Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2009)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Track the Films You Watch (2009) - Page 26

post #751 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

05/04/09

Night Unto Night (1949) Dir: Don Siegel
Production: Warner Bros.

Chicago scientist convalescing in the Florida Everglades meets a widow haunted by the memory of her dead husband. Somewhere on the east coast of Florida, while looking at a house to rent, John Gaylen (Ronald Reagan) finds the owner, Ann Gracie (Viveca Lindfors), in a disturbed state. He offers to take Ann to the home of her friends, the Shawns (Broderick Crawford and Rosemary DeCamp), to make sure she is safe. There she tells the story of hearing the voice of her husband, who died in the war, talking to her in their old home, the one for rent. That night, John suffers an epileptic attack. His condition is deteriorating, it’s taking a toll on him mentally, giving him suicidal thoughts. As John and Ann grow closer, amidst the backdrop of an approaching hurricane, will whatever measure of happiness they find save them from their demons?

The whole ‘Florida coast preparing for a hurricane’ scenario is reminiscent of KEY LARGO. This film was actually in production in late ’46, pre-dating the Huston film, but was shelved for two and a half years. The treatment of epilepsy is a little strange, was it a death sentence 60 years ago? They act like it is. It takes a while to get any sort of handle on the story, eventually there’s some kind of point about the finality of death, but it’s too incoherent to resonate. And when it’s over, there are more questions than answers. Reagan is good. Lindfors (the future Mrs. Don Siegel), however, is shown up by Osa Massen, playing Ann’s sister Lisa, a kittenish man-eater who turns nasty after John spurns her advances. Broderick Crawford is playing a philosophy spouting artist, so yeah, that's unlikely. The technical aspects of the production are impressive. The film is expressively shot by Peverell Marley and there is a nice, moody score by Franz Waxman.

out of 4
-----------------------------------
DON SIEGEL – “Expressive Esoterica”
Night Unto Night (1949)



James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Mighty Niagara (1943) (short)
Production: MGM

This Traveltalk does as good a job as you can with a movie camera of conveying the virtually incomparable grandeur of Niagara Falls. Opens with a standard panoramic shot of the scene from the Ontario side, including Horseshoe Falls and looks at both Niagara Falls cities, in New York and Ontario. Even though all sense of the magnificent scale of the Falls is absent, there are still some great shots taken from the Maid of the Mist boat. Apparently, by the time of this short, Niagara’s days as a honeymoon destination were waning or over. But in its day, it attracted the likes of Mr. and Mrs. James A. FitzPatrick, among many others.

out of 4


James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Picturesque Massachusetts (1942) (short)
Production: MGM

Off to Massachusetts, and where else to start but Plymouth harbor, where we see a stone canopy covering a certain rock and a statue of that providential figure, Massasoit. To Duxbury, and the house that John Alden and Priscilla Mullens lived in, still standing, still inhabited by an Alden, 8th generation. Then quick looks at a colonial restoration town in Sudbury, courtesy of Henry Ford, the birthplace of Clara Barton, and some of the historic and resort towns on Cape Cod. Lacks a 'wow' moment, feels like a field trip.

out of 4
post #752 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

This weekend: Werewolf Marathon

An American Werewolf in London
This movie has always held a special place in my heart. Not only is it a good and fun werewolf movie. It is the first ever werewolf movie I remember seeing. It is the movie that started my love for werewolf movies. I absolutely love the effects of the werewolf transformation. I thought they did a wonderful job on it... especially considering how old this movie is. It is hard to believe this movie is almost 30 years old already! I think Rick Baker really needs to be praised for the work he did on the effects of this movie! I thought the cast did a wonderful job as well. What do I say about the gore of this movie? It is kind of hard to explain. While the gore is there some of it is done in a lighthearted way. Like with the visiting corpse of David's friend Jack. I don't know if I am making sense here as I am having trouble putting my thoughts into words... but it is like the gore is there... but in a light hearted almost comedic way... but it don't have a look of it. more of a feeling of it, the actual looks of it is fantastic. I hope I am not being too confusing there. It is like the movie has a mixture of both serious and fun gore. If there is such a thing as fun gore. OK... I am rambling now... lets end this in saying that I absolutely love every minute of it! In my opinion this is a true classic horror in every since of the word!
post #753 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

This weekend: Werewolf Marathon

An American Werewolf in Paris
I remember when I first got this sequel 6 years ago... that I was not thrilled with it. And the fact that I have never watched it again till now had me not expecting much at all from it today. I tell you.. this movie isn't worthy of being a sequel to An American Werewolf in London! It fails miserably at even coming close to the bar that An American Werewolf in London set. That being said... it really isn't totally bad. I did like the girl, Serafine (played by Julie Delpy), quite a bit in this one. Not that Jenny Agutter was bad at all in the first one. This is just no more then a decent average werewolf romp. Not something that I will probably watch often. But entertaining every great now and then.
post #754 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

After Ingmar Bergman, Satyajit Ray is my favorite director. And so it was killing me that I had no DVDs of his on my shelf. I've pretty much given up on any possibility of getting decent region 1 releases of his work (with the possible exception of the Apu trilogy, Criterion or someone's gotta get to those eventually), so I bought a bunch of cheapo region-free imports. I selected from a variety of companies so that I could see who does the a decent job with them. Since I've already written at length about the films, my reviews are almost entirely about the DVD quality. Unless anyone's really interested in who's better, "Shemaroo" or "Big Home Video", I'll just post my scores here:

Charulata (rewatch) - 10
Kapurush (rewatch) - 8
Mahapurush (rewatch) - 6
Jalsaghar (rewatch) - 9
Pratidwandi (rewatch) - 10
Shatranj Ke Khalini (rewatch) - 7
post #755 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

This weekend: Werewolf Marathon

Ginger Snaps
This is another of my favorite werewolf movies. I originally first heard of the Ginger Snap movies when a good friend of mine started raving about them to me. I told her I couldn't wait to check them out and the next thing I knew she had given me all three of them for my birthday that year. It is one of those independent movies that you go into it not expecting too much but then you are pretty much blown away by it. Sure... some of the effects aren't as great as they could be if this movie had the budget of a blockbuster movie... but it looks like they did a very good job with what they had. It looks like they used the bulk of the effects budget for the end of the movie... using effects sparingly until then... which really seemed to work well for them. This movie also don't follow all the rules of Werewolves that Hollywood put into place. Of course there is nothing wrong with that. There is one downside... that is the portrayal of the sisters mother played by Mimi Rogers. Which is surprising to me as I normally like her in the things I have seen her in. But this time... not so much. But it could have been more the character then her performance. As she seemed more annoying then anything.
post #756 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

This weekend: Werewolf Marathon

Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed
I won't say I enjoyed this one as much as the first one... but I still definitely enjoyed this one. It of course takes place after the first one. But this time it centers around Bridget more then Ginger. Though you do see and hear from her throughout the movie. I liked the character of the younger girl who is nicknamed Ghost. I also liked the ending of this movie. It was both interesting and unexpected.
post #757 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

This weekend: Werewolf Marathon

Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning
Once again I prefer the first one. But this one is very good... I enjoyed it about as much as the second one. This one is of course a prequel. It shows how the Fritzgerald sisters has been cursed through-out time... in all their previous lives. I thought it was a quite original idea. At least I personally haven't seen it often at all. I do wish they would have changed the girls personalities at least some in this one since it wasn't meant to be within the same lifetime. You would think they would change some from one life time to another. But in this case they not only have the same names... but it is like they have the same personalities as well. At least that is how it seemed to me.
post #758 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

This weekend: Werewolf Marathon

The Howling
This is another one that I enjoy quite a bit. Released the same year as An American Werewolf in London... but doesn't rank quite as high for me. Don't get me wrong It is still an entertaining movie that I enjoyed a lot. But time wasn't as good to this one as it was to An American Werewolf in London. While watching it I felt like I was watching a nearly 30 year old movie. That wasn't the case on the other one. I did enjoy Dee Wallace in this movie. She drew me right in. And I especially enjoyed how they ended the movie. This one also had good werewolf transformation effects.
post #759 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

I agree that time hasn't been overly friendly to THE HOWLING. I still enjoy the movie but it's dated very badly since I first started watching it as a child. On the other hand, the uncut version of THE HOWLING 2 is a pure, campy delight due to the over the top gore, which was missing on the VHS when I first saw it years ago. The film is still bad but the gore is great. I also agree that AN AMERICAN WEREWOLF IN LONDON is very good. I haven't seen the sequel since opening day at the theater but I wasn't too fond of it but I might revisit it at some point. I was glad that the sequel came because an art house theater played the original film at the midnight movie where I ended up seeing it three times after a few months. I somewhat enjoyed the first GINGER SNAPS film but didn't care for the other two. CURSED I thought was awful. I haven't watched BLOOD AND CHOCOLATE yet even though I heard it was a semi-remake of I WAS A TEENAGE WEREWOLF. Nicholson's WOLF is another one I enjoy of the recent films. MOON OF THE WOLF is a TV Movie from the 70's that I liked as well.

THE WOLF MAN (1941) is still #1 to me though.
post #760 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Ruth Orkin: Frames of Life (1997) Mary Engel

Nice. low-budget documentary short takes a look at the career of photographer Ruth Orkin. That name might not be too familiar to people, it wasn't to me, but this documentary does her justice in showing why those who do know her love her work so much. We get some really beautiful clips of her work, which includes photographs of the likes of Tracy, Brando and other Hollywood stars. We also get a brief intro to some of the autographs she collected as a child including one by Clark Gable. The documentary also briefly goes over her marriage with filmmaker Morris Engel who she also worked with on his picture LITTLE FUGITIVE. The movie runs a very short 18-minutes but it packs in some nice information and in the end turned out to be a fitting tribute. Julie Harris narrates.

