Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

Good article, Ron. My SO got XM with his car purchase 2 years ago, and it certainly seems to me that quality has declined recently. Of course being a huge fan of classical music, I've never been very thrilled with XM's offerings. Now since the merger they've gone from one mediocre and two crap classical stations, to one mediocre and one crap classical station!

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

Interesting article Ron!

I've been saying from day one that the satellite radio model that XM, Sirius, and now SiriusXM have put forth is doomed to fail. There are not enough people who are willing to pay for the service for it to ever turn a profit.

Once relevant DJs like Opie and Anthony and Howard Stern, since going to sattelite, completely nominalize themselves. By moving to sattelite, they have made themselves irrelevant in the market. The few subscribers who they brought in are now there, and since they're broadcasting to a captive paid audience there won't be many more.

I enjoy the SiriusXM channels that Dish Network gives me and listen to them often. I also notice the frustratingly small playlists on my favorite stations. I have a rental car right now with satellite radio so I've been listening to it. The sound quality sucks. Both at home and in the car. At home my old Dish Network stations which predate satellite radio sound better than the SiriusXM stations. In my car local OTA radio sounds considerably better than the satellite offerings. People who care most about music listen to CDs and MP3s (even low bitrate MP3s sound a lot better than SiriusXM stations).

I know it's anecdotal, but the few people who I've talked to about satellite radio in the last year or so have all said they're dropping it. In these tough economic times who's going to pay $20/month for radio?

I think that satellite radio will continue, but on a much more modest scale and using a different model than the current SiriusXM model. There is a customer base for this kind of service, but it's a hell of a lot smaller than their models account for.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I have never had satellite radio, but I have been thinking about it lately. I am on the road 1.5 hours a day to and from work and the same old songs on my ipod are getting boring after 7 years. In the morning there is nothing but DJs, (dumb jerks) yacking away and endlessly laughing at themselves. So I listen to the ipod. On the way home I can listen about 1/2 the time to the radio if I keep switching between 3 stations. If I wanted to hear people talk I would put on talk radio, so many times I choose to drive in silence.

So I get the impression that I won't gain much with satellite radio except a new monthly bill?

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I have had CM for about a year now. The more I listen, the more I am beginning to get bored with it. There was a time I could listen to LaughUSA and actually hear new sketches. Now it seems, every time I turn it on, the same ole stuff... Just not my cup of tea I am afraid... Hopefully, baseball will be back soon and I'll have another reason to listen...

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I just grudgingly renewed (they made me a $77 for the year offer), otherwise I wouldn't have bothered. I have XM built-in my Acura TL, and I have the same beef I've always had-

The sound quality is horrendous. I have some really old 96kbps MP3s that sound marginally better. Since the merger, I've also noticed what you've said- too much talking.

They need to fix these issues, or I won't take it for $50 next year.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

Can I add a dissenting voice to all of the dissent?

It may be because I live in what has to be the worst radio market in the US, but I love my satellite radio. I got hooked on it in our new car and signed up for a year. I have since added a XMp3 and I can now listen in my office which is awesome. I hope to figure out how to get the XMp3 installed in the car soon.

Now I will grant you that most of the changes since the merger have not been good ones. The reduction in classical channels hasn't affected me yet. Even though it constitutes a larger and larger percentage of my music listening, I'm sure I'm not the aficionado that some of you are. I haven't tired of the channels yet and they are more variety than I had. Still I do understand. My wife recently got me a CD because of some work she heard on one of the channels before the merger. I doubt she would've heard it with the new lineup.

I love that I can once again listen to ESPN radio. I really like Tirico and Van Pelt. I also like having access to the BBC and other news channels. Then one of the main reasons I got satellite to begin with is for 164 (the OTR) channel. Fortunately it appears to have survived the merger well.

On the audio quality issue, I'd say that I understand the complaints as the quality can vary quite a bit, but most of the music channels I listen to seem to be pretty good. It's better than the FM I can get here. Is it my SACD stuff? Of course not, but it is serviceable.

Now the inane DJ banter...that has to go and I agree with Ron and his comments on the issue.

May I share a post-merger anecdote? I'll assume that the answer was yes. I did have some problems activating my new radio and after the first call they asked if I would like to take a customer service survey. "Just stay on the line and you'll be connected." Click. Dial tone. I chuckled.

Well the activation never did work so I had to call back and spend more time on the line getting the problem solved. "Would you like to participate in our customer service survey?" "Sure." Now I actually had a few constructive comments I wanted to pass along. Click. Dial tone. Who says customer service and value suffers when competition is reduced?

