Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › 2009 at the Box Office
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

2009 at the Box Office - Page 21

post #601 of 1466
Thread Starter 

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

4-Day Memorial Day Weekend Estimates

#1 "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian" $70.0 million
#2 "Terminator Salvation" $53.8 million ($67.2 million)
#3 "Star Trek" $29.4 million ($191.0 million) -32%
#4 "Angels & Demons" $27.7 million ($87.8 million) -40%
#5 "Dance Flick" $13.1 million
#6 "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" $10.1 million ($165.4 million) -31%
#7 "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past" $4.8 million ($47.0 million) -27%
#8 "Obsessed" $2.5 million ($66.4 million) -46%
#9 "Monsters vs. Aliens" $1.9 million ($193.5 million) -40%
#10 "17 Again" $1.3 million ($60.6 million) -62%
#11 "The Soloist" $1.1 million ($29.5 million) -55%
#12 "Next Day Air" $772K ($9.1 million) -66%

The top 12 earned $216.5 million, marking the fifth biggest Memorial Day frame in history. Business was up about 1% from last year, but down 12% compared to '07. 2009 has now tallied a domestic haul of $3.939 billion, which marks a 14% improvement over both last year ($3.456 billion) and '07 ($3.471 billion), up 23% compared to '06 ($3.216 billion), and 27% stronger than '05 ($3.114 billion).
post #602 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete-D

Curious that the more The Matrix films become more and more about "the war against the machines" instead of the Matrix itself, audience interest in that franchise also seemed to wane. Maybe the concept itself just doesn't work.

Correct.
post #603 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

I was forced to see Night at the Blewseum. Terrible. But, that said, I would waterboard my own mother for five minutes with Amy Adams, who is spectacular.
post #604 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

t4 dealt similar themes already dealt with in Battlestar Galactica tv remake series.

anyway, did t4 open on Thursday? what's w/the opening Thursdays trend? why does hollywood keep following lucas? i think revenge of the sith was one of the majors to open on thursday now everyone is doing it. he was the 1st to open wednesday now every1 follows suit. 1st to do special edition re-release to theater (or maybe close encounters?), now every1 does it.
post #605 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Quote:
Originally Posted by JediFonger
anyway, did t4 open on Thursday? what's w/the opening Thursdays trend?
Most likely, they wanted to get the jump on the big Memorial Day weekend and hoped to tout their 5 day haul. I don't think it has anything to do with George Lucas.
post #606 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR
hoped to tout their 5 day haul.
Funny that there 5 day haul was less then Night at the Museum's 4 day haul.
post #607 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon Conway
As someone who greatly enjoyed the new movie, wouldn't such a direction (Kirk Prime, Khan, the Borg) completely defeat the purpose of setting up an alternate reality? You just wiped the slate clean to do *anything* you want, and to be creative in that endeavor, and you want to retread old ground? STUPID. Tell new stories, damn it!

I've read lots of interviews with the screenwriters (especially Orci over at Trekmovie.com) and Abrams (AintItCool news among others), and I just didn't get the vibe that we're going to see Shatner, Khan and the Borg anytime soon. WHen fans ask, they dont directly rule out anything. on the contrary, they seem pumped that they're at the beginning of the first five year voyage and they have many possibilities for storytelling.

My main fear is that Paramount will impose the requirement for an evil baddy - YAWN. But the Trek guys don't sound like they're interested in retreads, they sound like they want to keep it fresh. I sure hope so, after such a great restart.
post #608 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

I can imagine future sequels having a pre-credits third act of a familiar episode playing out differently in the new timeline, and then jumping into the main plot that happens between the stories we already know.
post #609 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

I hope Drag Me To Hell does well this weekend. I hope it will at least come in number 2 behind UP. Does anyone know how this movie is tracking? I just got back from a screening of this and it is AWESOME! This is not your typical PG-13 horror movie, and I can teens going to this thinking it's along the lines of "The Ring" or "The Grudge." This movie did something that only Halloween has managed to do...scare the living crap out of me. There is not a dull moment in this movie. You are either laughing hysterically, jumping out of your seat, or are on the edge of it. This is like Evil Dead 4. Very good movie.
post #610 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shad R
I hope Drag Me To Hell does well this weekend. I hope it will at least come in number 2 behind UP. Does anyone know how this movie is tracking? I just got back from a screening of this and it is AWESOME! This is not your typical PG-13 horror movie, and I can teens going to this thinking it's along the lines of "The Ring" or "The Grudge." This movie did something that only Halloween has managed to do...scare the living crap out of me. There is not a dull moment in this movie. You are either laughing hysterically, jumping out of your seat, or are on the edge of it. This is like Evil Dead 4. Very good movie.