Sunday Round-Up, The (1936) William Clemens

Effective and highly entertaining musical short from Warner benefits from the use of Technicolor as well as its nice cast. The film deals with a Pastor (Dick Foran) who can't get people into church because they're at the local bar where they can play cards and see various musical acts. The pastor decides to fight fire with fire by hiring a few music acts for his church. I wasn't sure what to expect with this thing but I've always enjoyed watching Foran and he's in fine form here as the tough as nails pastor with a great voice. Foran is a lot of fun in the film as is a young Jane Wyman and horror fans even get to see a young Glenn Strange who of course is best known for playing Frankenstein's monster in the last three Universal films of their famous series. It's also funny seeing him credited at Glen "Peewee" Strange. The music is very good, the performances fun and the Technicolor adds a lot to the film. This was certainly a nice little gem well worth checking out the next time it's on TCM.

Background Beat, The (1965) No Director Credtied

Semi-documentary talks about the 1965 film ONCE A THIEF as director Ralph Nelson sits down with composer Lalo Schifrin to talk about what would work best in the film. We see the two discussing the psychological impact that the film needs and the best way to get this out of the score. I haven't seen the film in question but it did look mildly interesting but as far as this short goes it was okay but more could have been done. I think the film works best as we get to see the director and composer discussing what should be done

Glimpses of California (1946) No Director Credited

Another entry in the long running MGM series TravelTalks with James A. FitzPatrick. This time out we take a look at California and learn why Spanish settlers wanted to come there after Columbus reached the country. Also on hand are various sites, which centered around the famous gold rush. We also see some wide ranging railways, flowers and other sites. This is pretty middle ground in regards to the series but it does manage to have some great eye candy, which is brought out even more by the nice print shown on Turner Classic Movies. The movie shows us some nice scenery and FitzPatrick's narration is always good.




Mothra vs. Godzilla (1964) Japanese version Ishiro Honda

Original title: Mosura tai Gojira

During a typhoon a large egg washes up on shore and it turns out to belong to Mothra. She wants it back but a greedy developer decides to keep it for his own financial gain. Soon the mean Godzilla wakes up and starts tearing up Japan so now the greedy people need the help of Mothra to destroy him. I've read several reviews calling this the best of the original series and while there are plenty of nice things, overall I couldn't help but walk away disappointed because all of the bad things in other films like this are also on display here. Perhaps I'll get booed for saying this but when I watch a movie called MOTHRA VS. GODZILLA, I want to see the two of them do battle. We get a great battle sequence between the two but this lasts less than ten minutes and that leaves us with another 79-minutes of talk, talk and more talk. For the life of me I can never figure out why we get a campy film yet the screenwriter takes it so serious to bog it down with one dumb situation after another. We have men fighting in rubber suits with some other bad special effects yet the tone of the movie is fit more for a Bergman film. The movie has a few nice action sequences but I must admit that I was bored during the final battle, which has Godzilla going up against two of Mothra's offspring. I've never been impressed with the matte work in these films and that holds true here and I also wasn't impressed with the two small women. The special effects behind them were quite silly as was another sequence where the Japanese heroes go to their island to try and ask for Mothra's help. In the end, this is a mildly entertaining film but it has way too many flaws to completely work. Akira Ifikube's brilliant music score is certainly the highlight of the film.

Godzilla vs. Hedora (1971) Yoshimitsu Banno

Original title: Gojira tai Hedora

Better known as GODZILLA VS. THE SMOG MONSTER, this entry in the Japanese series is considered by many to be one of the worst. I personally wouldn't call it the worst and I say this because the movie is so bad I couldn't help but laugh at it and have a good time. The people of Japan are polluting their land and soon all of this leads to the oozy Hedora showing up and spreading more pollution everywhere. Thankfully Godzilla isn't doing anything and shows up to help them destroy the creature. There's no denying that this is a very poorly made film and an embarrassing one because of its message that it keeps trying to pass off. As laughable as the screenplay is you can't help but some of this had to have been on purpose and this starts with the music score, which just doesn't fit the film at all. Another hilarious sequence deals with Hedora's ability to throw polluted mud pies at people and one of the funniest bits is when one hits Godzilla upside the head. Godzilla's reaction is priceless and had me laughing so hard tears were about to come out of the eyes. Even wilder scenes include strange animated sequences, wannabe hip Bond-like sequences and another strange sequence where Hedora flies over some people turning all of them into skeletons. The wildness doesn't stop there as there's constant puss flowing from the mean guy. The fight sequences with Godzilla aren't anything special but they did contain a fair amount of charm.

Terror of Mechagodzilla (1975) Ishiro Honda

Original title: Mekagojira no gyakushu

Sequel to GODZILLA VS. MECHAGODZILLA has aliens picking up the broken pieces of Mechagodzilla so that they can rebuild him. They plan to use him to destroy the Earth but thankfully Godzilla comes to have some fun. After the opening, which uses stock footage from the previous film, there's very little going on in this movie until the wonderful final twenty-minutes. The beginning hour is just downright horrid and had me fighting back sleep because of how dreadful it got. Once again we have three different monsters in the film yet the screenwriter just wants to spend time with some stupid scientist and police officers. This might work is we actually had an interesting story for them to work with but that's not the case. Instead we have some of the dumbest aliens on this side of an Ed Wood film and, as was the case in PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE, the filmmakers take a cheap way out and have the aliens looking like humans only here they're wearing silly silver outfits. Once Mechogodzilla and Titanosaurus start to tear through Japan is when the film becomes fun and ends up being some of the best stuff from the series. The battle sequences are all very good as Godzilla must battle both bad guys as all sorts of things go flying through the air. The buildings crashing down still look incredibly fake but it's still fun. I really wish more would have been done in the middle so I could enjoy this film more but as it stands, just watch the final twenty-minutes and leave the rest alone.

Godzilla vs. Monster Zero (1965) Ishiro Honda

Original title: Kaiju daisenso

A couple astronauts (one played by Nick Adams) travel to Planet X where they are shocked to find an alien race asking for their help. Apparently King Ghidorah is holding them hostage so they ask for the help of Godzilla and Rodan. The astronauts agree to help since the aliens promise to tell them the cure for cancer but sure enough there's a twist, which has all three monsters threatening to destroy Earth. This is a pretty fun film from start to finish, although I'd argue it runs about ten minutes too long. With some editing down of the talking scenes this here would have played much better but as it is the movie remains one of the better ones I've watched from the series. As with many others, the budget is obvious very, very low and this is clear in how many things look incredibly fake but this has a certain charm here because it all looks rather unique. The outer space sequences have a surreal nature to them and the aliens are somewhat enjoyable even though they look just like any other human except for the weird clothes. Adams is fun to watch in the film as is the supporting cast, which is something I haven't said too often while viewing these movies. The final battle sequences are a lot of fun with Godzilla getting to do some boxing and Rodan doing his thing. AKA: INVASION OF THE ASTRO MONSTER



Let the Good Times Roll (1973) Robert Abel, Sidney Levin

Concert/documentary covering a Rock 'n Roll Revival, which toured the country and featured legendary acts like Little Richard, Chuck Berry, Bill Haley and the Comets, Chubby Checker, Bo Diddley, Fats Domino, The Five Satins and many other bands who probably hadn't been seen since the 1950's. I'm not sure if this tour or the film was done due to the success of AMERICAN GRAFFITI but they could have called this film a live version of the soundtrack to that film. The movie will certainly have your foot a shakin' throughout the running time as we get one classic song after another. If it was a hit in the 1950's then more than likely its being played here. There's just so much wonderful energy in each and every performance that you can't help but love this thing. The film was shot 2.20:1 so there's a lot of wide shots to perfectly capture all the performances. Much like WOODSTOCK, this film uses split screens to capture a lot of the action and this works out nicely. We also get some archival clips from the 1950's with various people preaching about how rock music is evil. It's always fun seeing these clips just to see how foolish those people still look. Also thrown in are clips from various films from that era including THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL, THE WILD ONE and I WAS A TEENAGE WEREWOLF. Fans of the classic rock 'n roll will certainly be doing themselves a favor by watching this great gem.
post #761 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

05/07/09

The Skull Murder Mystery (1932) (short) Dir: Joseph Henabery
Production: Warner Bros.

Mystery short written by S.S. Van Dine (of Philo Vance fame) is one of a series with, of all people, Donald Meek as the crime-solving ‘Dr. Crabtree’. Creaky early sound production with that strange, halting rhythm in the spoken dialogue, probably something to do with the lousy recording technology. This particular entry has some minor buzz about it because not only does it have Chinese characters played by Chinese actors, but one of the characters is a successful antiquities dealer. Pretty interesting for the era, right? However, before we start handing out image awards, I think it’s clear that the character is Chinese precisely so the audience, especially of that time, should suspect him. Otherwise, a few interesting/weird moments, like a persistent creepy moaning that pervades the last 5 minutes and a scene with Meek wearing an unsettling ‘death mask’ of the dead man in order to frighten a suspect into confessing, but the ‘mystery’ is woefully thin—neither a motivation nor how the victim was killed is ever explained, despite the perpetrator making a big deal over why he had a moral imperative to commit the killing. And if you don’t know who Dr. Crabtree is or what he’s doing tagging along with the police, you still won’t know after this one ends.

out of 4


The Male Animal (1942) Dir: Elliott Nugent
Production: Warner Bros.

College set comedy based on the play by James Thurber and director Nugent. Henry Fonda plays absent-minded English professor, Tommy Turner, whose plan to read in class a letter from Bartolomeo Vanzetti (of Sacco and Vanzetti fame, the original cause célèbre) as an example of fine composition, is revealed in the editorial of a student newsletter, causing much fear and recrimination within the collegiate community. When a bloviating trustee (Eugene Pallette) gets wind of the plan and sternly suggests the reading of the letter be skipped, Tommy only becomes more determined to do so, because after all, a “college is a place for ideas, not just your ideas or my ideas, but all ideas.” (ha ha ha! good one, movie.) Adding to Tommy’s feeling of being under attack is the arrival of everybody’s All-American and the greatest half back in Midwestern U’s history, Joe Ferguson (Jack Carson), who is in town to attend the big rivalry game against Michigan, but is also an old flame of Tommy’s wife, Ellen (Olivia de Havilland).

