Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2009)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Track the Films You Watch (2009) - Page 20

post #571 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
A note to Joe but TCM will be replaying WOODY ALLEN: A LIFE IN FILM on June 12th at 8pm.

Can you remind me on June 11th?
Seriously - thanks!

Quote:
Also, I went to that Billy Joel/Elton John concert last night and was rather amazed at how well the New Yorker was when he wasn't drunk like the last time I watched him. It was funny but they did a couple Beatles covers including "Birthday", which I don't believe I've ever heard. Or if I did I certainly didn't remember it. What album is that one on?

THE BEATLES (aka the double White Album).
post #572 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
Can you remind me on June 11th?
Seriously - thanks!

THE BEATLES (aka the double White Album).

I'll certainly try to remember. All that month Turner is splitting their days up with two directors. One director plays all morning the other all night.

Oh, that White Album I've never gotten around to buying. Perhaps they'll remaster them and drop the retail price before I hit 40.
post #573 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
Oh, that White Album I've never gotten around to buying. Perhaps they'll remaster them and drop the retail price before I hit 40.

It's currently only $24.49 at Amazon (keep in mind it's a double CD). This is one of the greatest albums of all time, with many songs I'm sure you'd like -- No Excuses!
post #574 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

The Reaping
When I bought this movie yesterday (Wednesday) it was a complete blind buy. I never even seen the trailer to it. But it was cheap... and the back of the case sounds like a good movie. One that reminded me of the short lived TV Series Miracles... which I enjoyed quite a bit. So I bought it before doing any research on it what so ever. Absolutely no more then an impulse buy. Once I got home with it the first thing I did was watch the trailer online. This was very promising... looked like something I would enjoy... and my expectations started to grow. Then I went to read some online reviews of the movie. It seemed most all reviewers was disappointed with this movie. And with that my expectations went done somewhat.

So I finally decide to watch it and see for myself just how good or bad this movie is. For me... This is a decent movie. Maybe slightly above average. But it is not even as good as I was actually expecting from the back cover blurb and trailer. The movie has a good story which I do believe could have been better. And it has some great visual effects. The movie did look pretty amazing. I think Hilary Swank did a pretty good job in this movie... but she has definitely done better in previous movies... so is not her best work. I also think the story over-did it with the flashbacks. OK... some was necessary... like explaining what happen to Katherine's daughter years before. But why the need to show flashbacks of what we actually did see previously in the movie? Do they think we would forget what happen? I won't say I am sorry I bought this movie... as it definitely wasn't terrible... and it was cheap. But I don't think it is one I will watch often. Though who knows... I may enjoy it a bit more on a second viewing... that has happened before.
post #575 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Batman: The Movie (1966 with Commentary)
I wanted to watch a movie with my daughter before she left for the weekend tomorrow. She is spending the weekend at her grandmother's house. So I got the idea for us to finally watch this movie with the commentary track on. We been wanting to listen to this track every since we watched this movie back in mid December. But I must say... I am glad we waited as long as we did. That way we had the chance to watch Return to the Batcave before watching this one again. I found this to be a lot of fun. You can tell that both Adam West and Burt Ward had a good time reminisce about this movie and the series. They really have a good attitude and sense of humor when it comes to their Batman years. Which is a great thing to see. It was also fun to see that a lot of the flashbacks in Return to the Batcave was pretty accurate. Brittany enjoyed this very much as well... she was literally laughing so hard that she was having a hard time catching her breath.
post #576 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Good Morning, Vietnam
This one I have not seen in many years. I am a long time fan of Robin Williams... I enjoyed him every since Mork & Mindy. In this movie he brings a lot of that energy he is so well known for. But even with that said... I think there should have been more. I would love to see him just let completely loose... no holds barred... and see what he could really do. But this is definitely a good, fun movie. Well worth the 2 hours you put into it.
post #577 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Fantasy Day #6:


03/09/09: ROCKETSHIP X-M (Kurt Neumann, 1950)

This is one of the earliest films to emerge during the heyday of sci-fi cinema, anticipating even DESTINATION MOON (1950) – to which it pretty much was a rival (albeit more modest) production. It already features many of the ingredients that would become genre staples: the crew of the spacecraft is virtually a microcosm of post-war America (though two are actually foreigners – including the obligatory intellectual female, Osa Massen, whose icy exterior melts under the dogged attentions of rugged pilot Lloyd Bridges), their mission (whose details are meticulously spelled out during the opening Press Conference) apprehensively observed by Ground Control and, of course, the eventual glitch which jeopardizes the flight and sends our heroes to Mars (inhabited by cave-men, victims of a nuclear fall-out, no less!) instead of the Moon. Needless to say, the film feels quaint at this juncture if still eminently watchable: given the low-budget involved, the narrative is mostly restricted to the admittedly stylish shuttle interior – though the climactic exploration of Mars effectively takes place on desert locations and shot in evocative sepia. Incidentally, the last act proves surprisingly downbeat (emphasizing its intent as a cautionary tale – Dalton Trumbo reportedly contributed to the script!) and, yet, it is capped by a determined effort to keep the space race going despite the initial failure (a scene which, again, would soon be turned into a sci-fi cliché: see THE QUATERMASS XPERIMENT [1955]).
post #578 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Musical Day #6:


03/10/09: CONTROL (Anton Corbijn, 2007)

The haunting music of Joy Division transcended the band's minimal output and modest cult status among British indie bands to become a highly influential sound. Shot in color but desaturized to be shown in black-and- white, CONTROL is a carefully-made biopic of their troubled singer Ian Curtis who, at just 23 years of age, tragically took his own life to become rock's first celebrity suicide. Although I had thought that this fateful decision was taken mainly on account of his debilitating epileptic condition, the film reveals that this had more to do with the fact that Curtis, being clearly unwilling to embark on Joy Division's impending first U.S. tour, had lost control of the band he fronted for (hence the title) and, more importantly, was deeply conflicted about the two relationships he had going on at the same time – with his wife Deborah back home (who had also borne him a daughter) and a Belgian amateur journalist/groupie that followed him around when performing. Based on Mrs. Curtis' memoirs, the film by necessity concentrates more on his personal than creative life; besides, director Corbijn, a former music video helmer, knew the band members personally and creates a remarkably straightforward and affectionate portrayal of Curtis' life and times. Apart from Samantha Morton (as Deborah), the cast is virtually made up of unknowns: at first, Sam Riley did not seem to me to look much like the real Ian Curtis but, before long, he had effectively inhabited the character (down to his awkward moves during Joy Division’s stage act); the lovely Alexandra Maria Lara (whom I had actually already watched in DOWNFALL [2004] and YOUTH WITHOUT YOUTH [2007] as Curtis' Belgian girlfriend, Annik Honore`) and Toby Kebbell (as the band's overzealous manager Rob Gretton) also score in the acting stakes. Furthermore, the extraneous music is well-chosen: apart from the well-documented fact of Curtis having watched Werner Herzog's STROSZEK (1977) and listened to Iggy Pop's "The Idiot" (1977) just before hanging himself, we also have The Velvet Underground (another band whose musical legacy ran a similar course to Joy Division's), David Bowie (ironically, Curtis is seen listening to the chameleon artist's own crossover album "Aladdin Sane" [1973], written during his first U.S. tour!), Roxy Music and The Sex Pistols.
post #579 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Thriller Day #6:


