Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking) - Page 3

post #61 of 136

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

Brothers Bloom is haphazard and flawed but very entertaining and quite satisfying in its own way. 7 of 10
post #62 of 136

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

I would love to supplement Adam's notes on The Brothers Bloom, but the showing I attended was plagued by technical difficulties, such that I obtained a full refund. What I saw I liked. Either I'll try again or wait for DVD (Blu-ray, if I'm lucky).

Valentino, the Last Emperor is a kind of retrospective biography of the fashion icon from the perspective of his 2007 anniversary show in Rome. The documentary team seems to have enjoyed complete access, because the footage is very revealing of Valentino at work and at the center of the private kingdom that has been constructed around him. Even if you have zero interest in fashion (like me), this is a compelling portrait of a remarkable character: fascinating, funny and stranger than anything a screenwriter could invent.
post #63 of 136
Thread Starter 

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

Added Terminator Salvation, review here. The movie itself was lackluster but entertaining; it does stand out as one of the best 35mm film presentations I've seen in years. In focus, properly matted, clean print. Things that used to be taken for granted but are now exceedingly rare.
post #64 of 136

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

Updated with TERMINATOR SALVATION. Never thought I'd see the day where three horror remakes (Last House, F13, Valentine) featured more imagination than a Terminator movie. A big disappointment but hopefully the next one will be better.

I'm going to try and catch TYSON this weekend as well as DRAG ME TO HELL.
post #65 of 136

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

Night at the Museum 2 is adequate as a sequel, a bit better than the original, aided greatly by Amy Adams' outstanding Amelia Earhart, which is easily the best thing in either movie by a country mile. It's still horribly flawed by a bloody inconsistent magic system whose internal contradictions are lazy and never explained. Yes it's a macguffin, but to have one be successful, you have to provide a reasonable explanation, otherwise the audience will care, and they'll be annoyed--or at least I will be.

Easy Virtue is wonderful, charming and a delight all around Colin Firth is brilliant, Jessica Biel eventually measures up to the brits (a tough role to play where you have to be intimidated by the other cast members in the beginning and then gradually shed that attitude as the film progresses, it makes her look like she's just not in their league in the early scenes, but the role calls for just that perception of her to be communicated). Kristen Scott Thomas is delightfully bitchy and vicious, and there's an extended scene with a small yippy dog whose humor is so perfectly timed and honed it would feel at home in a Chaplin movie. The dialog is refreshingly full of wit, intelligent yet accessible, which means the film is often laugh out loud funny simply by the cleverness of the lines and the superb delivery and context, very nice to discover that's still possible in a modern film. though perhaps only possible if Noel Coward is your source. The soundtrack is also fantastic, I knew most all of the songs already, but my friend commented at how suprisingly modern all the songs were, not bad for 70+ year old tunes.
post #66 of 136
Thread Starter 

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

Added Up. Had to wait for the 10:10 showing because the other 3D showings were sold out. Despite occasionally veering into Disney formulaic territory, it one of one the most meaningful pictures that Pixar has yet released. It asks big questions about nature of life, especially near the end of it, but wisely avoids concrete answers. After the opening scenes, the film covers decades in a montage full of life's ups and downs that puts a lot of faith in its young audiences. Wonderful achievement.
post #67 of 136
Thread Starter 

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

Added The Hangover, the latest of Todd Philips's incredibly watchable R-rated dumb comedies. Like Dude, Where's My Car?, guys who wake up deeply hungover with no memory of the previous night must retrace their steps to find something (or someone) of great value. This film mines the formula for everything its worth, fitting back together with clockwork precision and continuous surprises. Highly recommended.
post #68 of 136

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

the Hurt Locker is easily the best of the Iraq war movies, a superb tension-thriller that focuses on a fascinating and intense pair of character portraits of bomb squad members James and Sanborn.

Jeremy Renner is excellent as Staff Sargeant James, the leader of a bomb disposal unit in Iraq in 2004 (a time when there were few such units around, although the film makes the anachronistic mistake of referencing youtube, which iirc was invented 2005 and became popular in 2006). Anthony Mackie is completely brilliant and astonishing as Sergeant Sanborn, and in some ways I was more impressed with his performance as a perfect foil to Renner. Renner displays a ton of range and manages to a remarkable performance. There are undercurrent metaphors about leadership, fear, death, recklessness, courage, sacrifice, and more packed into the film and the fact that it is able to mine and utilize those deep elements of male comraderie is remarkable. In my opinion it's the ability to tap into those sorts of metaphors underlying the stress of combat that all the great war movies have in common, and Hurt Locker can join their ranks.