It’s pretty easy to read Professor Turner and Michael Barnes (the student who wrote the editorial praising Tommy), the two bespectacled intellectuals in the film (everyone else is more interested in the football game), as the authors of the play, Thurber and Nugent (also, Nugent played Turner on Broadway). Both writers went to Ohio State (Midwestern U, get it?) and the story in its way is a fairly acid taking down of college culture and athletics. The film does also takes the opportunity to make Tommy and Michael look silly (when everyone else is at the Michigan game, they stay home, get drunk and exchange theories on the ‘male animal’). It’s just not especially funny for a comedy. It too often mistakes loudness and rat-a-tat dialogue for humor. Fonda, so brilliant in THE LADY EVE, could’ve used Barbara Stanwyck, Charles Coburn and William Demarest to work off of. His ‘drunk’ acting is pretty awful. Olivia de Havilland is also victimized by her material. Jack Carson’s presence, however, embiggens the production, as it does in many of his films. He provides the few laughs. I’m also not sure about the flow of the narrative. The letter plot is introduced, dropped after about 15 minutes, and then for more than an hour the film is a marriage farce with the Tommy-Ellen-Joe love triangle front and center, and mirrored in another triangle involving Michael (Herbert Anderson), Ellen’s younger sister, Pat (Joan Leslie), and current Midwestern football star, Wally Myers (played by Don DeFore). Tommy’s dilemma with the letter is then revisited in the last 10 minutes, where Fonda gets to play ‘better than you’ (oh, yeah right you didn’t see that coming?) and everyone is suitably chastened, though there’s certainly nothing wrong with the message.

out of 4
------------------------------
ELLIOTT NUGENT – “Miscellany”
The Male Animal (1942)



05/08/09

James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Glimpses of Mexico (1940) (short)
Production: MGM

Open on the Bandera monument at Toluca, and a hearty ‘Viva Mexico!’ from Fitz in honor of that country’s recent commitment to “modern education and social equality”. Then to Lake Chapala, the largest body of freshwater in Mexico. Chapala flows into the Rio Grande de Santiago, the largest river in Mexico, and forms the Juanacatlán Fall, the “Niagara of Mexico”. The rest of the short is spent on the arts, crafts and music of Mexico. Best shots are the floating gardens of Xochimilco, which looks like a movie set, and the bird-men pole dancers which were also pretty cool/insane.

out of 4



Broken Lullaby (1932) Dir: Ernst Lubitsch
Production: Paramount Pictures

No Lubitsch touch here, in this post-WWI story of a French soldier haunted by the memory of the German he killed. Paul Renard (Phillips Holmes) is the soldier. When a talk with a priest fails to give him any peace, Paul’s guilt drives him to go to Germany and beg forgiveness from the family of Walter Holderlin, the German soldier he killed. There he meets Walter’s father (Lionel Barrymore), mother (Louise Carter) and fiancé, Elsa (Nancy Carroll). Paul initially struggles with telling them who he is, and the Holderlins mistake him for one of Walter’s pre-war French friends. When Paul and Elsa fall in love, it becomes even harder for Paul to reveal his secret. As he lives with the Holderlins as their new ‘son’, Paul’s conscience reaches the breaking point.

Excellent montage to open the film and set the scene (one brief shot: an Armistice Day parade is viewed at ground level through a space created by the missing leg of one member of the crowd), typical of this well photographed (by Victor Milner) production. The symbolism isn’t particularly subtle--a dead German soldier carries around Beethoven sheet music--and the melodrama is suffocating at times, but then most pacifist pieces from the time suffer similarly. The occasional ‘sad violin’ in the score doesn’t help. One of the better scenes shows a group of clucking, gray-haired German businessmen at lunch, discussing their hate and distrust of the French. But when Dr. Holderlin, who has taken Paul into his home, arrives to join them, no one will have a drink with him. It is one of the stronger points in the film—old men send young men to war and it suggests the role that nationalism plays in those decisions (smartly predicting WWII). The picture is mostly well acted, though Holmes is awful. His every line and gesture is delivered in a tortured over-acting flourish. Mercifully, almost no one else in the cast goes down this road. The standout is Lionel Barrymore, touching as the father, whether he’s angry or grieving. The dishonest ending isn’t very admirable, although that could be by design (but I doubt it).

out of 4
------------------------------
ERNST LUBITSCH – “Pantheon”
Broken Lullaby (1932)



Three Brave Men (1957) Dir: Philip Dunne
Production: 20th Century-Fox

A Naval Department employee’s world is turned upside-down by charges that he is a ‘security risk’, which gossipy members of his community interpret as being a communist. When we first see Bernie Goldsmith (Ernest Borgnine), he and his family are at the town of Riverview’s American Legion Memorial Day picnic. His daughter is the winner of the Legion’s essay contest. His son wants to go to the Naval Academy. Bernie has been a faithful worker for the Navy and an active member of the Riverview community. But his past is littered with several tangential connections to communist causes; a subscription to a newsletter, participation in a ‘political discussion’ group, certain associations. The Navy suspends Bernie, pending a hearing, and it soon gets around Riverview that he is a communist. Bernie, and his lawyer, Joe DiMarco (Ray Milland), must then begin the longshot task of clearing his name.

This is a finely acted courtroom drama from longtime screenwriter Dunne (HOW GREEN WAS MY VALLEY, THE GHOST AND MRS. MUIR), that lacks any real high points. Borgnine does a nice job on the helpless, well-intentioned Bernie. Virginia Christine is in the thinly drawn wife role. Milland, and in smaller roles, Frank Lovejoy, Dean Jagger, Nina Foch, Frank Faylen and Joseph Wiseman, as a bigoted finger-pointer, all do well in their parts. In a rather provocative move, especially for a story that’s a McCarthy parallel, the film allows that it’s the Navy’s obligation to at least investigate an employee with these ‘connections’, and it is the process which gets corrupted, by lying witnesses, runaway investigators, etc. Then again, this was probably done out of self-interest to get the cooperation of the Navy, rather than some attempt at evenhandedness. I also note a strange bit where the Goldsmith’s rabbi is said to be in the hospital, so the town’s Presbyterian minister (Andrew Duggan) counsels the Goldsmiths instead. They really couldn’t show a rabbi on screen?

out of 4
---------------------------
PHILIP DUNNE – “Miscellany”
Three Brave Men (1957)
post #762 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Our Hospitality - I started watching this once a while ago, and never finished it. Looking at it again now, I remember why. It's pretty slow moving for a slapstick comedy, especially at the beginning. There are good gags scattered throughout, and the stuntwork at the climax is amazing. Overall, not one of Keaton's best, but like most of his work it's entertaining enough. Rating: 7


Top Hat - Fred and Ginger are magical, naturally. And the movie has a lot of terrific verbal humor, good songs, and wonderful supporting performances from Edward Everett Horton and Helen Broderick. But I really hate when the comic premise is a wacky misunderstanding. Especially in a case like this, where the mix-up would be quite easily dispelled, if not for a series of miraculous coincidences and people constantly speaking obtusely. The film's more charming aspects kept me from getting too annoyed, but still I enjoyed Swing Time more. Rating: 7
post #763 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

This weekend: Werewolf Marathon

Underworld
Werewolves, Vampires, Action, Romance... this movie has it all. I know of many people that don't care for this combination of action and horror... but I have always liked it. This is actually the first time I watched this movie in quite a while. I really enjoyed this movie. It has lots of great action and beautiful imagery. I especially liked the look of (as they put it) the Gothic metropolis. While I liked the look of the werewolves in this movie... I felt a little disappointed in the transformation. I mean the CGI effects for it is alright... but after watching movies with it done "old school" I much preferred the look of the transformations from 20 to 30 years ago. But over-all I really enjoyed this movie. I am glad I decided to watch it again.
post #764 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Just so I can remember all the 2009-released movies that I saw when I make a Top 10 list at the end of the year, I'm going to list them here:

Movies released between January 2 and December 25
My Bloody Valentine (2009) (3-D)
Paul Blart: Mall Cop
Vacancy 2: The First Cut

Taken
Fanboys
Friday The 13th (2009)
Fired Up!
Watchmen
The Last House On The Left (2009)
Sunshine Cleaning
I Love You, Man
Adventureland
Observe And Report
State Of Play
Obsessed
X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Star Trek
Terminator: Salvation
Drag Me To Hell
Up (3-D)
The Hangover
The Taking Of Pelham 1-2-3 (2009)
Year One
Away We Go
Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen
The Hurt Locker
Public Enemies
Bruno
I Love You, Beth Cooper
Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince
500 Days Of Summer
Orphan
Funny People
G.I. Joe: The Rise Of Cobra
A Perfect Getaway
District 9
Inglourious Basterds
Taking Woodstock
The Final Destination (3-D)
Halloween II (2009)
Extract
Sorority Row
The Informant!
Jennifer's Body
Capitalism: A Love Story
Pandorum
Paranormal Activity
The Invention Of Lying
Toy Story/Toy Story 2 (3-D)
Whip It
Zombieland
Couples Retreat
Good Hair
An Education
Black Dynamite
The Stepfather (2009)
Where The Wild Things Are
Saw VI
The Box
A Christmas Carol (2009) (3-D)
The Men Who Stare At Goats
The Blind Side
Precious: Based On The Novel Push By Sapphire
Fantastic Mr. Fox
2012
Armored
Up In The Air
Invictus
Avatar (3-D)
Sherlock Holmes

italics = saw it on cable or video
Edited by TravisR - 3/7/10 at 8:47pm
post #765 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

05/09/09

Sabotage Agent (1943) Dir: Harold S. Bucquet
Production: MGM

A British munitions expert is sent into Czechoslovakia to sabotage a Nazi poison gas factory. London, 1940. British Intelligence is looking for a man with very specific talents, he must be fluent in Romanian, German and chemistry. Enter Captain Terrence Stevenson (Robert Donat), who we first see defusing a 2000 lb. bomb that has landed in a hospital, but not detonated. Once briefed (and after a nice scene with him saying goodbye to his mother, which was oddly the only scene cut for the American version, Adventures of Tartu), Stevenson is dropped into Czechoslovakia, in the guise of the dubious Romanian character (read: gigolo) and Nazi officer, Jan Tartu. ‘Tartu’ is billeted in the home of a Czech woman, there with her daughter (Glynis Johns), and a Nazi sympathizing Czech woman, Marúschka Brunn (Valerie Hobson), while he supervises in a munitions factory by day. There he must gain the trust of the Czech underground while also appearing to the Nazi’s to be doing a good enough job to be promoted to work on the important poison gas program. A very delicate balance, indeed.