03/11/09: PAYROLL (Sidney Hayers, 1961)

I recall catching this as a kid on a now-defunct Sicilian TV channel; besides, my dad owns the paperback edition of the original Derek Bickerton novel (published in conjunction with the film’s release). Clearly influenced by the seminal French noir RIFIFI (1955), this caper flick may not have the necessary qualities to attain equivalent classic status but it is proficiently handled nonetheless (in the recognizable style that characterized hard-hitting British cinema of the mid-1950s and beyond i.e. till the advent of the Swinging 60s). Of course, PAYROLL is highlighted by a heist sequence (meticulously planned in advance) – though, in complete contrast to the one seen in the Jules Dassin film, it is a brusque, messy and violent job! Typically, too, the gang is a very unstable outfit – Michael Craig is the brains (appropriately tough and rugged but perhaps too young to carry the requisite world-weariness of the role, he largely comes across as unsympathetic instead!), heavy-set Barry Keegan the brawn (thus the first to bite the dust), Tom Bell the hot-tempered member who even challenges Craig’s leadership, Kenneth Griffith the mild-mannered nervous type who invariably sows the seeds of their downfall, and William Lucas as the obligatory ‘inside man’ (an exemplary employee who then snaps at the critical moment). Up to here, the plot is routine, that is to say, predictable; the film’s coup, then, is in presenting two complex female figures: Francoise Prevost plays Lucas’ ambitious (and obviously bored) foreign wife who flirts with Craig, strikes a bargain with him (when she realizes the nature of his association with her hubby), and whom she even tries to double-cross (though he has the last laugh); Billie Whitelaw actually starts off in the colorless role of housewife (of the payroll guard killed in the robbery) but who subsequently turns – believably – into dogged and resourceful avenger! For the record, though a police investigation into the crime is conducted, it reaps little to no results: the gang brings about its own doom through mistrust, greed and foolishness: Griffith and Bell perish in quicksand, while a dazed and exhausted Craig typically ‘buys it’ at the finishing line (the open sea) thanks to Whitelaw’s vigilante tactics. PAYROLL, therefore, supplies the expected quota of action, thrills, hard-boiled dialogue and moody location shooting; all in all, it stands as director Hayers’ most satisfying work after the splendid occult horror piece NIGHT OF THE EAGLE aka BURN, WITCH, BURN! (1962)…though I should also be re-acquainting myself presently with his rare adventure film THE TRAP (1966), whose memory has similarly been relegated thus far to a long-ago Sunday Matinee` childhood viewing on local TV.
post #580 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Taxi Driver (1976) Martin Scorsese

Scorsese's masterpiece is a raw, powerful and nerve wrecking look at depression and loneliness. The film centers on taxi driver Travis Bickle (Robert De Niro), a man clearly with his own demons who finds a purpose in life when he meets a 12-year-old hooker (Jodie Foster) who he plans on saving from her pimp (Harvey Keitel). To me this is one of the richest films ever made and it's one that can easily be overlooked in some circles if you don't really connect to what the film is trying to say. I didn't care too much for the movie the first few times I watched it because I was too young to really understand depression and loneliness. After I understood what those things could do to a person is when I fully became aware of the power in this film and today it remains one of the most powerful films ever made. To me the entire film is pretty much about Travis trying to find someone to fit in with but of course it never really happens until he meets the hooker. He tries fitting in with the Cybill Shepherd character but falls flat on his face. He tries fitting in with his co-workers but that doesn't work out too well. No matter what Travis tries he keeps ending up alone and as he put it, he's God's lonely man. This film works on so many levels but I think the psychological one is where it's best at. Getting us into the mind of Travis works for many reasons but the biggest keys are the direction by Scorsese, the brilliant music score by Bernard Herrmann and DeNiro's groundbreaking performance. Putting those three things together is what makes this a classic but we can also throw in the screenplay by Paul Schrader, which rightfully gives the movie the time and patience to let the Travis character grow right in front of our eyes. DeNiro's performance is certainly one for the ages, although I think he would get even better with Scorsese's RAGING BULL, which would follow in four years. His performance here is nothing short of amazing because you can't help but be terrified by this guy because of the look in DeNiro's eyes. You can't help but feel sorry for him at the same time because there are countless moments where he embarrasses himself because he simply doesn't know how to fit in. The word anti-hero gets used a lot and perhaps that's a good term but I think it's something much deeper than that. DeNiro hits all the right marks without a false note anywhere. Foster is also impressive in her few scenes in the film as is Keitel as the pimp. Shepherd is also good as his Albert Brookes and the underrated Peter Boyle who has one of the best scenes in the movie where he's trying to talk some sense into Travis. The visual look of the film is mighty impressive and Scorsese's directing style is nothing short of amazing. The slimy looking streets and the dark atmosphere are one of a kind and something many films tried to copy but could never get it as perfect as it is here. This here remains one of the greatest American films ever made and I'm really not sure any movie could top it in showing the effects that loneliness can have on a person.

Jacknife (1989) David Jones

Powerful drama centers on a Vietnam vet (Robert DeNiro) who looks up an old war buddy (Ed Harris) but soon falls for his sister (Kathy Baker). There were a whole slew of war movies during this period but this here is the most overlooked and that's a real shame because it's one of the best. I've heard some refer to it as a continuation of THE DEER HUNTER and there might be a lot of truth to that because this film takes place fifteen years after the war and it's clear with our characters that the horror of Vietnam are still haunting them. The movie is very quiet as it doesn't preach nor does it try to scream some sort of message. Instead we just peek in on these three people's lives and how the Harris character is pretty much dead even though he survived the war. I think what works best here are the performances, which are all rather amazing. I called the film underrated but that's also true of DeNiro's performance, which to me is one of the better ones in his career. Once again DeNiro dives head first into a role and really comes away with a very memorable character thanks to his performance. For the most part his character is out going and energetic even though he has some demons inside him and DeNiro perfectly pulls this off. I especially loved him during his out going scenes where he's constantly moving and dancing around to let off all the positive energy he's trying to give off. Those are the scenes that worked best with me and the ones that the legendary actor pulled off the best. Harris is also wonderful in the film and manages to steal every scene he's in. He doesn't have too much dialogue so the majority of his acting is with his eyes and he really does a remarkable job. Just take a look at the scene where he goes to visit the parents of his friend who was killed in the war. Baker doesn't get enough credit as an actress but she too delivers the goods here. This film has a slow pace, which allows us to get to know the characters, feel their pain and understand how all three of them are trying to grow. The moving hits on some rather dark subjects and has an overall depressing tone. This might keep some people away but that would be a shame because they'd be missing out on a very impressive film with three excellent performances.

