Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2009)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Track the Films You Watch (2009) - Page 24

post #691 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

The Missing
This is one that I bought blind on the star power of Tommy Lee Jones... who I have been a fan of for quite a while now. This one is a little over the average movie length as it clocks in at 2hrs 17min. I have the Superbit version of this DVD. And let me tell you... maybe it is because I don't have a high def TV... but I don't see any difference quality wise between these Superbit DVDs and the regular releases. It seems like to me that it is just an excuse not to add any extras to the release.

The movie itself is very good... I enjoyed every moment of it. There is one part of the movie I am not really happy about... which I won't spoil here. Sure... it makes for a stronger story... but I just didn't care for it. As always Tommy Lee Jones did a fantastic job. I have liked him in everything I have seen him in. Very talented guy!
post #692 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

The Crowd - I've said that Westerns are my least favorite type of film. I think silent-era films are the runner-up. While there aren't many that I outright loathe, there's only a couple I've bothered to watch more than once, and only a handful more that I would want to. I like the ones that have some kind of avant-garde element to them... Un Chien Andalou, A Page of Madness, Metropolis, The Man With the Movie Camera. For the rest, it's usually a case of appreciating their influence and artistry at the time, but not especially enjoying them. And it's not because they're silent... many of my favorite films have very very little dialogue. It's just that the storytelling in them is so unsophisticated. And the humor is almost never funny to me. I get a kick out of Buster Keaton sometimes, but I prefer Groucho Marx... or Jacques Tati.

With that out of the way, what makes The Crowd so special that it ranks #178 on the TSPDT 1000, despite being so hard to get a hold of? Well, King Vidor definitely pulls off some great shots, making excellent use of space and perspective, and utilizing a few techniques that were probably ahead of their time. Other than that, however... it's just a simplistic, unsurprising tale of a schlub trying to make it in the big city. The schlub is not a particularly likeable guy, either. He's whiny and impulsive and kind of a jerk. The film is moving, but only on the most basic level. I wasn't getting choked up or anything. There are a couple of poetic moments (the irony of the juggling job, the final shot) but that's it. I can't rightfully say it was an awful movie, but definitely not one I would watch again. Rating: 6



Chelsea Girls - Fascinating and infuriating. I hardly know where to start. I've been aware of Warhol's films since I was a child, reading about Empire and Sleep in "The Book of Lists" under "Longest Films", but this is the first one I've actually seen. It must be said upfront: as a conventional "movie", this is terrible. The split-screen is a gimmick, the attention deficit camerawork is annoying, scenes go on way too long and there's huge sections without sound (at least on the DVD... I don't know if there was any audio recorded for those scenes or not). This is not entertainment, there's no message, and there's probably not much thought put into it. I hate to say this because it invites sneering and snickering, but this is art. And it serves an artistic function. It makes you think about the medium. Which screen do you look at? Are the occasional synchronicities between the screens accidental, and does it matter? How much of this is scripted (probably not much), how much is improvised, how much is real? Are these people being themselves, or are they playing personalities? Maybe both. I'm sure this all sounds a bit trite, but it really is interesting. Kind of.

I liked all the Nico (whose album "Chelsea Girls" has long been one of my favorites), Ondine and Brigid parts. Nico's mild semi-domestic scene in the beginning, then Ondine's toying with Ingrid, then Brigid just being hilarious. After that, it goes into "Hanoi Hannah" (Mary Woronov of Rock n' Roll High School fame) being an obnoxious cunt to everyone around her. I don't find this interesting, fun, clever, or even especially good improv. It's pretty easy to act rude and antagonistic. This goes on for quite a long time, much of it silent (which may have been a blessing). Then comes a short thing with a drag queen, and after that 30 more minutes of silent footage. I really struggled through this part. My initial enthusiasm was waning fast, and then narcissistic Eric shows up, riffing about his sweat and other things. However, the last half hour brings us back to Nico (silent and weeping on the left, photographed with multi-color light patterns) and Ondine (shooting heroin and ranting amusingly on the right). If I could edit this film the way I wanted (and it was Warhol's original intention to let the projectionist decide which reels to show when and how to mix the audio), I'd love it a little more. But given the version here, I have to deduct some points for that whole middle 100 or so minutes. Still, a thought-provoking work that gives you something to chew on... even if it is essentially just a bunch of junkies/freaks/actors/artists fucking around with a camera. Rating: 7
post #693 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Blazing Saddles
Today I felt like putting some comedy into my Western marathon... so what better then a Western Spoof. Of course Mel Brooks is the king when it comes to making spoofs... and this movie is no exception. I enjoyed every minute of it. Sure some of it my go a little to far on the dumb side for my taste... but I think that is just part of the fun. I especially enjoyed Harvey Korman... and of course Mel Brooks... they were both hilarious in this movie.
post #694 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Ultimate Avengers: The Movie
I just couldn't help myself... I was trying to save this movie for a marathon later... but I just couldn't wait to watch it. Especially after my daughter borrowing it from me and telling me how much she enjoyed it. So I thought I would slip this one in tonight. I got this through Amazon Marketplace very cheap. After watching it I feel like I got a heck of a deal... because I enjoyed every minute of it! I was never familiar with The Avengers... but always liked both Captain America and Iron Man. This is the first time I ever seen a few of them (Wasp, Giant Man & Black Widow). I really enjoyed seeing the team get together. I hope to get the second movie (with the Black Panther) before too long. As well as some of Marvel's other animated movies.
post #695 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Son of Sam (2008) Ulli Lommel

German director Ulli Lommel is back once again with yet another true life serial killer flick. This time out we travel to New York in 1977 when David Berkowitz (Yogi Joski) would have the entire city in terror and become known as the Son of Sam. As of me writing this Lommel had done thirteen of these films and this here is the tenth one that I've seen. Lommel has also gone outside the serial killer mode in the past few years with ZOMBIE NATION and THE TOMB but no matter which film you look out it's going to be pretty bad, which is a shame since this is the same guy who delivered the cult classic THE BOOGEY MAN. This film here is actually one of Lommel's best in years and certainly ranks higher than many films in this series but there are still way too many problems for the film to work. On a technical level the movie is a step up as it appear Lommel actually took his time to film it. Previous films were full of errors but at least those aren't here. The performances are all stale to say the least but Joski isn't too bad. The low-budget nature of the film is all over the place with the lack of any real special effects and some of the silly camera shots. If you've never seen any of these serial killer films before then you're probably going to be thinking this is an extremely poor movie. If you've seen previous ones and walk into this expecting something horrid, you might surprise yourself with a bad movie but one that's a step up from the others. The real nail in the coffin comes during all the scenes dealing with the devil worshipping and possession. These scenes are just repeated throughout the movie and they become quite tiresome after a while. Had the director stayed more focuses on the killer and his attorney things might have been even better.

Marley & Me (2008) David Frankel

The 2008 family hit has Owen Wilson and Jennifer Aniston playing a married couple who starts their family with the dog Marley who is with them as their life goes through many up and downs. It took me a while to get around to seeing this and even though I had heard about the ending the film really didn't lose any of its punch in any fashion. There are plenty of laughs along the way, although I would say the film is a little too dark for children. The ending is certainly very sad but the entire film was a lot better than I was expecting. The film was a lot darker than I was expecting for a "kids" film and in many ways this played out a lot like the older type of family movies that weren't just cute but also dealt with dark subjects. It seems like there's a debate on whether or not kids should view this but I'd probably say no because the movie hit me as one adults would probably enjoy more. Marley is certainly cute enough for the kids but the subjects of babies, life's journey and the various up and downs are probably going to hit home with adults. I had never read the story the movie is based on nor was I even aware of how popular it was but I still really enjoyed the movie. I think it could have been trimmed by five or ten minutes but outside of that everything works just fine. Both Wilson and Aniston are believable in their roles and really come off well as a real couple. Alan Arkin adds in some nice supporting in his small role but there's no doubt the movie belongs to the dogs playing Marley. No matter what age Marley is shown, he still the movie and makes it so adorable and cute.

Last House in the Woods, The (2006) Gabriele Albanesi

Original title: Il bosco fuori

The Italian horror film has been dead for nearly two decades now but director Albanesi tries to bring it back with this piece, which is getting mixed reviews to say the least. A woman and her boyfriend are in the woods when they are attacked by three thugs. Thankfully an elderly couple rescue them and bring them back to their house. Soon the young couple wish they had just stayed with the thugs because these elderly folks have a secret of their own. The title would make you believe this is yet another rip of THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT and while there are elements of that film the main draw here is THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE so in the end we have an Italian throwback to both of those. This is certainly exploitation 101 but without the sex and nudity, which was a little shocking. As far as the film goes there's certainly plenty of gore and violence but in the end it really didn't work for me. The low budget nature is put to good use as we get some very raw scenes but at the same time the film's third act is so over the top that you can't take any of it too serious. I'm not sure why the tone of the film changes but there are a couple extra characters thrown in, via CHAINSAW style, that just don't work. One deformed guy with some sort of thing growing on his shoulder eventually gets that thing popped and watch out. The gore is flowing throughout the final act but by that time I had grown pretty bored with the entire set up. If you want a throw back to the grindhouse days of the 70's then you'll probably want to give this a try even though the final results aren't a major winner and I doubt this kickstarts the Italian horror genre.