The opening scene of Captain Stevenson diffusing the bomb is quite good, even though you’re reasonably certain Robert Donat isn’t going to blow up 5 minutes into the film. He’s the devil-may-care, bravado version of the David Farrar character from THE SMALL BACK ROOM. While surely the less honest approach, this film is also lighter fare of a sort, a straight spy story, though certainly not without its dramatic moments. The acting is all well done, but Donat in ‘Tartu’ mode is actually a lot of fun in addition. The many twists and turns are all intelligent and come from the story naturally, an accomplishment in itself. There is some inventive matte and production work on the gas factory that suggests a cavernous facility, although miniature work in other places stands out a bit. While the ending is pure Saturday morning serial-type stuff, it’s in the spirit of the whole picture as a rousing adventure.

out of 4
post #766 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
Mothra vs. Godzilla (1964) Japanese version Ishiro Honda

I've read several reviews calling this the best of the original series and while there are plenty of nice things, overall I couldn't help but walk away disappointed because all of the bad things in other films like this are also on display here.

I just had to respond to this, Mike.
Yes, many Godzilla fans would call this - if not the best, surely ONE of the best - but then again, we're talking about Godzilla fans. You are not a fan of Godzilla films, even the better ones. You didn't even think much of the serious original GOJIRA (1954), let's be frank. So why you continue to waste your time with any of these remains a mystery to me. It's not like, say, with Jess Franco where you may occasionally find a film he directed that you can enjoy; with Godzilla films, they're all pretty much the same certain type of film and you know what you're going into before you even watch them. If you don't have fun with them, you just don't.

Quote:
Perhaps I'll get booed for saying this but when I watch a movie called MOTHRA VS. GODZILLA, I want to see the two of them do battle. We get a great battle sequence between the two but this lasts less than ten minutes and that leaves us with another 79-minutes of talk, talk and more talk.

I don't understand this. What did you want, 90 minutes of pure battle? Can you name any other "fighting monsters" film that has a lot of constant fighting? I think you may have given FRANKENSTEIN MEETS THE WOLF MAN a full four stars and those two creatures only mix it up for about 2 minutes, if that. They're all pretty much like that; the climactic battle is usually at the end.

As for the "talk, talk, talk", I don't agree, but then again it's not my review. There's a good plot here (hard to do in a Godzilla film) about the unscrupulous businessmen and their exploitation of Mothra's egg, with enough scenes of Godzilla rampaging in between to keep the ADD from setting in.

Quote:
Godzilla vs. Hedora (1971) Yoshimitsu Banno

Better known as GODZILLA VS. THE SMOG MONSTER, this entry in the Japanese series is considered by many to be one of the worst. I personally wouldn't call it the worst and I say this because the movie is so bad I couldn't help but laugh at it and have a good time. The people of Japan are polluting their land and soon all of this leads to the oozy Hedora showing up and spreading more pollution everywhere. Thankfully Godzilla isn't doing anything and shows up to help them destroy the creature. There's no denying that this is a very poorly made film and an embarrassing one because of its message that it keeps trying to pass off. As laughable as the screenplay is you can't help but some of this had to have been on purpose and this starts with the music score, which just doesn't fit the film at all. Another hilarious sequence deals with Hedora's ability to throw polluted mud pies at people and one of the funniest bits is when one hits Godzilla upside the head. Godzilla's reaction is priceless and had me laughing so hard tears were about to come out of the eyes. Even wilder scenes include strange animated sequences, wannabe hip Bond-like sequences and another strange sequence where Hedora flies over some people turning all of them into skeletons. The wildness doesn't stop there as there's constant puss flowing from the mean guy. The fight sequences with Godzilla aren't anything special but they did contain a fair amount of charm.

So let me see if I understand this correctly .... you thought MOTHRA VS GODZILLA was too serious, but then GODZILLA VS HEDORAH (aka THE SMOG MONSTER) was too silly?

Quote:
Godzilla vs. Monster Zero (1965) Ishiro Honda

This is a pretty fun film from start to finish, although I'd argue it runs about ten minutes too long. With some editing down of the talking scenes this here would have played much better but as it is the movie remains one of the better ones I've watched from the series. As with many others, the budget is obvious very, very low and this is clear in how many things look incredibly fake but this has a certain charm here because it all looks rather unique. The outer space sequences have a surreal nature to them and the aliens are somewhat enjoyable even though they look just like any other human except for the weird clothes. Adams is fun to watch in the film as is the supporting cast, which is something I haven't said too often while viewing these movies. The final battle sequences are a lot of fun with Godzilla getting to do some boxing and Rodan doing his thing.

Well, maybe there's hope after all!

Quote:
Let the Good Times Roll (1973) Robert Abel, Sidney Levin

Concert/documentary covering a Rock 'n Roll Revival, which toured the country and featured legendary acts like Little Richard, Chuck Berry, Bill Haley and the Comets, Chubby Checker, Bo Diddley, Fats Domino, The Five Satins and many other bands who probably hadn't been seen since the 1950's. I'm not sure if this tour or the film was done due to the success of AMERICAN GRAFFITI but they could have called this film a live version of the soundtrack to that film.

I saw this in the theater when I was 11 or 12 (that would be either 1973 or 1974), as a double feature along with AMERICAN GRAFFITI. I would like to have it on DVD someday.

Great moviegoing days. Boy, is it Over.

P.S . - How 'bout those Mets?
post #767 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

I thought this would get a post out of ya.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
I just had to respond to this, Mike.
Yes, many Godzilla fans would call this - if not the best, surely ONE of the best - but then again, we're talking about Godzilla fans. You are not a fan of Godzilla films, even the better ones. You didn't even think much of the serious original GOJIRA (1954), let's be frank.

Well, I'm not sure anyone outside of die-hards enjoy these movies. They are all incredibly poorly made and that includes the original. When a film deals with special effects and all of those effects are so incredibly fake and I'm meaning faker than something we'd see in an Ed Wood movie, there are going to be problems. I'm sure fans can get this out of their head but when a plastic tank starts shooting off fire crackers, all seriousness goes out the window for me.

Quote:
So why you continue to waste your time with any of these remains a mystery to me. It's not like, say, with Jess Franco where you may occasionally find a film he directed that you can enjoy; with Godzilla films, they're all pretty much the same certain type of film and you know what you're going into before you even watch them. If you don't have fun with them, you just don't.

I don't really think you believe this because you use to throw a fit when people would question why you keep enjoying certain films. As bad as Godilla films are they're still quite better than countless others I watch. Hell, Franco and Lommell included. These Superman cartoon, so far, have been very disappointing but that's not to say they won't get better.

Quote:
I don't understand this. What did you want, 90 minutes of pure battle? Can you name any other "fighting monsters" film that has a lot of constant fighting? I think you may have given FRANKENSTEIN MEETS THE WOLF MAN a full four stars and those two creatures only mix it up for about 2 minutes, if that. They're all pretty much like that; the climactic battle is usually at the end.

As for the "talk, talk, talk", I don't agree, but then again it's not my review. There's a good plot here (hard to do in a Godzilla film) about the unscrupulous businessmen and their exploitation of Mothra's egg, with enough scenes of Godzilla rampaging in between to keep the ADD from setting in.

Not 90 minutes of 90 minutes but perhaps an hour or 45 minutes of monsters. Perhaps interesting characters. Not bad acting. Overdramatic stories that I'm sure have a heartful meaning in Japan but not here.

I watched THE H-MAN last night, another Toho film and once again we have a monster movie where the brilliant monster has very little to do in the film. This worked in BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN but not in Japan cinema.

Quote:
So let me see if I understand this correctly .... you thought MOTHRA VS GODZILLA was too serious, but then GODZILLA VS HEDORAH (aka THE SMOG MONSTER) was too silly?

At least the first film had a good director behind the wheel. THE SMOG MONSTER was poor filmmaking from the start. Wasn't this the last of the series? I'm getting mixed reports on that in my (low) research on the subject. It was funny but my girlfriend walked in while I was watching SMOG and she couldn't believe how fake everything was. She started laughing and I'm sure many people feel this way.

Quote:
Well, maybe there's hope after all!

It was my 21st Franco film that turned me into a fan.

Now, what are you feelings on the recent Godzilla films? I've got them coming and from what I've read these are movies that CRITICS and FANS both enjoyed more than the original kid movies.

Quote:
I saw this in the theater when I was 11 or 12 (that would be either 1973 or 1974), as a double feature along with AMERICAN GRAFFITI. I would like to have it on DVD someday.

I hope so too but it's doubtful. They used film clips from LionsGate, Fox, Warner and MGM so Columbia might have a problem getting it released. TCM showed it 2.20:1 one so get that recorder out for the next showing.

Quote:
Great moviegoing days. Boy, is it Over.

Depends on what you see. PAUL BLART: MALL COP isn't exactly THE WRESTLER.

Quote:
P.S . - How 'bout those Mets?

$150 million of third place (or are they second now?).
post #768 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
I thought this would get a post out of ya.

Don't be so sure though. I'll bet you thought I would write again about how much I despise AN AMERICAN WEREWOLF IN LONDON, but I gave you a break on that one! How long do you think it'll be before Martin protests you and I having a dialogue here again?