EW's review gives it a Grade "A". We'll see how big Raimi's horror following is.
post #611 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

does it have the evil dead camp?
post #612 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

I'm predicting $40m to $50m for Up, $15m friday.

And $15m to $25m for Drag me to Hell, $8m friday.
post #613 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shad R
This is not your typical PG-13 horror movie, and I can teens going to this thinking it's along the lines of "The Ring" or "The Grudge."
Unfortunately, that's exactly what the ads look like. I'm definitely seeing it this weekend because it's a Sam Raimi horrror movie and word of mouth is good but the ads just make the movie look like yet another remake of a Japanese horror movie where water and big eyed kids that say "meow" are supposed to be scary.
post #614 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

I'm going to try and see DRAG tomorrow since I have the day off but I'm not really behind Raimi's "comeback" due to the PG-13 rating. It seems the ads are trying to get the SPIDER-MAN fans more than die-hard fans of stuff like THE EVIL DEAD.
post #615 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Don't let the PG-13 sway you. This movie is intense. I can just see all the kids in the theater during the possession scene. It feels R rated without the cursing.
post #616 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

The movie felt like PG-13 to me, Raimi substituted gross-out for gore. A fun film but instantly forgettable for me.
post #617 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Raimi's Army of Darkness was one of the softest R rated films I've seen. I'm pretty sure it only got the R rating because Bruce Campbell used the F-word more than once and that was it.
post #618 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Star Trek is now the year's top grosser:
2009 Yearly Box Office Results

will be the first film of the year to pass 200 million since thursday's gross hasn't been added yet, I imagine it'll cross the line today.

Up is on a lot more screens than I thought 3766. Is that more or less than WallE or Ratatouille? Considering all the talk about the lack of enthusiasm for the picture amongst merchandisers I thought it might also be in fewer theatres, closer to 3000. How many 3D screens/theatres is it in?

I think Up will have a 45+ opening but will have VERY small drops in the next two or three weeks. as I said before, I think in the long run it'll perform more like Finding Nemo in terms of it's legs and will probably outgross WallE and Ratatouille.
post #619 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Want theaters charging more for 3D showings of Up inflate the box office returns a little? I mean, I'm sure Paramount would have loved to have theaters charge an addition 2.25 for Star Trek so their return could be a little higher (I guess IMAX kinda evens it out though). This was the first digital 3D movie I have seen and will be my last until the prices are the same as 2D movies. Unlike IMAX, 3D is not worth the extra cost IMO.

At least I understand why my theaters has Up on more 3D screens and only one 2D. Not because it is necessarily more popular but, they make more money off of the 3D shows. Maybe one day 3D will be so popular that the prices will be the same, until then 2D is just fine.

Rant over!
post #620 of 1466
Thread Starter 

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Friday Estimates

#1 "Up" $21.4 million
#2 "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian" $7.6 million ($87.3 million) 52% Friday-to-Friday drop
#3 "Drag Me to Hell" $6.4 million
#4 "Terminator Salvation" $5.1 million ($79.6 million) 66% Friday-to-Friday drop
#5 "Star Trek" $3.7 million ($200.4 million) 38% Friday-to-Friday drop
#6 "Angels & Demons" $3.4 million ($97.0 million) 43% Friday-to-Friday drop
#7 "Dance Flick" $1.6 million ($16.0 million) 59% Friday-to-Friday drop
#8 "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" $1.2 million ($168.1 million) 48% Friday-to-Friday drop
#9 "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past" $635K ($48.7 million) 45% Friday-to-Friday drop
#10 "Obsessed" $220K ($67.1 million) 63% Friday-to-Friday drop

"Up" easily led the box office during its opening day as it pulled in a stellar $21.4 million. The movie looks headed for a debut weekend haul in the neighborhood of $65-$70 million, putting it among the top three biggest openings ever for Pixar, joining "The Incredibles" ($70.5 million) and "Finding Nemo" ($70.3 million).