Closet, The (2002) Gabriele Albanesi

Original title: L'armadio

Italian short has a young boy, in bed alone, hearing noises from his closet and going into a state of panic because he doesn't know what it is. After a few minute he decides to walk over and open the door. I won't spoil what's in the closet for you but there's a nice twist that makes this seven-minute short worth viewing. Albanesi would go onto make the cult title THE LAST HOUSE IN THE WOODS and while I had problem with that film and this one, it's clear to see that the director wants to lead the viewers one way before pulling a rug out from them.
post #696 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ - There are two versions of this story on the TSPDT list. Fortunately, they're both in the same box set, so I watched them back-to-back and had a Hur-iffic day. I decided to go with the Niblo version first. For a silent religious epic, I enjoyed this far more than I expected to. The production value ($3.9 million worth, according to iMDB) shows on the screen: the chariot race and the pirate battle are especially astonishing, and there's a lot of other impressive stuff too. The story is much complex and nuanced than a typical silent, and moves at a pretty good pace most of the time. I got really involved in it. I could have done without the magic fairly tale Jesus aspects, but it does contain some of Christianity's better teachings. Also, for a story set largely in the Middle East, the cast is lily-white... none more so than Jesus (although, in an interesting touch, we never see his face). But I guess that's to be expected. I probably wouldn't watch this again, but it was satisfying. Rating: 8


Ben-Hur - I watched the 1925 version first because I assumed I would like this one more. That was a mistake, it makes Wyler's pale in comparison in just about every way. This version (and I've heard the Niblo's is more faithful to the novel) is all Hollywoodized. About 50% longer, it adds a bunch of silly crap in an attempt to amp up the sympathy for Judah, his steamy passion for Esther, or the dramatic tension. Maybe the silliest of all is that old Hollywood standby, the deathbed speech. The sea battle in this one is, amazingly, an absolute joke compared to what had been over 40 years earlier. Rear projection and miniatures as plain as day. At least this one tries a little harder to be more ethnically accurate... including Hugh Griffith in blackface. Whoops. I would say that even the much-lauded chariot race is not a significant improvement. The widescreen presentation is more dramatic, but otherwise it's not really any more exciting than what Niblo pulled off. And I had to laugh out loud at Messala's spinning wheels of death; just one more way the deck is stacked more against Judah (who, while Messala is merciless with his horses, never once pulls out his whip during the race.... awww, what a great guy!). As for Heston, his intense brooding gets tiresome. Doesn't his face hurt from all that gritting his teeth and thrusting his jaw forward? If it sounds like I'm being harsh, I am. The only reason I'm not giving this a lower rating is because I'm taking into account that it's a bit unfair to compare it to another version. But I can't imagine enjoying this any more if I had seen it before Niblo's. Rating: 6


Senso - The cinematography is okay and the period detail is excellent. But there wasn't much else about this film I liked. I hate the character of Livia (Alida Valli): deceitful to her husband, clingy with her lover, a traitor to her people, and a vengeful bitch when she finally gets what she deserves. All because (it's implied) she'd never been boned so well before. It's hard to believe in anyone going so ridiculously ga-ga over boring old Farley Granger. Of course Granger is dubbed, quite badly, in Italian for this movie, with plenty of overacting. But if you really want to see some overacting, look no further than Valli, who chews the scenery like it's made out of Twizzlers. It seems like somehow there's the makings of a good film here, but it got lost along the way. Rating: 5
post #697 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Back to the Future: Part III
OK... I know I am stretching it a bit to add this one to my Western marathon. But as I have said before... Westerns really isn't usually my thing. And I admit... I am starting to tire of the westerns a bit. But hey... between the movies and the chapters of the serial I been watching in between I think I have done pretty good.

I don't know if I would say this is my favorite Back to the Future movie... but it is a lot of fun. I really liked the addition of Mary Steenburgen to the cast. She did a fine job fitting in... I also know her from the TV Series Joan of Arcadia which I also enjoyed a lot. I have to admit though... even though it was good see what Dr. Brown was up to after Marty made it back.... I didn't care too much for the flying steam engine. I mean it would have been one thing if they didn't make it fly.... but in my opinion the flying part just was a little too far (not story-wise mind you) it just didn't look right the way it took off.
post #698 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Donkey Baseball (1935) John Waters

Early Pete Smith short takes a look at the fad that swept through the country during the 1930's (or so the film says). Donkey baseball pretty much has the title telling you what the sport is but in case you missed it, it's playing baseball while on a donkey. There are a few changes in this version as games last for 13 innings, feature forty-run games and also players must stay attached to their dear donkey at all times. I pride myself in being a somewhat smart fellow when it comes to baseball and I know a lot of its history but I must admit that I had never heard of this "alternate" version until seeing this film on Turner Classic Movies. The oddball sport is certainly something to see and I would have liked to have had a straight documentary. Being a short from Smith we have some stuff done over the top just for laughs so it was hard to tell how much was real and how much was just for laughs. Either way, it's easy to see why this sport isn't being played today.

Radio Hams (1939) Felix F Feist

Pete Smith short takes a look at radio hams, which in other words are men who work on their radios in order to save lives or pass information over the radio during times of trouble. The film takes a look at two stories. One involving two friends talking over the radio when one gets poisoned by gas to where the other one must use the radio to find someone to help him. The other story deals with a missing ship and two pilots who go out looking for it, signaling back to the wives of the men lost at sea. This is a pretty entertaining short even though it is more dramatic than most of Smith's work. A lot of his work had large doses of humor but that's pretty much gone here with the exception of the ending, which deals with a Chinese man but I won't ruin the twist for you.

Domineering Male, The (1940) Johnny Hines

Dated but funny short from Pete Smith tries to put to rest the notion that men are always the ones chasing women. This time out we meet a young woman who decides to try and "catch" her a good one but she does so by changing who she really is. In other words, she likes to drink and smoke but she puts these habits to the side to make it appear she's more of an angel. Will the guy fall for it? The dating topics in this film are certainly dated compared to today but that really doesn't take away from any of the charm. There are many funny moments throughout the film including a nice sequence where the woman's fake out is out in the open and she tries to keep the guy from seeing it. The performances are all pretty good even though they don't get to speak and special attention should be paid to Ferris Taylor who plays the girl's father.

Miracle at Lourdes (1939) Henry K. Dunn

Entry in Carey Wilson's Miniature series for MGM tells the story of a doctor and wife who are living a perfect life until one day she is struck down with a crippling disease. The doctor loses all of his faith until the two travel to a small city where it was believed a young girl saw a holy vision, which brought forth holy water. Thousands of people travel to this site hoping for a miracle, which is exactly what the doctor is looking for. This is a fairly good short, although there's really nothing here that makes it jump off the screen. The performances show some weakness and the direction never really hits the story home. The story itself is an interesting one but I wish more could have been done with it.

Through the Colorado Rockies (1943) No Director Credited

James A. FitzPatrick's TravelTalks series travels to Colorado where we get to see the beautiful rockies as well as various other sites. These other sites include Stone Ship, Balanced Rock, the famous trout fishing and the stilt peach picking. This is one of the better entries in the series because the Technicolor really jumps off the screen and brings the beauty of the rockies right into your living room. As with all the others in the series, we get the casual information about the location but this one here is just so pretty to the eyes that you can't help but wish you could be there for yourself. The scenes from the top of the mountains are an incredible view as as the sequences dealing with the train tracks and how they were built so close to the water.

Rio de Janeiro: City of Splendour (1936) No Director Credited

A rather bland entry in MGM's TravelTalks series with James A. FitzPatrick. This time out we visit Rio de Janeiro where we see some famous palm trees, Sugarloaf Mountains and various other landmarks and how they've changed over the years. The beauty of the Technicolor is the main reason to watch this film as the colors leap off the screen but outside of that this is a pretty bland entry. The narration is also rather bland but the biggest problem is that nothing we see is all that special. Most of these shorts at least have a few moments that really make your eyes drop but I never got that feeling here. That's not to say there's nothing good in Rio but this short just doesn't capture it.
post #699 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Looney Tunes Golden Collection Vol 2, Disc 1

Big Snooze, The (1946) Bob Clampett

Elmer Fudd, tired of being abused by Bugs Bunny, decides to tear up his contract to Warner and go on vacation. Bugs needs him back so the rabbit invades his dreams to cause a nightmare. This is certainly a wild short but I've never found it to be a funny one. What does work here are the amazing colors inside the "nightmare", which look absolutely stunning in their remastered form. The visuals are certainly the main reason to watch this film as there aren't too many laughs. The film starts off with a chase, which would normally end a cartoon but here the gag is somewhat funny. The best sequence is the famous one where Elmer is tied to the train tracks and a train of rabbits run over him.