Last House on the Left, The (2009) Dennis Iliadis

First we got Ingmar Bergman's THE VIRGIN SPRING, which would then be remade by Wes Craven as THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT. The Craven film sent shock waves around the world with his vile violence and countless rip-offs started showing up including NIGHT TRAIN MURDERS and HOUSE ON THE EDGE OF THE PARK. In 2005 we got a semi-remake in CHAOS, which I found to be quite brutal but it too ended up with its own share of controversy. Now, in 2009, we get yet another film version with this one using the same title as that 1972 Craven film. This time out two teenage girls go to a motel to pick up some dope when they encounter Krug (Garret Dillahunt), his son and his two sicko friends. The girls are raped, tortured and left for dead when one of the girls is able to crawl back to her parent's (Monica Potter, Tony Goldwyn) house. The parents then discover that the people who tortured their daughter are staying in their house. As you can tell, this film really doesn't change any of the plot line too much, although there are a few changes, which tone down some of the actions that we saw in the original movie. That's not to say that the entire film is a watered down version because there's still some effective violence and the rape scene, while not as graphic as that in the original, is very unsettling. With that said, I've personally seen this type of film way too many times so this movie really didn't give me anything original to work with. I did enjoy a few of the changes with one being Krug's son being a teenager around the same age of the girls being tortured. This here added some nice twists to the story but nothing much was done with it. I won't ruin things but there's some interesting stuff that could have been done in the final act but it doesn't happen because the film doesn't want to cross that dangerous line. The film is technically well-made with director Iliadis doing a good job with his style and keeping the film moving. This film runs quite a bit longer than the original film but it's over before you know it so it's nice to know there aren't any slow moments. Another major plus are the performances, which are very good. Dillahunt does a very good job as Krug but of course we're going to have people comparing him to David Hess, which is unfair. Dillahunt tries to do the role differently, which I give him credit for doing and he actually manages to make the character quite creepy in his laid back approach. Spencer Treat Clark is also pretty good in the role of Krug's son and I actually wished we had spent a little more time with his character. Sara Paxton also impressed with in the role of the daughter as she made us care for her character even though we don't spend too much time with her. The best performances comes from Potter and Goldwyn as the parents. There's a scene they share together after they've learned what has happened where both of them have to show emotions and this scene comes off extremely well and better than anything else in the movie. Goldwyn has always been a fun character actor and it was nice seeing him in a leading role. The violence in the movie is rather laid back, although there are some brutal moments including a sequence involving a hand, which I won't spoil. The movie has a fresh look to it so those expecting something raw like the original are going to be disappointed. I think how much you enjoy the film will depend on how many of the previous versions you've seen. I've simply seen too many of them to fully get all the impact that this one tries to go for but if you haven't seen the earlier stuff then I'm sure this will win you over. Others will probably be on the fence like me.
post #581 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Flightplan
This is a very good thriller that I enjoyed every minute of. I have been a fan of Jodie Foster for a long time now. She seems to always give a role all she has. As much as I did enjoy this movie... it isn't without problems. They are just (IMO) small enough that it doesn't really hurt the story any. Like not explaining how she didn't have both boarding passes when she had them both in her pocket when she went to sleep. But over-all a very good movie well worth the hour and a half you have to put into it.
post #582 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Kiss the Girls
This is a great suspense thriller. I really enjoyed Morgan Freeman as Alex Cross. I decided to watch this movie after blind buying the movie Along Came A Spider and seen Morgan Freeman plays the same character in that one as he does here. So I am betting you will be able to guess what the next movie I watch will be. Tatyana M. Ali (Ashley on Fresh Prince of Bel-Air) plays Alex's niece who was kidnapped in this movie. So it was pretty cool to see that familiar face as well. I definitely recommend this movie if you never seen it.
post #583 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Along Came a Spider
This is one of the ones I bought blind this month. Never even seeing the trailer before hand. I bought this movie strictly on the strength of Morgan Freeman who I find to be an outstanding actor. And I am so glad I got this one... I enjoyed this movie just as much... if not more then then previous one. On the back of the case it calls this movie a spellbinding psychological thriller that is “a knockout with a surprise twist.”... and I have to agree with that... as there is a twist to this movie... one that I did not see coming. With that said... the movie is not perfect. There was things that bothered me. But for the most part they were more minor annoyances then anything else.
post #584 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

104th Street Curve, New York, Elevated Railway (1899)

Early film from Edison is yet another look at a train. When 1896's ARRIVAL OF A MAIL TRAIN was released and became a hit, it seemed like every studio was coming up with their own pictures about trains or taking place on a train. This one here, as the title pretty much says, goes through Harlem around a (then) famous "S" curve. We see this "S" curse through a few different points of view including one time with the camera stationed on a platform and another with the camera on the moving train. We get about five different views of this, which isn't all that interesting but the fun thing was seeing some people, how they were dressed and a look at various buildings from back in the day.

10th U.S. Infantry, 2nd Battalion Leaving Cars (1898)

Edison short pretty much has the title telling you everything that you'd need to know. The film, running just over a minute, features the 10th U.S. Infantry marching through the streets appearing to be heading off for war training. We see them carrying their guns, blankets, canteens and other items, which is a historical interest, if not exactly entertaining. We see a few people obviously not knowing that there's filming going on because they walk in front of the camera.

2nd Special Service Battalion, Canadian Infantry: Parade (1899)

Edison short shows Canadian troops leaving Quebec and on their way to the ar in Transvaal. The camera is stationed on what appears to be a bridge, which catches all the action of the men walking through the streets with thousands of people cheering them on. Once again you're not going to get any real "entertainment" out of something like this but it does remain interesting from a historic point of view or if you just want to see what early motion pictures were like. This type of short plays out like what would eventually be called a newsreel and while there are a few interesting images here that's about it.

9th Infantry Boys' Morning Wash (1898)

Part of Edison's "War Extra" series, which lead to various shorts being done on the military during 1898. This one here runs a very short 27-seconds but it's also one of the most fascinating. We see dozens of men standing over a pail of water with wash clothes scrubbing away at themselves. Once again, if you're looking for entertainment then you're not going to find it here in the traditional sense of the word. These type of films work best as a historical document and that's why this one here is so interesting. I'm not sure how many people has ever wondered how the soldiers took a bath back then but this film here shows you that just in case you were interested.

Admirall Cigarette (1897)

On a historic level alone this is a rather marvelous film because it shows the early use of films to advertise for various companies. This time out its Admirall Cigarettes. In the film we see four men sitting around as another jumps out of a box and starts throwing cigarettes everywhere. The four men then hold up a sign saying "We All Smoke." Even though this is what would become product placement, the film manages to still be very charming in its own right. According to what I've read, Edison would show these films on New York rooftops, which of course would gather hundreds of people, if not more. Rumor has it that Edwin S. Porter was arrested for blocking traffic while showing this film.

Admiral Dewey Landing at Gibraltar (1899)
Admiral Dewey Leading Land Parade (1899)
Admiral Dewey Leading Land Parade, no. 2 (1899)
Admiral Dewey Receiving the Washington and New York Committees (1899)
Admiral Dewey Taking Leave of Washington Committee on the U.S. Cruiser "Olympia" (1899)
U.S. Cruiser 'Olympia' Leading Naval Parade (1899)

George Dewey was an admiral in the U.S. Navy who is best remembered for his victory at Manila Bay during the Spanish-American War, which he won without the death of a single person due to the battle. Needless to say since he was a big hero in this country Edison decided to film him at various stages and release them to make some money.

