Warner Archive Discussion Thread (FEEDBACK) - Page 11

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

fair enough--that's what I would have expected...

and that's how it worked when I took TCM up on the RKO Classics from the Vault thing last year--which was pretty expensive in itself, but featured extraordinarily rare items that I wanted to encourage the studio to make available

this new batch, though, mostly includes films that could easily have appealed to a wider spectrum of viewers, if included in the right kind of package (and I've got the VHS tapes to prove that they used to think things like Three Comrades had a market---and no, I'm not even close to 40... I bought the VHS tapes with my newspaper delivery money when I was 14)

I spend close to 75% of my disposable income on classic DVDs, because I love them, and I want to see them in circulation... but this kind of niche collector thing seems counterproductive to me, and I reiterate that I won't be taking advantage of it, whether they ship to Canada or not...

normally, I wouldn't complain at all (it's not my style), but as I interpreted that list as 150 movies (all of which are almost certain to have been on the TCM schedule in recent years, and will almost certainly return) that won't be getting proper DVD releases ever, I'm sure you can at least understand my lack of enthusiasm

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

My comment was not about the economics behind Warner's pricing decision but the inability of some posters here to understand that some of us might be discouraged by it.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

I also wonder about the people who don't understand why some feel the prices are too high. Then again, maybe they are in a better financial position than I am. I am so excited about this plan by Warner, I just wish they would offer some kind of extra discount based on the # of titles you buy. I can only afford 4 at this time and I can't see myself buying anymore in the near future, especially since I'm avoiding many titles that I feel might make their way to retail one day.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

The price issue aside,i already find myself using the variable that the movie will show up in a box set with extras as a factor on what i order.I think Warners should do something to address that problem.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

I'm sure one of the things that comes in to play re the pricing is that it's much cheaper to manufacture (press) a big run of DVDs - the cost comes WAY down when you do bulk. When you're doing POD and doing it yourself, those costs rise and quite a bit. Not condoning or not condoning the price, just mentioning this fact.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

Jay,
Did you notice the 25% off code? If not it's XB392.





Crawdaddy

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

I can record movies from TCM and put them on DVD-R for < $2, and currently have about 150 movies in my collection this way.

I also have replaced many, many recorded movies with commercial releases when they became available at at reasonable price ($8 - $10 or so), and would like to continue to do that, but at $20 each that's not going to happen very often.

---------------

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

Yes, thanks Robert, this helps...hopefully they will have something like this regularly.

I am struggling right now to cut my buy list down to 4 or 5...it isn't easy!!

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

That doesn't mean the quality of your DVD-R recording is as good as what Warner is providing you. I've been doing such recording for several years now with over 1000 movies on DVD-R. However, I bought some of Warner's discs and will compare them to my DVD-R copies to see if there are differences which I expect there should be some improvement from Warner's DVD-R discs. If not then I'll reevaluate my future purchases from Warner Archive. Also, the showings on TCM might be from different film elements than those used for these Warner Archive offerings.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

If they can make that code unlimited with free shipping, it will help sales long-term beyond this initial rush to own this product. When people get their CC statements next month, I expect some folks to back off based on their particular economic situation.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

You're correct, but I don't have a tree in my back yard growing $20 bills.

Sometimes 'good enough' is what we have to settle for.

---------------

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

Scott, I'll sell you a sapling of one of those trees...for, let's say, $20!

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

The problem with the pricing is that they're appealing to the casual fan, not the collector. At $20 a pop, they're trying to draw in the old movie fan who remembers watching SUNRISE AT CAMPOBELLO (or whatever) and has always wanted it on video -- i.e. people who will buy 1-2 titles each. They're not appealing to the collector who is willing to blind buy 20-30 titles (or more) just because they look interesting. And it seems to me that the serious collector is who they should be targeting.

I can't believe there are too many people out there who will pay $20 for some of these films -- and we're nowhere near the bottom of the barrel! Once the initial frenzy dies down, I wouldn't be surprised if they started packaging them together or discounting them. But I can't see this happening for at least a year or two. And yes, they should definitely keep the 25% off/free shipping coupons floating around -- even with the coupon, $75 for five bare-bones DVD-Rs is pretty stiff.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

Hey, I hear ya and do sympathize with those of us that don't have the discreationary dollars to spend $20 on such discs. Hopefully, Warner will offer some kind of discount program.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

With the Gary Cooper movie Bright Leaf being taken off the list after it was included with all the other movies on the first day kickoff, I've decided to post the link to the ask WB a question over at my Gary Cooper tcm thread to get Gary Cooper fans to write in and show their support for putting Bright Leaf back on the list of movies. Hopefully this will help get the movie back up on the list of movies to order soon.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

Pretty stiff, and they'll continue to charge it as long as folks clamour to get their hands on these 'exclusive' titles.

