Re: THE FUGITIVE - Season 2 Volume 2
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mike from the 60's
More like, who at the studios will be "dropping acid" when the decisions are made for the soundtrack to S3.
|
It's back to the 60's

But I get your drift. "Ain't it the truth?"
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gary a fellow Fuge Fanatic
And this is why I'm not as willing to give CBS/Paramount a pass like many of the folks in this thread are apparently willing to. I just can't do it, because no matter how you slice it the studio could have done a better job with just a little bit more effort. There are undoubtedly several people living in and around L.A. that would have gladly worked on this project for little to nothing - people that do know the cues! It's not something the "average Joe" would want to handle, but it's not nearly as impossible a task as some might believe.
|
That's it for me as well. Because of the inconsistencies with the entire backscore issue, I can't see applauding CBS/P much to date. Yes, they did re-issue S2V1 and it's definitely an improvement, but, and here's where my view differs substantially from some here, is that the Rugolo portion of the backscore, while a necessary portion (and admittedly the "sig" of the show) is not enough for me to give "kudos" to CBS/P. For some of us, the cues are a big part of the mood for this show.
This is just imo here, but for me, I place the Rugolo portion at about 60-65% of the overall "impact" for me when I'm watching the show.
Another imo about this issue, but seeing how as it's opening day for us baseball sports fans out there, the analogy that I put on this backscoring replacement/editing/Heyes, etc.. issue is how a MLB batter would feel if they swapped out home plate umpires after every inning. Let's see...."Low strike zone"...."High strike zone"...."Nat'l League" strikes...."American League" strikes.....
"Know what I mean, Vern?"