Additionally the film has the best sound design in a film since Dark Knight or Transformers, it begs to be heard in a terrific theatre, incredibly impressive, and sure to garner at least one oscar nomination for mixing, if not two picking up the editing nom as well. (I also think Mackie could very well get himself a supporting nod here, but that Renner's perf will unfortunately be overlooked. it shouldn't be, it's the first legitimate oscar performance of the year (both of them are). simply outstanding.

I have only one caveat about the film, and that is I was about the eighth or ninth row of the theatre and about twenty minutes in I started getting badly nauseaus. This happened once before, when I was unfortunate enough to sit in the fourth row while watching Rachel Getting Married. So I think I just can't handle the shaky cam effect when it encompasses the entirety of my field of vision. As soon as a lull hit, I snuck to the rear corner of the theatre to watch the rest of the film. It's unfortunate, but I was the only one who seemed to have a bad experience with that, guess I'm just sensitive to it, or just watch movies on screens that are too big from too close. :-p

9 of 10
post #69 of 136

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

Most recent viewing:

Moon: The first film I've seen in a while that felt like genuine science fiction, anchored by a terrific performance (or should that be "performances"?) from Sam Rockwell. I'm not sure how wide a release this will get; so this may not get a big audience until DVD/Blu-ray.

The Taking of Pelham 123: Solid performances all around, but in the end I was underwhelmed. I think it was Helgeland's script. It felt workmanlike but uninspired.
post #70 of 136

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

The Proposal: Harmless silliness; the right Saturday film after a tough week.

Whatever Works: Even though the script was originally written for someone else, it's perfect for Larry David, who brings a genuine mean streak to the film that makes the familiar Woody Allen character a lot more obnoxious -- and also more interesting. Evan Rachel Wood plays dumb so effectively that she's almost unrecognizable (and she sounds like Anna Paquin in True Blood). Patricia Clarkson almost steals the movie until the bar scene between Ed Begley and Christopher Evan Welch (the narrator of Vicki Christina Barcelona), when they steal the movie.
post #71 of 136
Thread Starter 

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

Added The Brothers Bloom, our first opportunity to see what Rian Johnson can do with a proper budget. Frankly, I preferred his previous indie picture. The biggest problem is the problem I always have with con men movies; when you're never sure what is real and what is fake, the effect is to detach the audience from the proceedings rather than reel it in. That being said, it is a surprisingly hilarious film with a very sure sense of its own pacing and style -- almost like a live action cartoon. Our introduction to the brothers in the beginning is absolutely terrific. The music choices were not obvious yet fitting. Overall, a movie I enjoyed but admired rather than loved.
post #72 of 136
Thread Starter 

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

Added The Uninvited, my first theatrical 2009 release first experienced on DVD. A stellar film more concerned with circumstances, perspectives and suggestion than cheap thrills. Elizabeth Banks channels Louise Fletcher effectively, but the film hinges on Emily Browning's deceptively simple performance since it is through her eyes that we experience everything. A triumph of casting, rounded out by David Strathairn as the earnest but distant father and American Pie: Band Camp's Arielle Kebbel as the film's perpetually drunk horror movie T&A. A very smart horror movie.
post #73 of 136

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

Cheri: The reunion of star Michelle Pfeiffer, director Stephen Frears and screenwriter Christopher Hampton didn't produce a classic like Dangerous Liaisons, but it did produce an interesting film if you watch it with the right attitude. (It was alternately amusing and embarrassing listening to the two Bens on At the Movies miss the entire point of the film.) It's the story of an aging but still beautiful French courtesan who falls into a relationship with the much younger son (nicknamed "Cheri") of a "colleague" played by Kathy Bates. Based on a novel by Collette, it's about what happens when two people whose lives have supposedly deprived them of all possibility of falling in love suddenly do so -- and then don't know what to do about it. Sumptuously produced, often grotesque, sometimes funny, ultimately tragic.

The Hurt Locker: It's great to have Kathryn Bigelow back in the director's chair after so many years' absence. This film following the activities of a bomb disposal unit in Iraq deserves all the praise it's getting and then some. It displays all of Bigelow's characteristic strengths: taut action sequences, crisp editing, a frame that seems to vibrate with tension even when the shot is still. "War is a drug", the film proclaims in a text display at the beginning, and then it proceeds to show us 2+ hours of mainlining.
post #74 of 136

Re: 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

catching up:

Up is perfection and the year's best film, and in my opinion, Pixar's finest and most sophisticated film to date. 10 of 10

Seraphine is a very solid French film with a tremendous central performance. The film is consistently compelling and interesting but it never really soars, definitely worth watching though, this is a story and artist worth knowing about. 7 of 10