Those that can readily afford them will continue to wonder what all the whinging is about. Those that feel that an initiative that increases demands on disposible income at a time when we have less income to dispose, will simply get a shrug of the shoulders and a 'well, you don't have to buy them'. Which is the terrible, terrible truth.

I'll click the button, as I have done many, many times, and take a chance on a film because it may feature a star, a supporting actor or come from a CV of a director I've only recently discovered, even if I haven't seen it. That leads me to buy more; I've even bought box sets to get at one or two titles in the hope (usually fulfilled) that I'll enjoy the rest; why not? At the price, it's worth a punt.

I get the feeling that much of that has now passed. Which is kinda sad...$20 a film will remove that spontaneity.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

I think that title will be back on the site anyway.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

As an avid collector, I discovered at least 58 titles on that list I want.

Eck!!

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

In my experience TCM from cable or satellite doesn't look anywhere near as good as the typical Warner DVD of a film of comparable vintage. Much, much softer, particularly evident the larger the display. Obviously, everybody will have their own cost/benefit ratio, but strictly quality-wise, the two methods are not equal.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

I really believe the target for these are not "blind buys" or spontaneity, but to meet the collections of the classic movie fan - Think of this as TCM ala Carte

Also,why should there be a rush to buy everything at once and not be select in what to buy (especially those with limited DVD budgets!) since these will not be 'going out of print'! You've seen the press - they are going to put up the whole darn library!

The price point for what it is is value for money - you're not only paying for the film , BUT FOR THE SERVICE - people forget that. Think about those who have to pay for an extra tier of cable or satelite service just to get TCM just to see a few films a month.

I wonder how long before we see the following on TCM after a film "Enjoy this film? It's available at The Warner Archive" for films available this way?

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

Wasnt Gary Cooper supposed to get another boxset from WB that had Today We Live (1933) in it? Maybe I dreamed that.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

Right now I think of it as overpriced, overhyped and over there...

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

It was in the early stages but like other titles never made it out of those early stages. The same case might be said for the unreleased Abbott and Costello movies.

Pretty much our only hope is to get WB to release prestine copies of these movies on dvd-r that is a great deal better than the bootleg stuff out there. WB started this trend with the announcement of Bright Leaf but for some unknown reason took it off of the list with no notification as to why pissing off all the die hard Gary Cooper fans like myself.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

I think the DVD-R bit is deliberate. They can do regular releases of the best sellers, & people who have bought the DVD-R will want to buy the pressed disc.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

Sorry to disagree but movies like Bright Leaf never made even to VHS and I highly doubt that many of these titles will ever make it to pressed dvd.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

I think it is great to make the library available.but lets hopes they offer some as double features especially on some of the B's that run about an hour. Also some of the titles could have be placed in Box set for example Clark Gable.etc thus more bang for the buck than the $19.95 plus tax for a single title.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

This is a terrific idea.

For a luxury item like a dvd, and especially one of a beloved film which may not be popular enough to warrant a full-scale release, I think these are a great idea and not at all overpriced. As with anything that's a luxury, if it costs more than I'm willing to pay, I'll go without. For people who really want a film, it's not an exorbitant price. Especially, as Denny pointed out, that you are paying for the service a well as the film.

I'm glad to hear that the international shipping problem will be resolved soon.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

That's a really good idea!! Throw a few box sets together for a discounted price!!

They got my money for this month, and I can't wait to see what they announce on April 1 !!

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

Well said, John.

I ordered two films I've been waiting to be released for a while (Abe Lincoln in Illinois and Too Hot to Handle). Those were worth 20 bucks each to me. I'm interested in some of the others (Adventures of Mark Twain, Doc Savage, a couple others) but not at 20 bucks a pop.

re: Warner Archive Discussion Thread

Yes, this is exactly what I would like.

Titles that may potentially sustain a retail release down the line should be excluded from this collection which should consist exclusively of features that will never receive retail distribution.

The prospect of purchasing expensive DVD-Rs without supplements may seem enticing to some and I admittedly am interested first and foremost in the films, but with the potential risk of having them reissued later on professionally mastered silver-back discs with full artwork, possible extras and an affordable price... I am personally not willing to spend money that I otherwise would've instantly parted with for a long overdue film like Jacques Tourneur's Wichita at US $20 + s/h.

I'm still uncertain of how they reached this price point... there is less/no risk involved in distributing their films this way as they are not pressing media for retail with the hopes of recouping costs but on a made-to-purchase basis. They are spending little to no money whatsoever on packaging and artwork, nor supplemental features. The media itself is cheaper to reproduce as is the effort involved in all regards. Yet the studio is asking well in excess of ANY single catalog release that should warrant otherwise -- ones produced in mass quantities for retail that come with extras, commentaries, carefully designed artwork/packaging and officially pressed DVD discs. My question is... why???

I'm not against the idea here, in fact I think it's GREAT!

I just don't like the way that Warners has chosen to tackle this...


Thank you!