I'm not sure how much money the company ended up making but some back then might have seen these films as a rip because you really don't get too many views of Dewey. The shorts vary from one to another but they run from a minute and a half up to four-minutes but in some of them Dewey is only visible for a few seconds. ADMIRAL DEWEY LEADING LAND PARADE is shot very poorly so apparently the cameraman was a new one. Its "sequel" looks a lot better and features some interesting shots of various people watching. You'll notice the tree tops are blowing from side to side so it seems a wind storm was going on. RECEIVING WASHINGTON AND NEW YORK appears to be a staged shot as Dewey walks to and from the camera several times. The LEADING NAVAL PARADE is an interesting one as we see countless ships going down the Hudson River but the curious thing is again the wind that is blowing all sorts of things around.

Dewey Arch, New York City (1899)
Governor Roosevelt and Staff (1899)
Dandy Fifth, The (1899)
Panorama, Union Square, San Francisco (1903)

These set of shorts are from American Mutoscope and Biograph as they too, like Edison, were interesting in filming the arrival of Admiral Dewey so that they could make some money. Both studios shot their material on September 30, 1899 and some of the film would be released as early as October 1, 1899 so that should tell you how much the two were trying to top one another.

DEWEY ARCH, NEW YORK CITY shows the same parade, which was highlighted in Edison's ADMIRAL DEWEY LEADING A LAND PARADE but this here is from a different angle and location. This film was shot with a view of the arch from Fifth Avenue. GOVERNOR ROOSEVELT AND STAFF is an interesting one for obvious reasons and films the parade as it turns onto 72nd Street (as does THE DANDY FIFTH). PANORAMA, UNION SQUARE, SAN FRANCISCO was shot Thursday, May 14, 1903 as the city commemorates the victory of Dewey's battle at Manila Bay. This here is also the most entertaining but then again I love all of the early panorama films. This one here gives us a grand view of the entire events and we also get to read some interesting advertising on some buildings. It's also interesting because you know what happened to the city three years later.
post #585 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

3/10 Pinocchio (1940):

Pinocchio very much deserves its status as an all-time classic. The story and characters remain relevant and charming, and the animation holds up against any work done to date. My only real problems with the movie are a plodding first act and the strange fascination with rear ends.

I highly recommend that those who have the disc check out the audio commentary. It is a wonderful mixture of enthusiasm, information, and appreciation.
post #586 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quicksilver Highway
As some of you know... I love anthology horrors. This one is a TV Movie that unfortunately only had 2 stories within the movie. Other then, of course, the wraparound story. This really isn't the best anthology horror I ever seen... but it isn't that bad either. It is definitely worth seeing. One thing that this one does that I haven't seen on other anthology horrors. There is a different wrap-around story for each of the two main stories. The first story is told to a newlywed woman that is stranded on the highway while waiting for her husband to return with a new tire. The second story is told to a skeptic visitor to Aaron Quicksilver's little tent of horrors. I thought this added to the story more then telling both stories to the same person does. As for which story did I enjoy more? That is a pretty close call. But I would probably say the second one about the hands.
post #587 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

While You Were Sleeping
This is another one of this month's blind buys. I bought it solely to add to my Sandra Bullock collection.... though I have had some people tell me this is her best romantic comedy role. I don't know if I would say "The Best"... there is still several I never seen... as well as a couple that I would rank right up there with it... but it is definitely one of her best. I did enjoy every minute of it. Unfortunately the only extra on this release is some trailers. But at least it does have the Theatrical trailer.
post #588 of 1550
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Repo! The Genetic Opera (2008) Darren Lynn Bousman

In the same tradition as THE ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW comes this horror/musical, which has a great visual style and good story but the end result isn't what they were going for. Set in the near future there's a major epidemic, which causes people organs to stop working where they die. Thankfully a new company opens up that finance organ-transfers but if you don't pay on time they send Repo to the scene who will rip them out of you. This is from the same director who brought up three of the SAW sequels so you know the gore is going to be here but what I didn't expect was such a visual style. Both the style and look of the film were so good that I couldn't take my eyes off the screen. The extremely dark look will remind some of the early Tim Burton days but I wouldn't dare say this is better. The way the director uses the comic book visuals to tell us information about certain characters was another plus but for me the biggest problem was the music. I don't mind music being used when it's good but I must admit that none of the songs here really caught my ears except for the one when Paris Hilton comes to the shop to get worked on. I'm sure many are going to love the songs, which is why you see so many positive reviews for this. Had I enjoyed the songs more then I'd be singing all the praises but I just can't. The performances are all rather good with Hilton, believe it or not, stealing the film in her few scenes here. Bill Moseley, Anthony Head and Alexa Vega all fill out their roles well but Paul Sorvino doesn't come off as good. Another big mistake I think the movie makes is that it tries to make itself a cult movie. You can not make a cult movie because the whole point of a cult film is that you tried to make a real movie that ended up not working yet crowds eventually picked up on it. That's what happened with THE ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW as the producer and director never made it just so people would show up in drag and talk to the screen. Ed Wood didn't make PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE for people to laugh at. Those films were made as films and then became a cult item. When you set out to make a cult film it's just not the same. In the end there's plenty to enjoy here but it's doubtful I'll ever pay this another visit.

Don't Look Back (1967) D.A Pennebaker

Marvelous and landmark documentary covering Bob Dylan on his 1965 tour of England, which would turn out to be the last time people would see the legend in 100% folk as the next year would see the singer strap on an electric guitar. Since the film was released there's always been some debate on how much of the persona of Dylan here was made up and how much was real. In the interviews I've seen and just knowing as much about him from this period I'd guess that the majority of what goes on here is made up. It seems to me that Dylan is giving a (very good) performance as what a rock star is as we get countless great sequences with the man screaming and shouting but also having fun. The film and Dylan's attitude here has upset a lot of people including Roger Ebert who held a grudge against Dylan up until the Martin Scorsese documentary was released. Many people object to Dylan's treatment of a Time Magazine reporter but I personally don't see anything wrong with it. Reporters were always trying to challenge Dylan so why shouldn't he challenge them right back? Some might even object to Dylan putting down other musicians like Donovan but to me this sequence is just Dylan showing off his humor. The comeback Dylan gives when the reporter asks about Dylan just makes me break down laughing each time I hear it. Not only do we get Donovan here but there's also Joan Baez, Alan Price, Albert Grossman, Bob Neuwirth and Allen Ginsberg of course. As for musical numbers we get quite a few great ones including a passionate performance of "It's All Over Now, Baby Blue" with Dylan jamming away in his hotel room. We get Dylan and Baez doing duets to two Hank Williams songs, archival footage of Dylan's "Only a Pawn in Their Game" and several songs from his shows at the Royal Albert Hall. Perhaps the greatest and most famous sequence is the very first sequence in the movie as we're treated to Dylan dropping the title cards to his "Subterranean Homesick Blues". I think even non-Dylan fans would get a kick out of this if they are wanting to learn some history about music back in this era. Pennebaker does a remarkable job of just sitting back and letting his camera pick up the action.