Angels and Demons made me want to visit Rome moreso than I already did. I must admit it was utterly fascinating and far more interesting and compelling than the Da Vinci Code. Then again, I'd had the misfortune of reading the wretched Da Vinci Code so watching the movie was just an extension of the page-turning-tedium of reading the book. Ron Howard does work in this film that I feel is deeply unappreciated, of all the summer action films this one is easily the finest directing. The screenwriting, characters and plot are all cardboardish, but the direction elevates the material into a compelling and very enjoyable film experience. Tom Hanks also contributes a great deal, his presence and performance I feel was a more interesting factor in the film this time, though he's still not so much integral to the plot as he is a writer's homonculus capable of knowing the depth and breadth of minutia necessary to advance the plot. 6 of 10

Food Inc is really a film I shouldn't be reviewing as such a film is basically preaching to the choir with me and I had a disastrous turn a few years back when I took a traverse through health fanatic wacko land. However when I eventually returned to reason I had a few principles I kept. Sugar, flour and Corn products are pretty bad for you, most of the organic stuff is just as industrial as conventional, and you can always find a new degree of 'omg healthy' that is more and more narrow (and expensive) with greater and greater health claims. And the final conclusion I made was that I can't escape corn on my salary anyway because it'll be part of all my meat, poultry, eggs, fish, milk, cheese and any and every prepared food, so perhaps it was all a losing battle anyway. What's remarkable about Food Inc is that it possesses the same sort of conclusions I came to, this is not a hardcore anti industry film, it shows clearly the complexity of the issues, presents alternatives (Salatin's famed farm, for example) as well as the breadth of contemporary food production. More than anything this is a film about how our food is produced, rather it is CAFO beef, mass-chicken, or corn on top of corn and it is very entertaining about showing where our food comes from and what goes into the production of it. Remarkably they got aerials of the CAFOs and undercover footage of processing plants, so much of this film is material that has often been suppressed since due to many states food-libel laws we're not allowed to know about our food's path to us or say anything against us (witness the woman in the film who refuses to say what changes her family has undergone since losing a daughter to industrial food ecoli because she's afraid of lawsuits. and it's a well founded fear that the pants could be sued off her for simply stating specifically how they've changed what they eat. In any event the film is fantastic, very entertaining and I imagine for many people extremely informative, one of the very best documentary's I've seen (crossing my fingers for the oscar). 10 of 10

Whatever Works is another success for Woody Allen, the film is very funny, funnier even than some of his early funny ones. Evan Rachel Wood is a revelation here, delivering her best performance since Thirteen. And she is also gorgeous. Larry David has been called a thinly veiled Woody Allen, and I think that is entirely the wrong tact to take. To me it was clear from the beginning that this character was Groucho Marx, not Woody Allen. The similarities to Woody's own life not-withstanding, I feel that there is a greater sense of anarchy to David's worldview than an Allen characters usually possess. In any event the film is consistently witty, entertaining and charming and the entire audience laughed their asses off. 8 of 10

The Hangover is not at all what I expected. It's more of a comic detective story than it is a frat boys gross out humor. It has more in common with a Coen Bros' comedy than anything else. The script is every bit as tight and well thought out as Big Lebowski or O Brother Where art Thou? and the writers obviously paid immense attention to making every scene matter, both in the initial run through and in planting an element that will payoff later in the film. That's the fundamental genius behind the coen's comedies, that their scripts are so insanely complex yet utterly clear and precise. There have been few other filmmakers who have managed to update the tradition of Wilder or Hawksian screwball comedy into the modern era, but in many ways, The Hangover is the finest Hawks-esque screwball comedy of the modern era, and that was completely unexpected. To be fair, I guessed where the missing groom was from the moment they visited the location (before he goes missing) which if anything enhanced my pleasure in the film. :-p 8 of 10

Transformers 2 is a deeply problematic film that fails on far more levels than it succeeds. I do not think the plot was too complex to follow. I do think that having all the characters be confused during the film doesn't help plot comprehension, especially when the audience is even more confused than the characters. The script also fails to match the humor and charm of the first film, often taking a more serious tone that seems at odds with the action and nature of a film about giant robots clobbering each other. Additionally the robots have no chance to develop their personality because they only ever fight. It really makes you realize how important those scenes of the robots goofing off in Sam's yard was in the first film, as ill advised as it all seemed at the time. Why, for example does Optimus Prime only ever fight? Good guys have a grand tradition of outwitting their opponents as often as they outfight them (except of course in Tarentino crap) I'd have much rather seen some cleverness from the robots to vary their impact in the film. But perhaps the biggest problem with the film is that any rules governing the limitations of the robots powers are completely thrown away whenever it is inconvenient for the writers (because they've written themselves into a corner), as new superpowers are introduced we have less and less stake in each new fight because there's no consistency. I did very much appreciate Fallen's Egyptian royal headdress though which was the film's singular subtle touch. Shia LaBeouf's ability to carry this film is truly remarkable and I really hope that the third film gives him a better script to work with as he's shaping up to be a capable actor accompanied by some very strong charismatic star power, and few actors his age have displayed that quality of late. 4 of 10
post #75 of 136
Holiday weekend viewing:

