New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

post #1 of 36
Thread Starter 
ronsreviews_covers_14487280.jpg

Quantum of Solace
Two-Disc Special Edition

Release Date: March 24, 2009
Studio: MGM Home Entertainment
Packaging/Materials: Two-disc VIVA Eco-Box with cardstock slipcover
Year: 2008
Rating: PG-13
Running Time: 1h46m
MSRP: $34.98

MAIN FEATURE SPECIAL FEATURES
Video 2.40:1 anamorphic 1.78:1 anamorphic
Audio DTS: English 5.1 / Dolby Digital: English 5.1, Spanish 5.1, French 5.1 Stereo and Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles English, Spanish Closed Captioned


The Feature: 3/5
Despite its enigmatic title, the second film starring Daniel Craig as James Bond is as simple as they come. Picking up mere minutes after "Casino Royale's" final scene, "Quantum of Solace" makes a beeline to payback. Bond wants it bad for whoever killed Vesper Lind (Eva Green, in the previous film) and the new Bond Girl, Camille (Olga Kurylenko), hardly has an identity without it, the need to avenge her family so strong that romance with a handsome English spy isn't even a consideration. With the pair's cloud of brooding angst hanging over their adventures (as raucous and well executed as they are), it's hard to really enjoy "Quantum of Solace"; the gloom ultimately undermines both the spirit of Bond (even in this tougher, grittier version) and the finer details of the plot (involving the water rights machinations of "philanthropist" Dominic Greene, played by Mathieu Amalric). Though "Casino Royale" definitely went to dark territory at times, it came up for air once in awhile. By contrast "Quantum of Solace" resolves to drown in its sorrows, so by the end the title's "little bit of peace" becomes more a plea from the audience than a cryptic reference to the characters' emotional needs.


Video Quality: 5/5
It's rare that I can review a film's DVD and Blu-Ray releases back-to-back. Viewing the movie on Blu-Ray first, one would expect the DVD to suffer from comparison. True, there's not as much detail and definition - particularly in the wide shots - and overall sharpness and color depth aren't as great. But, all things considered, the film looks fantastic on DVD and represents a high caliber transfer for the format.

Presented in its original aspect ratio of 2.40:1 and enhanced for widescreen displays, blacks are deep and inky and contrast, stylistically enhanced in some scenes, is excellent. Fine object detail is very good, desert sands looking quite good with no signs of compression problems, and sharpness is both fine and consistent. Colors show good depth and saturation, though the film gets almost monochromatic in its color palette as it progresses. Fleshtones vary a little depending on the locations (e.g. warmer in the southern climates and cooler in the northern) but look appropriate and realistic. Overall the DVD transfer is excellent, with no signs of undue digital manipulation like edge enhancement or noise reduction.


Audio Quality: 4.5/5
As with the video transfer, the 755 kbps 5.1 DTS audio track lacks some qualities compared to a high resolution option - subtlety and expansiveness being the most obvious. I can't justify giving the track full marks though, as it just seemed a little too blunt at times, though I will freely admit that I'm probably letting the lossless experience cloud my judgment. Still, I expect with nothing to compare it to, DVD owners will be well pleased. Sonic detail and definition are very good with breaking glass, growling airplane engines and the upper registers of the orchestral score. LFE is deep, clean and powerful, giving the subwoofer its strongest workout in the explosive finale. Surround activity is equally satisfying, ranging from dynamic, localized effects and pans in action scenes to more subtle ambient textures for various interior environments. Though I had to turn on the subtitles to cut through some of the heavy accents, dialogue is consistently clear and well balanced with the rest of the sound elements.

A Dolby Digital 5.1 track is also available. After a rudimentary comparison (I was not able to switch tracks on-the-fly) I favored the DTS option, which seemed to offer a wider soundstage and a "brightness" I tend to prefer.


Special Features: 3/5
Culling material that was used on the film's website and throwing in required fare like trailers and a music video, the special features package makes you feel full, but not really satisfied. The five featurettes are video diary entries from the 007.com website, but they use much of the same material as the longer "Bond on Location" documentary. And overall there's little exploration of or insight into the filmmakers' decisions about character and story. Ultimately, the most interesting item is the "Crew Files" (also originating from the website), which gives a deserving nod to some of the lower profile positions on the production, while also providing glimpses behind the scenes.

All items are 1.78 anamorphic with stereo audio, except where noted.