Quote:
Well, I'm not sure anyone outside of die-hards enjoy these movies. They are all incredibly poorly made and that includes the original. When a film deals with special effects and all of those effects are so incredibly fake and I'm meaning faker than something we'd see in an Ed Wood movie, there are going to be problems.

Well, I think it's absurd to call the original Japanese version of GOJIRA "incredibly poorly made". Believe it or not, these days I think the effects were pretty darn good for what they were in the day. At the very least these monsters do feel gigantic, and I'll take them over CGI or stop-motion animation any day - I mean, at least the beings/actors are actually present. If there were really such monsters in existence, they'd probably look fake in the flesh, too.By the way, as far as I'm concerned, the effects aren't as bad as in Ed Wood movies.

Quote:
I'm sure fans can get this out of their head but when a plastic tank starts shooting off fire crackers, all seriousness goes out the window for me.

Not for me though, but to each his own. I am having more fun watching the big monsters who are actually actors, and I'd prefer that the artifical ingredients were the tanks, planes, fake buildings, etc rather than the other way around.

Quote:
I don't really think you believe this because you use to throw a fit when people would question why you keep enjoying certain films.

I don't think you can point to a long-running series which I don't enjoy yet keep watching.

Quote:
As bad as Godzilla films are they're still quite better than countless others I watch. Hell, Franco and Lommell included.

Well, watching a blank screen is often better than Franco so I don't know if that means much!

Quote:
THE SMOG MONSTER was poor filmmaking from the start. Wasn't this the last of the series? I'm getting mixed reports on that in my (low) research on the subject.

No. You still have GODZILLA VS. GIGAN (1972), GODZILLA VS. MEGALON (1973), GODZILLA VS MECHAGODZILLA (1974 version; not the remake -- which I just read on IMDB that you already saw) and the one you just watched - TERROR OF MECHAGODZILLA (1975), which was the last of the 'original series'.
If you want to see some extra-stupid Godzilla films, check out those first two. You won't believe your eyes, even for a Godzilla film. MEGALON is the silliest of them all.

Quote:
It was funny but my girlfriend walked in while I was watching SMOG and she couldn't believe how fake everything was. She started laughing and I'm sure many people feel this way.

I wouldn't expect anybody's wife or girlfriend, of all people, to "get" Godzilla movies. Of course the movies are laughable, but I don't have to tell you what a huge cult following Godzilla has. I'm pretty sure Godzilla has one of the longest-running series in cinema, from 1954 to today. I would advise you to check out the Japanese Monsters forum over at the CHFB; all and any of your questions can be answered over there, but I warn you those guys take these films seriously. And despite my sounding like a Big G Advocate here on HTF, those guys in that CHFB forum are way over my head!

Quote:
Now, what are you feelings on the recent Godzilla films? I've got them coming and from what I've read these are movies that CRITICS and FANS both enjoyed more than the original kid movies.

Well, from my experience I've mainly heard that fans do NOT prefer the more recent films; they like the old '60s and '70s movies better, and I would agree. There's just something about the charm of the older movies. I've checked your IMDB listings and see you watched at least two of these newer ones - you gave GODZILLA VS MEGAGIRUS a "Bomb". However, the sfx are probably superior in the newer films.. but they just don't have the same fun. I actually have several newer Godzilla films here on DVD which I've never watched.

Quote:
Depends on what you see. PAUL BLART: MALL COP isn't exactly THE WRESTLER.

Sure -- nor is it DOUBT, or GRAN TORINO -- I know. But still, you know I feel that generally speaking movies were better 'then' as opposed to 'now', with few exceptions. This is something we've batted around before. We won't agree.

Quote:
$150 million of third place (or are they second now?).

But the money criticism you ought to save for those NY Yankees. Be that as it may, money isn't everything, as other teams constantly prove, thank God.
post #769 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

[quote=Joe Karlosi]

Quote:
Well, I think it's absurd to call the original Japanese version of GOJIRA "incredibly poorly made". Believe it or not, these days I think the effects were pretty darn good for what they were in the day.


We probably won't agree on the subject but I do think stuff like THEM or even the Universal sci-fi films were better. I'd even take the original KING KONG as having the better effects but my original comments were meant in regards to critics, not necessarily fans or even people like me.

Quote:
I am having more fun watching the big monsters who are actually actors, and I'd prefer that the artifical ingredients were the tanks, planes, fake buildings, etc rather than the other way around.

I'd agree with the fun part to a point. For me it's fun seeing the monsters but the plots, to me, are just dull and take away from the entire film being fun, which would be the reason I couldn't revisit these each and every year like some of the "bad" American movies I rewatch.

Quote:
I don't think you can point to a long-running series which I don't enjoy yet keep watching.

To be fair, two-star ratings aren't exactly BOMB ratings.

Quote:
Well, watching a blank screen is often better than Franco so I don't know if that means much!

A blank screen over a nude Romay???

Quote:
No. You still have GODZILLA VS. GIGAN (1972), GODZILLA VS. MEGALON (1973), GODZILLA VS MECHAGODZILLA (1974 version; not the remake -- which I just read on IMDB that you already saw) and the one you just watched - TERROR OF MECHAGODZILLA (1975), which was the last of the 'original series'.
If you want to see some extra-stupid Godzilla films, check out those first two. You won't believe your eyes, even for a Godzilla film. MEGALON is the silliest of them all.

You caught me in a goof, as I did mean TERROR as being the last until 1985. I do have some of them on my queue but some are showing a long wait so I'm not sure I'll get them on. I got GODZILLA RAIDS AGAIN sitting here but the rest are going to have to come from Blockbuster.

Quote:
I would advise you to check out the Japanese Monsters forum over at the CHFB; all and any of your questions can be answered over there, but I warn you those guys take these films seriously. And despite my sounding like a Big G Advocate here on HTF, those guys in that CHFB forum are way over my head!

Hell, you know I'm asshole enough not to worry about what they think. Childhood memories can never be touched so I wouldn't want to rain on them unless they pushed me to do so. Of course, one of them might be the one who calls me a bastard each time I post a Godzilla review at IMDB.

Quote:
Well, from my experience I've mainly heard that fans do NOT prefer the more recent films; they like the old '60s and '70s movies better, and I would agree. There's just something about the charm of the older movies. I've checked your IMDB listings and see you watched at least two of these newer ones - you gave GODZILLA VS MEGAGIRUS a "Bomb". However, the sfx are probably superior in the newer films.. but they just don't have the same fun. I actually have several newer Godzilla films here on DVD which I've never watched.

I apologize because I wasn't clear in my original post. It seems critics LOVE these recent films and "younger" fans support them for being more "real". I certainly didn't expect those at CHFB to enjoy them as much. It seems critics in the major cities praised the newer Godzilla films while the original still took some beatings when it was re-released. Of course these are critic proof movies so....

Quote:
But still, you know I feel that generally speaking movies were better 'then' as opposed to 'now', with few exceptions. This is something we've batted around before. We won't agree.

I'd agree in regards to Hollywood blockbusters. Not to mention those who I feel spend the most time going to movies.

Quote:
But the money criticism you ought to save for those NY Yankees. Be that as it may, money isn't everything, as other teams constantly prove, thank God.

I fight with my father all the time over the Yankees. It looks like both NY teams would learn to build a team and not a money machine. I was happy to see the Braves won tonight but it really doesn't matter as they've fallen too far back.
post #770 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

05/11/09

Trapeze (1956) Dir: Carol Reed
Production: Susan Productions, Hill-Hecht-Lancaster/United Artists

One-time circus performer Burt Lancaster fulfills a career ambition by producing this circus-based drama. Hot-shot, wannabe ‘flyer’ Tino Orsini (Tony Curtis) decides to follow his old man’s advice--leave Brooklyn and go to Paris to study with the famous trapeze artist, Mike Ribble (Burt Lancaster). But when Tino tracks Mike down, at the Bouglione Circus, he finds him as nothing but a rundown tent rigger. Years earlier Mike fell and was injured pulling off the dangerous ‘triple’ (he is one of only six performers ever to pull off the stunt) and he was never the same. After a brief audition, Mike sees Tino’s potential and agrees to start up the act--Orsini and Ribble, with Mike as the ‘catcher’. Their goal is to make Tino the seventh man ever to pull off the triple. But will a devious, scheming tumbler (Gina Lollobrigida), who excels in self-preservation, come between Mike and Tino? Is there room for three in the act?

Nice pre-credits sequence of a trapeze act gone bad that, at least, assuages some fears that this might be too silly a premise. Alright, it’s still pretty silly, the professional and romantic intrigues of high flying acrobats, but it’s painless. Obviously a fun role for Lancaster, it’s clearly him on the bar in many scenes, and the association with Curtis did lead to SWEET SMELL OF SUCCESS a year later. They have a scene together early in the film--they sort of promise each other that Lola, the tumbler, won’t come between them--when you wonder who is actually in love with who. Sure enough, the source novel has a plotline where Mike kills a woman who is in love with Tino. Lollobrigida has about a ten inch waist she features, but is otherwise mostly uninteresting (she has some ghastly make-up on that gives her an anemic look). Thomas Gomez, as the circus owner fending off one of the Ringling brothers for talent, and Katy Jurado, as a woman from Mike’s past, add flavor in small roles.

Notes: The film had the most expensive ad campaign in history up to that time and was the third highest earner of 1956. Possibly as a result, it was tied up in several lawsuits by complainants seeking story credits. A stuntwoman for Lollobrigida actually died in a fall. Monty Clift was at one time considered for the role of Tino, hard to see what would have interested him though.

out of 4
-----------------------------------------
CAROL REED – “Less Than Meets The Eye”
Trapeze (1956)
post #771 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott


We probably won't agree on the subject but I do think stuff like THEM or even the Universal sci-fi films were better. I'd even take the original KING KONG as having the better effects but my original comments were meant in regards to critics, not necessarily fans or even people like me.