The Girl from Monaco: A cleverly dark satire that goes right past some viewers, as Ben Lyons so amply demonstrated on At the Movies. It's about the mess that ensues when utterly incompatible notions of seduction and its uses collide with each other. For the aging celebrity lawyer, Betrand (played to perfection by the great Fabrice Luchini), it's an indulgence and a passtime, pursued in the traditional French manner where the mind is the principal  erogenous zone. For the amoral young weather girl, Audrey (Louise Bourgoin in her film debut), it's both good fun and a useful tool for career advancement. For Christophe, the bodyguard hired to protect the lawyer during his current high-profile case in Monaco (a nicely understated Roschdy Zem), it's all about satisfying a natural bodily need before getting back to the job at hand. The film takes you to some unexpected places, and they're not always comfortable. Featuring the legendary Stéphane Audran as Bertrand's stony-faced client.

Public Enemies. Not my favorite Michael Mann movie, but a very good one.

Tetro. Francis Coppola's first wholly original script since The Conversation. It's a gorgeous film with a much more straightforward plot than his previous effort, Youth Without Youth. A young man, Bennie (impressive newcomer Alden Ehrenreich), comes to Buenos Aires, looking for the brother, Angelo (Vincent Gallo), who had abandoned the family years ago in apparent revolt against their father, a brilliant and world-famous conductor (Klaus Maria Brandauer). Angelo is living with Miranda (Maribel Verdú, from Y tu mamá también) and now insists on being called "Tetro". A tortured story of family secrets and rivalry is gradually revealed as Bennie and Tetro alternately confront and run away from each other. Carmen Maura co-stars as an influential critic and, as always, adds a shine to the screen. Shot in luminous black-and-white with occasional color sequences that leap off the screen, and with sophisticated sound editing by Walter Murch. Some viewers will find it trying and arty, and it does risk both of those things. But it's also brilliant.
Edited by Michael Reuben - 7/12/2009 at 11:58 pm GMT
post #76 of 136
Thread Starter 
Added Away We Go, a great little film from a director I don't particularly care for: Sam Mendes. While the film is littered with his trademark absurdist touches, the complete product is almost a rebuttal of the model of humanity presented in American Beauty; while there are some truly awful people in the film, starting with the male lead's parents, there are also plenty of decent, warm, loving people that find themselves in awful situations. And there are people like Burt and Verona, who have found in each other the life they want to have. Their cross country trek exposes them to various outrageous and tragic models of what family means, until finally they find home. IMDB tells me the film was written by David K. Eggers, acclaimed novelist of A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, and his wife of seven years. Neither he nor she is free from the pretensions they so brutally mock. But his back story has more than a fair share of tragedy, and together they have found happiness. Together they seem to argue that is brutal, disappointing, surprising, hilarious, and devastating. Taken together, the final product should be seen as an endorsement.
post #77 of 136
Thread Starter 
Added Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. After my disappointment with Order of the Phoenix, I wondered if it was the new director or the new screenwriter that was the biggest problem. Half-Blood Prince definitively answered that question. This screenplay is a masterpiece, one of the best examples of adaptation I've yet experienced. Steve Kloves has improved with each script in this series, and the penultimate installment (if you count the two-part Deathly Hallows as one film) benefits from his experience. Each storyline builds upon itself with a very tangible, if sometimes understated, payoff. His last script, Goblet of Fire, made the decision to dump buckets of plot in favor of character development -- a decision I very much approved of. With this film, Kloves takes advantage of the scarity of big set pieces to have both. This is the first mystery, so to speak, since Chamber of Secrets that felt fully developed. The teen romance hijinks serve to obfuscate the main story thread, which is Harry hunting Draco hunting Dumbledore. Said hijinks also highlight Kloves's aptitude for humorous interludes, stripped down and largely bungled in the fifth go-round. Terrific adaptation, tremendous film.
post #78 of 136
That's how I feel, having Kloves back made an enormous difference and the film feels more like Goblet of Fire (still the best of the lot. :))  I do think some of the problems from the fifth film are still evident in this film (lack of pacing internally within the scene, for example), but their much less hampered because the rest of the film is strong.  Some of it was frustratingly inane though. :-p
post #79 of 136

Latest:

Bruno: I laughed. I didn't care what was and wasn't staged.

Yoo Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg: Truly fascinating documentary about Gertrude Berg, the woman who invented the TV sitcom as writer, producer and star. During her long career in radio and TV, she single-handedly wrote 12,000 (yes, twelve thousand) scripts. She was also the first winner of the Emmy for best female lead in a comedy. Today no one remembers her, because, at the height of her popularity, she refused to fire a blacklisted co-star, and that was enough to get her show canceled. I Love Lucy took over the time slot, and Gertrude Berg, and her TV alter ego, Molly, were history. The blacklisted co-star, Philip Loeb, whose chief offense was successfully helping to organize the Actors Equity union, committed suicide. The character that Zero Mostel plays in The Front is loosely based on him.