[Disc One]

Music Video "Another Way To Die" (4m30s): Jack White and Alicia Keys' video for the title song.

Teaser Trailer (1m50s): With Dolby Digital 5.1 audio.

Theatrical Trailer (2m23s): 2.40:1 anamorphic with Dolby Digital 5.1 audio.

[Disc Two]

"Bond on Location" (24m45s): A thorough tour of the film's many locations (the most of any Bond film), including Panama, Mexico, Chile, Austria, Italy, and of course England. Though 24 minutes is not a lot of time to cover every location in detail, the documentary focuses on the major set pieces that took place at each locale. I recommend viewing this lengthier piece as opposed to the subsequent featurettes, which use much of the same material but are presented less cohesively.

"Start of Shooting" Featurette (2m54s): Besides offering a date when shooting began (January 3, 2008), the piece offers a glimpse at stunt training, jet boat training and stunt driving training.

"On Location" Featurette (3m14s): Shooting in Mexico and Panama City.

"Olga Kurylenko and the Boat Chase" Featurette (2m14s): Kurylenko shares her experiences with stunts and stunt preparation.

"Director Marc Forster" Featurette (2m45s): Forster's working style, goals for the film and major challenges.

"The Music" Featurette (2m36s): Composer David Arnold talks about writing music, while Alicia Keys and Jack White offer their thoughts on the title song.

Crew Files (45m30s): Profiles of thirty-two members of the film crew, which include everyone from the location manager in Panama City to the DC3 airplane pilot to the title sequence directors. The sheer volume of profiles offers a nice glimpse at the variety of jobs associated with a film production and shed a little light on the jobs we often see scrolling by in the credits. All the pieces were originally shot for and posted on the film's website.


The Feature: 3/5
Video Quality: 5/5
Audio Quality: 4.5/5
Special Features: 3/5
Overall Score (not an average): 4/5

An overly personal - and ultimately gloomy - Bond film gets fantastic technical treatment but a mostly perfunctory special features package. Since we saw it happen before with "Casino Royale" I wouldn't be surprised by a future release with a more extensive set of extras. However, those who don't care so much about supplementals should be quite pleased with this release.

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #2 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Thanks for the review. I liked this movie more than many here (and I did not care for The Dark Knight which many here loved).

The extras do not look worth the extra $, so I pre-ordered the single disc. I am glad they did not compromise the bitrate of the feature with those paltry extras.
post #3 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

This, my friends is a sad, sad day. This is the first time I dont own a 007 flick. Moonraker can now sleep easy in it's bed, knowing that it's no longer the worst Bond movie of all time - and I have a *VERY* high tolerance for bad movies.

Then you add in the fact that the Bond discs used to be the high water mark for boatloads of extras. They had some really well done documentaries - but this? Please, it's insulting.
post #4 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony J Case
This, my friends is a sad, sad day. This is the first time I dont own a 007 flick. Moonraker can now sleep easy in it's bed, knowing that it's no longer the worst Bond movie of all time - and I have a *VERY* high tolerance for bad movies.

Then you add in the fact that the Bond discs used to be the high water mark for boatloads of extras. They had some really well done documentaries - but this? Please, it's insulting.
Believe it or not the film looks better on Blu-ray than it did in a theater under state of the art projection. To bad the film doesn't merit the fine transfer.

I enjoy Quantum of Solace the way I enjoy the "B" spy films of the 1960s and 1970s. It is so far removed from its origins that I don't think of it as a Bond film at all. This new concept of the Bond character is so objectionable I'm glad the traditional Bond theme isn't used to lend it credibility (until the end titles). Classic espionage films like The Ipcress File, The Quiller Memorandum, and the adaptations of John LeCarre make Quantum of Solace look pathetic in comparison, and it's outclassed by the Bourne films. There are some interesting aspects visually and aesthetically, but they don't amount to much.

I've been enjoying the A&E Network's Horatio Hornblower Collector's Edition. Eight made-for-cable features in the box. Literate scripts telling original, inventive adventure stories with sensible, consistent characterizations in well-mounted productions. The action is well-staged and exciting. The producers are Michelle Buck, Delia Fine, and Andrew Benson. The director is Andrew Grieve. There are four or five excellent writers. This team really understands genre film making and how to tell a good story. Plus -- and this is very, very important -- they respect and maintain the concept and cultural identity of C.S. Forester's young hero. The very Englishness of these 8 films is refreshing. Too bad the Hornblower team can't be entrusted with the Bond films because the current owner and controllers of the franchise are creatively bankrupt.
post #5 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

I like dark, serious Bond--in fact, those are my favorites, but didn't care much for this one. Not that it matters--they'll still sell millions of copies.
post #6 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Worse than "Moonraker"? That's a bit nuts if you ask me. The only great sin "Quantum of Solace" is guilty of is being a 4/5 followup to a 6/5 film.