Broom-Stick Bunny (1956) Chuck Jones

Witch Hazel is at home on Halloween proud as can be since she's the ugliest woman around. Then there's a knock at the door where another ugly witch is but it turns out to be Bugs Bunny in an outfit. The real witch then decides she needs some rabbit to complete her next meal. This is a pretty good entry with Bugs being at the top of his game and Hazel being a pretty good villain. I'm sure the film could have thrown in more homages to other "scary" type of films but that's just a small issue. Bugs gets a lot of good lines but the real charm of the film belongs to Hazel are her dire need of being ugly. The twist ending is a very nice one and gets the biggest laugh of the film.

Bugs Bunny Rides Again (1948) Friz Freleng

The setting is the roughest town in the West where Yosemite Sam will shoot whoever tries to stand in his way of anything. Then Bugs comes to town and the two start their battle. This is yet another winning short to feature Bugs and Sam and this just gives further proof that the two, when working together, were one of the greatest comedy duos out there. There's one great joke after another but my favorite sequence comes at the very end when the two sit down to play cards to determine who leaves town. How the card game ends and everything that follows is just priceless. Another winning sequence happens early on when the two start walking towards one another getting ready to shoot.

Bunny Hugged (1951) Chuck Jones

Spoof of wrestling has Bugs Bunny jumping into the ring after his owner is destroyed by The Crusher. Once inside the ring the rabbit is totally out of his league so he must use his brains to try and bring down the best. There's quite a bit that happens inside the seven-minutes of this short. There's pretty much action from the start to finish and most of it is very good. The best sequence is early on in the picture and doesn't even feature the hero Bugs. It's a scene where The Crusher destroys the other wrestler, a "pretty boy" type and the way he's destroyed is just hilarious. The violent action is another plus as is all of the animation, which looks extremely well.

French Rarebit (1951) Robert McKimson

Bugs Bunny finds himself in Paris, walking down a street when rival chefs start fighting over which one will have Bugs on their menu that night. Soon Bugs joins the fighting in order to make both of them look like fools. This was never one of my favorite Bugs shorts and I'd probably say this is one of the least entertaining over all. There's some nice imagination and good animation but outside of that this thing is pretty lifeless. You expect a lot more in terms of laughs but there's not a single one here, which is rather shocking. Another problem are the two chefs and how bland and boring they are. Not once did they make me laugh and they even manage to bring Bugs down to their unfunny level.

Gorilla My Dreams (1948) Robert McKimson

A mama gorilla is ashamed of being the only one not to have a baby but when a shipwrecked Bugs Bunny shows up she decides to take him as her own. This doesn't sit too well with her cranky husband who wants to get rid of Bugs. This is a good entry in the series, although it's certainly not one of the best. The biggest problem I had with the movie is that it ends rather abruptly and the ending, while trying to be clever, doesn't really pull off the punch it was going for. There are still some nice moments between the mama and Bugs and the action between Bugs and the dad is fast and violent.

Hare-Brained Hypnotist, The (1942) Friz Freleng

Nice short has Elmer Fudd trying to use hypnotism to capture Bugs Bunny but the plan backfires. Elmer does get some sweet justice when Bugs turns him into the rabbit and he finally gets to harass Bugs. This early Bugs Bunny short manages to have some pretty good laughs and I've always enjoyed the animation from this period. There are many good sequences but there's no doubt that the best one is at the end when Elmer thinks he's the rabbit and gets to mess around with Bugs by giving him some of his own medicine. The movie is a minor classic but there were certainly better shorts out there.

Hare Conditioned (1945) Chuck Jones

Looney Tunes short has Bugs Bunny working in a department store as part of an outdoor display. His mean boss then wants to use him in a taxidermy display, which Bugs isn't too fond of. This has never been one of my favorites even though I know it has a rather large following amongst other animation fans. For me I've never been too thrilled with any of the action because it simply doesn't make me laugh. I think Bugs is up to his usual good standards and I think the yellow-skinned owner is also quite good. The two work well together but that didn't really matter because it still didn't make me laugh. Heck, even the animation is good but this one just isn't for me.

Heckling Hare, The (1941) Tex Avery

The hunting dog Willoughby is out sniffing for a rabbit and of course finds Bugs Bunny but soon he's going to wish he hadn't. This is another winning short from director Avery who apparently walked away from Warner after a falling out due to the ending here. I certainly don't know all of the details but I did find the ending here to be the best thing about the movie, although one could argue the actual payoff is a tad bit of a cheat. The rest of the film isn't among Avery's best work but I think it's still a good film. Both Bugs and Willoughby work well together and there are plenty of funny scenes including the before mentioned ending as well as another scene where the dog thinks he has killed bugs.

Little Red Riding Rabbit (1944) Friz Freleng

Classic Merrie Melodies short is a retelling of the Little Red Riding Hood story except here we have Bugs Bunny being what the wolf is wanting. A lot of people seem to be rather hit and miss on this short but I've always found it to be quite funny from start to finish. Some put down the granddaughter as being too annoying but I think that's the entire point and it does pay off well in the ending where things get mixed up a little. The action between the wolf and Bugs is pure classic with a number of great scenes including the wonderful one where Bugs puts a hot coal inside the wolf's pants. The animation is extremely well done and there's enough action for two movies.

Tortoise Beats Hare (1941) Tex Avery

Bugs challenges Cecil Turtle to a race and you just know who is going to win. This classic film from Tex Avery contains plenty of nice action and some great jokes, although in a way I find it rather hard to cheer for anyone from either side since both are cheating throughout the film. Perhaps that's just my brain over thinking things but this is still a very entertaining and very funny film. There are many great gags but the best are Bugs when he starts to go mad wondering how Cecil keeps passing him up. The final gag is also a winner. As good as this short is I think its sequel TORTOISE WINS BY A HARE is even better.

Rabbit Transit (1947) Friz Freleng

Third and final meeting between Bugs Bunny and Cecil Turtle has them racing cross country and both promising not to cheat, although that rule gets thrown out early on. This short isn't nearly as good as the previous two but there's still enough charm here to make it worth watching. What really brings this short down is the fact that there aren't enough laughs to keep it going. I wouldn't say we've seen this stuff too many times before but there's certain freshness missing from the story, characters and even some of the gags like the power jet turtle shell.

Slick Hare (1947) Friz Freleng

Elmer Fudd plays a waiter at the Mocrumbo, a restaurant with Hollywood's A-list stars. Humphrey Bogart orders rabbit but when Elmer tells him they're out the legendary tough guy demands he get one. Back in the kitchen lies Bugs Bunny but will Elmer be able to serve him up? This is a great cartoon from start to finish because of all the celebs we get to see. Not only do we have a great impression of Bogart but we also see the Marx Brothers, Frank Sinatra and a funny bit of Ray Milland in his THE LOST WEEKEND role. Bugs and Elmer are also at the top of their game as the action between the two is great as are all the jokes. One of the highlights deal with pies being thrown and Bogart taking one in the face.

Baby Buggy Bunny (1954) Chuck Jones

Cute, if not exceptionally funny short, has Bugs Bunny becoming a father but what he doesn't know is that his new "kid" is actually a gangster who just got done robbing a bank. I know many cartoon buffs considering this a masterpiece but to me it's only a good film that just doesn't have enough laughs to be considered a classic. The biggest problem for me is the kid, Finster. I just don't find him cute, tough or even funny. The early stuff with his acting the part of the child was incredibly dull to me and the short doesn't really pick up until Bugs realizes who he is and makes him pay for it. The sit of Bugs shaking the baby is somewhat deranged to watch but that's what makes it funny.

Hyde and Hare (1955) Friz Freleng

Being a major fan of horror movies as well as Bugs, you'd think I'd love this short but in fact I find it to be rather tame. The kind Dr. Jekyll comes to the park everyday to feed Bugs some carrots and one day decides to take him home as a pet. At the house the doctor drinks his potion, which turns him into the monstrous, green skinned Mr. Hyde. This film really doesn't contain too many laughs until the end when Bugs turns into the monster but sadly they don't spend anytime with this joke. Everything before that is decent but nothing really jumps off the screen. I enjoyed the calmness of Dr. Jekyll and I thought the transformation scenes were good but there still weren't enough laughs.
post #700 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

04/23/09

James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Honolulu: The Paradise of the Pacific (1935) (short) Dir: Ruth FitzPatrick
Production: MGM

A look at Hawaii in its days as a U.S. territory. Fitz is careful to note the heavy influence on the main city of Honolulu, “rapidly becoming a modern metropolis comparable with the most up-to-date cities in the world”, as well as it being “the headquarters of one of the most strategic and important naval stations of the U.S. Navy”, as would soon become apparent to anybody who didn’t know that. Some of the landmarks include the Tower of Aloha and a famous statue of King Kamehameha. Technicolor is used to good effect. Interesting stat: in the 150 years since Cook’s arrival, the population of pureblood Hawaiians went from approximately 400k to 15,000.

out of 4


James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Rio de Janeiro: City of Splendour (1936) (short)
Production: MGM

Did the Portugese explorers who discovered Brazil foresee Rio one day becoming the “most magnificent city in the world”, Fitz wonders? Well, maybe not, but being greeted by the sight of Sugarloaf upon entering Rio’s port, they could have been forgiven if they had. The Rio in this short is one damn picturesque city, attributed to a massive transformation effort that occurred between the years 1902-06. Seemed a minute or two short compared to typical Traveltalks. The Technicolor footage was shot by Winton Hoch (She Wore a Yellow Ribbon, The Quiet Man).

