Re: Mobile Fidelity announces new SACDs from Rickie Lee Jones and The Band
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lee Scoggins
I must politely differ here Paul. There are significant sonic benefits to hirez layers like Super Audio. I'm not sure why exactly you are not hearing it but it is quite noticeable on my system and several of my friends. Now it is truie that if you have a Wadia or similarly fancy CD player then the gap in sound narrows but it is still there. I'm heard it on around a half dozen systems of close friends who have SACD capability.
|
I did qualify my statement by saying "most cases" and "reliably distinguish". Perhaps I should have expressed my point slightly differently. I have noticed some difference, some of the time. However, the differences, with my ears and gear, are not sufficient to warrant a major difference in price. I usually budget to reflect 'biggest bang for the buck' and MCH trumps 2 CH, for me, each time. I'll gladly "upgrade" to a MCH SACD/DVD-A of something I already own in redbook, but I won't do the same for 2CH hi-res. As for buying something new in 2 CH hi-res (new in the sense of "I don't already have it"--I'm an avid used disc shopper), if the price difference is not more than 10% (happens, but not overly frequently) OR it is only available as a hybrid 2CH (RCA Living Stereo and Pentatone seem the only ones I've encountered) OR it contains extra material not found on the redbook release (also very rare) OR it has been remixed/remastered and trustworthy reviews indicate that the new mastering is better than the original redbook release (of course, this is still subject to the 10% rule or the "only available in hybrid" rule), then I'll buy it. Otherwise, to me, it's not worth the extra money.
One other note on differences--I know it is hotly debated in some circles and this is my own view with no intent to proselytize--I have reached the conclusion, for 2 CH comparisons, that the bulk of any improvement in SQ in hi-res audio owes more to the extra care the producers of some of those discs take at the mastering stage rather than any inherent superiority of the format itself. When I've compared the same mastering (as I have with RCA Living Stereo releases--about the least processed SACD releases available), redbook vs SACD in 2 CH, any difference becomes so small that the level of concentration required to notice it takes away from the joy of listening to the music. If redbook were as carefully treated across the board, rather than merely in a few cases (relatively speaking), hi-res would be largely superfluous for 2 CH and we would all be better served by the music industry at large. Sadly, that is not the case. Perhaps if my ears were sharper and my gear was better, I'd notice a more significant difference. But I'm getting older, not younger, and I have other life concerns besides my hobby (children, mostly) so my gear isn't going to get significantly better for quite some time.