post #211 of 237
2/9/09 at 1:08am
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
Read back a few pages.
|
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
Well, if he was less popular then he'd been fired and kicked out of Hollywood.
I was watching that documentary on Polanski where they plead and moan for Polanski, a rapist, to be given another shot. The filmmakers are bending over backwards to give the man a break yet I'm sitting here wondering if the filmmakers would go to the same trouble if some bum living in a trailer had taken his twelve-year-old neighbor, drugged her up and then slept with her. Hollywood wants Polanski to be forgiven but I wonder how much sympathy they'd have for the trailer trash. In other words, the bigger they are the more their issues will be overlooked. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
Kinda reminds me of the folks in that Polanski doc who blamed the 13-year-old girl for being at his house.
I can only imagine Bale doing that on the set of an Eastwood directed film. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
Okay, obviously I'm naive with what I write and how it's going to be taken so here goes.
Polanski: In the new documentary, everyone who defends Polanski keep saying how it was the mother's fault that she left her child at Polanski's house. They mention that the girl was already sexually active, drinking alcohol and taking pills so Polanski wasn't the one who got her started. None of these people (3 of them) ever simply said Polanski was wrong for having sex and giving drugs to a miner. Bale: Everyone keeps talking about how to act on a set. How the DP was out of line for ruining a shot. How the DP should have known better. How McG should have handled the DP. How McG isn't in control of the set. These are all fine points but not many have put Bale down for what he actually did. A simple "Bale was out of place" would go a long way. It seems a lot of people (not all) are shining a spotlight on the wrong of the DP without saying what Bale did was wrong. And please don't think I'm limiting this to the folks here because I'm not. Co-workers, other actors, directors and so forth are coming to Bale's defense. No one has said he should have handled it better. There is no attempt to compare the two acts. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
With Polanski, people should really watch the documentary but apparently he also dated Kinski when she was 15. Apparently he photographed other 12/13 year-old-girls as well. Why do people still want to work with him? I'd say because he's a great director but this goes back to the who you are and so on. If a drive-in director had done these acts then it's doubtful his career would have continued. Just look at Salva. Even Hollywood threw the book at Salva yet they give Polanski an Oscar and a standing ovation. I doubt many "normal people" remember him. If so I'd bet it was for the "sex with a minor" charge. Film buffs will certainly remember him for his talent even if it leaves a bad taste in their mouth.
I doubt this hurts Bale unless T4 turns out to be a bad movie. If it turns out bad then I'm sure some will go after him and McG. If they make a good movie all will be forgotten and the YouTube video makers will pick something else to make fun of. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
I never compared their acts. I compared the people who say neither one did anything wrong.
|
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
You can read it however you like and you are more than welcomed to be insulted by it. Just make it clear that I never compared rape and a sissy fit by a "punk".
Not even Bale can defend his actions and even he has said that he was way out of line. His so-called holy defenders can't even say he should have handled it a different way. Instead of saying Bale did anything wrong they want to push the fault to the DP or McQ. A simple: Bale was out of line but.... would have worked but these defenders can't even say that. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
Well, you're just going to have to move on in life as Bale has.
|
| I'm certainly not going to take back what I said. |
| As for silly shock value, you seem to be the one dragging it out with this overdramatic "removing respect" from myself. As with Bale, I don't know you so I can't say I'm going to lose any sleep over you losing respect due to what I wrote. I guess I'll be the bad bully and say I've lost respect for someone like you who can't say Bale did anything wrong and instead push it off on a victim and a bystander. |
| At least Bale had more guts to admit he was wrong, which is why he gets my respect while those defenders don't. |
| I'm sure if Bale read some of these defenders he'd probably go off on another rant. |
|
Originally Posted by Henry Gale
I get this sense of the end of something, soon.
|
|
Originally Posted by JohnRice
This thread went off the tracks, careened over a cliff in the pouring rain, etc.
|
| I just didn't take the time to come up with another word. |
|
Originally Posted by JohnRice
Wilhelm? I'm not familiar with that. The only "Scream" that comes to mind is Münch.
|
|
Originally Posted by JohnRice
Wilhelm? I'm not familiar with that. The only "Scream" that comes to mind is Münch.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jeff Gatie
what about that Gauguin guy?
|
| Never mind Münch, what about that Gauguin guy? Another one who screwed up a respected career (as a stockbroker) because of a penchant for young girls (and yet people still buy his work). |
|
Originally Posted by Holadem
Well, I think Bale, who I do not know, owes me an apology because he yelled at someone else I do not know, about something that's none of my business.
-- H |
|
Originally Posted by Holadem
Well, I think Bale, who I do not know, owes me an apology because he yelled at someone else I do not know, about something that's none of my business.
-- H |