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I have so many thoughts on this I am not sure where to start...lol. I agree, when I have a music station on I want commercial free music without dj banter, especially when I'm paying $12.95 a month for it. I originally signed up with Sirius because I was a fan of Howard Stern, I bought my Sportster back at the end of 2005 and amazingly it still works. I would listen to mostly Classic Vinyl, Backspin and other channels close to those genre's. Than last April I bought a new Honda and it came with 3 months free of XM. Knowing the merger was around the corner and Mel's promise that it would be good for the consumer I ended up statying with XM, as I enjoyed their Top Tracks and The Rhyme channels and I did not have to constantly transfer my Sportster. Once the merger passed things started going downhill. Even though they were now the same company they were not giving multiple subscription discounts for those who owned an XM and a Sirius sub. Than they wanted $4 more so you could listen to Howard Stern on XM. The excuse at the time was they could not merge the channels but low and behold a few months later channels were merged and some were removed. After customer complaints some channels were brought back. Than they started censoring some channels and even though I am not a fan I can not believe they are rebroadcasting censored FM broadcasts of the Bubba The Love Sponge show. Now they want to charge $2.99 more a month to listen online and raise the multiple sub discount $2.00. This company is doing everything wrong and lately I'm starting to feel that it's purposeful. Come March I'm canceling my XM sub, I will just lug around my Sportster. I am still teetering on keeping my Sirius sub, while I am a fan of Howard and enjoy some of the music channels I am getting sick of their business ethic and I guess it will take a large amount of subscriber cancellations for them to either wake up and make a last ditch effort or it will be the final nail in the coffin of their demise. With stock in the .12 cent range I cannot imagine it's too far away.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I own an iPhone ... And with the ability of that device to dock via various third party devices to the car stereo I don't really see a need for satellite radio.

Music? The iPod capability of the iPhone provides all the music I need. And I don't really require CD quality in a car since the ambient road noise and other factors already hurt dynamic range. So MP3 quality is usually adequate. It's also possible to download a new song or album at any time anywhere via the iPhone's access to the iTunes library.

Sports talk and News? Between podcasts that are specific to the sport that you're interested in and programs like "WunderRadio" -- available for a one time modest fee at the Apple "Application Store" -- you have access to much more Sports talk and News than will ever be available via satellite. "WunderRadio" provides access to about 80% of *all* the AM and FM radio stations in the country. (Another iPhone app -- "iHeartRadio" -- provides access to most of the rest.) While the fidelity of the FM music channels provided by these apps can't compete with satellite radio, the fidelity for sports and news shows is fine. ESPN radio is easily available as well as dozens of major news talk shows. With the most recent iPhone firmware all podcasts are also available at any time via iTunes. It's also a kick to be able to hear your local FM sports talk station while on a trip ... and not have to ever worry about driving out of the signal range.

With the mixture of iPod capability and access to most AM and FM stations via applications that work over AT&T's EDGE and 3G networks, it's hard to believe that any mobile professional requires anything more than an iPhone these days. And if you have access to a Wi-Fi hotspot you'll find that the fidelity of the AM/FM stations provided by "WunderRadio" and "iHeartRadio" will rival satellite. Heck, at that point you can even use the "Pandora" app to create your own personalized music radio "station".

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I'll tell you what, I see the demise of my cash as the stock price is stuck at $0.10.

When/if will they turn a profit.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

Had Sirrius for a couple of yeats and still do in the wife's Commander. In the beginning, it was great, but now the one thing that's getting to me is their need to play the same songs over and over again. I was always under the impression commercials would be a thing of the past and I would get to here a wider selection of music. I was wrong on both of them. For example, on the soul station, I should not here Issac Hayes' version of Walk on by three times in one day. There's plenty of music out there for that genre including some b side songs.

Then the DJ giving a complete history of the song he's about to play. I have no problem with some history as it can be rather entertaining to here a song's orgin but a 5 to 10 minute dialogue on the issue, is a bit too much. My mother in law thinks it's incredible that we can listen to the same station from New York to South Carolina but the fact is there's a need for a change in format. Go back to almost no music interruption, CD quality music would be a big plus.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I think there are pros and cons to satellite radio, but there’s pretty much pros and cons for any entertainment media. (I’m sure someone has a pro about Betamax and eight-track tapes.) I think its most serious problems are the increased and fluctuating rates (I wish I could swing one of those $77 deals, but all I seem to get stuck with are the $156 yearly rates—which has definitely scared off some of my friends.) and the fact that if hardware malfunctions after a year, you’re pretty much left with having to upgrade to recent, more expensive equipment to keep up since repair parts are apparently obsolete the minute a unit is released to the general public. That bothers me more than yakking DJs, I guess.