KING KONG is a great movie, but for me I've never liked the tiny little toy Kong model and have always preferred the actors in suits. It doesn't affect my enjoyment of KK though, because it's just such a good adventure through and through, despite the toy. As for CRITICS -- bah. You know as well as I do that most of them are unfair to offbeat movies like horror and certainly Godzilla. They're the last people I'd ever pay attention to regarding these genres.

Quote:
A blank screen over a nude Romay???

Lina Romay is attractive enough, but she has zero sexuality when it comes to being alluring or enticing. She often looks bored. Besides, sheer nudity alone does not make a film.

Quote:
I got GODZILLA RAIDS AGAIN sitting here but the rest are going to have to come from Blockbuster.

Don't even waste your time. If you didn't appreciate the original GOJIRA, you won't like this dull followup. Especially if you want less talk and more monsters.

Quote:
Hell, you know I'm asshole enough not to worry about what they think. Childhood memories can never be touched so I wouldn't want to rain on them unless they pushed me to do so. Of course, one of them might be the one who calls me a bastard each time I post a Godzilla review at IMDB.

"Childhood memories" are not entirely why some fans are Godzilla lovers over there. Some of those fans are not that much older than yourself in that Japanese films section of the forum.

Quote:
I apologize because I wasn't clear in my original post. It seems critics LOVE these recent films and "younger" fans support them for being more "real". I certainly didn't expect those at CHFB to enjoy them as much. It seems critics in the major cities praised the newer Godzilla films while the original still took some beatings when it was re-released.

I don't know which critics you're talking about in major cities, since the newer Godzilla films did not get an American release. The only one that did was GODZILLA 2000, and I don't recall critics praising it. If you see enough of the newer films I'd bet you'd find them more "dull" with a lot of "boring story" and not enough monster stuff. However, the effects are an improvement.

Quote:
I fight with my father all the time over the Yankees. It looks like both NY teams would learn to build a team and not a money machine.

With regard to the Mets, they've certainly built a team, and they've been close to the pennant the last few years. And while I am against all the money being spent these days, the fact is that if ANY team (including your Atlanta Braves) ever got to the success level of the Yankees, they'd also be able to buy the most expensive players too. I don't think you'd mind at all if the Braves were able to buy a pitcher like Johan Santana. But as I said before, other teams with far less money have been winning and the Yanks haven't won a World Series in almost 10 years, so it doesn't matter in the end.
post #772 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Devil in the Brain
Italy/France 1972 106m color
Universal/Marianne/Verona (Maurizio Lodi-Fe`)
original title: Il Diavolo nel Cervello

Returning to his hometown after many years, a young man pays a visit to his former rich girlfriend but finds she has gone mad after her philandering husband was apparently shot dead by their disturbed son.

The title proves merely allusive, so that a rather ordinary mystery lies at the heart of this complex study of the bourgeoisie - which is treated in too aloof a manner anyway. Though the director seemed uncomfortable working outside of a Western setting, the film nevertheless contrives a reasonably satisfying denouement.

w Suso Cecchi D'Amico, Sergio Sollima d Sergio Sollima ph Aldo Scavarda m Ennio Morricone

Stefania Sandrelli, Keir Dullea, Micheline Presle, Maurice Ronet, Renato Cestie`, Tino Buazzelli, Orchidea De Santis, Gaia Germani


Plot of Fear
Italy 1976 95m color
CPC Milan/GPE (Ermanno Curti, Guy Luongo, Rodolfo Puttignani)
original title: E Tanta Paura
aka: Too Much Fear

A series of violent murders are linked to the death of an escort girl at a villa, meeting-place of a club ostensibly comprised of animal lovers.

The usual giallo concoction is here spiced up with touches of humor and sleaze (the animated porno is a particular highlight), while attempting to make a significant statement about the nature of justice and the abuse of power. Slickly done and generally involving, though badly let down by a sluggish pace.

w Paolo Cavara, Enrico Oldoini, Bernardino Zapponi d Paolo Cavara ph Franco Di Giacomo m Daniele Patucchi

Michele Placido, Corinne Clery, Eli Wallach, John Steiner, Tom Skerritt (wasted as the hero's superior), Jacques Herlin


Kleinhoff Hotel
Italy/West Germany 1977 92m Telecolor
Alpherat/Roxy/Trust International (Giuseppe Vezzani, Luggi Waldleitner)
aka: The Passionate Strangers

A French woman misses the plane to rejoin her husband and lodges in the Berlin hotel where she had resided as a student. Here, she begins to take an interest in the volatile young radical next door…

Shades of Last Tango in Paris, with added political overtones: the result in this case is both dull and pointless, when not risible. The jazzy musical accompaniment is just about its sole commendable feature.

w Valentino Orsini, Faliero Rosati d Carlo Lizzani ph Gabor Pogany m Giorgio Gaslini

Corinne Clery, Bruce Robinson, Katja Rupe`, Michele Placido, Werner Pochath, Peter Kern


Night World
US 1932 57m bw
Universal (Carl Laemmle Jr.)

Various dramas come to a head during one busy night at a swank nightclub.

Good snappy fun that, apart from being typical Depression escapism and an efficient piece of Pre-Code Hollywood, also boasts notable credits.

w Richard Schayer, P.J. Wolfson story Allen Rivkin d Hobart Henley ph Merritt B. Gerstad m Alfred Newman
ch Busby Berkeley

Mae Clarke, Lew Ayres, Boris Karloff, Dorothy Revier, George Raft, Russell Hopton, Clarence Muse, Hedda Hopper, Dorothy Peterson, Bert Roach


The Shooting Party
GB 1985 98m Technicolor
Castle Hill/Edenflow/Gavin/Geoffrey Reeve and Associates/Premier (Peter Dolman, Jeremy Saunders)

In 1913, several British aristocrats and other European luminaries convene at the estate of one of them for a weekend shooting session; here, their true natures invariably emerge.

Rather like a British version of La Regle du Jeu but nowhere near as incisive or memorable: in fact, it is mostly vapid (not to mention irritatingly genteel) and tedious. That said, the killing of animals for sport is effectively seen as a portent of man's basic dehumanization in times of war (itself obviously signifying the passing of an era).

w Julian Bond novel Isabel Colegate d Alan Bridges ph Fred Tammes m John Scott

James Mason, Edward Fox, Cheryl Campbell, Judi Bowker, Rupert Frazer, Robert Hardy, John Gielgud, Gordon Jackson, Dorothy Tutin, Joris Stuyck

+ James Mason's last theatrical feature, released posthumously.

BFAN: script


Haunts
US 1977 98m Eastmancolor
IRC/AGP/ESI/Marrero/Nachshon/Tucker (Herb Freed, Burt Weissbourd, Norman G. Rudman)

A middle-aged woman, troubled by her murky past and living at a farm with her secretive uncle, feels particularly threatened by the presence of a hooded killer at large in the community.

For the most part, this atypical slasher, infused with a strong feel for its pastoral/religious setting, maintains a low-key approach; patient viewers are eventually rewarded by a clever final twist, which also lends the whole unexpected depth.

w Herb Freed, Anne Marisse d Herb Freed ph Larry Secrist m Pino Donaggio

May Britt, Cameron Mitchell, Aldo Ray, William Gray Espy, Ben Hammer, E.J. Andre`, Kendall Jackson, Robert Hippard


The Marseille Contract
GB/France 1974 91m color
Columbia/Warner/AIP/Kettledrum/PECF (Judd Bernard)
US title: The Destructors

Despairing of ever capturing a drug lord hiding under a veneer of respectability, an Italo-American police inspector based in Paris resorts to unethical means by hiring an assassin to eliminate him.

Exciting action marks this slick and violent crime saga clearly in imitation of rawer models (The French Connection, Get Carter and Across 110th Street); unfortunately, plotting is far-fetched and the treatment mostly conventional.

w Judd Bernard d Robert Parrish ph Douglas Slocombe m Roy Budd

Anthony Quinn, Michael Caine, James Mason, Maurice Ronet, Marcel Bozzuffi, Maureen Kirwan, Alexandra Stewart, Catherine Rouvel


Games
US 1967 100m Technicolor Techniscope
Universal (George Edwards)

A wealthy young couple like to come up with unusual thrills to entertain guests, but things take a serious turn following the arrival of a mysterious middle-aged lady at their home.

Stylish if uneven psycho-thriller, with reasonable characterization, effective black comedy and suspense touches giving way to standard Grand Guignol imagery and a final derivative twist. Still, a worthwhile diversion and perhaps its director's most significant work to obtain studio backing.

w George Kearney d Curtis Harrington ph William A. Fraker m Samuel Matlovsky

Simone Signoret, James Caan, Katharine Ross, Don Stroud, Kent Smith, Estelle Winwood, Marjorie Bennett, Ian Wolfe


The Yin and the Yang of Mr. Go
US 1970 89m color
National General (Dick Randall)

A young American novelist obsessed with James Joyce becomes entangled in international intrigue when an Oriental villain covets a deadly laser beam…but the latter is eventually touched by Buddha and reforms.

This inordinately silly blend of muddled espionage, flaccid literariness and tentative mysticism, done with tongue-in-cheek but in extremely poor taste, makes for a veritable disaster which manages to embarrass a host of good actors.

w Burgess Meredith, Dick Randall story Alvin Osteroff, Joseph Zucchero d Burgess Meredith ph Frank Johnson, John M. Stephens m/songs Nicholas Carras, Robert O. Ragland

James Mason (as Y.Y. Go), Jeff Bridges (as Nero Finnegan), Irene Tsu, Jack MacGowran, Burgess Meredith, Broderick Crawford, Peter Lind Hayes, King Hu, Clarissa Kaye (Mrs. James Mason, playing a lesbian acolyte of Mr. Go)

+ Jeff Bridges' inauspicious film debut and, possibly, James Mason's career nadir.
post #773 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

5/9 Star Trek (2009):

I went to see this again with my sister. It's still a great movie, although it's never quite the same as the first time watching it with a super-excited audience. I didn't notice the lens flares too much the first time, but this time, they were a little distracting during the battle over Vulcan sequence.