out of 4


James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Through the Colorado Rockies (1943) (short)
Production: MGM

Nice survey of some of the most amazing natural scenery this country offers—the “eastern gateway to the Rocky Mountains”. Just point a camera at Pikes Peak and you’re halfway home. Other sights include Garden of the Gods, with the Balanced Rock and Steamboat Rock (which Fitz calls Stone Ship) attractions, and the Royal Gorge, as well as the suspension bridge that traverses it. That bridge carries rail traffic through the Rockies, and we get a brief glimpse of a mind-blowing rail trip—through the gorge, along the Arkansas River, across the Continental Divide. Nice day at work, that one. Also featured is a small town along the Colorado River called Palisade, known for its peaches of all things. In a neat trick, workers in the peach orchards do their picking on stilts to best protect the trees from ladder damage.

out of 4


James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Visiting Italy (1951) (short)
Production: MGM

As Fitz acknowledges, you could spend all day on Rome, so to keep this Traveltalk sensible, it plays more like a slideshow—the Tiber River, the Ponte Sant’Angelo, the Piazza Venezia, the Forum, the Colosseum, St. Peter’s, the Vatican, and the, uh, “famous white oxen of Tuscany”. On to Assisi, where life appears to be only slightly different than it was 19 centuries earlier, and then Pisa, and its famous tower. A bit too random in the end.

out of 4


James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: The Capital City: Washington, D.C. (1940) (short)
Production: MGM

Nice tour of D.C., although, as it’s mostly a collection of government buildings, your sense of awe is moderated in accordance. I guess it all depends on how you respond to things like “this building houses the board of governors of the Federal Reserve” or “in this impressive building the affairs of the Department of Labor and the Interstate Commerce Commission are conducted”. Opens at the Washington Monument with a sweet panoptic view of the city from the top. One of the more striking views is of the Mall, a bit more ‘green’ then it is today, with what looks to be only the Smithsonian building along it. Fittingly ends at the Lincoln Memorial.

out of 4


A Pete Smith Specialty: Quicker’n a Wink (1940) (short) Dir: George Sidney
Production: MGM

This is sort of classic ‘Pete Smith’ where they take something oddball and make it interesting. The oddball in this instance is Dr. Harold E. Edgerton of MIT, and his invention, the stroboscope light, which enabled the photography of high speed objects. Things like a fan blade in motion, the exact impact of a man kicking a football, a man driving a golf ball through a telephone book, a hummingbird in flight, the ol’ bullet through some object (here a lightbulb), etc. Best shot is a cat lapping up some milk—not by curling its tongue upward, like we might do, but by dropping its tongue down with the end curled underneath, like a lower-case ‘j’. Worst shot is total nightmare fuel—a dentist working a drill on a tooth while little shards of enamel spark off.

out of 4
---------------------------------
GEORGE SIDNEY – “Lightly Likable”
A Pete Smith Specialty: Quicker’n a Wink (1940) (short) , John Nesbitt’s Passing Parade No. 26: Of Pups and Puzzles (1941) (short) , Jeanne Eagels (1957) , The Swinger (1966)


Crime Does Not Pay No. 25: Drunk Driving (1939) (short) Dir: David Miller
Production: MGM

If we go by Inspector Doyle of the Highway Patrol of "one our western states", it was safer to wrestle a grizzly bear in an alligator pen than it was to go driving in 1939; 21,000 people killed or injured a week in automobile accidents, 1 million a year, and 1 in 20 IN THIS AUDIENCE can count on being dead or disabled within the next 5 years! To show us how quickly things can go wrong, we’re introduced to John Jones, innocently celebrating a promotion with a couple of belts of bourbon. Jonesy, being the world’s biggest lightweight, gets into an accident after two shots and is amazingly identified by the cop on the scene, as well as his wife later on, as having been drinking. JJ shrugs it off and in classic driver’s ed. scare film style has to learn his lesson the hard way when the world’s longest ten mile drive (it begins in daylight and ends, still not at the destination, in the dark of night) results in tragedy. Probably scared a few people in that more innocent era.

out of 4
---------------------------
DAVID MILLER – “Miscellany”
Crime Does Not Pay No. 25: Drunk Driving (1939) (short)


La Fiesta de Santa Barbara (1935) (short) Dir: Louis Lewyn
Production: MGM

Hollywood crashes “one of America’s most famous historical celebrations”, the annual fiesta at Santa Barbara, in this early Technicolor short. Narrated by Pete Smith, with appearances by Chester Conklin (introducing MGM starlets, among whom are a brunette Cecilia Parker, a blonde Ida Lupino, as well as Toby Wing), Gilbert Roland, Robert Taylor, Binnie Barnes, Harpo Marx, Andy Devine, Buster Keaton (stuck doing some lame shtick), Gary Cooper and Ted Healy. The specialty acts are nothing to get excited about, although The Garland Sisters singing ‘La Cucaracha’ have some historical significance.

out of 4
post #701 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

50 First Dates
I thought this weekend I would start my movies out with 50 First Dates. I know of a lot of people that dislike Adam Sandler... but I personally have always enjoyed his movies. I also have enjoyed Drew Barrymore in most the stuff I have seen her in... so when I saw this one in the bargain bin of the local Wal-mart I was pretty quick to grab it. I know I have seen this one once before when it was first released... but really don't remember much about it. But I was pretty sure it was one I enjoyed. After watching it today I realized yes I did enjoy this movie... Very much so... even more then I remembered! It is definitely a more mature comedy then a lot of other Adam Sandler movies. Drew Barrymore was great as the cute and sweet girl next door with no short term memory. I also loved how they ended this movie. They opted to make it more realistic instead of trying to pull off some sort of miracle cure for Lucy. Was there anything I didn't like about this movie? Sure... there is the walrus vomit joke which would have fit in many Sandler movies... but just didn't belong in this one... then there was Lucy singing the Beach Boy Song with a terrible (hopefully fake) singing voice. And lastly I didn't care much for Lucy's brother. But all that is really minor... and didn't ruin my enjoyment of the movie much... if at all. I would say even if you do not usually enjoy Adam Sandler movies... give this one a chance... you may be surprised.
post #702 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

The Hills Have Eyes (2006)
This was a complete blind buy... never even seen the trailer before buying it the other day. Before watching a movie I always (Whenever Possible) watch the trailer first whether it is on the disc or if I have to find it online. The first thing I noticed when I watched the trailer today is that Emilie de Ravin is in the movie. I first became aware of her in the TV Series Roswell. Then I also notice Ted Levine who I know from the TV Series Monk. So I was happy to see that there will be a familiar face or two in it to watch. In the credits I also saw the name Billy Drago who I have become a fan of over the years. I first notice as The Demon of Fear on Charmed. Though I didn't notice him in the movie itself... so I imagine he was one of the ones that was buried under a whole lot of prosthetic make-up. I never seen the original to compare this to... but that may be a good thing because I was able to judge this movie on it's own merits alone... and I must say I enjoyed every minute of it. I have the Unrated version... and they definitely wasn't shy with gore in this movie!
post #703 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
Feature Films Watched in 2009


084) 04-20 Cannibal Holocaust (1980)

I'd certainly like to hear your opinions on this one. I'll wait for your comments before posting mine but I will say I do feel it's overrated.
post #704 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Looney Tunes Golden Collection Vol. 2 Disc 2

Beep, Beep (1952) Chuck Jones

Second film in the Road Runner/Coyote series is a pretty good one as the dumb but always trying Coyote comes up with new tricks as he tries to catch his meal. The highlight of these new tricks is a long running sequence where the two are inside a dark mine and we can only see them from the lights on their helmets. I'm not a die-hard fan of the series but I am watching them again in the order that they appear on Warner's second disc in their second volume of Looney Tunes shorts. Seeing them in order might have me changing my mind but this one here is a pretty good short from start to finish as the action is always at a feverish pace and we get many good gags including the before mentioned mine sequence but there's also another good one dealing with water.

Going! Going! Gosh! (1952) Chuck Jones

Third in the series has the Coyote using all sorts of extremes to try and capture the Road Runner. This time out we get a hot air balloon, a cliff falling and even cross dressing. My one complaint for this series is that the same stuff just keeps happening over and over and perhaps this isn't as noticeable in only the third film but it is something that has kept this duo off my favorites list. Even with that said this is still en enjoyable cartoon that manages to fly by because you just can't help but feel sorry for Wile E. Coyote. No matter how dumb he is or how many times he fails, you can't help but admire him for the effort. The highlight has to be the two scenes where he meets a truck head on.

Zipping Along (1953) Chuck Jones

The fourth Wile E. Coyote and Road Runner series has four way roads, guns, bombs, bird seed, cutting the strings on a bridge and more TNT as the dumb one keeps trying to catch his dinner. Even early on in the series we're starting to get quite a few repeat jokes and this would certainly continue throughout the series but you can help but be entertained by Wile's effort to get something to eat. The joy of watching him try and try harder only to fail is the real key to this series since the Road Runner offers very little outside his classic "Beep Beep". The highlight of the film has to be the free bird seed offer.