Personally I'd only put "From Russia with Love", "Goldfinger", "Thunderball", "The Spy Who Loved Me", "Goldeneye" and "Casino Royale" above "QoS". The amount of over-hatred for this movie is insane.
post #7 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill GrandPre
Worse than "Moonraker"? That's a bit nuts if you ask me. The only great sin "Quantum of Solace" is guilty of is being a 4/5 followup to a 6/5 film.

Hear, hear Bill...
post #8 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Bond in spaaaace! As much as I enjoyed the scrappy sequel to Casino Royale I much prefer Moonraker, my guilty favourite Bond, he shamefully admitted.

And what no commentary on the QoS dvd? tsk tsk it'll be in the extreme ultimate collectors edition some time in 2010 or whenever the next 'gritty' humourless Bond instalment arrives at cinemas.
post #9 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Christou
And what no commentary on the QoS dvd?

The original Casino Royale DVD didn't have a commentary either, so I guess it's par for the course...
post #10 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Moonraker was one of those so bad it's funny movies I thought. It doesn't "fit" with the other Bond movies from the era. QOS was a huge dissapointment after how awesome Casino Royale was.
post #11 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill GrandPre
Worse than "Moonraker"? That's a bit nuts if you ask me. The only great sin "Quantum of Solace" is guilty of is being a 4/5 followup to a 6/5 film.

How about the sin of taking the camera, strapping it to the back of an epileptic wolverine and throwing it into a room full of mannequins? Seriously, who's brilliant idea was it to dress bond and the bad guy he was chasing in (more or less) the same colored clothes and then shoot the action scene on that scaffold so shaky that I could not tell one person from another until someone was dead? I honestly could not tell what the fuck was going on in that scene. I will pay HUGE money to Hollywood if they just knock off the "We don't have actors that know how to fight, so we'll just zoom in real tight and shake the camera around a whole bunch instead" shit.

How about the sin of making Bond an uncouth thug who is only slightly better than the people he's opposing! Okay, I understand that Casino Royale was a reboot to the series, and that we see Bond learning to be Bond at the start of his career, and while I wasnt too fond of that movie, I was okay with that approach. But we should move past that now! I like my dapper secret agent in a unwrinkled tux with laser cufflinks and a martini in one hand (and a woman in a bikini on the other arm). I like my thinly disguised sexual innuendo female names. I liked my huge side-of-beef henchmen with weird teeth or some other physical deformity. I like it when the stakes are high, the world hangs in the balance while the evil mastermind orbits the planet in his death ray satellite, gloating.

How about the sin of no damn stunts? Bond has always been known for bigger than life stunts where real stunt men do real things that make you go "DAMN!", not this rapid fire bluescreen crap. Where's the guy skiing off the cliff? Where's the guy bungee jumping off the dam? Where's the car doing the 360 corkscrew jump? Where's the record breaking 70 foot speedboat jump over a cop car? Where's the guy leaping from back to back, using alligators as stepping stones?

How about the sin of shit music? The main theme is utterly dreadful. It's not a bad song for the first 30 seconds or so, and then Keys has to open her mouth and start singing. Hey look, someone forgot to include a melody! White and Keys have no audible chemistry and then the song really falls apart at the end when it's all hi-hat upfront burying the rest of the song. When you make Madonna's Die Another Day look good, something's gone horribly, horribly wrong. Oh and while we're speaking of music, where the hell is the Bond theme?!? Only once did we get the classic Bond theme, and that was at the very end. Come on, we need that back STAT. It's like the Jaws theme (the shark, not the guy with weird teeth) or the Shaft theme - when the Bond theme kicks in with the massive horn blasts and wicked guitar rift, you know some shit is about to go down.

