Re: A few words about...™ Pinocchio -- in Blu-ray
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScottR
Wow! If this is true that it is supposed to be there, Disney should fix it.
|
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by ScottR
Wow! If this is true that it is supposed to be there, Disney should fix it.
|
|
Originally Posted by StevenW
This much fuss over one word!? Come on.
|
|
Originally Posted by Brad Vautrinot
I don't. It's bad enough I have to sit through FBI warnings, commentary disclaimers by the studio, trailers (I love trailers but make them a menu item and not required viewing before the movie), etc.
Now I have to sit through some PC banter about second-hand smoke? What's next from Disney - a surcharge for carbon footprints? An anti soda campaign? A trash the Twinkies and MacDonalds fat diatribe? Disney has deleted and manipulated scenes in some of their classic animation movies in the interest of being PC. They are so paranoid about "offending" someone they have taken this to pathological extremes and as a result we'll likely never see Song Of The South or Fantasia or Dumbo or what have you in their original forms. Sad days. Brad |
|
Originally Posted by MatthewA
I was able to skip past the smoking intro (and yes I was in awe of the film's BD treatment; I bought and watched the movie the day it came out). I don't like it, but as long as I can skip it and it keeps the movie uncut, there are worse things to get upset over. Maybe now they can put a disclaimer/sermonette on an unaltered Fantasia BD or that Uncle Remus picture.
It's interesting how smoking gets singled out when it is viewed very disapprovingly in the film. And no warnings about: —Animal abuse —Drinking —Stereotypes of Italians, French, Dutch, and Russians —The endangered status of whales —Biting into a piece of metal —The smoke, and therefore pollution, produced by burning firewood —A child's bare bottom in one of Gepetto's clocks. —Some might consider "jackass" a bad word —Anything at Pleasure Island —Obesity —The idea that you can actually get stuff by wishing on a star —Gideon's hand gesture when Honest John reminds him of the time they tried to convince Stromboli that he was a puppet. —Single parenting If we want to warn people about antisocial behaviors, we might as well go whole hog. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Rogers
When does this warning show? I haven't seen it yet. Maybe it was the way I started up the movie. When the first Disney blu-ray trailer shows I went to menu and played the movie from the total menu.
|
|
Originally Posted by TravisR
It plays before the menu comes up. It sounds like you skipped it though.
|
| I knew this was going to come up, just as I knew everyone would ignore the issue of today's colorists tampering with creative decisions of the original filmmakers because they are careless, inattentive, or arrogantly think they can make it look better. This disrespect for the original color of early films has reached epidemic proportions and needs to be confronted head-on by critics and reviewers. |
|
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet
It's not careless, inattentive, or arrogant to do one's best to match color fidelity to the most stable and objective elements available: the painted artwork. As a matter of well informed opinion, one can argue that photographic elements should be the overriding point of reference and not the hand-painted artwork. However, that doesn't indicate that there's anything careless, inattentive, or arrogant about presuming the other point of view.
Lowery and Disney have meticulously restored the color to what they believe to be the most true representation of what the original artists wanted us to see. They may or may not have done this perfectly or to everyone's taste, but careless, inattentive, and arrogant aren't words that apply. |
|
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet
Lowery and Disney have meticulously restored the color to what they believe to be the most true representation of what the original artists wanted us to see. They may or may not have done this perfectly or to everyone's taste, but careless, inattentive, and arrogant aren't words that apply.
|
|
Originally Posted by Robert Harris
Thank you, David. Couldn't have said it better myself. An enormous amount of effort has gone into re-capturing the original look of the cells -- not prints, which are by-products, nor that old standard of archival propriety, the VHS reference tape.
|
|
Originally Posted by rich_d
I agree. I would also add (in this layman's opinion) that, specific to the color palette, I do not sense that they tried to pretty up the film. I think that color manipulation is THE issue in video of this decade, whether it is changing colors to a more 'modern' palette or warming up the colors to make the film appeal as eye candy or messing with the white/black of the film. I just do not get the sense that this has happened here.
Robert, With that viewpoint and assuming some art is in very good condition, do you think that WHV should re-capture the original look of the matte paintings in the Wizard of Oz? |
|
Originally Posted by Robert Harris
Thank you, David. Couldn't have said it better myself. An enormous amount of effort has gone into re-capturing the original look of the cells -- not prints, which are by-products, nor that old standard of archival propriety, the VHS reference tape.
|
|
Originally Posted by Craig_Ehr
Just as an aside, does anyone else think that it would have been much cleaner and easier to implement the "DisneyView" matting by mastering it with the video encode (i.e. instead of layering it on the screen using Java graphics)? Then, if you don't want to view it you select black bars to cover them up instead...no timecodes, no dropped images, no tricky software image fading, etc.
|
| Unfortunately, I can be of little help to both questions. First, I’m not involved with the Home Entertainment releases. I sometimes help in research, by finding and restoring the song demos and such. Recently, in the case of Sleeping Beauty, it was the elements I found to build the soundtrack album (in 1996) that prompted the studio to rebuild the audio for the new BluRay. If I’m involved at all, it’s usually in the historic element side of thing. I don’t know what was done on Pinocchio. Second, the Pinocchio Soundtrack is the only Classic Soundtrack (aside from Fantasia) that I did not produce. I did assist in some research to help Michael Leon (the producer) find some elements and offer advice. But what I can tell you is similar to the situations in all of my own soundtrack restoration projects as well – most of the original separated elements no longer exist. In the 1950’s there was a movement within the film industry to get rid of all the nitrate based film stock (it could spontaneously combust). When they began what I refer to as: ‘The Great Purge’, it was decided to only transfer “important” elements to the new Safety Film. In most cases, the separated elements – the vocals, the effects, the dialog, and the music elements were destroyed. They felt that the only elements necessary to save were the Composite (complete mix) for new prints over the years, and the M&E (the music and effects mix without vocal or dialog) for use in dubbing the films into other languages. They never thought that anyone would ever go back and remix a film – it was unheard of at the time, and why waste the funds. Fortunately, they weren’t completely thorough. Some elements survived ¬- maybe bits and pieces, and sometimes complete songs. Every single soundtrack I’ve restored (except for Poppins and Jungle Book), were cobbled together from whatever elements I could find. In the case of Pinocchio, I know that Michael and I found the Music Only elements. There were in mis-marked cans, and we assume that it was because of this that they survived The Great Purge. However, no vocals could be found. So we turned to the WDL record master that Tutti Camarata produced in the 1950s. It turns out that Tutti started producing the WDL soundtrack series just before the purge, so he had access to those long lost separated elements. Michael used that master as the source for the songs. It may have been when Tutti originally created those album tracks, when those lines went missing. That’s just a guess, but it seems likely. Incredibly, as we were going through those mis-marked Pinocchio cans, we came across a treasure – in the very last can were several small reels of film. They turned out to be the separated music only, vocal, and chorus tracks for “When You Wish Upon a Star”. And if the fates conspired to only allow us to rebuild and restore one song in Pinocchio – I’m exceeding grateful that was the song! I know, a lot of words just to say “I don’t know”, but there ya are. Randy |
|
Originally Posted by Robert Harris
No. The matte paintings were "as photographed," and created to match the surrounding sets. Totally different situation than cells.
|
|
Originally Posted by rich_d
I'm not sure who you are quoting with "as photographed." If you simply meant that a matte painting is created from a set design photograph, how is that different from a cell that started out as a photograph before rotoscoping?
Further, the Emerald City (cityscape) does not exist other than in the art of the matte painter. It's not matching a vision, it is the realized vision. With the discussion point about color, how is that fundamentally different from referencing the color of a painted cell? |