Stop! Look! and Hasten! (1954) Chuck Jones

Another good entry in the Wile E. Coyote and Road Runner series has our favorite dumb but hard working friend still trying to catch his dinner. A motorcycle, a tiger, leg building vitamins and even a pop up steel wall are just some of the devices used by Wile. This is another fun, if routine, entry that manages to offer up some good twists as well as some nice laughs. The best sequence in my opinion is the one where Wile digs a trap to catch his dinner and thinks it has worked until he jumps into the hole. Another nice gag deals with him taking some vitamins to grow stronger legs, which makes him run faster but there is naturally a downfall.

Ready.. Set.. Zoom! (1955) Chuck Jones

A motored bathtub, glue on the road, a large rubber band and cross dressing are just a few of the ways that Wile E. Coyote tries to catch the Road Runner but I'm sure you know how everything is going to end. The sixth film in the series is perhaps the weakest so far but it still manages tog et a few laughs as that poor Wile just keeps trying no matter how badly it hurts him. There are some nice gags this time including the glue on the road, which does harm to the coyote in a few ways. The gag with the female road runner is without a doubt very neat but I won't spoil it for you.

Guided Muscle (1955) Chuck Jones

Entertaining episode in the Wile E. Coyote and Road Runner series. This time out the coyote is cooking a tin can when he sees a better dinner, the road runner of course, passing. The coyote tries grease, large rocks, rubber bands and turning himself into an arrow but we know what's going to happen. Once again there original ideas are pretty much gone, although several of the old tricks are given a face lift here. The grease joke is something we've seen before but it still works here. Another very good scene is the one where Wile tries to turn himself into the arrow.

Gee Whiz-z-z-z-z-z-z (1956) Chuck Jones

The eighth pairing of Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner is yet another winner, although the beatings poor Wile takes keep getting worse. This time out we don't even get past the opening credits when Mr. Wile is run down by a truck but we then get other attacks including large rocks, falling from cliffs and various bombs. One of the best sequences in the film is when the coyote dressing up as "bat-man" and tries to fly after his dinner. This plan works for a while but what makes the joke so funny is that you're expecting one gag but instead we get something else. Another great gag is the painted version of a broken bridge, which of course comes back to hurt Wile.

There They Go-Go-Go! (1956) Chuck Jones

Poor ol' Wile E. Coyote is so hungry the film starts off with him cooking mud to eat but he even messes that up. Then the Road Runner goes pass him and an all new hunt begins. This time out we see Wile try using a sling, a gun, spiked balls and even a rope on a tree but, of course, we know what's going to happen. I'm watching these shorts in order and I must say that I've love to see Wile take one big chunk out of the Road Runner. Considering this is the ninth attempt of Wile you can't help but wish he could just eat one time. If not the Road Runner I wish he could eat anything the right way. The series was certainly starting to repeat itself but there's enough action and explosions here to make it worth watching.

Scrambled Aches (1957) Chuck Jones

Tenth film in the series has Wile E. Coyote up to the same old stuff but this time out we get a few new tricks with the best one being the dehydrated boulder. This is a pretty routine entry in the series but you can't expect too much out of the tenth film especially considering this was pretty much a one-joke series with the same type of jokes being used over and over again. The action is certainly top-notch as our beloved coyote finds one way after another to hurt himself. The small steam roller and escape hatch are very well done. Another thing to mention is the colors used here, which are extremely warm from start to finish. I'm going to guess this was done on purpose and isn't just the work of the remastered DVD since this short is on the same disc as the others.

Zoom and Bored (1957) Chuck Jones

One of the best in the series has Wile E. Coyote trying all sorts of new tricks including bees, a brick wall, a gun and a couple bird seed traps. To me this is one of the best in the series because it seems so fresh and original, although we do get a couple repeat jokes. One of the best sequences of the series comes at the end when Wile using a rope to slide down to catch the Road Runner but instead heads straight for a train. What he does next and the sign that the Road Runner hold up is just priceless. Another great gag is the one dealing with the bees and you know how it's going to end.

Whoa, Be-Gone! (1958) Chuck Jones

Twelfth film for Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner turns out to be one of their best. This time out the hungry coyote uses all sorts of tricks including bombs, large rocks, a nailed barrel with dynamite and perhaps best of all, a grow your own tornado kit. This is an extremely fast-paced entry in the series and I might even call it the best as it does a very good job at matching the freshness of the first film. We've seen a few of the jokes before but even so they come off very fresh here. The best joke is a reworked one of something we saw earlier with the "dehidrated boulder" routine. This time out it's a tornado that you add water to and all heck will break loose, which naturally happens but this time it's just more pain for poor old Wile E..

Cheese Chasers (1951) ;star: Chuck Jones

The final of six films in the Hubie and Bertie series has the two mice eating so much cheese that it actually makes them never want to have it again. So, with that in mind, they decide to end their lives by offering themselves up to Claude the Cat but he can't understand why they're doing it so he refuses to eat them. Soon Claude is wanting the local bulldog to eat him but he too refuses. This is a fairly cute and entertaining short that manages to have enough charm and laughs to keep it going. The entire situation of someone wanting the higher up to eat them is pretty funny and it makes for some solid entertaining. There aren't any major laughs but there are enough here to make this worth viewing.

Dover Boys at Pimento University or The Rivals of Roquefort Hall, The (1942) Chuck Jones

At one time Chuck Jones said Warner almost fired him because of this cartoon and it's very easy to see why. This here is without question one of the strangest shorts I've seen from the studio. Three brothers, Larry, Tom and Dick, are taking their fiance out when a rival kidnaps her. I'm really not sure what to say about this film but I guess the best way to put it is that this is either a great masterpiece of originality or one of the worst films ever made. I'll let you decide but I thought the film was pretty bad but at the same time I couldn't help but admire how different it was. The characters are strange, the color scheme is strange and pretty much everything else is strange including the humor. I'm really not sure what this thing is trying to do or if it's trying to spoof something but this here is one you'll have to see for yourself.

Mouse Wreckers (1948) Chuck Jones

Mice Bertie and Hubie come to their new home when they notice Claude the Cat, the best mouse catcher out there, is staying there. Together the two try to make Claude think he's crazy so that he'll move out. This here is a minor cartoon that makes for one great ending but everything before it is rather dull and bland. All of the "tricks" being done to the cat are rather blandly done and for the life of me I could never believe that the cat would be dumb enough to think everything that was happening was only a dream. A dumb cat would have fallen for this but apparently this one was a great one so I don't buy it. The ending is terrific as the cat thinks he's in an upside-down room. The payoff to this sequence is enough of a reason to watch the film.

Bear for Punishment, A (1951) Chuck Jones

Ma, Pa and Baby Bear star in this short that takes place on Father's Day as the dimwitted Baby tries to give dad a good gift but of course fails. BUGS BUNNY AND THE THREE BEARS is one of my favorite animated shorts but this here certainly isn't in the same league. I think one of the biggest things missing is the voice work of Mel Blanc as none of the bears here contain the same energy, charm and fun of the original. The voices here just aren't the same and it really takes away from the story because the grumpiness of Pa just comes off as cruel and not funny. There's one hilarious scene that has Baby Bear fixing dad a pipe, which doesn't go as planned and this here is without question the best scene in the movie.
post #705 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Hellbound: Book of the Dead
This is part of Hostile Hauntings... a low-budget horror movie set I have containing 6 movies. This movie is also known as Cadaver Bay. For the most part I am disappointed as the storyline had potential to be more then what it turned out to be. Don't get me wrong... as there is some good points in this movie. They really try hard at supplying the right atmosphere even though they failed. But there is some decent effects... the bad acting could have been worse. They seemed to have tried... but felt like a movie created by a first year film student.
post #706 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Creature from Black Lake
Another total blind buy... but I got it so cheap I couldn't help myself. This one was actually less then $4... new. It is a movie that was made back in the mid '70s. I have definitely seen better... but this movie did keep my attention. It is one that I was able to enjoy. It is actually one of the first Big Foot movies I ever watched. It had some good atmosphere and I did like how they barely showed the creature... making you use your imagination on what he really looks like close up.
post #707 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

04/25/09

James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Glimpses of Morocco and Algiers (1951) (short)
Production: MGM

First up is Algiers, and—ripped from today’s headlines!!—a story about its harbor once being the base of a notorious band of pirates. Rather bedeviled by the scoundrels, the U.S. resorted to paying a $400,000 annual ‘tribute’ to the pirate leaders of Algiers to ensure safe passage, that is until Commodore Perry was sent in to, as Fitz puts it, “adjust the matter permanently.” To Casablanca next, with a nod to the French influence and a look at such landmarks as the Institute of Physical Education. Peeks at Rabat and Marrakech were probably more interesting to the audiences of the day as rare and exotic. Rather drab episode altogether, “pungent and odiferous” indeed. JAF makes a rare appearance.

out of 4


James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Beautiful Bali (1940) (short)
Production: MGM