5/11 Shrek 2 (2004):

Time has not been kind to this film. A lot of the humor is dated, and the jokes that seemed so hilarious and fresh in the theater have lost some of their appeal. The core is still decent, and I love the new characters that Shrek 2 introduced.
post #774 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
They're the last people I'd ever pay attention to regarding these genres.

Wish I had listened to them in regards to that American GODZILLA in the 90s.

Quote:
Lina Romay is attractive enough, but she has zero sexuality when it comes to being alluring or enticing. She often looks bored. Besides, sheer nudity alone does not make a film.

Oh, I've said that same line countless times over the years. I do prefer the Euro sexuality though.

Quote:
Don't even waste your time. If you didn't appreciate the original GOJIRA, you won't like this dull followup. Especially if you want less talk and more monsters.

I'd never consider it a waste of time since I've yet to see one that made me want to stop watching them. I'm pretty sure I've seen the rest of the ones you mentioned back when I was a kid. I remember buying the Goodtimes versions of them back when Suncoast was open and had that budget section.


Quote:
I don't know which critics you're talking about in major cities, since the newer Godzilla films did not get an American release. The only one that did was GODZILLA 2000, and I don't recall critics praising it. If you see enough of the newer films I'd bet you'd find them more "dull" with a lot of "boring story" and not enough monster stuff. However, the effects are an improvement.

I was going by the IMDB and their "release date". Appears some of them played a few cities like San Fran and Chicago but nothing like a wide tour. GODZILLA: FINAL WARS came today, which had me smile until I saw it ran 125-minutes, which got me a little worried.

Quote:
With regard to the Mets, they've certainly built a team, and they've been close to the pennant the last few years. And while I am against all the money being spent these days, the fact is that if ANY team (including your Atlanta Braves) ever got to the success level of the Yankees, they'd also be able to buy the most expensive players too. I don't think you'd mind at all if the Braves were able to buy a pitcher like Johan Santana. But as I said before, other teams with far less money have been winning and the Yanks haven't won a World Series in almost 10 years, so it doesn't matter in the end.

I don't think real teams blow leads like the Yanks did to the Red Sox (up 3-0) or the way the Mets lost it the past few years. I don't blame them for spending cash since, like you said, they still haven't won anything. Don't think they will this year either.
post #775 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Natalee Holloway (2009) Mikael Salomon

Lifetime Movie Network produced TV movie tells the story of Beth Twitty (Tracy Pollan) who headed to Aruba after her 18-year-old daughter Natalee went there for a trip and turned up missing. The prime suspect was a local named Joran Van Der Sloot but his changing stories and possible cover ups by the police leaves this case unsolved. I admit to being one of those who heard about this case early on and followed most of it so I really didn't learn anything new by this movie. If you're familiar with the case then this movie isn't going to teach you anything and if you haven't heard of the case then I doubt the movie is going to tell you enough to get a full view of the case. There were many different stories told by the suspects and a couple of them are looked at here but in the end the movie just isn't strong enough to work. I found Pollan to go over the top way too many times and at points in the film she'd become quite annoying. The big prayer sequence was so over acted that I wanted to look away. Some could call this TV acting, which to me is unfair to say but I wasn't impressed. The direction is decent but the screenplay could have used some work. The film tries to tell a big message of being careful when you're overseas but I think it overlooks the biggest flaw in the real story and that's 18-year-old girls shouldn't be given the keys to run wild in a foreign place and getting drunk. The drinking issue is the real message that should have been given off because sadly, this isn't the first girl to get drunk and have something bad happen to her by the hands of a guy.

H-Man, The (1958) Ishiro Honda

Original title: Bijo to Ekitainingen

Toho film has some excellent special effects but a story that made me want to punch the television. A man gets hit by a car but when the driver gets out to check on him he discovers that the man is gone and only his clothes remain. More and more stories of people being killed only to have their clothes remaining start piling up and soon it's learned that a blob-like substance is doing the killings. This Japanese film, from the team who brought us GODZILLA, is pretty much another version of THE BLOB and while there are some great moments we also get sucked into some pretty bad ones. I've often complained that the Godzilla films were weak because they didn't center their attention on the monsters and that holds true here as well because we get a subplot of gangsters, which ends up taking up nearly an hour of the 79-minute running time. The monster really doesn't take center stage till nearly the 50-minute mark, which is just crazy because of how good it is. There's an early sequence on a ship that is highly effective but moments like these are few and far between as we get too much dialogue with a boring subplot. The special effects for the blob creature are quite good and better than what we saw in the earlier American classic. I watched the P&S, American dubbed version, which was recently on Turner Classic Movies but will revisit the film when Columbia releases it later in the year. Rumored to include the Japanese version I will certainly give it a second take in its original language.

Are You in the House Alone? (1978) Walter Grauman

Made for TV drama is actually disguised as a horror movie. The film starts off as teenager Gail (Kathleen Beller) is being taken to the hospital after being beaten and raped. We then flashback and see the events leading up to the rape, which include her dating a new guy, being made fun of by her old boyfriend and having several other men set themselves up as red herrings. The first hour builds itself up as a horror movie in the same vein as BLACK CHRISTMAS but things take a turn in the final act when the rape happens and I must admit that the movie got rather disgusting to me. This was made for TV so everything is very tame but at the same time I thought the rape stuff was very poorly handled and in the end it come off more distasteful than anything else. To make matters worse is the fact that the build up really isn't anything special because it's obvious from the first five minutes who the attacker is going to be. I caught onto the bad guy right from the start so each additional red herring they threw at me had little effect. The screenplay is full of those "made for TV" holes but that's to be expected. Beller does a pretty good job in her role, although she does go over the top from time to time. Scott Colomby stole the film for me with his very strong and believable performance. Dennis Quaid has a nice supporting part and Ellen Travolta (John's sister) also has a small role. This TV movie seems to have a decent cult following but there really wasn't enough here to keep me interested.

Without Lying Down: Frances Marion and the Power of Women in Hollywood (2000) Bridget Terry

Turner Classic Movies documentary about screenwriter Frances Marion who was the highest paid writer in Hollywood for nearly three-decades. She got her big break by being the exclusive writer for Mary Pickford and after that she's go onto win two Oscars as well as write for nearly every major star working during that time. Her credits include THE BIG HOUSE, THE CHAMP, DINNER AT EIGHT, ANNA CHRISTIE and the silent masterpiece THE WIND. This documentary, narrated by Uma Thurman and Kathy Bates, does a great job at painting Hollywood during the silent era and into the early talkies. It was interesting learning how mostly women were working as writers and how much freedom they had as workers compared to how women were being treated throughout the rest of the country. I wasn't too familiar with Marion's personal life but hearing about the death of her actor husband was an interesting listen as were stories of her friendship with Pickford. The most fascinating part was how she would write screenplays for people she knew who needed the work. Fans of silent films will certainly want to watch this documentary, which gets shown on TCM once or twice a year.

Captain Thunder (1930) Alan Crosland

Early talkie has Victor Varconi playing El Captain Thunder, a Mexican bandit who causes as much trouble as he can but he'll always keep his word. The bandit goes from one form of trouble to the next until he meets and falls for a lady (Fay Wray). I had heard some incredibly bad things about this film but it didn't turn out as bad as I had feared, although this is still one of lesser films I've seen from this era. Director Crosland is best known for THE JAZZ SINGER and other films from that era including DON JUAN and OLD SAN FRANCISCO and I must admit that I've never been a big fan of his work. That trend continues here but to be fair I'm not sure how much blame should go towards him and how much on the screenplay. Even as I write this I can't be certain to what this film was even trying to do. I'm going to guess it was meant as a low-budget version of THE CISCO KID but I'm still not sure if the title character was suppose to be a good or bad guy. Either way he is 100% annoying and it doesn't help that the first time we see him he's pretty much trying to get laughs by harassing women. Wray, playing a Mexican woman, doesn't earn many acting stripes but she did have KING KONG coming in a few years. She certainly looks great, which at least gives the viewer something to do in the film.

Pursuit (1935) Edwin L. Marin

A pilot (Chester Morris) is asked by a woman (Sally Eilers) to take a small child (Scotty Beckett) across the border into Mexico so that his mother doesn't lose him in a custody battle with his evil aunt. The pilot agrees to do it for the money but soon he begins to grow fond of both the child and woman. This was a fairly decent "B" picture that features a nice cast doing fine work but the film would eventually run out of steam before it could really pack any sort of punch. Being a major fan of Morris added some entertainment as he is a constant joy to watch. The screenplay offers him very little but he manages to have some nice comic touches and his chemistry with Eilers is right on the mark. Former Our Gang star Beckett certainly delivers a lot of charm and cuteness in his role as the kid and it's rather shocking to see the young kid here who would grow up to have a very destructive lifestyle. After seeing him here it's still rather shocking to see how his life would end. The film has a lot going on in the first thirty-minutes and this is where the film is at its most charming. Everything possible happens and the director keeps everything moving at a fast pace but things come crashing down when Henry Travers character enters the film. After this things slow down and eventually crash at the end. The most shocking thing is the ending where we see the three stars in blackface.



Private Screenings: Ann Miller (1997)

Ann Miller is the quest this time out in Robert Osborne's ongoing series, which takes stars from the past and interviews them in today's time. Miller opens up about several of her classics including STAGE DOOR, YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU, ROOM SERVICE, TOO MANY GIRLS, EASTER PARADE, ON THE TOWN and KISS ME KATE. She also tells some pretty nice and at times strange stories about some of her co-workers including which Marx brother she was scared of. We also hear about her relationship with Lucille Ball and how she introduced Ball to her future husband. Miller also tells a strange story of how Louis B. Mayer became obsessed with her and then tried to kill himself after she refused to marry him. Another stranger story is Miller saying when she was 9-months pregnant, her husband beat her and threw her down a flight a steps. She would eventually have to give birth with a broken back. With the serious stuff aside, there's a lot of wonderful talk here about the MGM Factory and various other aspects of her career, which makes this episode a lot of fun.