I have been a Bond fan all my life, ever since my mom took me to see The Spy Who Loved Me in the theaters back in '77, and I've been hooked ever since. I've had all the films on VHS, then on laserdisc, now on DVD. I've read all of the Ian Flemming books, most of the John Gardner books and a couple of the Raymond Benson books. Hell, I even found a copy of Colonel Sun by Kingsley Amis back in the mid-eighties. But I would take a dozen Casino Royale (I mean the shitty Woody Allen version and not the moderatly decient new version) over this turd any day of the week.
post #12 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Indeed, QoS was nothing more than an over-budgeted, over-edited Steven Segal movie.
post #13 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

My feeling has been that the camp that hates Craig's Bond love Moore, and Connery fans (mostly) embrace this new incarnation. It's possibly a tad simplistic, but it appears to me to be divided along those lines.

Years ago (I think it was shortly after Brosnan's first effort), Connery said that the problem with Bond post Diamonds Are Forever, was that he was 'not quite hard enough, not quite dirty enough'.

Well, now he is.
post #14 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
My feeling has been that the camp that hates Craig's Bond love Moore, and Connery fans (mostly) embrace this new incarnation. It's possibly a tad simplistic, but it appears to me to be divided along those lines.

Years ago (I think it was shortly after Brosnan's first effort), Connery said that the problem with Bond post Diamonds Are Forever, was that he was 'not quite hard enough, not quite dirty enough'.

Well, now he is.

Hear, hear.
post #15 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hodson
My feeling has been that the camp that hates Craig's Bond love Moore, and Connery fans (mostly) embrace this new incarnation. It's possibly a tad simplistic, but it appears to me to be divided along those lines.

It's a LOT simplistic. What about folks who loved Casino Royale but hated QoS? (That'd be me!)

I'm on board with Craig's Bond - I just thought QoS was a mess. That doesn't make me one who only likes silly, campy Bond...
post #16 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

The BR does look better than the cinema.
The sound has less bass than CR.

The plot was less impressive than CR.
post #17 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin Jacobson
It's a LOT simplistic. What about folks who loved Casino Royale but hated QoS? (That'd be me!)

I'm on board with Craig's Bond - I just thought QoS was a mess. That doesn't make me one who only likes silly, campy Bond...


And that makes me too. Sean Connery and Timothy Dalton are my 2 favorite Bonds, and Craig is the best since Dalton, possibly/probably better than him. However, I did NOT like QOS - very much enjoyed Casino Royale.



Edit: I see that John was referring to those who hate Craig, which I don't--I like him as Bond very much, just don't like one of his 2 Bond movies...
post #18 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hodson
My feeling has been that the camp that hates Craig's Bond love Moore, and Connery fans (mostly) embrace this new incarnation. It's possibly a tad simplistic, but it appears to me to be divided along those lines.

Naw, that's not it - at least for me. I love Connery just as much as Moore. I also think that poor old Dalton got the shaft with crap scripts and would have been an awesome Bond with some time to grow. I like Brosnan and while I think that Lazenbe was a tad wooden, given another movie to loosen up into the roll, he would have been a great Bond.

It's not even Dan that I object to. The blond hair is merely superficial - I can live with that. And I don't mind him being a cold hearted bastard - I loved the moment Brosnan used his license to kill and executed whatsiface in Tomorrow Never Dies, or the bit in For Your Eyes Only where Moore kicks Locque's car over the cliff. No, I blame Broccoli and Wilson for making him an unlikable brutish thug.

(But then under Barbara Broccoli's reign, the films have become downright prudish - the nude sand motif of the opening credits, for example, is too damn shy to shamelessly celebrate female beauty like Maurice Binder's classic sequences of the seventies and eighties.)
post #19 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

I don't see how any of the actors who have played Bond can be faulted. In fact the actors from Connery all the way up to Craig are largely responsible for holding the franchise together. I enjoy all their performances. Interesting that each actor exits the series feeling a little cheated; except perhaps Dalton, who's never talked publicly about it.

No, my complaint is with how the character of James Bond has been redefined, with the producing and writing decisions that are made before an actor becomes involved. Decisions like "our next film QoS has to be more like the Bourne films" and "make James Bond more like a Dirty Harry or a Paul Kersey" and "make sure Bond is excoriated in the dialog like the discussions on Oprah." The last six Bond films will become known to future generations as the "Stop! or my M. will shoot!" phase of the series. It really is time to change the producers at the helm or at least over-rule them somehow so that they can't impose any more destructive creative controls.

This new James Bond has an inner ugliness instead of an inner decency. He's as dumb as a post in Casino Royale and he's all monkey-see / monkey-do in QoS. He is not closer to Fleming's Bond, but the furthest away the series has ever been. He is an insult to the audience's intelligence.
post #20 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Of all the Actors the only one I don't really care for is Moore. I enjoy some of his adventures, but he himself always seemed unlikeable.

