post #31 of 80
3/23/09 at 7:51pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
| Why on earth would they make a new player for a dead format?? |
|
Originally Posted by Cees Alons
You can still buy new 33 1/3 and 45 rpm turntables, can't you?
Even 78 rpm ones. USB versions even. And rightfully so! Cees |
|
Originally Posted by Maggi Magg
Edwin-S
Why on earth would they make a new player for a dead format?? |
| You can still buy new 33 1/3 and 45 rpm turntables, can't you? Even 78 rpm ones. USB versions even. And rightfully so! |
|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
There are a lot more people with copies of HD DVD movies than there are with either DVD-A or SACDs, but the player has the capability to play at least one of those dead formats. There is even the possibility of a firmware update to allow the player to play the other dead audio format. Yet, there is no support for a large group of people to play their HD DVDs.
|
|
Originally Posted by Doug Otte
What's the source for your claim that more people own HD-DVD than SACD? I'd like to see those data. It might be true, but I've never seen those figures.
|
| And, why do people insist on calling SACD and vinyl "dead"? Titles continue to be released on both media. Doug |
|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
There are a lot more people with copies of HD DVD movies than there are with either DVD-A or SACDs, but the player has the capability to play at least one of those dead formats. There is even the possibility of a firmware update to allow the player to play the other dead audio format. Yet, there is no support for a large group of people to play their HD DVDs.
It would have made a lot more sense to add an HD DVD playback capability to the player than to add support for dead audio formats. I'm not saying they had to support a dead format. It just shouldn't be called a "Universal" player when it clearly isn't. Calling it "Universal" would require it to be able to support all of the shiny disc formats: CD, HDCD, SACD, DVD-A, DVD, HD DVD, VCD, and Blu-ray. What are the other ones I've forgotten? And don't say 45s, 33-1/3s, and 78s. They don't count as they aren't shiny. |
|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
IMO, SACD support is mostly in there to allow a small group of people to continue to play their existing SACD collections.
|
|
Originally Posted by CraigF
SACD is in there because it's...Sony. No need to pull out numbers and stats, or speculate why some of the other "missing" formats or features aren't, this is the real answer.
Oppo is probably already being bent over the test bench on their BD licensing fees. It is not easy for a smaller manufacturer to enter this realm. |
|
Originally Posted by Alfonso_M
I'm a bit confused here..
"Another bonus with this player is the ability to do SACD playback. With the minimum HDMI 1.2 spec (this player is 1.3) you can send direct unprocessed DSD to a capable pre-amp or receiver, this is a excellent way to listen to SACD and is highly recommend by your reviewer." Is this player capable of decoding DSD and sending it via the analog audio outs to a receiver, or just "pass thru" via the HDMI out? |
| SACD - The BDP-83 plays Super Audio CD (SACD) and supports both stereo and multi-channel high resolution audio programs. Users can select whether to output the DSD (Direct Stream Digital) signal in its native format or convert it into PCM. 7.1-Channel Analog Output - Individual analog 7.1-channel surround outputs are ideal to connect to a 7.1-channel or 5.1-channel surround sound system. The BDP-83 delivers an incredible sound stage and an immersive surround experience. |
|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
There are a lot more people with copies of HD DVD movies than there are with either DVD-A or SACDs [...]
|
|
Originally Posted by Doug Otte
What's the source for your claim that more people own HD-DVD than SACD? I'd like to see those data. It might be true, but I've never seen those figures.
|
|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
That was an assumption on my part. I've been looking for statistical data to back the claim, but I'm having trouble finding it. I'm lousy at searcning for statistical data on the internet.
|
|
Originally Posted by CraigF
SACD is in there because it's...Sony. No need to pull out numbers and stats, or speculate why some of the other "missing" formats or features aren't, this is the real answer.
|
|
Originally Posted by Doug Otte
Sorry, but did you really think about this nutty idea before you posted it? How many Sony BD players support SACD? Zero.
|