To the Dutch East Indies and the island of Bali, a population relatively unchanged in its ways since the co-mingling of natives and invading Indian refuges sometime in the 1400’s. Of course, one tiny, wee bit change was the Dutch “subduing” the natives and assuming official control in 1906. But, as Fitz points out, the Dutch wisely “left Bali to the Balinese.” Good look at the people and customs, including Bali’s #1 dancer, Gigi, who we witness popping and locking and just generally serving dudes. Seriously he was awesome. You can tell Fitz enjoyed Bali, he even takes a moment to lament the recent impingement by tourists, the “roving white man”, on “beaches that were only yesterday the exclusive domain of brown feet.”

out of 4


The Halliday Brand (1957) Dir: Joseph H. Lewis
Production: Collier Young Associates/United Artists

Domineering patriarch ‘Big’ Dan Halliday’s (Ward Bond) irrational hate destroys the lives of sons ‘Little’ Dan (Joseph Cotten) and Clay (Bill Williams) as well as daughter, Martha (Betsy Blair), in this western from Joseph H. Lewis. As the oldest son, ‘Little’ Dan was expected to take over for his father, both as sheriff and in running the ranch. ‘Little’ Dan had always blanched at the thought of succeeding his father, whose “hard hand” ways were alien to him. “You don’t get a confession by just asking questions,” the father tells the son. When the not-quite-accidental death of a “half breed” ranch hand who was romancing Martha happens, it sets in motion the struggle between father and son over the Halliday ‘brand’, which is something a bit more than just a way to mark cattle.

The film starts out okay, with a good, if somewhat familiar, premise pitting father against son. The dynamic between the father and the sons, and also between the two sons, was interesting (Clay is eager to please, but ineffectual, resentful), but it sort of devolved from there. The film can be talky and over-heated at times. Bond and Cotten are good, though neither in top form, but the rest of the acting is average at best. Bond’s character is such a boogeyman, he could have benefited from some shading. Viveca Lindfors is just wrong as a half-Native American, half-white love interest. There is a recurrent ‘love theme’ that is irritating at first, and then makes you start laughing from its awfulness thereafter. A small thing for sure, but there is a nighttime scene, shot on a stage, that is way too phony looking for 1957. Outside of that scene, it is shot quite nicely, authentically western looking, with some nice visual touches (a lynching scene is one standout, a showdown between Bond and Jay C. Flippen is another). The final verdict though is somewhat disappointing.

out of 4
-----------------------------------------
JOSEPH H. LEWIS – “Expressive Esoterica”
The Halliday Brand (1957)
post #708 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Howard the Duck is truly remarkable because each new scene is actually worse than the scene before it.
post #709 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST : I'd certainly like to hear your opinions on this one. I'll wait for your comments before posting mine but I will say I do feel it's overrated.

There was a lot of discussion on this film over at the CHFB and a friend of mine had loaned me the DVD months ago so it was just sitting here waiting to be watched for the longest time. I guess I just never had the desire to rush it because I wasn't anxious to see the animal cruelty it was so infamous for. But the discussion at CHFB coaxed me into taking the plunge. Actually, I was rather exhausted from a long day of work that evening and wasn't in the best frame of mind for watching this at the time (if there's ever a proper frame of mind for twisted stuff like this) so maybe I'll give it a second look down the line to see if my one-star rating goes up a notch or two.

I thought the legendary descriptions of gross and needless animal cruelty were not overstated... they did turn out to be disturbing to me. I am no PETA fanatic or anything, but I just felt all this was done just for the sake of torturing and killing these animals on camera. But it wasn't even so much the animal violence that soured me on the movie the most. It was basically that the general "direction" was a mess, just everything thrown together. I thought the acting was pretty bad too.

I would say the eerie music soundtrack was the one thing which really worked to the movie's advantage, and though we're now oversaturated with "movie projects within movies" like THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT, CLOVERFIELD, and DIARY OF THE DEAD, I'd have to say that if CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST was the first movie to utilize this concept, I'd have to give it kudos for establishing that interesting idea. Also -- the ending was so realistic to me that I honestly was not sure this wasn't an actual snuff film. After it ended I had to watch some DVD extras and interviews to actually make sure this stuff was staged! Since it turned out that it WAS faked and yet even I could have my doubts after watching so many exploitation films over the decades, I guess in a sick way, this also is to the movie's credit.
post #710 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

12 Monkeys
This is another movie I blind bought recently. Never even seeing the trailer before buying it. Some decent stars in this movie. I like Bruce Willis... I am not too familiar with Madeline Stowe, but everything I have seen her in to date I have enjoyed. Brad Pitt has always been hit and miss in my eyes. I always thought him to be a somewhat over-rated actor. Though he can be good at times. I did like him in Fight Club, Interview with a Vampire and Seven. And I have to admit... he was right good in this one as well. After watching the trailer I was a little concerned this movie would be a bit on the confusing side. But it really wasn't. It was really an interesting, enjoyable movie. Maybe it was a little on the slow side in some parts. But not terribly so. Over-all I am glad I added it to my collection... and for a very cheap price too.
post #711 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

4/16: The Lord of the Rings: Special Extended Editions (2001-2003)

I finally got to do a marathon of all three extended editions. I'm glad that I had the experience, but I think that they work better in smaller doses. It's just really hard to keep focus after about the fifth hour. I would like to try a theatrical edition marathon someday, however, to see if that pacing and slightly longer breaks between movies work better.

4/23: Star Trek (2009)

I was lucky enough to see an advanced screening last Thursday. My audience and I had a fantastic time. We laughed, cried, and cheered together. In my opinion, it is a fantastic movie for both die-hard Trekkers and general audiences who just want a big summer action film. It is easily the most accessible Trek film of the 11, and it sets things up for plenty more adventures in the future. I'd like to give special mention to the ship flybys. They showcase the new Enterprise beautifully without bringing the movie to a screeching halt like in Star Trek: The Motion Picture.

4/25: Earth (2009)

You should know if you like nature documentaries or not. I typically do not like them, but I decided to go based on the excellent preview and the James Earl Jones narration. Ultimately, the film has some breathtakingly gorgeous moments, but there is not enough variety or drama to sustain a 90-minute length. Also, the writers felt that they had to stick in a few lines about how humans are destroying habitats or ways of life for some of these animals. The point may be valid, but just once, I'd like to watch one of these specials that is a pure celebration of nature with no finger-pointing or politics at all.
post #712 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

04/26/09

Take Care of My Little Girl (1951) Dir: Jean Negulesco
Production: 20th Century-Fox

Bit more going on in this film besides the slightly too earnest treatment of college and sorority life. It’s like Sirk for the teen set, and a few years before Sirk and Ray, no less. Cool and pretty Liz Ericson (Jeanne Crain) and her somewhat less cool and less pretty best friend, Janet, are freshman at Midwestern U, where they plan to rush the prestigious Upsilon Upsilon Upsilon (the Tri U’s) sorority, whose housemother (played by Gilligan’s Island’s Natalie Schafer) was once a ‘sister’ of Liz’s mother. After being prepped her whole life by her mother to be a Tri U, Liz is a smash and wows everyone, including the snobby, image obsessed sister, Dallas (Jean Peters). Janet, however, fails at Rush Week, isn’t selected and drops out of school. In fact the sorority gets between Liz and all her friends, including Adelaide (Mitzi Gaynor), who has no time for its foolishness, and nice guy Joe (Dale Robertson), a war vet, who also finds the whole thing silly. “Isn’t it natural to want to belong”, she asks Joe. “What about all the clubs, lodges, associations, brotherhoods?” “What about them?” Joe answers. The more Liz becomes involved with the Tri U’s, and starts playing into roles and what’s expected of her, including hooking up with an alcoholic frat boy (Jeffrey Hunter) who gets her mixed up in a cheating scheme, the less she gets out of it. After witnessing the cruel treatment of a fellow pledge, Liz is forced to take stock of her decisions.

Appallingly low on, uh, naughty hijinks as I was led to believe all films with sororities contained (80’s movies, you’ve failed me again), specifically anything involving Jean Peters if I were to make a request, but the sly subversion, courtesy of the Epstein brothers’ script, adds interest and relevance. Not only does it play with the issue of conformity as both coping method and path to success, but it also deals with class—the sorority is interested not only in girls that look the part, but also come from the right background and status. And if you read the sorority as a stand-in for something bigger, it fairly skewers the hypocrisy that can exist in all social institutions. Interestingly, the producer was Julian Blaustein, whose THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL similarly masked greater ambitions within its seemingly modest premise.

Notes: Even though a planned sub-plot involving a “snubbed Jewish co-ed” was dropped, as were other racial and religious prejudice aspects of the book it was based on, the film was still controversial, with the national Pan-Hellenic Society advising members to quietly boycott the picture. Apparently a Scorsese favorite, he programmed it for a film series he ran at Lincoln Center in the early 90's.

out of 4
-------------------------------
JEAN NEGULESCO – “Miscellany”
Take Care of My Little Girl (1951)
post #713 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

RE: CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST

Joe, I had pretty much the same reaction as you did the first time I watched it. Over the years I've gone back and "enjoyed" it more but I still find the entire film to be rather repulsive and not for a second do I buy the director's bullshit reasoning behind killing the animals. His story has changed so many times over the years that it's easy to tell he's lying. One story had him claim that the producer made him shoot the stuff. The next story had him claiming the (dead) producer shot it himself. He says he would "never" shoot animals getting killed yet the idiot seems to have forgotten that his previous cannibal movie featured animals being slaughtered.

