DLP is better despite changing lamps, I think
Just spoke to Andersen's TV rep. I wanted the Mitsu WD-65835 65 inch, Costco $2400. It has 120 Hz rather than 60 Hz refresh rate to reduce motion blur (especially good for sports), which is a new technology. A comparable LCD would probably cost around $4,000 conservatively. The mitsu bulb runs out around every 2 years at $100 a pop. The mitsu picture is much better or at least as good. 2 years x 5 bulbs = $500 for 10 years, $1000 for 20 years. So I still save a lot of money over the long run. It appears the unpopularity is due to changing the bulbs, and the non-flat panel design. I thought changing bulbs was a pain and swore never to buy a DLP again. But looking at the savings and getting 65 inches at that price point, my view has changed and I will get the Mitsu DLP.