Transformers 2: How badly will my credibility suffer for saying that I enjoyed this? It's a comedy. It's a very silly comedy. Even the robot scenes are comedies. (When Tony Todd brings out that ripe theatrical voice as the Fallen, who can be expected to keep a straight face? When Sam gets tossed on the bed by every college freshman's wet dream, who turns out to be a killer robot, I was almost on the floor!) Now, admittedly, I bring a skewed perspective to all of this, because Julie White, who plays Sam's mother, is one of my favorite comic actresses, and she can crack me up with the flick of an eyebrow. And John Turturro was one of the best things about the first film ("The man's an extortionist!"); I practically cheered when he showed up on screen. 

Bay has always understood that movies like this have to be funny. Sometimes he does a better job than others, and I agree with Adam_S that the big robots in 1 were funnier than those in 2. But then you get one that Mikaela puts on a leash, who pretty much behaves like Leo Getz in the Lethal Weapon films. The big robots may be dull, but the little ones are pretty funny.  

post #80 of 136
Thread Starter 
An old friend of mine is moving out of state at the end of the month, so a few of us got together and drove down to the Hi-Way Drive-In in Coxsackie for I Love You, Beth Cooper. It proved to be a more fascinating experience than I'd expected. While the set pieces are about as cardboard cut-out as you can get, it's one of the few high school one last hurrah comedies that treats its characters as people rather than archetypal props. It also notices how parents shape who we become. As the protagonist Denis Cooverman, Paul Rust is as nerdy as we've seen on the big screen since Eddie Deezen, the type of creature seemingly genetically doomed to nerdom. But his parents are caring, firm but not overbearing, functional and still very much in love. Alan Ruck and Cynthia Stevenson rein in their usual eccentricities to be the kind of parents some of us were lucky to have, and the rest of us wish we had. Beth Cooper is the goddess of Buffalo Glen High School, but she is the product of physical passion at a KISS concert. Both Denis and Beth are smart, perceptive, complex teenagers. But Denis is going to Stanford in the fall, and Beth has a vague interest in community college. After a life of hell, Denis sees a bright future opening up before him. After a life atop the social hierarchy, Beth is perceptive enough to see a future of banal mediocrity unfolding before her. Like most head cheerleaders, she has a pair of lackeys in tow. Unlike most head cheerleaders, she doesn't abuse them and they don't lack for their own aspirations. One is smart and cultured, a fact that she doesn't hide but strategically doesn't emphasize. The other is responsible for the best one liners of the movie; stupid isn't quite right, she's something stranger. The movie could be about the geek trying to get into the beauty's pants, but it isn't. After a while, sex is entirely beside the point. It's a movie about the unlikeliest pairing in the graduating class getting to know one another and finding something they'd given up hope in. Beth Cooper teaches Denis how have fun and start living. Denis gives Beth Cooper something deeper. As Beth Cooper says good bye to Denis at the end of the film, she hugs him and he hugs back with a gentle warmth that she seizes on. Beth Cooper, so desired by so many, has never felt really loved by anyone until Denis. We see her face but Denis doesn't, as the confident facade cracks and Hayden Panettiere conveys just the right balance of surprise and longing. If, down the road, Beth Cooper is the beautiful wife of millionaire nerd Denis Cooverman, she will not be with him for the money. Their children will be lucky to have the kind of upbringing Denis himself was lucky to have.
post #81 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben View Post


Transformers 2: How badly will my credibility suffer for saying that I enjoyed this? It's a comedy. It's a very silly comedy. Even the robot scenes are comedies. (When Tony Todd brings out that ripe theatrical voice as the Fallen, who can be expected to keep a straight face? When Sam gets tossed on the bed by every college freshman's wet dream, who turns out to be a killer robot, I was almost on the floor!) Now, admittedly, I bring a skewed perspective to all of this, because Julie White, who plays Sam's mother, is one of my favorite comic actresses, and she can crack me up with the flick of an eyebrow. And John Turturro was one of the best things about the first film ("The man's an extortionist!"); I practically cheered when he showed up on screen. 

Bay has always understood that movies like this have to be funny. Sometimes he does a better job than others, and I agree with Adam_S that the big robots in 1 were funnier than those in 2. But then you get one that Mikaela puts on a leash, who pretty much behaves like Leo Getz in the Lethal Weapon films. The big robots may be dull, but the little ones are pretty funny.  