11th. Naval District 'United States Coast Guard Band' (1944) Bobby Connolly

When WW2 broke out every studio in the country started producing various features and subjects built around the war, the men fighting it and various other aspects. We got various documentaries from the likes of Frank Capra, John Ford and John Huston and we got major stars like James Stewart and Clark Gable to appear in them. This short here takes a look at the then famous Coast Guard Band who were popular enough to put on concerts at the Hollywood Bowl and various other places. This short runs ten-minutes and is pretty entertaining as the songs are patriotic and rather nice. I'd be lying if I said I was familiar with any of the tunes being played but that didn't take away any of the entertainment.

Annie Laurie (1936) Joseph Sherman

Lackluster short from MGM really doesn't work on any level. The ten-minute film tells us how the Scotish song "Annie Laurie" happened to be written. As it turns out Scotland was in the middle of a major civil war when lovers (Dennis Morgan, Ann Rutherford) get torn apart. Both Morgan and Rutherford would end up making some memorable films in their career even though neither name is really noticeable today. Morgan is probably best remembered by horror fans with his role in the 1939 horror film THE RETURN OF DR. X. Rutherford would appear in several Andy Hardy films so she too would be remembered by some film buffs. This film here is rather poorly made and the direction can't be seen. The movie tells the story fairly easily but it's boring. The action scenes are also boring and the movie really does drag at even ten-minutes.

Honolulu: The Paradise of the Pacific (1935) No Director Credited

Another entry in MGM's popular TravelTalk series with this one looking at Honolulu and needless to say there's a lot of outdoor activities being shown off. We visit various sites including the capital, floral wreaths making, coloring of coral, Waikiki Beach plus countless surfers and swimmers. I've said this several times but it's important to remember when a short like this was made. Sure, you can punch up Honolulu on your computer today and get a much better documentary on what to do there but in 1935 I'm sure this was a major delight and that's why this series lasted so long. The one interesting note while watching this movie is the fact that it shows the island six years before Pearl Harbor.

Roseland (1930) Roy Mack

Vitaphone short has a millionaire (Donald Cook) trying to pick up a girl (Ruth Etting) working at the famed club. On this particular night she gets to sing in a talent show. This is a fairly good short even though it's only goal is for us to listen to the wonderful voice of Etting. She was quite popular back in the day and it's easy to hear why when you get a few tunes from that voice. Her acting on the other hand isn't that impressive but I can overlook that here. The film borrows a lot from the Cinderella storyline and works out fairly well. Cook is one of my favorite, lesser known actors from this era but he doesn't get too much to do. The best sequence is when one of the dance hall girls is having to dance with a man with bad breathe. Her comments are priceless.
post #589 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Wu Zetian - The story of the only female to serve as empress of China. Although her rise to power is painted as ruthless, deceitful, and downright cold-blooded, during her reign she does care for the people and seems to make some progress in women's rights. She's an interesting character, as are the wussy, easily-fooled emperor and his jealous but well-intentioned wife. The film is a bit workmanlike, but there are signs of artfulness, for example the unique "fan-style" wipes. Some of the political machinations can get confusing and/or tedious, but a few scattered song and dance routines help spice things up. Rating: 7


Secret Agent - One of the few Hitchcock films I hadn't seen yet (and most of the others are silents). It fits in beautifully with his late 30's thriller period, perhaps not as memorable as 39 Steps or Lady Vanishes, but every bit as good as Young and Innocent or Sabotage. A few clunky bits, but loaded with marvelous little touches like the roulette wheel and the snuffing out of the cigarette, and scenes of taut suspense. Peter Lorre hams it up a little, but his combination of comedy and menace is a treat. If the story as a whole feels a bit uneventful (and the "surprise" rather obvious), it is at least very well-crafted. Rating: 8


Ossessione - I never quite know how to react to Visconti's films. They show obvious signs of expert craftsmanship, are generally solid in their construction and deal with subjects that have dramatic heft. But some of them grab me and some of them don't. This one, for the most part, grabbed me. Gino and Giovanna are complex (if not wholly likeable) characters... sometimes a little too complex, with sudden or unclear shifts in motivation, but Visconti uses them to cover a lot of thematic ground. The story itself is familiar territory (I've never seen either American version of "The Postman Always Rings Twice", but there are also similarities to Cain's other writing like Double Indemnity) but except for being a little slow in the first act, it's compelling. So far I haven't seen a Visconti film I would count among my favorites, but I'm glad I watched this one. Rating: 8
post #590 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

War Day #6:


03/12/09: BATTLE CRY (Raoul Walsh, 1955)

For all its box-office potential (notable credits, star cast, epic production), this WWII effort in color and widescreen does not seem to enjoy that much of a reputation. Having watched it for myself, I can understand why: the film spends a great chunk of its nearly 2½ hours exploring (or is that exploiting?) the dreary love lives of the various members of a marine unit; this atypical approach may prevent the film from being yet another routine actioner, but, it does comes perilously close to soap opera at times – which is worse! Director Walsh was an action expert but, as I said, here this element is relegated to the last 20 minutes or so; popular novelist Leon Uris’s screen adaptation of his own novel was by all accounts a watered-down affair (actually common practice for Hollywood at the time). Incidentally, Walsh would helm the similarly mild film of a classic war novel by another renowned author – Norman Mailer’s THE NAKED AND THE DEAD (1958), for which he ‘recalled into service’ a number of actors from BATTLE CRY itself. The cast, then, includes established and up-and-coming stars: Van Heflin (despite being top-billed his role is virtually that of an observer), Dorothy Malone, Raymond Massey (a mere cameo), Nancy Olson, Aldo Ray (who comes off best) and James Whitmore (basically retreading – albeit effectively – his Oscar-nominated role in BATTLEGROUND [1949]) in the former category and William Campbell, Anne Francis, Tab Hunter, L.Q. Jones (formerly Justus McQueen, he stuck to his character’s name here professionally thereafter!), Perry Lopez and Fess Parker in the latter. The narrative features, at least, three ongoing romances: Tab Hunter is even involved with two women (Mona Freeman, absurdly third-billed, and an unlikely dalliance with frustrated Dorothy Malone), bookworm John Lupton has an even less believable relationship with floozie Anne Francis, while tough/beefy Aldo Ray demonstrates his sensitive side when he falls for New Zealander Nancy Olson. These are developed intermittently between the training sessions and the aforementioned climactic action bout (which despite some obvious stock footage is fairly well handled on a grand scale); joining the various dots, as it were, within this episodic structure is Whitmore’s sympathetic narration.
post #591 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Western Day #6:


03/13/09: THE TORCH (Emilio Fernandez, 1950)