I never really thought about it much until recent viewings of Moore in "Maverick." His episodes are just dull and boring, and its hard to root for him. This is solely due to Moore, if either of the other Maverick's were in his place it would be a vast improvement.
post #21 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack Gibbs
Of all the Actors the only one I don't really care for is Moore. I enjoy some of his adventures, but he himself always seemed unlikeable.

I never really thought about it much until recent viewings of Moore in "Maverick." His episodes are just dull and boring, and its hard to root for him. This is solely due to Moore, if either of the other Maverick's were in his place it would be a vast improvement.

I like Roger Moore even though I found his portrayal of 007 to be too distant from Fleming's conception of the character. I enjoy his Bond films in spite of that fact. On the other hand, I think Moore's portrayal of Simon Templar is sublime.

Back on track, I found the Bond character as written in QOS to be farther removed than Moore's films from Fleming's original concept of 007. I hope to see that rectified in future films.
post #22 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

QoS worse than Moonraker? That's a laugh. Nothing is worse than Moonraker, except maybe A View to a Kill. Worst Bond.....hmm...Moonraker or AVtaK......AVtaK or Moonraker....hmm.....hmm. Nope. My vote still goes to Moonraker. That film was the Bond series at its absolute nadir.

One of the biggest problems with the Bond series under the tutelage of Babawa Bwoccoli is that she forgot "M" is supposed to be a bit part and that the initial isn't shorthand for "Mama".

I have to admit I can't figure out what people want out of this series. People did nothing but bitch that the Bond series was formulaic, trite, and worn out when the films were all big stunts, a pile of gadgets, and ridiculous mad villains bent on world domination. The producers ditch all of those cliches and try to make it harder and more realistic. Now the bitches seem to be over the lack of big stunts, fancy gadgets, and over-the-top-villains bent on world domination.

I don't think the producers of this series can win no matter what they do. Maybe it is time to send Bond to the Old Spys Home.
post #23 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard--W
He is not closer to Fleming's Bond, but the furthest away the series has ever been. He is an insult to the audience's intelligence.

This is Fleming not Le Carré Sex, sadism and snobbery - I think the 21st century incarnation largely fits that remit (plus the requirement to make container loads of profit), you don't, that's a shame. But if what you want is a Bond that slavishly follows Sir Ian's text, then, well, that's never going to happen.
post #24 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

I read most of the original novels many years ago. To me the film series started going downhill with You Only Live Twice. That's when they hit on "the Formula", and simply remade that film many times (with a few exceptions along the way).

By the time of Brosnan's Bond, I thought they should simply stop filming them. It is a colossal waste of money to keep cranking out the same overblown epics every couple of years. A low point for me was when they named a character "Christmas" just so Bond could make a tasteless pun about Christmas coming twice in one year. I never bothered to see Moonraker, AVTAK, Octopussy or Die Another Day.

The series reboot has really worked for me. We now see Bond get into situations in which his life is literally on the line. He no longer is simply "knocked out" and then taken on a tour of Dr. Evil's establishment and shown where the self-destruct button is. Also, I think there is enough humor in Craig's Bond. In the novels, there were not nearly as many Bond bon-mots as there were in films past. Some of the late Connery (and most Moore) films are outright comedies. Hoever, in the film of From Russia With Love, after Kerim Bey dispatches the enemy agent emerging from mouth of the image of Anita Ekburg on the billboard, Bond quips, "she should've kept her mouth shut". I don't remember if that line was in the novel (I think it was), but it is an example of the extent of humor in the novels.

What puzzles me about the dislike many have for Quantum of Solace is that, to me it does not seem all that different to me than Casino Royale. Sure, it has a lot more action, but I sort of think of it as the rest of Casino Royale. The complaints that Bond is too much like Bourne could be leveled at Casino Royale as much as QOS. Of the early Bond films, I guess the Craig films remind me most of From Russia With Love. Robert Shaw was a cold-blooded adversary, and the fight between Bond and Shaw was almost savage. That sort of intensity was lost in many later films, and IMO the Craig Bonds have revived it.
post #25 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Gaah! Too many Batman fans on this thread, not enough Bond fans. I grew up with the Connery and Moore Bonds, watched each of those films dozens of times over the decades. I find them far more entertaining than any of the new Bond flicks. Good or bad I'd rather have those old movies in my collection than the Brosnan or Craig Bonds. Nostalgia rules!