Apparently a remake/sequel was lined up for this year but last I heard the backing fell apart and it's not going to be made. I do believe this was one of the first "movies within a movie" so BLAIR WITCH certainly owes a lot to this movie. I remember at the time the filmmakers claimed they had never seen this film. THE LAST BROADCAST appears to be the movie they ripped off and that film's director had seen HOLOCAUST so....

You mentioned how some of the stuff looked real, the woman with the pole through her you know what and up through the mouth gets some major debate. Several FX experts claim this is a real body because they couldn't recreate how it was done. I'm not sure how true it is but the director's story on how this was done doesn't add up either.

I've seen most of the Italian cannibal films and most of them, while vile with animal killings, are entertaining for exploitation trash. Most of them are more like adventure movies with someone crashing in the jungle and having to battle to get out alive. HOLOCAUST went for the "blame the media" story but the rest are just trashy entertainment. JUNGLE HOLOCAUST is my personal favorite but EATEN ALIVE and CANNIBAL FEROX are downright crazy in their own right.
post #714 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
I do believe this was one of the first "movies within a movie" so BLAIR WITCH certainly owes a lot to this movie. I remember at the time the filmmakers claimed they had never seen this film. THE LAST BROADCAST appears to be the movie they ripped off and that film's director had seen HOLOCAUST so....

How about, from the early 70's, THE LEGEND OF BOGGY CREEK?



04/27/09

The Outcasts of Poker Flat (1952) Dir: Joseph M. Newman
Production: 20th Century-Fox

Third screen adaptation* of Bret Harte’s short story, first published in 1869, about a group of misfits stranded by a snowstorm in a cabin somewhere in Northern California mining country. When a robbery of the assay’s office shocks the conscience of the people of Poker Flat, they respond by jettisoning the town’s undesirables, including gambler John Oakhurst (Dale Robertson), weathered whore ‘Duchess’ Shipton (Miriam Hopkins), crazy, old drunk and pickpocket Jake (Billy Lynn), and Cal (Anne Baxter), a woman known to associate with the lone escaped bank robber, a man named Ryker (Cameron Mitchell). Cast out, the group is traveling through the mountains when a storm descends on them. Forced to seek shelter, Oakhurst leads them to an old cabin where they hope to wait out the storm with what little food they have. That plan is quickly altered by the arrival of Ryker, looking for the money he left with Cal. With the storm showing no signs of letting up and as the prospects for survival get bleaker, Ryker becomes more sadistic and gun-happy and the ‘outcasts’ hopes for holding on until rescue arrives get smaller.

Newman does a nice job of keeping the tension up, which can be difficult when the majority of the story takes place in a single, small setting, in this case the cabin. The action can be suffocated or the proceedings come off stagey. Of course, it’s a good strategy not to push your luck, and at 80 minutes, the film smartly keeps it from lingering. The movement within the tight quarters is shot well, Joseph La Shelle is the DP, and there is also a superbly shot opening scene of a nighttime bank robbery. It plays like a western version of THE KILLERS. There’s also a nice twist on a shootout near the end (it’s basically smoked out). Dale Robertson is quite good as the circumspect gambler Oakhurst, who calculates his every move by the odds of its success. Anne Baxter is her typical dramatic self. It’s not much of a role for Hopkins, but she certainly has the attitude down for a weary, old prostitute. Mitchell menaces. I dug it.

Notes: *The story was first filmed in 1919, direction by John Ford, with Harry Carey as Oakhurst; the second attempt was in 1937, Christy Cabanne directing, Preston Foster starring. Ford later had an option to film the tale through his Argosy Productions but it never materialized. Gregory Peck was attached at one point, which would have made this somewhat reminiscent of the excellent YELLOW SKY.

out of 4
---------------------------------
JOSEPH M. NEWMAN – “Miscellany”
The Outcasts of Poker Flat (1952)
post #715 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Good call on BOGGY CREEK. I haven't seen the film in a very long time so I can't remember the exact technique it used but the documentary style does seem like something that would have influenced the director of CH. I'm not sure if Joe has seen it to remember if it was the same thing. There's another 70s drive-in flick that my mind is drawing a blank on but I think it too features a "movie inside a movie" format. I just can't recall if it was used the same way as in CH.
post #716 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

The Servant - Terrific little film from the British New Wave. The proletariat uprising against the bourgeoisie, on a small scale. There's a very Bunuellian flavor to the class warfare, sly subversive wit, slightly surreal narrative, and sensuality. I honestly had no idea what was going to happen next... not that it was so off-the-wall crazy, but it always managed to surprise me. This is all augmented by some fine cinematography, a hep jazzy score, and a very good performance from Dirk Bogarde (the other actors were decent, too, but it's pretty much Bogarde's show). Complaints: enough with the mirrors. I'm getting bored with mirrors. There was one, maybe two, good uses of them here, the rest was just showing off. Also, I didn't care much for the "married couple" bit near the end (if you've seen it, you should know what I mean), but it doesn't last that long. Other than that, I really liked this one a lot and might add it to my collection. Rating: 9


Sin City (rewatch, Blu-Ray) - Let's not kid ourselves here... this is pure adolescent fantasy. Curvy babes in skimpy costumes, insane amounts of violence, and cool guys with tough talk. Its intellectual value is nil, and its artistic value is only in its style. But oh what style. Since my first viewing, I've read Miller's works, and Rodriguez brings it to life perfectly. It might be garbage, but it's FUN garbage that's awfully easy on the eyes. Although I'm not as gaga over it as I was at first, I still enjoy it. Rating: 8


They Were Expendable - I've seen five other collaborations between John Ford and John Wayne. Stagecoach was okay, but I've hated the rest. And this one goes in the "hate" stack. The cinematography is very good, highlighted by some impressive battle scenes (a few moments of obvious rear projection notwithstanding). And the story is mildly engaging, although rather fragmented. It's the attitude I can't tolerate. I understand that it's a product of its time, but all this gung ho patriotism makes me ill. The military is portrayed as entirely made up of a swell bunch of Joes, every single one of them. They've all got nicknames, and they can all take a good ribbing, and they're falling all over themselves to serve their country and go kill some "Japs" and "nips". When they get put on "boring" duties, they get very crestfallen and start whining their asses off... there's nothing manly about DELIVERING MESSAGES, for Pete's sake! And the score is unbearably packed with patriotic tunes, it's incredibly awful. Sentimental, heavy-handed pap, and poorly acted as well. And what a waste of Donna Reed. Rating: 4
post #717 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

04/17/09: DESERT LEGION (Joseph Pevney, 1953)

Another trip to the ex-village sexton/film buff yielded a pleasant evening of movie talk and viewing – in this particular case, the former being more rewarding than the latter in view of the fact that the 25-year old print of the obscure Alan Ladd vehicle DESERT LEGION was so washed out as to belie its having been originally shot in “glorious Technicolor”! Indeed, the only color scheme prevalent throughout the screening was a reddish hue that, more than anything else, is a tell-tale sign that a celluloid print is well past its “best before” date. But, as if that was not disheartening enough, the film kept sticking in the projector, making the image jump up and down, requiring our host to make his expert manual interventions a handful of times. For better or worse, the film we were watching was a routine star actioner that even I was unaware of before seeing its worn poster proudly displayed during the latest exhibition of such rare items held regularly for the public by our host. The script requires the viewer to accept diminutive Ladd as a formidable Legionnaire who possesses the only credentials to capture a renegade Arab rebel (played by one of the least likely actors suited for this role, Richard Conte!) that has been preying on their sentries and save the mythical Shangri-La-like community of Medara, buried deep within the desert, from his evil clutches. For support, Ladd only has his old, tale-spinning buddy Akim Tamiroff, while the inevitable love interest is provided by Arlene Dahl – with Universal clearly believing that the audience would not have anyone but another statuesque Arabic redhead (a` la Maureen O’Hara) for a leading lady!! Despite the intermittent sprinkling of intriguing ideas – Ladd is abducted by the mysterious Dahl and taken to her hidden abode in clear imitation of Pierre Benoit’s much-filmed “L’Atlantide”; the two confrontations between Ladd and Conte are both unconventional in nature and setting: in the arena with the two contestants sharing one spear between them and, the climactic one, atop a mountain’s rock-face – this particular mix, unfortunately, fails to rise to any particularly memorable or even satisfactory level…which makes the possibility of a future revisit via superior elements highly improbable!


