world, I thought it was functional. Bridges can bring the menace when he wants to, and it was nice to see him do that against the more affable version of him we've seen more of in recent years.

Two things really elevated the film for me, though. First was Olivia Wilde, who was a real surprise. In the trailers, I assumed either she was a femme fatale or a variant on the frosty ass-kicking heroine we've seen a lot of in this genre (a la Trinity, Angelina Jolie in action mode, etc.). Instead she brought a great deal of warmth, innocence and spark to her part, and really livened up the film (she got the two biggest laughs in my theater) and got you rooting for the good guys.

Second element was, yes, the totally awe-inspiring score by Daft Punk. WOW. When they were attached to this, I knew something interesting would come of it...but I had no idea it would turn out to be one of those instant classics that defines the movie it was created for. Lately it seems like fewer and fewer filmmakers are willing to hand their films over to composers and say "okay...let's bring this to life," but the people behind this one did, and man what an entrancing an beautiful piece of work they came up with. With a spectacular mix in the film, I'd wager it does as much as the 3D to immerse you in the experience.
post #138 of 168

Chuck,

 

I'll give you "Flow Like Water".  An amazing piece of music.  It's up there with Zimmer's "Time" as favorite tracks this year from a film score....

post #139 of 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick H. View Post

First was Olivia Wilde, who was a real surprise. In the trailers, I assumed either she was a femme fatale or a variant on the frosty ass-kicking heroine we've seen a lot of in this genre (a la Trinity, Angelina Jolie in action mode, etc.). Instead she brought a great deal of warmth, innocence and spark to her part, and really livened up the film (she got the two biggest laughs in my theater) and got you rooting for the good guys.

I had the identical thought.  I was so glad they went with the child-like wonder of the world and her love of her rescuer/mentor.  The standard "frosty ass-kicking heroine" who looks down on the main hero and has to train him would have not worked well here.

 

I still wanted much more light cycles.

post #140 of 168

I'm not surprised that this is getting so many positive reviews, because taste in movies(especially this type) is always subjective.  For me though, I'd rank it among Spiderman 3, and Transformers 2 for the biggest disappointing  sequel films I have ever seen.

post #141 of 168

I'm just glad that they didn't totally crap on the original storyline too badly. My "mitychlorian" detector did go off a little bit when they started talking about the "isos" but it was harmless I guess.

 

I had a specific thought or two on the plot and where it fell down...

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

My complaints actually aren't about "plot" per se but more about the emotional impact of the events in the story. There were some big betrayals in this movie: Clu attacks his maker. Zeus sells out Sam. But when these moment occurred they had zero emotional content. They didn't register as significant character actions with any real meaning. Just cues to some fisticuffs action, and the story goes on. There were some other places where the emotional content was present: Sam and Flynn's reunion, for example, was an actual moment between two characters. But there was much more content in the film that registered a zero on the emotional impact scale. All the flashbacks to "building utopia, man!" What did that feel like? What were all the big hopes and dreams that Clu destroyed? When the Isos were slaughtered in the streets, how did that impact the rest of the programs? All those restless programs ready to foment revolution, what are their stories? This is not bad material, but it was extremely lightly touched so that the "plot" could move forward to the next action scene. And action is empty without a backing in characters that the audience has invested in emotionally. The action in Tron was amazing, but empty.

post #142 of 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillG View Post

One other observation I had.

 

Minor Spoiler

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Was Sam's apartment, the shack that said "DUMONT" on it supposed to be the "garage" that the Barnard Hughes character from the original film mentions as the place he started Encom in while speaking with Dillinger?

If so, kind a neat callback to the original.


 

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

I noticed that too. Inside the computer world, Barnard Hughes' program was named "Dumont" 

 

 

post #143 of 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick H. View Post

Two things really elevated the film for me, though. First was Olivia Wilde, who was a real surprise. In the trailers, I assumed either she was a femme fatale or a variant on the frosty ass-kicking heroine we've seen a lot of in this genre (a la Trinity, Angelina Jolie in action mode, etc.). Instead she brought a great deal of warmth, innocence and spark to her part, and really livened up the film (she got the two biggest laughs in my theater) and got you rooting for the good guys.

Second element was, yes, the totally awe-inspiring score by Daft Punk. WOW. When they were attached to this, I knew something interesting would come of it...but I had no idea it would turn out to be one of those instant classics that defines the movie it was created for. Lately it seems like fewer and fewer filmmakers are willing to hand their films over to composers and say "okay...let's bring this to life," but the people behind this one did, and man what an entrancing an beautiful piece of work they came up with. With a spectacular mix in the film, I'd wager it does as much as the 3D to immerse you in the experience.


I would agree with that Olivia Wilde was much better than I expected.

 

Daft Punk simply rocked with their music. I loved the fact that they were in the movie as DJ's as well.

 

I saw the original in the cinema way back when, so I loved the homage they did in the opening scene with the original Tron Poster while at the same time Bridges talking to his son while using the toys to bring us up to speed. I probably missed some more subtle references.

 

I want to see more Lightcycles as that was just incredible.

 

I did see it in 3D

post #144 of 168

Saw it tonight in 3D. I thought it was a worthy continuation of the story. I enjoyed it very much. And I'm glad it was a continuation, complete with Bridges and Boxleitner.

 

I had watched TRON last night with the commentary, and noticed that was at least one "I wish I had thought of it at the time" comment that was incorporated into the story, although in a heavily modified form.

 

The lightcycle sequence from the original film is still an amazing piece of work, and the new ones just blew me away. In fact, the whole design of the "new" world felt right. It kept the important visual and aural aspects of the original film, while updating everything so it wouldn't feel dated. I do wish that the transition sequence was longer, like in the original.

 

One major thing did disappoint me....

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

I wish they had done a little more with Tron at the end. His return/redemption was all too brief, and thus unsatisfying, for such an heroic character.

And why isn't there an official discussion thread so we can post without spoiler tags?

post #145 of 168

Quick questions: does this movie overwrite the game Tron 2.0, or does that fit in?  And, are the current games anything like Tron 2.0?

post #146 of 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg_S_H View Post

Quick questions: does this movie overwrite the game Tron 2.0, or does that fit in?  And, are the current games anything like Tron 2.0?

No, the film ignores Tron 2.0 completely. And so do the games (supposedly).
 

 



Quote:
Originally Posted by nolesrule View Post

Saw it tonight in 3D. I thought it was a worthy continuation of the story. I enjoyed it very much. And I'm glad it was a continuation, complete with Bridges and Boxleitner.

 

I had watched TRON last night with the commentary, and noticed that was at least one "I wish I had thought of it at the time" comment that was incorporated into the story, although in a heavily modified form.

 

The lightcycle sequence from the original film is still an amazing piece of work, and the new ones just blew me away. In fact, the whole design of the "new" world felt right. It kept the important visual and aural aspects of the original film, while updating everything so it wouldn't feel dated. I do wish that the transition sequence was longer, like in the original.

 

One major thing did disappoint me....

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

I wish they had done a little more with Tron at the end. His return/redemption was all too brief, and thus unsatisfying, for such an heroic character.

And why isn't there an official discussion thread so we can post without spoiler tags?


Joe:

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

I agree. However, I'd figure that we haven't seen the last of Tron. Tron: Redemption, perhaps?

post #147 of 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Barg View Post


Joe:

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

I agree. However, I'd figure that we haven't seen the last of Tron. Tron: Redemption, perhaps?

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Yes, I noticed that Tron did not derez, so I guess there is that possibility...

and as much as I'd like to see a continuation of the story, especially in regards to that particular aspect, I'm not sure the film is going to bank enough to get a follow-up.

post #148 of 168

http://www.boxofficemagazine.com/articles/2010-12-tron-legacy-screenwriters-on-stars-story-of-the-upcoming-tv-series

 

 

Quote:

Adam Horowitz and Eddie Kitsis, screenwriters of the new film TRON: Legacy, told BOXOFFCE that the forthcoming TRON spinoff projects would offer a continuation of the mythology of the movie series.

 

"There's a 10-part micro series that will premiere next summer that Eddie and I wrote," Horowitz said during an interview in Los Angeles, Calif. "And we've also worked on a couple of episodes with the series itself. We've hired an incredible team; we've got a guy running the show named Charlie Bean who is an amazing director."

 

When asked whether the animated series will be part of the continuity of the films, Kitsis said, "Absolutely. And we're treating it very seriously." He explained that the events of the show will take place in between the events of TRON and TRON: Legacy. "This animated show will take place from when Flynn is in a safe house. It's from when Clu takes over the grid to before when Sam comes in. So if you were wondering what was the grid like before that, then watch the show."

 

Horowitz indicated that it will feature an eclectic cast of voice actors, including the actor who played Tron in both films. "We hesitate to tell too much just yet, but it will fill in the blanks of some things, and also explore some new areas as well," he revealed. "Bruce Boxleitner is in it, Elijah Wood, Linda Moore, Paul Reubens, Lance Henriksen. I mean, we've got a really cool group of actors."

 

He also suggested that some of the stories might piggyback on preliminary ideas that he and Kitsis developed for the film that didn't make it into the final cut. "To give you an example of how we approached storytelling sometimes is like when you're in the End of Line club, when we first meet Castor and he's being berated by one of the patrons saying, ‘I want an audience with Zuse.' His name is Bartik, and there's an entire back story we have for him. The guy with him, his name is Hopper, there's a whole thing between the two of them, what they are doing in there, and how they got there. It's like over the years of developing this movie, we developed all these mythologies and all these back stories and all little tangential things."

Kitsis said that he and Horowitz came up with explanations for every aspect of these peripheral characters, and that gives them a richer mythology to draw upon for future stories. "Did we have time to do the Bartik story? No. But now maybe the Bartik story is in the animated series you know, he's got a huge scar on his face. I want to know how he got that scar. We couldn't sit down and write that there's a guy with a scar on his face without knowing what the scar was. So we hope it adds to the depth of the movie. Our intention is to try and make something that is more than just, let's go get something. We treat TRON very, very seriously and as writers we try to have a reason and a world for everything and not all of it gets to be shown because in this particular movie, we only had two hours.

 

"[So] hopefully it fills in the blanks in and in a fun way and an intriguing way."

post #149 of 168

I just saw the movie tonight (after watching the original last night).  It was a good sequel to the original, carried out in the same kinda vein and feel, just with a bit more zen.  I'm definitely looking forward to the mini-series coming, and hope that there is a followup made to this.  Just enough questions left unanswered, and Murphy's cameo has to be expanded -- although, that may occur in deleted scenes on the DVD.

 

Short review (in no particular order):  The music was great, the graphics amazing, the 3D unobtrusive but well done, and the story wasn't as terrible as most seem to be making it out to be.

 

Aside:  And they said that the Narnia movies had strong religious overtones... smile.gif

post #150 of 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane D View Post

 the only thing that sucks about the soundtrack is the 8 or so missing tracks. a uk special edition has a 2nd disk of 5 tracks, amazon has 1 bonus and itunes has 2 and somewhere else had another. although you can buy the amazon and itunes ones for 99¢, luckily they aren't 'album only' purchases



Is there a reason the soundtrack CD is black like old playstation game discs? Style thing, or some new draconian anti copy measure?

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)