Re: PHE Press Release: Braveheart * Gladiator * Forrest Gump (Sapphire Series Blu-ray
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BillyFeldman
Well, I wasn't a teenager when they came out and I didn't like them then and don't like them now. Epic for me is Ben-Hur, Spartacus, King of Kings, Lawrence Of Arabia, etc. But I understand who the studios are trying to get to - it won't do them any good, as they'll find out, and then maybe they'll start releasing some movies that are of interest to the legion of collectors who made DVD what it was. It's never going to happen for Blu-Ray until they do - that's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
|
Good for you. It's good to hold on to things one finds precious like one's own opinion. Of course, it doesn't mean it is precious for anyone else. There is no "legion of collectors" that "made DVD what it was". The only people I know who "collect" movies (as opposed to buying a few favourites and a lot of kids movies) are on boards like this--hardly a drop in the bucket. I have a collection (nearly 800 films) that on boards like this often appears miniscule. However, in the "real world", it dwarfs the next biggest collection of any of my friends and family by at least 500 titles for one and 700 titles for the rest.
Quote:
| Real catalog titles were the studios' bread and butter for DVD for years. Loyal customers, and there were many of them, came back to that well over and over and over again. Just ask Warners. Just ask Fox. No, it's not the same for Blu-Ray - they're trying to get the fanboys and the modern movie lover - they'll get some, but, as has become very apparent, not what they thought they would, because the modern movie lover also loves to download, to Netflix, to do anything but really purchase. Drop the prices, put out great films, maybe then Blu-Ray will have a shot. |
And here is the crux of your argument. Just about every thread I've seen you participate in eventually gets around to making this tired statement. The Blu-ray section at my local video store is growing faster than the DVD section did back in the day. Rack space is growing at local stores. BD has displaced DVD in the most prominent display areas in the Future Shop and Best Buy stores around here. The movies that people I talk to that make them want to get BD players are NOT "deep catalogue films" like
Spartacus and
King of Kings (the latter one being UNKNOWN to any of them, I'm sure). They want
Star Wars,
Lord of the Rings,
Braveheart,
Gladiator (imagine that),
Indiana Jones...the list goes on but it hardly contains anything made before 1980. I might prefer, as you do, a greater focus on "deep catalogue" films, but let's not pretend that such films are what drove DVD to success and are required for BD to be considered a success. Hell, even now, over a DECADE after its been on the market as a product, there are films coming out for the first time on SD DVD (and I've been buying them because it could be another decade or longer before they get a BD release--if ever). If "deep catalogue" was so vital in the first five years of DVD, then why am I still waiting for
The African Queen? No. The "deep catalogue" became a viable market segment AFTER the films you don't seem to appreciate made DVD a widely adopted format. The same applies to BD.
And, back to the OP--
Braveheart and
Gladiator will be on my shelf for sure (they will be on my Christmas list as I've got a stack of films to keep me busy until then and, if I don't get them for Christmas, I'll pick them up shortly thereafter).