While a distinguished film-maker in his native country, director Fernandez is perhaps best-known today for playing the heinous General Mapache in Sam Peckinpah’s seminal THE WILD BUNCH (1969); for the record, later he was also the one to make the titular request in the same director’s BRING ME THE HEAD OF ALFREDO GARCIA (1974). This genuinely oddball Western, then, was a Hollywood remake of Fernandez’s own previous critical success ENAMORADA (1946) – proving once again that the tradition in Tinseltown of looking for hot properties (when it comes to both subjects and their creators) in foreign lands is indeed a long-standing one; unfortunately, the end result here begins promisingly enough but gradually peters out. Anyway, apart from the director, Pedro Armendariz also reprises his earlier role of the Bandit General (which is how the film was known in the U.K.), while associate producer Paulette Goddard unwisely chose herself for the role of the leading lady. Ostensibly the town beauty, Goddard is far too old for the part but, sporting a completely misconceived schoolgirl look and playing it utterly over-the-top, her performance is forever threatening to bring the whole film crumbling down with it! Luckily, Fernandez gives the whole a remarkably visual texture (straight from the very opening scene in a glass factory) that lends it a presciently “Spaghetti Western” feel and the intermittent, awkward instances of goofy humor (including Goddard sending Armendariz literally flying off his horse into the air with a firecracker!) only serve to reinforce this impression. The third star featured here is Gilbert Roland but his role of the taciturn town priest (and old school friend of Armendariz’s) is clearly subservient to the main couple who, inevitably, form a tenuous triangle with Goddard’s dullish fiancée. The Mill Creek DVD I watched was a typically substandard edition that failed to do justice to celebrated cinematographer Gabriel Figueroa’s (also from the original Mexican production) lyrical shots, and the hiss-laden soundtrack was similarly hard to sit through.


03/13/09: SUKIYAKI WESTERN DJANGO (Takashi Miike, 2007)

This is further proof that cult Japanese director Takashi Miike is not for me: as can be deduced from the title, the film is a pseudo-homage to the Italian Spaghetti Westerns (though Django has almost nothing to do with it!). In fact, the plot is yet another rehash of Japanese master Akira Kurosawa’s samurai classic YOJIMBO (1961), which had actually led to Sergio Leone kick-starting the Spaghetti Western subgenre with that film’s first remake A FISTFUL OF DOLLARS (1964)! Anyway, for Miike, this is typically violent fare – even more pointless than usual and all rather amateurishly assembled; besides, having the actors speak English results in unintentional laughter more than anything else (though Quentin Tarantino’s absurd cameo is no less embarrassing: incidentally, I may well have been witness to the genesis of the picture back when these two mavericks ‘butted heads’ at the 2004 Venice Film Festival!). Needless to say, the squalid atmosphere peculiar to European Westerns is largely missing here…but, then, neither does the film extract particular benefit from its own country’s heritage! With characterization tending towards mere posture (when it is not insipid), we are left with a clutch of stylized-but-hollow action sequences to grab the attention – all of which, ultimately, leaves a bad taste in the mouth. Perhaps mercifully, the version I watched is the shorter (by 23 minutes) International Cut.
post #592 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Animation Day #7:


03/14/09: WALL-E (Andrew Stanton, 2008)

This brand-new Oscar winner for Best Animated Feature is an unusual and generally successful Pixar offering (marred by a sag in the middle). The amiable titular character is a robot entrusted with the clean-up of a decimated Earth; typically humanized, he falls for the female probe sent to determine the habitable condition of life on our planet. The design of the film (both the Earth wasteland – familiar architectural landscapes have been replaced by scraps of garbage – and the spaceship to which Wall-E follows his beloved – presciently peopled by laid-back, overweight non-entities) are interesting and quite sophisticated for this type of fare. The eclectic score includes original material (notably Peter Gabriel’s Oscar-nominated song “Down To Earth”) but also a couple of numbers from the musical “Hello, Dolly!” – seen via an old VHS copy of the 1969 film version which Wall-E is continuously playing.


03/14/09: PRESTO (Doug Sweetland, 2008)

Included on the WALL-E (2008) DVD is another Oscar contender, albeit in the Animated Short category. Actually, it proved surprisingly even more satisfying than the occasionally maudlin main feature: 5 near-perfect minutes of non-stop hilarity involving an egocentric magician and his come-uppance during a stage performance by the proverbial rabbit-in-the-hat (when it is denied food). Highly inventive – especially funny is the struggle with the ladder, which recoils into the conjuror’s groin – and (necessarily) fast-paced, it does that rare thing nowadays by genuinely evoking memories of the classic Looney Tunes cartoons from Warner Bros. While I have not watched the eventual Oscar winner in its category, I would say that PRESTO was equally deserving of the coveted statuette as WALL-E itself.


03/14/09: BURN-E (Angus MacLane, 2008)

This slight but harmless short is a made-for-video spin-off of the theatrical animated feature WALL-E (2008) highlighting a very minor character from it and has appropriately been included on that film’s DVD edition; it feels like a deleted scene from the main feature, but actually involved a different director. The titular figure this time around is an accident-prone robot – getting to grips with a mischievous signpost – on the spaceship seen in WALL-E (the character – and his mate – even makes a cameo here via scenes lifted from his own vehicle!).
post #593 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Comedy Day #7:


03/15/09: LET GEORGE DO IT! (Marcel Varnel, 1940)

Until now, I had only been familiar with British comedian George Formby via a long-ago Italian TV viewing of IT’S IN THE AIR (1938); having recently acquired his entire output on 6 DVDs, I opted to get to know him all over again by way of that vehicle generally considered to be his best. While it is not exactly side-splitting and the star himself a simpleton in the vein of the later Norman Wisdom (though not as raucous or sentimental), the film nevertheless manages to elicit considerable excitement and suspense – a` la Alfred Hitchcock’s seminal British thrillers of the 1930s – from its WWII espionage plot; with this in mind, the end result compares favorably with the equivalent Hollywood product. Incidentally, this was a milieu in which virtually all comedians would operate at one time or another: in the case of Britain, we not only got Formby contemporaries such as The Crazy Gang’s GASBAGS (1941) and Will Hay’s THE GOOSE STEPS OUT (1942) but Wisdom himself, whose most satisfying effort for me personally was THE SQUARE PEG (1958). Of course, Formby was equally well-known for his amiable ukulele-playing (showcased here in a number of passable songs); typical of this kind of film, then, his character is mistaken for a spy (by both sides) but invariably proves his mettle and eventually foils the villains (with the help of a pretty heroine). The latter is played by Phyllis Calvert, while a very young Coral Browne is the obligatory femme fatale; also in the cast are Bernard Lee as the male member of a couple whom George is forever running into, causing no end of trouble in the process, and Torin Thatcher as the captain of the U-boat on which George finally stows away (and is shot out of like a torpedo!). As I said, the film is filled with several tried-and-true, yet wholly delightful, thriller elements: coded messages passed via musical notes, the murder during a recital, and the climactic race-against-time to avert a disaster at sea. To get back to the star’s comedy routines, the scene inside the bakery is a bit labored but the dream sequence – culminating with George parachuting into Germany, disrupting a Nazi rally and beating up the Fuehrer! – is truly inspired (for the record, the script was co-written by distinguished future director Basil Dearden).
post #594 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Drama Day #7:


03/16/09: SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE (Danny Boyle, 2008)

