where to start...mmmmmm. a few years ago when i had my 32 inch CRT and used avia and some of the other calibration disks i had a good satisfying picture with no problems.
it was a bit darker with contrast and brightness set in the general middle more or less and felt "safe" with those settings and also hoping this is close to how the movies are "supposed" to be seen. looks good to me!
now that my crt is long gone and am now on my 3rd lcd i have noticed a few things. i've tried using the usual calibration disks and i do get a good picture BUT after calibrating and comparing the settings after calibration the contrast settings are always on the high side and the picture does NOT have that softer and darker look of the old crt, it's much brighter and vivid. i'm not complaining but i am wondering about the difference and there is a difference.
have the directors changed their minds about how they think the picture should look ? i'm not sure what to make of this or maybe it's me but the after calibration "look" now on lcds sure doesn't look the same as the after calibration look of crts. yea i know they are two different televisions but i'd think the end result should look closer to the same.
maybe the old crt settings are burnt into my brain and am having a time trying to turn that corner with the higher contrast settings, call me old school but i get alittle queasy with contrast set at 80 or 90 even though it looks good.
william
it was a bit darker with contrast and brightness set in the general middle more or less and felt "safe" with those settings and also hoping this is close to how the movies are "supposed" to be seen. looks good to me!
now that my crt is long gone and am now on my 3rd lcd i have noticed a few things. i've tried using the usual calibration disks and i do get a good picture BUT after calibrating and comparing the settings after calibration the contrast settings are always on the high side and the picture does NOT have that softer and darker look of the old crt, it's much brighter and vivid. i'm not complaining but i am wondering about the difference and there is a difference.
have the directors changed their minds about how they think the picture should look ? i'm not sure what to make of this or maybe it's me but the after calibration "look" now on lcds sure doesn't look the same as the after calibration look of crts. yea i know they are two different televisions but i'd think the end result should look closer to the same.
maybe the old crt settings are burnt into my brain and am having a time trying to turn that corner with the higher contrast settings, call me old school but i get alittle queasy with contrast set at 80 or 90 even though it looks good.
william