As for the much maligned Quantum of Solace, I was one of the very few members in the QoS discussion thread that liked the film, practically everyone else hated it. It's near the bottom on my Bond favourites list but as a kick ass action film it had few equals last year.
post #26 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Well, I'm not much of a Batman fan, at least as far as The Dark Knight is concerned. I do have all of Batman: the Animated Series on DVD, as well as Batman Begins on DVD and HD DVD. I guess my dislike of The Dark Knight is akin to the dislike many have of QOS. I fail to see why anyone would want to sit through The Dark Knight more than once, but many here luuuuuved TDK, so you never know.

A thing to remember about Bond is that as a series it is unprecedented. It would have made sense for the franchise to die with the 1960's, as the books were written (primarily) in the 50's and the "spy craze" died out in the 60s. All other film series' lasted 10 or so years. If you look at other film series'-The Saint, The Falcon, Charlie Chan, Michael Shayne, Dr Kildare, whatever, died out and now look like products of a different era. Occasionally, some of those old film series' might be revived with a feature or two, but those were not part of the same series. It is almost unbelievable that the Bond franchise (accounting for generational regime changes) is the same franchise as the one that began in 1962.

Even though it is the same franchise, it can easily be divided into sections by the actor who played Bond, and the direction the series was taking. Some people like every incarnation of Bond, some only like "their" bond, which is often the first one they saw. It makes sense to me that some people will not care for a certain version of Bond. I do not have ANY of Moore's bond in my collection, which is why I refused to buy those boxed sets. I hated his prissy portrayal and the comedic direction of the series. After suffering through Brosnan's The World is Not Enough, I doubt I would have bothered seeing another Bond film if the franchise had not gone off in a new direction.

bTW, I can see how some are bothered by the fact that QOS was so fast it did not slow down to catch its breath. I simply look on it as the action-packed conclusion of Casino Royale. I would be surprised if the next Craig outing is the same.
post #27 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Christou
It's near the bottom on my Bond favourites list but as a kick ass action film it had few equals last year.

And this is the statment I argue against the most. Lets assume for a second that Quantum of Solace does not have 40 years of baggage attached to it, that it's just a generic action flick without 007. Even given all that, it STILL fails as an action flick.

The opening car chase, for example, with Bond under constant machine gun fire, is so quickly cut and so obviously composed of incomprehensible CGI that we're essentially looking at blurs, bright colors bouncing off each other and lots of noise, inter-cut with Bond at the wheel and POV shots of approaching vehicles. Or take the foot chase and fight across the rooftops (pointlessly inter-cut with pretentious art house scenes of a horse race, mind you) - I quite literarily couldn’t tell which person was Bond and who the enemy was. They were both dressed in black, and with the camera whipping around so badly, I simply couldn’t tell who was who.

This whole "shake the camera" action sequance nonsense that grips Hollywood these days has *GOT* to stop!
post #28 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hodson
This is Fleming not Le Carré Sex, sadism and snobbery - I think the 21st century incarnation largely fits that remit (plus the requirement to make container loads of profit), you don't, that's a shame. But if what you want is a Bond that slavishly follows Sir Ian's text, then, well, that's never going to happen.
Not what I meant. Dr. No, From Russia With Love, Goldfinger, Thunderball, and On Her Majesty's Secret Service don't follow Fleming's text slavishly, but they are right and proper adaptations and great Bond films. The rest of my answer is in post 130 and 124 here:

http://www.hometheaterforum.com/htf/...on-thread.html
post #29 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

yeah I thought I hated the quick cuts in the ice car chase from "Die Another Day" I found it distracting and it ruined what should have been a good chase scene. But crap that was nothing compared with the action in "QoS".
I still adore "Casino Royale" while "QoS" just left me cold...and the song, well just dont even get me started on that. Lets just say I thought Ah-Ha had the worst with "the Living Daylights" (they should have gone with "If There Was a Man") but ewww this song hasnt grown on me at all.
post #30 of 36

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: Quantum of Solace

Ready to buy Quantum of Solace twice in one year? Now that the 2-disc special edition DVD and Blu-Ray are out and selling well, director Marc Foster told the Toronto Sun that he is working on an upgraded edition for Blu-ray. Details are here:

Forster working on better DVD | DVD | Entertainment | Toronto Sun
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Official HTF DVD Reviews

Gear mentioned in this thread: