Re: Ask Tog!
I've been reading Tog sporadically for years and really enjoy his insights. However, I ascribe to the common and simple critique that his own website* reveals his comprehension of human factors is not so strong as he claims.
But I've not read his articles in a while; glad for the reminder.
* Ah, it's not as hideous as it was a couple years ago. Perhaps he's applying his own research.
Skimmed the first article. Agree that the Dock is borked. (So is the Finder.)
As for iPhoto, his argument seems a bit asinine: Does he also expect iMovie to scale from news to Harry Potter production? GarageBand to scale from dabblers to producing Metallica? So why would iPhot scale from vacation photos to pro photo? Newbs who become experts with 10,000+ photos can buy Aperture or Lightroom.

This comment seems right on:
Quote:
| Since the photos were all organized in iPhoto, it only makes sense that you sync them with...iTunes! |
iTunes management of all things iPhone seems to violate basic Apple design sensibility Apple.
And this is quite intriguing:
Quote:
This flatness mania is damaging Apple developers. When the App Store first opened, I was buying everything. I’ve now stopped buying. I no longer have anything I want to throw away and nowhere to put anything new. I’m an early (and compulsive) adopter, but millions of others will soon reach this same point. The gold rush is going to suddenly be over, and it has nothing to do with people getting bored or the Apps becoming less interesting. It’s just that Apple has failed to give people a means of storing what they might buy.
|
A quick google shows an iPhone can hold 148 apps. Can you imagine Apple putting a 148 song limit on iTunes? Or a 148 song limit on its iPods? At free or $0.99, apps are as cheap and buyable as songs.