04/18/09: TWILIGHT FOR THE GODS (Joseph Pevney, 1958)

Had I ever wondered why this vintage Rock Hudson adventure film was not included in Universal's 3-Disc/5-film Franchise Collection dedicated to its star, the answer is now clear to me: it just is not very good. Despite a respectable pedigree – Ernest K. (ISLAND IN THE SKY, THE HIGH AND THE MIGHTY) Gann adapted his own novel for the screen – and its seafaring STAGECOACH-like plot, the film never amounts to much – not even during a climax in which the decrepit vessel (commandeered by Captain Hudson who is burdened with a Lord Jim-complex) is almost lost during a storm. The characters of the crew and passangers are, likewise, all from stock: a mysterious, statuesque redhead (Cyd Charisse) with a past that falls for – and cures – our lock-jawed hero; a sleazy second-in-command (Arthur Kennedy) who, at first, undermines but eventually grows to respect his superior; initially mutinous sailors (headed by Charles McGraw) who, again, are on Hudson's side by the end of the film; a trouble-making charlatan (Leif Erickson) is redeemed by long-suppressed love for his aging primadonna; a womanizing drunkard (Richard Haydn) sparring verbally with an old priest; an aged couple (Vladimir Sokoloff), etc. For what it is worth, Hudson also has a hairy mutt for a pet (which goes on to perish from a shark attack) and the dramas haunting the two protagonists are depicted for us via short flashback sequences.



P.S. Call it a mid-year crisis or whatever but these 2 long-past-due reviews are going to be the last from me for the present.

Although this decision was mostly brought about by yet another PC crash, I just don't think it's feasible anymore to write (in my typically - or, if you will, irritatingly - exhaustive fashion) on every single film I watch. This 3-year-long commitment had unconsciously made me slow down my viewing habits practically to a standstill throughout this April and that's definitely not good - especially in view of the fact that over the last few months I've acquired a number of highly-desirable titles that I had been on the lookout for years. Therefore, if my current viewing speed is to increase, something had to be sacrificed and, regretfully, the most time-consuming one was the natural scapegoat I found.

I will also be doing away with my current thematic viewings because, again, it doesn't make much sense to watch, say, 4 noirs (a favorite genre) a month if I have a backlog of around 75 in my unwatched pile because I also have to make room for musicals (my least favorite genre) or whatever. Besides, I have now accumulated 38 never-before-watched movies from my 12 favorite directors which, again, under my current viewing structure would have had to wait their turn so to speak - which, I realize now, is pretty silly.

So, rant over - I hope nobody gets suicidal tendencies while reading this confession. I will still be lurking around these here parts, regularly updating my 2009 tally on Page 1 and replying to your comments when my input seems justified.
post #718 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Oh, yeah sure, Mario, thanks to you and your rich vein of form re: requests on another board now I have a massive backlog too! But hey, once it becomes a chore I understand you have to walk away. I'd still like to see you chime in on some of the stuff I know you have on deck so hopefully you come back or just post your thoughts in digest form or something.



04/28/09

Nine Lives Are Not Enough (1941) Dir: A. Edward Sutherland
Production: Warner Bros.

Two beat cops and a crusading whiz reporter joust with a slick gangster who’s always a step ahead of the law and try to prove that the possible suicide of a missing millionaire was actually murder. Might these two things be connected?

Standard quickie B, typically cliché-ridden, but with at least a likable roster of Warner players. Ron Reagan plays the newspaper reporter, Matt Sawyer, whose habit of sensationalizing stories constantly puts him at odds with his exasperated city editor, JB (Howard Da Silva). James Gleason and Edward Brophy play the two cops. Charles Drake plays ‘Snappy’, a reporter from a competing paper while Sawyer’s love interest is played by Joan Perry, who would soon give up the honor of being a Hollywood actress for the honor of being Mrs. Harry Cohn. The whole things goes by so quickly (barely over an hour) it’s hard to get offended by it. The strictly dopey humor is provided by Brophy’s clueless cop, Drake as the rival reporter always getting bested by Reagan, and a ‘dumb’ character who appears to be retarded (which isn’t as funny in real life as it is in the movies), and in the modern remake would be the role that generates all the Oscar buzz.

out of 4
--------------------------------------
A. EDWARD SUTHERLAND – “Miscellany”
Nine Lives Are Not Enough (1941)



Reserved for Ladies (1932) Dir: Alexander Korda
Production: Paramount British

Dryly amusing comedy about a London headwaiter who conceals his working class background to pursue a proper young lady “outside his position” he’s fallen in love with. Max Tracey (Leslie Howard) is a headwaiter at London’s posh Grand Palace Hotel, where he is much loved by all the dignitaries and social elites for his wit and sophistication. When a new guest, Sylvia Robertson (Elizabeth Allan), checks in, it’s love at first sight for Max. In his attempt to woo Sylvia, who doesn’t yet know what he does for a living, Max follows her to a winter resort in the Alps. When Sylvia and the other guests see Max lunching with a king (whom he knows and has served at the hotel) they assume he is a prince. Things are further complicated when a jealous booty call, the Countess Ricardi (Benita Hume), follows Max to the resort to check up on him. As Sylvia falls in love, she tells Max that their “social differences” shouldn’t mean anything in the end. But when the truth comes out, and their ‘roles’ are reversed, will she still feel the same?

Typical subtle humor from the British perspective, but there are at least a few ‘chuckle out loud’ and even racy moments (Max’s first survery of the patrons in the dining room, the unwanted guest in the train dining car, the double entendre with the Countess). A handsome looking production (Alfred Junge worked on the design) impressively put together on what must have been a shoestring budget (Paramount, required to spend money in England that they earned in England, looked to mount these overseas productions as cheaply as possibly). Howard is enjoyable, but while Ms. Allan (1935's A TALE OF TWO CITIES) is quite pretty, she’s not especially interesting and their relationship is rather cold. George Grossmith as the King and Morton Selten, who plays Sylvia’s father, are standouts. Merle Oberon is supposed to be here, still in her 'Estelle Thompson' days, but I couldn't spot her, I assume she was cut out in this version.

Notes: This U.S. version apparently excised 20 minutes from the British version, which shows mostly in the last act, and changed the title from SERVICE FOR LADIES. Story was filmed once before by Paramount, in Hollywood in 1929, as SERVICE FOR LADIES, directed by Harry D’Arrast and starring Adolphe Menjou.

out of 4
------------------------------------
ALEXANDER KORDA – “Lightly Likable”
Marius (1931) , Reserved for Ladies (1932)
post #719 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario Gauci
P.S. Call it a mid-year crisis or whatever but these 2 long-past-due reviews are going to be the last from me for the present.

Although this decision was mostly brought about by yet another PC crash, I just don't think it's feasible anymore to write (in my typically - or, if you will, irritatingly - exhaustive fashion) on every single film I watch. This 3-year-long commitment had unconsciously made me slow down my viewing habits practically to a standstill throughout this April and that's definitely not good - especially in view of the fact that over the last few months I've acquired a number of highly-desirable titles that I had been on the lookout for years. Therefore, if my current viewing speed is to increase, something had to be sacrificed and, regretfully, the most time-consuming one was the natural scapegoat I found.

I will also be doing away with my current thematic viewings because, again, it doesn't make much sense to watch, say, 4 noirs (a favorite genre) a month if I have a backlog of around 75 in my unwatched pile because I also have to make room for musicals (my least favorite genre) or whatever. Besides, I have now accumulated 38 never-before-watched movies from my 12 favorite directors which, again, under my current viewing structure would have had to wait their turn so to speak - which, I realize now, is pretty silly.

So, rant over - I hope nobody gets suicidal tendencies while reading this confession. I will still be lurking around these here parts, regularly updating my 2009 tally on Page 1 and replying to your comments when my input seems justified.

SAY IT AIN'T SO, MARIO!

That is -- I can respect your reasons, but I still hope you'll offer up a more condensed method of writing your thoughts on films you watch, at the very least.
post #720 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario Gauci
I just don't think it's feasible anymore to write (in my typically - or, if you will, irritatingly - exhaustive fashion) on every single film I watch. This 3-year-long commitment had unconsciously made me slow down my viewing habits practically to a standstill throughout this April and that's definitely not good - especially in view of the fact that over the last few months I've acquired a number of highly-desirable titles that I had been on the lookout for years. Therefore, if my current viewing speed is to increase, something had to be sacrificed and, regretfully, the most time-consuming one was the natural scapegoat I found..[/b]

I prefer my reviews in the "longer" format (5-10 paragraphs) but it's just downright crazy to do that if you're not getting paid or reviewing for a site. That's why if I'm not doing one of those two then I just go with the short notes that will at least kick start my brain to remembering how I felt about a movie when I'm never going to watch it again and it might come up in a debate at some point.

When you cut down your reviews this past year I was hoping you'd jump into the conversational mode a tad bit more and perhaps that will happen now.

You're a fan of Maltin so perhaps you can break them down that way. That's what "inspired" my current format, although I do go too short and too long at some points.

You also bring up the word backlog and I use to say that but I've thrown that word out. I was unemployed for 4+ months, which meant sitting on my ass that whole time and you can trust me that you'll never get caught up. No matter how much you watch you'll always find five new titles to replace that one title you just watched so the word backlog isn't in my vocabulary any more. I tried going through all six volumes of the Looney Tune sets this month but only made it through volume 1 and two discs of vol 2. Well short of my goal, which was to get my "caught up" but then it hit me that I still watched damn near 100 of them in one month alone.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2009)