Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › To Live and Die In L.A. Cancelled Once Again . . . But Now Out!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

To Live and Die In L.A. Cancelled Once Again . . . But Now Out!

post #1 of 15
Thread Starter 
This is, I believe, the second time this film has been cancelled on BD and just a day or two before its scheduled release. Anyone know what gives?

Amazon states "Discontinued by the manufacturer".

Brad

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #2 of 15

Re: To Live and Die In L.A. Cancelled Once Again

That sucks!!

I've been looking forward to this. Great, underrated 80s movie.
post #3 of 15

Re: To Live and Die In L.A. Cancelled Once Again

If it's truly cancelled, I'm hoping it's because the features from the SD SE are being included with it.
post #4 of 15

Re: To Live and Die In L.A. Cancelled Once Again

Yeah, it's one of my fave films, would love to add this to the collection. Great soundtrack as well.

Win
post #5 of 15

Re: To Live and Die In L.A. Cancelled Once Again

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Vautrinot
This is, I believe, the second time this film has been cancelled on BD and just a day or two before its scheduled release. Anyone know what gives?

Amazon states "Discontinued by the manufacturer".

Brad


Oh no...
post #6 of 15

Re: To Live and Die In L.A. Cancelled Once Again

Bummer. I was hoping with this one out of the way that maybe we'd finally get the Sorcerer special edition that's been hinted at for awhile.
post #7 of 15

Re: To Live and Die In L.A. Cancelled Once Again

Is Wang Chung suing for his cut?
post #8 of 15

Re: To Live and Die In L.A. Cancelled Once Again

To further confuse the situation, now Amazon has it back up for pre-order, apparently with an estimated release of July 1.
post #9 of 15

Re: To Live and Die In L.A. Cancelled Once Again

Back in the garage for a quick oil change and remastering!
post #10 of 15
BREAKING NEWS!

I just received the HTF review copy of this title, and I think I may know the reason for the delay. 

The cover art hasn't changed. It's still as shown at various etailers (including Amazon and DVD Empire). It indicates a 25 GB Blu-ray disc containing the movie encoded with MPEG 2 and the soundtrack in DTS-HD MA, with a DVD that also has the movie plus all the special features (the previously issued 2003 special edition).

And, indeed, the case does contain one Blu-ray disc and one DVD, the latter bearing the same artwork and 2003 copyright date as the DVD previously issued by MGM.

However . . . the Blu-ray isn't 25 GB. It's 50. And when you start playing it, the codec doesn't show up as MPEG 2; it's AVC. And there are a few more subtitle options than are listed on the case.

A full review will follow this weekend, but I thought this was worth reporting sooner rather than later.
Edited by Michael Reuben - 2/5/10 at 4:06pm
post #11 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben View Post

BREAKING NEWS!

I just received the HTF review copy of this title, and I think I may know the reason for the delay. 

The cover art hasn't changed. It's still as shown at various etailers (including Amazon and DVD Empire). It indicates a 25 GB Blu-ray disc containing the movie encoded with MPEG 2 and the soundtrack in DTS-HD MA, with a DVD that als has the movie plus all the special features (the previously issued 2003 special edition).

And, indeed, the case does contain one Blu-ray disc and one DVD, the latter bearing the same artwork and copyright date as the DVD previously issued by MGM.

However . . . the Blu-ray isn't 25 GB. It's 50. And when you start playing it, the codec doesn't show up as MPEG 2; it's AVC. And there are a few more subtitle options than are listed on the case.

A full review will follow this weekend, but I thought this was worth reporting sooner rather than later.
I received my BRD from Amazon on Wednesday, but haven't yet played it.  I hope I don't regret not cancelling my old order.




Crawdaddy
post #12 of 15
I watched the BRD today and thought the film looked very good in comparison to my memory of viewing the film many years ago in a movie theater.  The film, like many films in the 1980s, was never that pretty to look at whether in a movie theater or on some video format at home.  This is not to say the camerawork of the film wasn't good.  I thought the audio track was more impressive on BRD so I'll be interested to read Michael's full review regarding both the video and audio presentations of this release.  I didn't play the SD DVD.




Crawdaddy
post #13 of 15
post #14 of 15
Crawdaddy-
Its interesting that you mentioned that you thought the audio track was better on Blu-ray.  Michael had the opportunity to submit a question for William Friedkin.  He asked:

Quote:
In 2003, you spoke in detail about the process of digital restoration for the DVD.  Has there been any further restoration work done for the Blu-ray release?

Here is William Friedkin's response.  He addresses both the audio and the video:
post #15 of 15
Parker uploaded it to YouTube for those without superfast internet:

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › To Live and Die In L.A. Cancelled Once Again . . . But Now Out!