post #61 of 134
5/12/09 at 1:55pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by OliverK
Your post pretty much sums up the stance of a lot of people that have tried with so many words to voice their disappointment with this Blu-Ray and you brilliantly put it in just one short sentence
|
|
Originally Posted by Paul Arnette
Thanks, Oliver. Sarcasm is my preferred means of communication.
Honestly, I'm sure there is some improvement, but this release is a big disappointment especially when Fistful of Dollars has been handled so brilliantly on BD in Italy. |
|
Originally Posted by Lyle_JP
The sound-alike was never the problem. In fact, his scenes are the least jarring and out of place. It's the voices of the 70-something Eastwood and Wallach emanating from their 30-something bodies that suddenly rip me out of the moment every time I try to watch this extended cut. Had the producers tried to digitally "youthen" their voices (as was done with great success on "Lawrence of Arabia") than maybe it could have worked. But really, they should have gone with all sound-alikes or just left the scenes alone.
|
|
Originally Posted by Danny_N
I watched the region B release tonight of The Good, The Bad And The Ugly, or better, I tried to watch it. DNR on this title is as bad as Patton and The Longest Day. There is absolutely no fine detail left in the picture and the result is a BD that is just slightly better than the DVD. I turned it off after 30 minutes because I found it unwatchable. I can't believe that they screwed up this release. Very very disappointing.
|
|
Originally Posted by Paul_Scott
it looks like a fresh, clean print being as being viewed in the finest studio screening room.
|
|
Originally Posted by OliverK
It seems that now we get the extremist opinions from both sides....
|
|
Originally Posted by OliverK
It seems that now we get the extremist opinions from both sides....
Like a clean print in the finest studio screening room ??? |
|
Originally Posted by Danny_N
I don't consider myself an extremist, far from it, but TGTBTU is without a doubt one of the worst BDs I have seen. It's even worse than Patton as there is less information in the frame to begin with. Scrub away the grain and you're left with a release that looks like a DVD. The only difference is the absence of compression artifacts but fine detail, which a properly transferred Techniscope film (ie one that retains the grain) should show on BD, is completely absent.
I haven't seen the Italian release of A Fistful Of Dollars so I can't give my opinion on that (although I trust Oliver's judgement) but if anybody wants to see how good a Techniscope film on BD can look like, I suggest they check out Blue Underground's The Bird With The Crystal Plumage or ITV's The Ipcress File. |
|
Originally Posted by Paul_Scott
I don't want my Bds filtered of all texture and looking like video.
|
| BTW-this is on a Pioneer FPJ1 (JVC RS-2 clone) 1080p projector, 96" wide viewed 9' back. |
| I really think people need to pick and choose their fights with more discretion. The People who lash out at every less than absolutely perfect edition with the same ferocity just end up spewing white noise after a point. |
|
Originally Posted by Danny_N
The only BDs that I really have complaints about are Patton and TGTBTU. I have seen numerous BDs with a high level of DNR, eg Zulu, Brief Encounter, Salo, Vanishing Point, the first two Trek movies (haven't seen the others yet) but still considered them watchable. But TGTBTU is for me unwatchable.
|
|
Originally Posted by Paul_Scott
I really think people need to pick and choose their fights with more discretion. The People who lash out at every less than absolutely perfect edition with the same ferocity just end up spewing white noise after a point.
|
|
Originally Posted by Paul_Scott
While I remember even then considering it a disappointment, it was the only watchable version at the time having finally replaced the 4:3 letterbox edition.
|
|
Originally Posted by mike--
...
oops, meant to reply to the other thread on TGTBATU....... if the moderators could help me out? |
|
Originally Posted by mike--
Absolutely abominable!! I have Zulu and Patton & The Longest Day, but (which, to my eyes Zulu is the benchmark disc for what can be done positively with DNR, as for Patton & The Longest Day, I wish I could say the same! ) TGTBATU takes the cake! Some close ups and scenes do look OK, but overall this film looks way too soft for a BD.
oops, meant to reply to the other thread on TGTBATU....... if the moderators could help me out? |
|
Originally Posted by Paul_Scott
I was on the fence about opening my copy last night or packing it up and sending it back. What I did NOT want was to throw $20 away on a minimal, near indistinguishable 'upgrade' from the DVD. I pulled out the SE DVD first, and was shocked at how awful it looked. I originally watched it on a different projector. While I remember even then considering it a disappointment, it was the only watchable version at the time having finally replaced the 4:3 letterbox edition. On my current pj, which is ruthlessly revealing of poor sources, it's a real eye sore. Ringing, mpeg artifacts, smeared grain and detail that just looks like clumpy noise...the only saving grace is Leone's frequent use of extreme close-ups which mitigate all these problems.
I don't give a piss how good or what Fistfull Of Dollars looks like, the Bd of TGTBATU is a MAJOR improvment over what has been the best available version for home theater here. It really doesn't bother me that the image isn't awash with grain- that's not the only metric for what differentiates the look of video and the look of film. In all other aspects the image on Bd looks far more natural and more filmlike than the SAME FILM on DVD. And the grain isn't totally absent. Any filtering looks to have been done with some discretion and some restraint. Bottom line for me is- this doesn't look like scrubbed linoleum to me- it looks like a fresh, clean print being as being viewed in the finest studio screening room. |
|
Originally Posted by John Hodson
Happily, the Clint Eastwood disc will have all the extras of the earlier special editions, plus English, French and Spanish tracks, PLUS a mono track (hopefully mostly original) AND a previously unheard Christopher Frayling commentary track.
|
|
Originally Posted by BillyFeldman
I was curious about comments on this disc, which I thought only okay. I'm new to Blu-Ray, but I absolutely cannot believe someone here had the temerity to criticize the import of Zulu - I put that on a couple of days ago and I could not believe the beauty in front of my eyes - with achingly beautiful color and clarity - maybe the best color disc I've ever seen. Sometimes this anal fixation on whatever people perceive as whatever people perceive is absolutely perplexing. I'll go along with TGTBATU not being perfect, but Zulu - sorry, it's spectacular. I'll tell you what else is spectacular - ITV's Black Narcissus. Amazing.
|
|
Originally Posted by Lyle_JP
Well, we can forget that. As far as I can tell, the entire mono track is a mixdown of the DTS, with all the fancy new gunshots and other ridiculousness. Why did they even bother to include this? Did they really think we were all clamoring for a newly remixed mono track?
|
|
Originally Posted by Jim_K
Watched this two nights ago and thought the pq was decent enough. Perhaps not as much detail as there could have been but still a significant enough upgrade (on my system at least) from the DVD.
I saw nothing that merits some of the histrionics I've read about this release. Not that I'm surprised. |