Private Screenings: Leslie Caron (1999) Tony Barbon

Leslie Caron sits down with Tuner Classic Movies host Robert Osborne as they discuss her career in Hollywood, which she got started with the help of Gene Kelly. Her first film, AN AMERICAN IN PARIS, made a huge impact on her career and this led to other films like LILI, GIGI, THE STORY OF THREE LOVES and IS PARIS BURNING?. All of these films are discussed here with Caron who interviews quite well as she has an answer for everything that's asked. Osborne, as usual, does a great job at keeping the conversation going with his always interesting questions. I must admit that I haven't seen too many of Caron's films but hopefully that will change in the near future. This interview certainly does a good job at highlighting her career and making one want to see the movies. She also discusses Kelly, Francois Truffaut and Cary Grant.




Governor C.C. Young Hails Greater Talkie Season (1930) No Director Credited

Three minute short film was not only an early talkie but an early color picture as well. Actor Ronald Colman introduces California Governor Clement C. Young who stands up and speaks to the camera. The Governor tries to tell people that Hollywood can police itself to keep cinema clean and that they didn't need a Production Code. Of course, we know what would happen as Hollywood would avoid the "rules" laid down until 1934 when a P.C. was put in place. This really doesn't work too well as a short or as entertainment but it does remain interesting as a part of history. I couldn't help but wonder how much Hollywood had to pay this guy to get him in their pocket. This film certainly isn't a great piece of art but the history behind it makes it worth viewing by film buffs.

Isham Jones & His Orchestra (1934) Roy Mack

Warner short has (as the title says) Isham Jones showing off his stuff with a couple musical numbers, which are pretty good, although he had much better work out there. "You're Just a Dream Come True" and "Why Can't This Go on Forever" are the two tracks and they make for a good short but at the same time you can't help but wish "It Had to Be You" or "I'll See You In My Dreams". The 9-minute short goes by very fast and the songs are quite catchy and the dancing nice. There's certainly nothing ground breaking here but if you're a fan of musicals then you'll want to check this out.

Paree, Paree (1934) Roy Mack

Bob Hope plays a millionaire American touring Paris and falling in love with a woman (Dorothy Stone) who doesn't know he's rich. The man bets his friends that he can make her fall in love with him without telling her how much money he's worth. This musical-short is actually a remake of 50 MILLION FRENCHMEN, the 1931 Cole Porter film. I was pleasantly surprised at how charming this film was because of its two leads who turn in nice work and we've also got some very good musical numbers. We get five different musical numbers and they are all quite good and the dance sequences are handled very well by director Mack who was an old pro at this type of short. Stone really steals the film with her charm, which makes it easy to see why someone would fall for her. I think Hope's comic timing was still a little weak but he too is quite charming in the film.

Know Your Money (1940) Joseph M. Newman

Part of MGM's "Crime Does Not Pay" series, this short takes a look at how the Secret Service makes sure counterfeit money doesn't end up switching hands in America. The film centers on a small group of people passing around fake ten-dollar bills and how the Secret Service eventually catches them. This entry in the series takes great pride in telling us we're actually seeing how counterfeit money is made and passed around. We get a title sequence at the start of the film letting us know what we're watching is real and that adds some fun to the movie. I'm a big fan of this series and this here is yet another worthy entry as it contains some good thrills as well as telling a good story. The performances are all quite good, the direction tight and in the end this is well worth viewing if you're a fan of crime dramas.

Hong Kong: The Hub of the Orient (1937) No Director Credited

James A. FitzPatrick's TravelTalks series through MGM continues in this trip to Hong Kong where we learn about their people, customs and their land. The most entertaining aspect of this film is its look at the local fishing communities, which contain some pretty strange "rules" about the women and some neat looks at the things they come up with by using the fish. We see many small shops where the people of Hong Kong try making money and we also learn about how other counties are trying to make a mark there. Whereas a lot of Hong Kong is still old fashioned, new customs are trying to work in to where people can make good for themselves. As is the usual case, the narration is top-notch and we get some beautiful places to look out in all their Technicolor glory.

MGM Jubilee Overture (1954) No Director Credited

Johnny Green leads the MGM Orchestra in this short, which was showing off the studios 30th Anniversary by playing some of the music from their most famous films. We get the title track from SINGIN' IN THE WIND plus the songs "I've Got You Under My Skin", "The Last Time I Saw Paris", "Over the Rainbow" and "Baby, It's Cold Outside" among others. If you're a fan of any of these songs then you'll certainly want to check out this 9-minute short as the orchestra is very tight and Green does a great job bringing this old classics to life. The cinemascope doesn't hurt things either as we get a grand view of the band at work.
post #776 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott

Without Lying Down: Frances Marion and the Power of Women in Hollywood (2000) Bridget Terry

Turner Classic Movies documentary about screenwriter Frances Marion who was the highest paid writer in Hollywood for nearly three-decades. She got her big break by being the exclusive writer for Mary Pickford and after that she's go onto win two Oscars as well as write for nearly every major star working during that time. Her credits include THE BIG HOUSE, THE CHAMP, DINNER AT EIGHT, ANNA CHRISTIE and the silent masterpiece THE WIND. This documentary, narrated by Uma Thurman and Kathy Bates, does a great job at painting Hollywood during the silent era and into the early talkies. It was interesting learning how mostly women were working as writers and how much freedom they had as workers compared to how women were being treated throughout the rest of the country. I wasn't too familiar with Marion's personal life but hearing about the death of her actor husband was an interesting listen as were stories of her friendship with Pickford. The most fascinating part was how she would write screenplays for people she knew who needed the work. Fans of silent films will certainly want to watch this documentary, which gets shown on TCM once or twice a year.

I've never got around to watching the doc, but the book (same title) is excellent.
post #777 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
Wish I had listened to them in regards to that American GODZILLA in the 90s.

I wish I had listened to my own instincts with regard to that lousy Matthew Broderick "Godzilla" movie.

Quote:
GODZILLA: FINAL WARS came today, which had me smile until I saw it ran 125-minutes, which got me a little worried.

I have it still sealed and unseen, along with several others. I haven't heard good things about it from fans.

Quote:
I don't think real teams blow leads like the Yanks did to the Red Sox (up 3-0) or the way the Mets lost it the past few years.

What do you mean, "real teams"? By the way, your Atlanta Braves blew a 3-0 lead to the Mets last night and lost.

Quote:
I don't blame them for spending cash since, like you said, they still haven't won anything. Don't think they will this year either.

I think the Mets have an excellent chance this year. Of course you don't think they'll do it this year either, but that's only because you're going by recent seasons. That's got nothing to do with this year; they've got the best pitcher in baseball (Santana), the best closer (Rodriguez) and a slew of good hitters. The Braves have been old news for a long time now, and they're so weak that they're no longer even the Mets' "Arch Rivals" anymore; now it's the Phillies.
post #778 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
and they're so weak that they're no longer even the Mets' "Arch Rivals" anymore; now it's the Phillies.

My comment was towards the Yanks but..........

http://letsgomets.vox.com/library/po...s-atlanta.html



Madman (1982) Joe Giannone

Minor slasher has a group of kids and their councilors in the woods telling scary stories when one is told about Madman Marz, a deranged farmer who killed his wife and kids with an axe. Before the night is over Marz is called out of his cabin to start chopping people up one by one. This film has gathered a small cult following over the past few years and it's easy to see why because there is some good stuff here but overall the movie just doesn't work well enough to put it along side such classics like FRIDAY THE 13TH and THE BURNING. What does work is a very good killer and it's somewhat of a shame that he was never brought back for any sequels. The visual look of him is quite good and it perfectly captures the mood of the story being told at the start of the movie. Another good segment is the start of the film when his backstory is being told. This small sequence is qutie good and actually manges to build some nice atmosphere. We get some interesting kills as well but the biggest problem for me is the pacing of the film, which is all over the place. There never seems to be any real pace built as everything just seems to be falling over itself and never really flowing together. This eventually makes the film seem a lot longer than it actually is and there are some very (unintentional) funny scene like one loving making sequence in a hot tub that just falls flat on its face. Seeing Gaylen Ross, from DAWN OF THE DEAD, is always fun but neither her nor the rest of the cast adds too much to the film. One more thing that does work is the fact that the filmmakers don't play by any rules, which leads to characters being killed off and those you'd expect to survive end up being slaughtered early on. It terms of a slasher this movie isn't too bad but there's still a lot of work that needed to be done with it in order for it to become a classic.

Old New Mexico (1940) No Director Credited

Another entry in James A. FitzPatrick's TravelTalks series, this one taking a trip to New Mexico where we start off in Santa Fe, the oldest capital in the U.S.. We learn how Indians were pretty much the founders of the land and see various other sites including famous churches, various ruins and prehistoric cities. As is to be expected, we get a lot of nice visuals in this episode, which once again features terrific sites via the Technicolor. This episode also features a lot of time talking about how the state is still populated by Indians (7% according to FitzPatrick) and how they are now adapting to today's times. We also get some interesting stories about their past and how they helped shape the state. Considering how many Westerns were showing Indians, all of this talk comes off rather refreshing.
post #779 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam_S
I've never got around to watching the doc, but the book (same title) is excellent.

My job allows for quite a bit of reading time so I might check the book out. I really wasn't aware of her connection to Pickford, which is something I'd like to hear more about.
post #780 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
My comment was towards the Yanks but..........

The Mets' obstacle to the playoffs: Atlanta - Vox

So what? That's one opinion. I'm telling you as a Mets fan that I (and pracitically ALL Mets fans I talk to) are no longer worried about Atlanta at all. They aren't even in the running in past years. It's The Phillies now.

Back to movies -- I like MADMAN more than you do. I think it's superior to THE BURNING.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2009)