Re: 2009 at the Box Office
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tim Glover
Not surprised about Last House On the Left. We saw it opening night friday and it was sold out.
|
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by Tim Glover
Not surprised about Last House On the Left. We saw it opening night friday and it was sold out.
|
|
Originally Posted by Tim Glover
Unreal about Taken's box office hold. Cool. But a sequel? Um...what will they call it? Taken 2....Taken Again?
|
|
Originally Posted by Shawn_KE
Sad news, it looks like she has passed away.
|
| Natasha Richardson dies after ski fall Natasha Richardson, a film star, Tony-winning stage actress and a member of the famed Redgrave acting family, has died. She was 45. Richardson died after suffering injuries in a fall on a ski slope at a Quebec resort about 80 miles northwest of Montreal. She was talking and joking after the fall, resort officials said. But she was later taken to a hospital for treatment. |
|
Originally Posted by JayMacey
When will studio's get that 99% of the time, it has NOTHING to do with the stars they put in the film. If the movie doesn't look good, people won't go: point blank.
"Studio Experts" consistently predict bigger openings because it has a Tom Cruise or a Julia Roberts or even Will Smith. Take a look at Seven Pounds. Will Smith movies have always been percieved as "sure fire blockbusters". Seven Pounds opened to $16m its first weekend, under Yes Man, & went on to gross a little over $60m. There may be a small percentage that just went to see it because its Will Smith. But most people didnt go because the trailers/ marketing, etc just didn't click with them. They had no interest. Then you have a movie like Superbad, or Slumdog that has virtually no stars & goes on to make a killing. |
|
Originally Posted by TerryRL
"Seven Pounds" made $70 mil domestically and close to $98 million overseas, giving it a worldwide haul of nearly $168 million. As Zack pointed out, everyone pretty much knew going in that "Seven Pounds" wouldn't be a hit the size of "Hancock", and with a cost of about $55 million, the studio was happy with how it turned out. Did they want more? Of course. Will it go down as a Smith misfire? No it won't.
|
|
Originally Posted by Shad R
Wow! I thought it would be lucky if it hit $50mil. Does it seem like this is the opening summer movie weekend? Each year it gets pushed a week or two back. I remember when summer movie season started on Memorial Weekend, but with big movies like Shrek, Spiderman, and Iron Man getting early May releases, it won't be long before summer movie season starts on Valentines Day.
|
|
Originally Posted by Colin Jacobson
When The Matrix came out in March 1999, I thought that sort of signalled a NEW really early start to summer. Granted, I don't think anyone expected it to be such a big hit, so I don't think this was a "let's start summer in March!" movement, but it DID show studios that they could make big bucks with "summer blockbuster" kinds of flicks while in the early part of spring...
|