Haha! Nice and a little surprised Michael. I wish you'd posted that review in the Transformers 2 thread it would have made all the difference. There's so much negativity in those threads, that people who enjoyed the film were either embarrassed or scared to post something.

A list of 2009 release films I've watched so far.

Ratings out of 5.

Aliens in the Attic 
Angels & Demons 
Antichrist  
Avatar  
Boat That Rocked ,The 
Bronson   
Bruno   
Coraline  
Crank 2  
Crew ,The  
District 9  
Drag Me to Hell 
Dragonball Evolution  
Duplicity  
Extreme Movie
Fast and Furious  
Fighting  
The Final Destination
500 Days of Summer 
Friday the 13th  
G.I. Joe - Rise of Cobra  
Gamer  
Hangover ,The  
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince  
Harry Brown  
Haunting in Connecticut ,The  
He's Just Not That Into You  
Hurt Locker ,The  
Hydra 
I Love You Man  
Ice Age 3 Dawn of the Dinosaurs
Infestation
Inglourious Basterds 
Jennifer's Body  
Knowing   
Land of the Lost  
Last House on the Left  
Law Abiding Citizen 
Lesbian Vampire Killers 
Mega-Shark vs Giant Octopus  
Miss March 
Monsters vs Aliens 
Moon  
My Bloody Valentine 
Night at the Museum 2 
9   
Observe and Report  
Orphan  
Pandorum  
Paranormal Activity 
Paul Blart Mall Cop   
Perfect Getaway ,A  
Pink Panther 2   
The Proposal  
Public Enemies  
Push    
Spirit ,The  
Star Trek   
State of Play  
Street Fighter Legend of Chun-Li  
Surrogates  
The Taking of Pelham 123  
Terminator Salvation   
Transformers - Revenge of the Fallen  
12 Rounds   
2012 
Unborn ,The   
Underworld - Rise of the Lycans  
Up  
War Wolves  
Watchmen   
Wolverine  
Wyvern 
Year One  
Zombieland  
HK - Blood the Last Vampire  
HK - Red Cliff II   
HK - Sniper ,The  
Japan - Tokyo Gore Police  
Anime - Storm Riders   




Edited by Steve Christou - 1/10/10 at 8:34am
post #82 of 136
Quote:
I wish you'd posted that review in the Transformers 2 thread it would have made all the difference. There's so much negativity in those threads, that people who enjoyed the film were either embarrassed or scared to post something.
 

By the time I saw the film, most of the posting in those threads had already happened. Besides, no one cares what I think .  

This thread is like a personal journal, and I really enjoy that.
Edited by Michael Reuben - 7/27/2009 at 12:15 pm GMT
post #83 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Christou View Post

There's so much negativity in those threads, that people who enjoyed the film were either embarrassed or scared to post something.
 