A curious mix of CITY OF GOD (2002) and QUIZ SHOW (1994), this surprising multi-Oscar winner is a good film to be sure but also somewhat overrated (as was director Boyle’s TRAINSPOTTING [1996] after all). The editing is deftly intricate (spanning several years, the story continually jumps back and forth in time) and the exotic score certainly effective; however, Boyle’s flashy technique rings false within the context of its underprivileged setting! SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE may have alerted the rest of the world to the dire conditions of life in (the so-called) modern India but, at the same time, it cannot have benefited the country’s tourist industry any! The film’s trump card is actually the ‘impossible romance’ at its core: the two young leads are believable and undeniably appealing. The whole “Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?” angle, then, has a decidedly contrived feel to it: though apparently based on fact, the film was clearly intended as a fable. That said, some of the flashbacks do not really illuminate us as to how the hero knew the respective answer: for instance, does someone need to know who invented the revolver just because he owns one (much less an uneducated person) and would the final all-important question of such a show be one to which the answer could have easily been arrived at by common sense (had it not been a recurring motif)?
post #595 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Musical Day #7:


03/17/09: SID AND NANCY (Alex Cox, 1986)

Alex Cox is a director whose knowledge of vintage genre cinema I have appreciated on a handful of DVDs over the years but, ironically, I have yet to be completely satisfied with a film of his own. Actually, I was expecting that this musical biopic of sorts – which is also his best-known and most acclaimed film – was going to be it but, alas, I could not have been more mistaken! To begin with, while I certainly acknowledge the importance (and sheer raw power) of their sole official studio album, "Nevermind The Bollocks, Here's The Sex Pistols" (1977) in the history of Rock/Punk music, it is not a record that one remembers with much affection unless he happens to have lived through the whole punk phenomenon. It is not that the film in itself is badly done (although I did find it surprisingly conventional in treatment, so that the poetic striving of the fantasy conclusion feels completely incongruous!), it is just that the main characters – notorious Sex Pistols bassist Sid Vicious and his American junkie girlfriend Nancy Spungen – are arguably the most repulsive celebrities ever to have had their 'sensationalistic' life-story portrayed on film (interestingly, Courtney Love has a small part here as Spungen’s gal pal: her much-publicized relationship of some years later with Nirvana front-man Kurt Cobain basically turned them into the Grunge equivalent of Sid and Nancy…though, in their case, he proved the only casualty)! The (relatively) good news is that, for most of the time, the viewer forgets he is watching actors on the screen (Vicious is, of course, played by another British 'bad boy' of his generation, Gary Oldman); still, the fact that these people are clearly self-destructive – since their only motivation for becoming heroin addicts is boredom – kills any pathos inherent in their tragic fate. For the record, the film does tackle some of the best-known incidents in Sid's life: the Pistols' gig in front of a hostile audience of American rednecks (wherein Sex Pistols vocalist Johnny Rotten famously uttered "Have you ever had the feeling you were being cheated?", Sid's irreverent cover of Frank Sinatra's anthemic “My Way”, and, inevitably, Sid's own drug-fuelled knifing of Nancy in New York's famous Chelsea Hotel. Incidentally, I have recently also acquired Julian Temple's documentary on the seminal punk band, THE GREAT ROCK'N'ROLL SWINDLE (1980)…but, based on my negative reaction to SID AND NANCY, I do not suppose a viewing of that one will happen any time soon!
post #596 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

My Name Is Bruce (Blu-Ray) - There's some fun to be had here, but it's too self-aware and tongue-in-cheek for my tastes. Some of the gags are okay, a lot are terrible (Brokeback Mountain reference? Who thought that was a good idea?). Somehow I didn't hate myself for watching it, though. Primarily for hardcore Bruce Campbell fans... which I'm not, but I do enjoy him in general. As a sidenote, the image quality is pretty lousy for Blu-Ray. Rating: 6


Precautions Against Fanatics - A sort of a mockumentary short about people who protect race horses. Coming just before Even Dwarfs Started Small, you can see the same sense of absurdist humor emerging, but there just isn't much an idea here. It seems to have the same amateurish "bunch of guys just fuckin' around" quality as the earlier The Unprecedented Defence of the Fortress Deutschkreuz. A very minor blip in Herzog's career. Rating: 5


The Dark Glow of the Mountains - Herzog has used mountains to great effect... most notably the simmering volcano of La Soufriere, the stunning opening shot of Aguirre and the main plot device in Fitzcarraldo. But between the dud Scream of Stone and this bland mini-doc about Reinhold Messner, he doesn't seem to fare as well with mountain climbers. The biggest problems here are in the audio... instead of Herzog's usual hypnotic narration, the commentator is some poor man's Orson Welles, and the Messner and his associate are dubbed by the kind of guy you might hear in any Discovery Channel feature. I'd much rather hear the original voices with subtitles, this dubbing really put a damper on the occasion. Even overlooking this problem, there's just not much meat here. There are a few of those magic Herzog moments: Messner and his porters beating a treacherous path to the base camp, the climbers as tiny figures against the huge face of the mountain, and some of Popul Vuh's usual haunting score. But too much of is talking heads, and even then I don't feel like I'm getting a particularly insightful look inside the mind of a climber. Messner's remarks are typically exactly what you'd expect them to be. His feats may be impressive, but as far as being a fascinating personality, he's no Timothy Treadwell. Not a bad film, just rather blah. Rating: 6


The Rise to Power of Louis XIV - Boy, was I not looking forward to this. My experiences with Rossellini have been generally underwhelming (in my opinion Rome Open City is one of the least justified "classics" of all time). And I'd heard this his made-for-TV historical films were extremely dry and mechanical, meant purely to educate, not entertain. That was not entirely the case with this film. There are moments of subdued drama, and even a tiny bit of humor. But it does lean towards the didactic, and as for "mechanical", look no further than its lead actor, Jean-Marie Patte. The man seems to be constantly reading from cue cards or concentrating on hitting his marks. Bresson elicited minimalist performances from non-actors in ways that seemed to hint at hidden depths. Patte is utterly lacking in depth, almost an automaton. It's not all that bothersome, but it does make the proceedings feel like amateur hour. I can't say I didn't get anything out of this film. It was educational. It wasn't even terribly dull. Nothing special about it, though. Rating: 6
post #597 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Very late to the party, and I'm not much of a movie buff, but I do watch theatrical shorts.

Placeholder
post #598 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

The Day After
This is one of the movies I bought blind.. never even heard of the movie before. It is a TV Movie from 1983. Going into this movie I am hopeful I will enjoy it... but at the same time skeptical for some reason. I think that could be partially because of what I see in the cast list... we have JoBeth Williams... a name that sounds so very familiar to me... something from my past... was thinking an old TV Series... but going by imdb apparently not. Then we have Steve Guttenberg.. He is alright as an actor... but never really was that impressive to me. Then I see the name John Lithgow.. I don't know what it is about this guy... but something always bugged me about him... I haven't been impressed with him in anything I have seen him in. So I guess with actors that I am basically indifferent with or straight out do not like I went into this move with some concerns about my enjoyment.

I realize that 1983 is more then 20 years ago... but this film felt like it was even older then that. I think that is partially because of the grade of film used on this movie... it just had a cheap, aged look to it. This movie definitely starts out on the slow side. It seemed like forever before the attack happened. Though once the people knew about the attacks my interest in the movie did rise and I did start to enjoy the movie somewhat. As for my dislike of John Lithgow... once again I did not care for him in this movie... but luckily he only had a small part. Once the attack was over... and the survivors was dealing with the fallout it became a pretty powerful story. This movie... while a decent attempt... is far from the best movie I have seen on the subject. All in all this one really is no more then average... maybe slightly above.
post #599 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Oh yeah, out of all the "what if?" nuclear paranoia films of the 80's... When the Wind Blows, Threads, Testament, et cetera, The Day After is definitely one of the worst. It was a huge event at the time, though... everybody watched it and talked about it.


