Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: My Three Sons: The First Season, Volume Two
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gary
Gary "I'm a bit surprised at the number of people that seemingly don't care about this development of removing entire underscores from a classic TV show" O.
|
That's two of us here. To me, it seems to indicate that the TV/DVD buyers reside in distinctive groups:
1) Buyers that will purchase the show with minor (my def of minor won't be the same as others here) edits, ie missing teasers or tags, missing original "The ____, in Color" openings, Time Compression (that's a major deal-breaker to some here, not me), a particular song removed from episodes for copyright reasons, ie Frank Sinatra, etc, playing in a background club, restaurant scene.
2) Buyers that will pass on a release for any or all of the reasons above
3) Buyers that will get a show regardless of changes since said show is on their all-time "Grail" list.
4) Buyers that will pass on what I define as wholesale changes, like substituting the entire underscore
5) Those that will pass due to video/transfer quality
6) Buyers without specific knowledge of a show that either watched the show as kids and will purchase the show with "memory lane" or nostalgia as a primary motivation to purchase.
For myself, I usually fit into #4 and an occasional #5.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stephen
Everybody has their own set of standards, but the music excisions we're discussing are so radical that I'm surprised there's not more of a consensus on this point.
|
Stephen, I'm also somewhat suprised but imo, the reason that this seems to be so is that we on this Bd represent a small % of the sales with these sets, at least that's what I think. Where would you all guess that we at HTF represent as a % of the buying public with these these pre-70's sets? Without data, my guess is at most, we probably buy 5% of these units in sales.
I respect Randy's & Doug's viewpoints on this issue. I'm just on the other side of it

But I also think that a no-sale stance by HTF'ers wouldn't be large enough to register with the studios. I think that with some indy's, like Shout or Infinity, it's different since we have some avenues there that imo, are rare with the majors.
Bottom line to me is that for those here that buy M3S, enjoy. I'll pass due to the underscore removal.
I posted something similar to this on the Fugitive thread but it's always seemed to me that TV/DVD is viewed a lot differently than film DVD releases. ie, if a complete score had been removed and substituted in a popular film DVD release, would you guys think that the reaction would be the same as with M3S or the Fugitive? Granted, the Fugitive issue received more attention than I'd have guessed, but the result is (from CBS/P) more of the same.
I can't help but believe that it should be "apples & apples" instead of "apples & oranges" when we look at a wholesale underscore change with a TV/DVD release and a film DVD release. I realize that comparisons due to copyright reasons are a moot point. Just my "2 cents" as Gary would say

I think that what's bothered us most here at HTF with these wholesale underscore removals, is that it set a precedent that, to my knowledge, hadn't occured previously with TV/DVD. Now we have a repeat release with the original score removed. In addition, considering how it was first done with the Fugitive S2V1 release, that probably altered our perception of the studio and put us in a different frame of mind for upcoming pre-70's releases.