I agree with that unfortunately. I didn't like Transformers but given how much money it's making, there's clearly many people that loved it. But if you look at only the internet, you'd think it was the most hated movie ever made and that most likely isn't the case.
post #84 of 136
I forgot to include The Hurt Locker in my 2009 film list, directed by Kathryn Bigelow the film follows an elite bomb squad in Iraq. The film has a documentary feel thanks to the use of mostly unknown actors. There is plenty of tension as the squad goes about its dangerous business defusing roadside bombs, watched by people who wouldn't care a jot if the bombs blew up in the soldiers faces. Recommended.
post #85 of 136
Thread Starter 
Added 500 Days of Summer, a film I'd already had plans to see upon release here when I got an email from Fox Searchlight a day or two back with free passes for an advanced screening. One of the few films that delivers exactly what its trailers promise, exactly as well as you were hoping it would. The last time I saw Joseph Gordon-Levitt was his breakout performance in 2005's Brick. Here he cements his status as non-traditional leading man material. He doesn't match our perception of masculinity, but he carries himself with masculine confidence. Zooey Deschanel's performance is a bit of a cypher; Gordon-Levitt's character never quite gets underneath the beautiful, strange and charming persona the Deschanel has perfected over the course of her relatively short silver screen career. It is as well-rounded a portrayal of love as I have seen, capturing the soaring highs and miserable lows that embodies. We see events as Gordon-Levitt's character sees events; what is presented is emotionally true but certainly not literally true; with love, when is that not the case? The 500 days span from the first moment he lays eyes on Summer to the day when he's finally able to move on from her. Summer is frustrating, beguiling, even at times unconsciously cruel to him. But she is, in her own way, honest with him. As the narrator warns at the beginning, this is not a love story. It is, however, a celebration of love and the very act of living.
post #86 of 136
Thread Starter 
Added Judd Apatow's Funny People, which is simultaneously more rewarding and less rewatchable than the director's previous two works. An invisible line separates them: 40-Year-Old Virgin and Knocked Up are essentially raunch comedies with better developed and more empathetic leads than you'd usually expect. Funny People is hilarious at times, and comes fully stocked with plenty of raunch. But from the acting to the rythym of the editing to Janusz Kaminski's melancholy cinematography, you can't escape the feeling that Funny People is a film while its predecessors were merely great movies. Our protagonist is Seth Rogan's gullible but well-intentioned comedy writer Ira Wright (Weiner), but the picture's lead is of course Adam Sandler's character, George Simmons. Simmons is a parody of Sandler, down to the riddiculously awful PG-13 movies. The film opens with a camcorder video over the main credits of the real Sandler making prank phone calls in his twenties. That side of Sandler, the side that thrived on SNL in the early 1990's, is evident in George Simmons. But he approaches George like his characters in Punch-Drunk Love and Reign Over Me. From our first moments with him, we sense something is profoundly missing with him. Not repressed like Barry Egan nor emotionally tramatized like Charlie Fineman. The movie hints at possible sources for his problems, but by the time we meet him, the damage or disfunction has already festered into a manner of living. A health scare prompts him to reconnect with his ex-flame, but the events that unfold make the case against George. As Ira notes near the end of the picture, George is the only person he's met that's learned nothing from his near death experience; he got worse. The supporting cast is equally terrific. Jonah Hill continues to polish his established persona as Ira's roommate, which is just fine with me. Rounding out the living situation, Jason Schwartzman thrives as a sitcom star that loves to lord his newfound success over them. Apatow's wife Leslie Mann plays George's old flame, and her real life children are again along for the ride, just barely fictionalized: Preteen Maude plays Mabel, and her younger sister Iris plays Ingrid. It's fascinating in the Harry Potter sort of a way seeing them change from Knocked Up to this movie along with the rest of Apatow's stable of actors. Maude in particular is entrusted with a more sophisticated role this time out; Mabel is a precocious modern kid, but she shares a scene with George where she expresses the universal fears of a 10-year-old worried her parents are going to get a divorce. Ira, who is the product of a divorce, clues in on this from the moment he is made aware of the situation. George, who is the product of a couple that probably should have divorced, appears to think Mabel should suck it up. There's a lot of angles to take with this film, and it's definitely an announcement that Apatow is a talent to be watched on the silver screen. After all, it took Woody Allen seven movies to happen into Annie Hall.
post #87 of 136
TV Host: What's the baby's name?
Brüno: I gave him like a traditional African name: O.J.
African-American Lady: WHAT?

I cringed, I squirmed, I laughed out loud and I cringed again. Bruno's not a film I'd watch again in a hurry but it did have some hilarious moments. My favourite bit was the least offensive - Bruno "the most famous gay Austrian since Arnold Schwarzenegger" wants to be an actor in Hollywood and his agent gets him on the tv series "Medium" as an extra, Bruno somehow ruins take after take and gets kicked off.

Warning offensive language ahead -

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
In another funny sequence Bruno hooks up with some swingers and somehow they don't twig that he's gay until they're in full swing, he starts patting the guys on the back while they're at it with the ladies, one guy explodes "This is a fuckin' swingers' party. OK? If you don't want pussy, if you don't want fuckin'... then quit fuckin' touching me and quit looking at me. I definitely ain't lookin' at you in the eye. OK? I didn't come here for no fuckin' queer shit, OK?" 

Not sure if I can honestly recommend Bruno. But if you're looking for something truly offensive, here it is, enjoy.
post #88 of 136
Thread Starter 
Added Orphan, which features an absolutely brilliant and chillingly realistic first half that has fun subverting the standard horror movie bag of tricks -- think The Good Son only with a much better young lead. The whole movie revolves around Isabelle Fuhrman, and like Lina Leandersson in Let the Right One In it can be said that she gives a real and complete performance. Through the first half of the film, she's right up to the level of the film, playing every beat exactly right. In the hackneyed, increasingly ridiculous second half, she's better than the film even as she's called upon to bring less and less to the table. Vera Farmiga also does a terrific job as the mother whose troubled past robs her of credibility at crucial moments. Unfortunately, she has the misfortune of almost looking like a lot of other actresses, so I spent most of the movie trying to figure out if she was Maggie Gyllenhall with colored contacts or maybe Julie Delpy with brown hair, etc.  Meanwhile, Peter Sarsgaard plays the world's most clueless and casually cruel husband. All in all, I can think of a half-dozen better ways to end the picture than the way it actually ended.
post #89 of 136
Latest:

Lorna's Silence: I'm still warming to the style of the Dardenne brothers, but their latest film has the advantage of a truly gripping central performance by Arta Dobroshi as the Albanian immigrant, Lorna, who is caught up in an elaborate scheme of false marriages (yes, plural) to establish citizenship. Part of what makes the film interesting is the way you're dropped into scenes and only gradually get the information to make sense of them. The criminal enterprise in which Lorna finds herself trapped is never thoroughly delineated -- my wife and I spent a long time trying to piece it together, and finally gave up -- but that's part of the point. Lorna's just raw material for this machine, and the film sticks to her point of view. We never see more of the machine than she does.