Slumdog Millionaire - Well, what do you know, the Academy actually picked a pretty good movie. I've avoided most discussions and reviews of this movie, wanting to form my own opinion. I imagine a lot of hayseeds out there were perplexed by the Bollywood-style ending, but then again they probably wouldn't have liked much of the rest of it, either. I also can imagine some people missing the point about destiny and objecting to all the coincidences in the film (although that final question, destiny aside, was way too easy). I thought it was a genuinely engaging story, nicely structured and not overly clichéd. It does wallow in its own misery a little too much, and the editing occasionally gets a bit manic, but all in all I was impressed. Rating: 8


Things We Do When We Fall in Love - It was about 6 months ago when I spotted the title The Beautiful Washing Machine on the library shelf and was intrigued enough to give it a go. I was absolutely smitten with its unique oddness, and compared it to a combination of Tsai and Weerasethakul. I would say the same about this movie, and am now very eager to see everything I can by James Lee. The story is partially (or even mostly) mundane: a tortoise-paced tale of a couple, going through a vague rough patch in their relationship, taking a spontaneous drive out of the city. They drive around a lot, shop for a plant, have a minor spat, look for a motel, grab a bite to eat. If you don't have the patience for Tsai (or, say, Tarkovsky) this stuff is probably going to drive you nuts. But every now and then Lee throws in a curveball that sidetracks the film in a whole new direction. He makes the mundane into something quite unpredictable. It's very thought-provoking and exciting, and examines romance in ways that are familiar yet seem to explore new territory. Doesn't have the same surreal nature as BWM, but it's almost as satisfying. Rating: 9
post #600 of 1550

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Foreign Day #7 (or Nunsploitation Day #3):


03/18/09: THE DEVIL IS A WOMAN (Damiano Damiani, 1975)

According to the Leonard Maltin Film Guide, this film merits a BOMB and is “indifferently acted…technically atrocious”…he must have been thinking of THE KILLER NUN (1978; see below)! What we really have here is an excellent cast of internationally renowned actors involved in a serious, arty exercise in “Nunsploitation”: Glenda Jackson stars as the iron-willed Sister Geraldine who heads a strange hybrid of mental asylum and tourist hostel in Rome, with Adolfo Celi her right-hand man and Father Confessor to the ‘inmates’. The latter are an eccentric set of ecclesiastical misfits – Francisco Rabal is a communist bishop from Cuba, Arnoldo Foa` a Polish monsignor who collaborated with the Nazi regime in WWII, etc. – and wealthy degenerates – Gabriele Lavia is a Prince unhealthily obsessed with his own sister and so on; running the day-to-day operations of the establishment with an equally iron fist is Bolivian émigré Lisa Harrow (who, when married to the local Police Chief, fell for an anarchist and later organized the former’s death in an ambush). The coming of historian Claudio Cassinelli (on an invitation by Foa`, who needs help to write his memoirs in order to exculpate himself in the eyes of his superiors!) slowly but surely turns the entire order of things in disarray: contacting Lavia’s sister on his behalf against Jackson’s specific instructions (an innocent and trivial action which, indirectly, leads to Lavia’s suicide a` la ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST [1975]), reawakening Harrow’s feelings of love for another man (she had previously turned those onto her pet feline or nightly bouts of masturbation!), etc. Eventually, all of the ‘inmates’ are liberated by Cassinelli’s presence, revolt and go back out into the real world – including Harrow who shacks up with the writer himself; unfortunately, as a result of Jackson’s malicious misinformation that she is terminally ill, her long-dormant sexuality blooms into full-blown nymphomania (which includes sleeping with the, by her own admission, disgusting condominium handyman) and, while on their way to see a doctor by train, she runs out on her mate altogether! Some time later, just as he is about to commit himself to a new relationship with the briefly-glimpsed Ely Galeani, Cassinelli returns, on a hunch, to Jackson’s hostel and, to his shock, discovers that all the inmates have come back and become their own previous subservient, resigned selves (he now also finds among them Lavia’s gorgeous sister, the woefully underused Adele Sperati)! Director Damiano Damiani has made an eclectic bunch of interesting movies over the years and this, while perhaps not among his best work, is certainly one of them, aided in no small measure by another of legendary composer Ennio Morricone’s weird, choral scores. From the cast, newcomer Harrow is a revelation (in every sense of the word, since she indulges in full frontal nudity during that aforementioned handyman encounter): this is still her best-known film – although she would later go on to have a son by actor Sam Neill. Personally, it was a joy for me to watch 3 actors from films I dearly love – Celi (THE PHANTOM OF LIBERTY [1974]), Foa` (THE 100 HORSEMEN [1965]) and Rabal (NAZARIN [1959], VIRIDIANA [1961], BELLE DE JOUR [1967]) – sparring verbally onscreen in their scenes together. One final note: ironically, it may be that this film is not better-known because the two English titles accorded it (including THE TEMPTER) were already attached to more popular movies!


03/18/09: SCHOOL OF THE HOLY BEAST (Norifumi Suzuki, 1974)

This is the most extreme example of “Nunsploitation” I have yet watched, one that will surely offend religious purists; even so, its no-holds-barred attitude actually characterized much of Japanese cinema at the time – evoking memories, in particular, of both Yasuzo Masumura’s BLIND BEAST (1969) and Toshio Matsumoto’s FUNERAL PARADE OF ROSES (1969). Incidentally, I was not familiar with director Suzuki’s work – but his stylized, and remarkably confident, approach here is very effective (even if the presentation itself was slightly marred by intermittent combing). Japanese nuns are certainly an unorthodox sight: thankfully, they are given well-rounded characters (the heroine is also quite lovely) though it is sometimes hard to tell one girl from the other! The episodic nature of the plot and its novel (thus most interesting) aspects – the mystery tied with the convent surrounding the heroine’s ancestry, the presence of a Rasputin-like hedonistic priest (whose eventual come-uppance arrives by divine/spiritual intervention, no less!) and the belated introduction of a white-robed villainess (getting her just desserts in violent fashion after being involved in a bell-tower fight with the heroine!) – render the film a bit of a muddle (especially in its dash to tie things up towards the end) yet it proves consistently absorbing, even invigorating, fare. Of course, it would not be a “Nunsploitationer” without moments of violence (the most harrowing – and blasphemous – tortures see the heroine being wrapped in a hawthorn bush and a ‘witch’ ferreted out by Inquisition-like methods) and rampant eroticism (involving both heterosexual and lesbian couplings…but, then, even the heroine’s induction ceremony is carried out with her completely in the buff!). There is unexpected (and slightly misplaced) slapstick, too, in the scene where a couple of men are clandestinely introduced into the convent dressed-up as nuns so as to aid the heroine in extricating her revenge plan – which has them raping the stern (but obviously frustrated) Vice Abbess, responsible for the girl’s mother’s demise at child-birth, in her sleep!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2009)