"Drag Me to Hell" got off to a solid start as it debuted in the third slot. The movie looks headed for an opening tally of about $15 million, making it the best non-Spidey debut for director Sam Raimi.

The 'Night at the Museum' sequel had a solid hold and will finish in the #2 slot this weekend. "Terminator Salvation" took a steep 66% Friday-to-Friday hit, but the studio (WB) was encouraged that it wasn't worse. "Star Trek" rounds out the top five as it became the first '09 release to pass the double-century mark domestically.
post #621 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Will
Want theaters charging more for 3D showings of Up inflate the box office returns a little? I mean, I'm sure Paramount would have loved to have theaters charge an addition 2.25 for Star Trek so their return could be a little higher (I guess IMAX kinda evens it out though). This was the first digital 3D movie I have seen and will be my last until the prices are the same as 2D movies. Unlike IMAX, 3D is not worth the extra cost IMO.

At least I understand why my theaters has Up on more 3D screens and only one 2D. Not because it is necessarily more popular but, they make more money off of the 3D shows. Maybe one day 3D will be so popular that the prices will be the same, until then 2D is just fine.

Rant over!


I have to agree about Digital 3D. Through the glasses the screen (and it's a pretty big screen) actually looks smaller. Imax 3D definitely is worth the additional cost. I'd still watch it on Digital 3D if Imax 3D wasn't available for a film.
post #622 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Quote:
Originally Posted by TerryRL
"Up" easily led the box office during its opening day as it pulled in a stellar $21.4 million. The movie looks headed for a debut weekend haul in the neighborhood of $65-$70 million, putting it among the top three biggest openings ever for Pixar, joining "The Incredibles" ($70.5 million) and "Finding Nemo" ($70.3 million).
I went to see Up tonight with a friend. We got there 45 minutes before the 9:20 3D show, figuring we'd have no problem with a kids' movie that late. Completely sold out. We caught the 10:10 3D showing instead, which was also packed -- mostly with older teens and twenty-somethings. I only counted two kids in the whole theater. While they were obnoxious through the ads and trailers, both were completely silent through the film itself -- just glued to the screen the whole time.

This is a movie that deserves to do well. Ed Asner is still at the peak of his abilities.
post #623 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

$68M opening for UP!
post #624 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Damn I predicted $40m to $50m for UP, I underestimated it's appeal, the trailers didn't excite me at all, it looked a bit.. what's the word you guys use? 'meh'?. Hell the last time I was enthusiastic about a PIXAR film was The Incredibles back in 2004, great film.

I did better with Drag Me to Hell, my prediction was $15m to $25m and it did $16.6m. Raimi should stick to Spider-Man movies, I was one of the few here who loved Spider-Man 3.
post #625 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Christou

I did better with Drag Me to Hell, my prediction was $15m to $25m and it did $16.6m. Raimi should stick to Spider-Man movies

The sad thing is it's probably telling producers or studios to make remakes or sequels instead of something original.
post #626 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
The sad thing is it's probably telling producers or studios to make remakes or sequels instead of something original.
I don't know what they estimated it to make but I think $16 million isn't that bad given the competition, the ad campaign and that I think alot of its target market (teens) are probably more interested in movies with 'splosions in the summer than being scared.
post #627 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

I hope expectations weren't too high but by just looking at opening weekend numbers I can't help but think it should have been more.

Horror Remake Movies

Several horror remakes have opened at 20+ million and the same is true for the sequels. It seems people scream and shout about "original" movies not making money and that $16 million is still quite a bit lower than many of the remakes are making. Some people joke that it's hard to get a movie made out of an original idea and I hope these numbers don't prove them right.

