Re: 2009 at the Box Office
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steve Christou
"The only reasons to see this structurally messy, poorly directed flick are the spectacular effects, which overwhelm the plot, and the charismatic performance of soon to be Hollywood star Aussie Sam Worthington who steals every scene he is in."
In contrast to Star Trek, Terminator 4 has been getting less than rave reviews, currently 24% on the tomatometer. I wonder if it'll effect it's opening weekend? I'll stick to my $50m to $60m opening weekend prediction.
|
I wonder though is the Star Trek plot really that much better than the "structurally messy" T4?
Does John Connor get marooned on Alaska where he finds Arnold Schwarzenneger has been waiting 25 years to save him from an ice creature for instance?

Or is Trek getting a pass because "well the story isn't the greatest, but gosh darnit, we sure do love the new younger, more colorful style ... and besides the last two Trek movies were sleeping aids" aspect that even some reviewers admit out right in their review?
I'm not a fan of McG, but I do wonder if there is a double standard being leveled against Terminator 4 here. Guess we'll find out this weekend.