But I still love satellite radio. I’ve had a Sirius hookup since about 2004 I think. I guess I’ve been so used to the Sirius DJ banter, that I’ve kind of become immune to it. But although the djs on Sirius’s Underground Garage are sooooo long-winded, I’ll put up with them because they play great music that I’ll never be able to pick up on any of the FM stations around the rural area I live in. (Ditto the Roadhouse and Willie’s Place Classic Country music channels.) Besides local radio around here seems to play about ten minutes of music and fifty minutes of commercials. I refuse to go back to it.

I also love that I’m able to listen to entire Miami Dolphins NFL broadcasts, which is something I can never do here in Carolina Panther and Washington Redskins FM/AM territory. Also our local AM radio sports station is ESPN until 8am, when it then switches over to local news and sports talk. I love that I can listen to ESPN all day if I want. Ditto Stern. I’m not chained to the 6am broadcast. I can listen to the show in the afternoon or the evening (although Stern’s seemingly constant whining and Artie Lange’s constant “rehabbing” are starting to wear down my patience).

My biggest irk with SiriusXM now: I almost went with XM back in the day, because they had a Cinemagic channel (movie soundtracks and songs) that wasn’t available on Sirius. I was very excited when the merger happened and found that Cinemagic would be located on Channel 81 (Sirius). Well I had to put up with two months of holiday music on Channel 81 (with news that Cinemagic would finally return on January 1). Well it did return on January 1, and I enjoyed it a lot for the three days that it aired. By the end of the week, Sirius had pulled it and ran constantly looping ads announcing the Disco channel would be coming to Channel 81 in two weeks. It seems Cinemagic had disappeared from the Sirius line-up. Is it still on XM? If so, why would they yank it from Sirius?

Sorry for the long post!

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

The Sirius DJs and limited music playlist are what should have gone.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

A very well stated article, Ron.

However, I suspect that Karmazin is the kind of guy who listens to nobody, so he'll take Sirius/XM down the same road until it runs off the cliff. Regardless of subscriber input.

I may have been the ONLY person who noticed, but almost immediately after the merger the XM Opera/Vocal channel was executed (along with the outstanding classical programmers from XM).

American Creeping Meatballism wins again.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

It is still on XM. They moved it to 76. It is now adjacent to the classical channels.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

"Channels" plural? Aside from the opera/vocal channel, isn't there just the one classical channel? XM had two: the main classical channel that played full length pieces (with far too much baroque) and the "snippets" channel that played shorter single movements and a lot of "pop" fluff. I think the "snippets" channel has been removed from XM, leaving only the main, excessively baroque, channel.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

Last I checked, which was yesterday, both the "snippets" channel you describe and the main classical channel are still there.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I've been a XM subscriber for 7 years and grown attached to The Boneyard which was a heavy metal channel that played the bands I grew up on, plus it played new songs from these bands.

When Sirius took over, they replaced The Boneyard with Hair Nation. I made a mental decision to compare the play lists. I know Hair Nation plays exclusively bands from the 80's, they do play 70's and 90's metal bands at times.

My complaint so far has been the poor playlists that this station has. Though they don't repeat songs from the same bands, they play the same bands over and over. I can listen to a Motley Crue song at 1pm and they will play another Crue song at 2:15pm. I don't call that variety. Now The Boneyard did show hints of this before the merger and I did send them an email, but it wasn't as bad as it is now with Hair Nation.

Get rid of the DJ's!! I cannot stand their stories between songs that have nothing to do with the music. If the DJ's remarks contributed to the channel in anyway, I wouldn't have a problem, for example 'Next up with we Ratt, Ratt will be playing tonight in Cleveland'. I don't care that it is Dustin Hoffman's birthday in between songs from KISS and Dream Theater.

With The Boneyard back on the air, I'm taking note of their playlists, I hope the repetition of Hair Nation doesn't leak over to the new Boneyard.

Paul

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

Ron, I completely agree with your editorial!

My experience with satellite radio has only been in rental cars on vacation. One time they threw it in for free, but on a recent trip, I paid extra because I remembered how much I loved Little Steven's Underground Garage. In both cases, I knew I would be driving around a lot and it was a chance to hear some new/unfamiliar music along with some random surprises of things that I normally wouldn't hear on the radio.

Would I pay for this at home? Maybe before, but with all the complaints I keep hearing and raised prices? NO WAY.

If the execs at the newly merged company really think consumers will pay a premium to hear "familiar songs" on satellite radio, I want to see the research that makes them so certain. It sounds like they are sticking to opinions from people who would never pay a monthy fee for satellite hoping that they can change it enough to lure them in. Like everyone else here seems to understand, this is going to alienate the people who ARE willing to pony up.