Julie & Julia: Another stunning transformation by Meryl Streep, who not only conveys the sheer exuberance of Julia Child, but also the iron will required to get her through many years of revision and rejection before she became the national institution that, in retrospect, she seems always to have been. Unlike many critics, I enjoyed the contemporary portions of the film with Amy Adams playing the failed novelist trying to reinvent herself as a blogger, but that may be because I think Adams can do no wrong. My biggest complaint: Adams and Chris Messina (as her husband) should have been a lot fatter at the end of the year-long project to cook and eat all of Julia Childs' recipes from her influential French cookbook. But they're professional actors; so, of course, they look like their svelte selves. Nora Ephron's best film in years.

Adam: Could have gone wrong in so many ways and doesn't. The film is anchored by Hugh Dancy's remarkable performance as the title character, a high-functioning young man with Asperger's Syndrome smitten by his new neighbor, Beth, a school teacher and aspiring children's book author played by Rose Byrne. Exceptional supporting work from Frankie Faison (as Adam's older friend) and from Peter Gallagher and Amy Irving (as Beth's parents, who have their own issues). If you think you know where the film is going, you're probably wrong.
post #90 of 136
Thread Starter 
Added:

District 9, a strange little confection of a movie that never quite resolves what it wants to be. Is it an Apartheid parable? An alien shoot-em-up? A tolerance story? A freakish transformation story a la The Fly? Things are made stranger by the choice of protagonist: a happy-go-lucky, Murray Hewitt-esque mid-level flunky in a multi-national conglomerate (called, unimaginitively enough, Multi-National United) with businesses that include arms manufacturing and the administration of refugee camps for the 1.8 million strong alien population in South Africa. The first half of the film is far superior to the second half, where the stakes have been reduced to survival at all costs. The parallels between the slums of District 9 in this timeline and the slums of District Six in Capetown are fairly straight forward. After a preliminary examination of the starving population inside the spaceship hovering over Johannesburg, it is decided that all on board are worker drones -- the leadership appears to have mysteriously disappeared. Once settled on the surface, the MNU officials treat the aliens (called prawn for their Crustacean-like appearance) as worker drones, barely worth their contempt. The aliens were run into are no more or less violent than any confined human refugee population. Midway through, however, we are introduced to a few aliens from the leadership class and they are, for lack of better wording, more human than the rest. This portrayal is counterproductive, because it seems to affirm the assumptions of the South African regime. Since the movie is presented in a loosely mockumentary format, though, perhaps that is the point. The ending is neither the worst nor the best possible ending based on the information we have been presented.

Race to Witch Mountain, a 2009 film now out on DVD, which was far more frustrating than I expected it to be. When I Redboxed it out of nostalgia for the earlier film, the reviews has led me to expect something awful. It was not. Dwayne ("The Rock") Johnson does a terrific job carrying the film, making scenes work even when both the script and the editing are working against him. AnnaSophia Robb is also great, carrying the bulk of the load for the two alien siblings with a performance that it is both rigidly alien and emotionally compelling. You believe that she's a brilliant extraterrestrial and terrified child. Cheech Marin and Garry Marshall also pop up with fun cameos. The frustration comes from the tension between the movie's themes and ideas and its strict adherance to the PG family audience. Both the 1975 Escape to Witch Mountain feature and the 1995 TV remake felt completely natural as family movies. But this film has violent mob gangsters, Men in Black style federal agents, and alien assassins. The audience just doesn't fit given the pieces with which it was assembled. Carla Gugino, who managed to be dangerous and seductive as well as warm and maternal in the family-focused Spy Kids series, is here stripped of all the tools that makes her such a compelling screen presence. Every scene with her in it is less compelling than the scenes without her. Most frustrating is the lack of faith in the audience; some really compelling science fiction ideas are introduced but quickly dropped for more pedestrian subtitutes. The most interesting comes in an early scene where Robb's alien girl has just demonstrated telekinesis for Johnson's cab driver. That's impossible, he declares, to which she responds: "No, it's quite possible. On our planet as well as yours. You don't do it, because you haven't learnt to use your full brain capacity." More interesting than Superman-esque aliens that look identical to us is the idea that the species the children actually come from a different branch of the same human tree that was split off and seperated at some previous point in time. I know I would have been more interested in a movie where young technologically and intellectually superior humans come into contact with their primitive genetic forebears for the first time and find that we have something to bring to the table too. It would have made the journey one of discovery of the alien twins as well as their Earthing companions, in the way that the orphans slowly piecing together their heritage was in the original.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › 2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)