Of course there could always be other reasons like the ads, the cast, the title and so on but it just seems there's a running cash cow in remakes with other stuff not bringing much home.
post #628 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

You can't predict what people will go for, Drag Me to Hell had rave reviews (over here at least) but the moviegoing public just wasn't that interested. Remake of My Bloody Valentine opened with $21m but that had the 3-D gimmick as an attraction. Friday the 13th remake did $40m in it's opening weekend, astonishingly that was 62% of it's entire US take, it fizzled out at $65m. Which is still a lot more than Sam Raimi's horror movie is going to do, unless word of mouth keeps it afloat, but I doubt it.
post #629 of 1466
Thread Starter 

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Weekend Estimates

#1 "Up" $68.2 million
#3 "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian" $25.5 million ($105.3 million) -53%
#3 "Drag Me to Hell" $16.6 million
#4 "Terminator Salvation" $16.1 million ($90.7 million) -62%
#5 "Star Trek" $12.8 million ($209.5 million) -44%
#6 "Angels & Demons" $11.2 million ($104.8 million) -48%
#7 "Dance Flick" $4.9 million ($19.2 million) -54%
#8 "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" $3.9 million ($170.9 million) -52%
#9 "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past" $1.9 million ($50.0 million) -50%
#10 "Obsessed" $665K ($67.5 million) -66%
#11 "The Brothers Bloom" $652K ($1.4 million) +70%
#12 "The Soloist" $500K ($30.3 million) -41%

The industry enjoyed a very robust weekend of business as May closed with the biggest haul in the history of the month. The top 12 pulled in $163 million, which was about 1% below last year's haul, but up nearly 27% compared to this frame in '07. This also marked the first time ever that May pulled in more than $1 billion in ticket sales (assisted by higher ticket prices). Overall, May '09 sold the fourth highest number of theater admissions (more than 141 million) coming in behind '03 (158.5 million), '02 (158.1 million), and '04 (143.6 million).

2009's massive year-to-date total now stands at $4.143 billion, passing the $4 billion mark in record time. 2009's mark represents a 13% bump over last year ($3.665 billion), up 12% over '07 ($3.700 billion), 19% stronger than '06 ($3.488 billion), and a 23% improvement compared to '05 ($3.377 billion).

Pixar/Disney's "Up" delivered the third best opening ever for Pixar Studios as it pulled in $68.2 million, coming in behind "The Incredibles" ($70.5 million) and "Finding Nemo" ($70.3 million). The movie also earned the fourth biggest debut of the year (behind "X-Men Origins: Wolverine", "Star Trek", and "Fast & Furious") as it pulled in a per-theater average of $18,109 from its 3,766 locations. The studios are expecting an extremely healthy run for this one, as well as delivering Pixar's fifth Best Animated Feature Film (it would be their third in a row if they were to win it).

Fox's "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian" lost about 52% of its business from last weekend and has so far tallied more than $105 million. The studio is expecting a final domestic haul in the area of $200 million.

Universal's "Drag Me to Hell" gave director Sam Raimi his biggest non-Spidey opening tally, but fell short of last year's "The Strangers" which opened on the same weekend. That film pulled in $21 million. Still, Universal got a solid opening out of 'Hell', but don't expect the movie to have very strong legs.

WB/Sony's "Terminator Salvation" fell off by a steep 62% and has so far tallied nearly $91 million. Look for this one to top out in the neighborhood of $130 million. Paramount's "Star Trek" became the first '09 release to pass the double-century mark. Sony's "Angels & Demons" passed the century mark this weekend. Paramount's "Dance Flick" is nearing the $20 million mark. Fox's "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" has pulled in just under $171 million thus far. WB's "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past" hit $50 mil. Sony's "Obsessed" continues to creep toward the $70 million plateau. Summit Entertainment's "The Brothers Bloom" expanded to 96 more theaters and enjoyed a 70% bump in business. DreamWorks/Paramount's "The Soloist" has now tallied more than $30 million.

Next weekend will see the releases of Universal's "Land of the Lost", WB's "The Hangover", and Fox Searchlight's "My Life in Ruins". Expect big launches from both "Land of the Lost" and "The Hangover", but it will be interesting to see if either has enough juice to dethrone "Up".
post #630 of 1466

Re: 2009 at the Box Office

Quote:
Universal's "Drag Me to Hell" gave director Sam Raimi his biggest non-Spidey opening tally, but fell short of last year's "The Strangers" which opened on the same weekend. That film pulled in $21 million. Still, Universal got a solid opening out of 'Hell', but don't expect the movie to have very strong legs.

I wouldn't be too sure about that. Unlike many horror films released in the past few years, this one has received very good reviews. I'd say word of mouth surrounding this film will be very positive. I honestly think you're underestimating its potential.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › 2009 at the Box Office