I see this whole operation going the way of Voom in the near future.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

Well written article Ron. I'll put in my 2 cents representing someone that never had a satellite radio subscription and give some of my thoughts.

I am a big music fan and to me satellite radio was and always will still be "radio". You are still at the mercy of the dj's/programmers and have no control over what is played. I think overall people who really want to listen to what "they" want in the car will either bring along their cd's or their mp3 players.
Speaking of which ... in the same last few years that satellite has been going downhill are the same few years that portable mp3's have become super cheap and aux inputs on cars have become standard, making true customization super easy.

The only time I ever considered signing up was when Stern joined Sirrius as I was a big fan and missed his morning banter. But then I thought that if he will be on Sirrius and really have his freedom to do whatever he wants, it would take away from his bite as the struggling everyman that he always related to with his battles for his freedom and his voice to be heard ... and this is what happened somewhat. He lost his bite and now he is dare I say irrelevant regardless of his astronomical salary.

Anyway, just read a big writeup in the NY Times that mentioned that satellite radio has NEVER turned a profit since their inception and are not on the way to do so in the near future. Throw in the current general economic woes that plague every business and I think they are facing the innevitable.

Bring back good FM programming I say and leave the customization to your mp3 player.
Technology has been getting ahead of itself too fast in the last decade. Its time to put the breaks on a bit and really look into what people want.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

The only exposure I've had to XM/Sirius is the fact that DirectTV now uses them for their music channels. I much preferred it 5 or so years ago, when they used a different service. The sound quality was better and they had NO DJs.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

Ron, I totally agree with you. As a long time XM subscriber (back when they actually had CD quality channels) I can say that the decline has been long and steady. For people who like talk radio (sports, news, DJs, etc.) I think the SiriusXM service may be palatable. However, every music station that I used to listen to has been completely ruined by DJ banter and short station playlists. I seem to recall reading in the XM fan forums that the old XM stations would have 2500+ songs in their rotation while the Sirius stations had around 500 unique songs in their rotation. XM150 (comedy) and XM46 (Boneyard) are two stations that I used to listen to constantly and that I will no longer turn on because they have been completely ruined. Hint to Sirius: I do NOT want to listen to DJs or annoying call-ins, I want to listen to music (or comedy). If I want a DJ show, then I will turn to the DJ station (or Stern, or O&A, etc.). 2-3hr programs (like XM150 Standup-sitdown and XM46's Eddie Trunk show) were how talk programs on music stations should be done (of course both were canceled after the merger).

I am giving SiriusXM until May to correct their problems and then canceling my subscription (I already called them and told them this).

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I miss the punk channel on Sirius - and what happened to Mel's promise of cheaper prices?

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I have been a subscriber of XM now Sirius/XM for about 3 years and I loved it. While there certainly are problems that you've all made clear. it is still better than the 20 minute an hour of cemmercials you get on FM.

Beyond that though. I am getting the feeling that the time for satellite radio is probably at an end. With the coming of nation wide wireless internet coverage, how long will it be til you will simply log into your favorite on-line radio in your car? I seriously doubt that Sirius/XM will exist as a true "Satellite" radio service 5 years from now.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

Well, I guess it is official:

Sirius XM plans official rate hike for March 11th - Engadget

I'm not personally bothered by them charging for the stream as I don't use it, but it may be a bummer for some. I'm also not sure how many would be willing to pay for it. Seems a bit pointless with all the free streams available.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I didn't follow this that close so maybe I just don't know. But it seems to m I remember one of the main reason the FCC allowed the merger to take place was that Siriur/XM would not be allowed any kind of rate hike for 3 years after the merger takes place.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

Wow. I guess I'm not the only one less than impressed with the merger. the 80s station used to be my favorite on XM. I no longer listen to it as I can't stand the DJ and the playlist leaves a lot to be desired. I used to listen to 25, 26 (bring back flight 26 please!) Come on do we really need channels dedicated to Elvis, Springsteen and Sinatra? They just combined traffic channels so Seattle now shares with SF, no more wait less than a minute for traffic. I have a tuner in the house and one in each car and I have started to think about canceling.

Re: Opinion: The demise of satellite radio

I also miss the old 80s station on XM and I think the general consensus here seems to be that the DJs need to go or at least be scaled back. It does make me wonder what their market research is telling them about the DJs. Are they more popular with the general population of listeners? As far as I'm concerned, if they want to cut costs they could lose the DJs. I don't know what to do about the playlist.