New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray - Page 3

post #61 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleddyn Williams
But that would require re-authoring the disc. The MPEG-2 and lack of extras matches the pattern of early Fox releases. I think this was meant to come out some time back, and for whatever reason, just made it out the door.

The studio obviously didn't want to go to the extra expense of redoing to disc to bring it up to current standards. Released on the same day, The Omen, obviously prepared later, has all the extras produced previously, and even some new ones.
By George I think you got it!

You have to wonder how many similar titles have the same problem that haven't been released yet? We can beat the studios up over this, but can we make a good business case for them to stop this practice?

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Carrie [Blu-ray]
post #62 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Crawford
You have to wonder how many similar titles have the same problem that haven't been released yet?

Boy, Robert, that's a scary question! I had thought that by this stage, a disc like Carrie was an aberration, but who knows? There could be other old encodes just waiting to see the light...
post #63 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleddyn Williams
Boy, Robert, that's a scary question! I had thought that by this stage, a disc like Carrie was an aberration, but who knows? There could be other old encodes just waiting to see the light...
You have to wonder about it as I've heard whispers of them existing from my sources.





Crawdaddy
post #64 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

You can purchase the 3-disc Blu-ray special edition of Speed Racer on Amazon for $19.95. Am I comparing the two films? No. But that's value, and WB knows it. Fox could have EASILY thrown the existing extras for Carrie onto a second BD25 and included them with this release, especially considering the exorbitant MSRP. They made a deliberate decision to not do that. If it bothers you, do as I did and vote with your wallet. Maybe the bean counters there will eventually get the picture.

Mr. Harris, thank you for your comments on the technical aspects of the Blu-ray transfer of Carrie. I found them to be valuable, as always.
post #65 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpippel
If it bothers you, do as I did and vote with your wallet.

I did, but I'm always fearful that, instead of sending the message, "this release wasn't good enough, so get it right next time" to the studios, they interpret it as "no one is interested in this title anymore, so don't bother double-dipping later".
post #66 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

I rented this and was a bit disappointed by the picture quality, definitely looked like the brightness of the image was cranked up, at first I thought something was wrong with my projector. The detail was there, just washed out.
post #67 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

I watched this last night and I must say I'm happy with the presentation of the film. To me, it looks like an "un-futzed with" transfer. Of course, I have no idea what the original negative looks like.

On the subject of missing supplements, sure, I would have liked to see the supplements from previous editions included in the Blu-ray Disc, but I really think that in some ways we've gotten spoiled about that. If there had never been extra material, we wouldn't miss it now.

I buy DVDs and Blu-Ray Discs for films. Even if you don't give me gravy on my mashed potatoes, I still have my mashed potatoes.
post #68 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob LoVerde
On the subject of missing supplements, sure, I would have liked to see the supplements from previous editions included in the Blu-ray Disc, but I really think that in some ways we've gotten spoiled about that. If there had never been extra material, we wouldn't miss it now.

I...I...I don't even know how to begin a response to that...
post #69 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis Brashear
I...I...I don't even know how to begin a response to that...

Hi Travis,

I can understand your bewilderment.

I made my above statement to play a bit of devil's advocate. Like I said, sure, I would have liked the Blu-ray Disc to include all previously available supplements. I'm only saying that the fact that it doesn't isn't the worst thing in the world.

I remember walking into a store one evening in 1988 or so and seeing the newly-released VHS of "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" selling for $100. A VHS of a film presented in "pan-and-scan" with no supplements whatsoever. In a paperboard box, to boot. Fans of the film bought it and were happy to have the film at all.

And so, to shell out around $30 for an excellent 1080p transfer of "Carrie" doesn't seem beyond the pale to me.

Just my mild opinion...
post #70 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

I like Carrie though it's not what I'd consider a favorite film which made my decision easy. I would've bought this but barebones and overpriced? = no sale.

For me the Blu-ray version should be the definitive presentation of any movie, especially since we're paying premium price compared to SD. Not only PQ/AQ quality (that should be a given) but bonus content as well.

There're plenty of other releases to spend my money on.
post #71 of 91
Thread Starter 

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Attempting to compare a "fair" selling price of a DVD or BD, versus VHS doesn't quite tell the complete story. While millions of DVDs have been sold, and BD numbers increase along with the base of players, VHS was not originally set up as a sell-through market. Early in the format, prices were oriented more toward rentals. If someone wished to own, so be it, but at a price.

From the outset, DVD was organized toward sell-through. Some of the studios, along with independent publishers, have chosen to market their products at very low, attractive prices, while other seem somehow stuck in the laserdisc era. IMHO, the ultimate success of Blu-ray is dependent upon two functions. Reasonable player prices and software prices within relative means.
post #72 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Fox is now using a "priced not to sell" pricing scheme. I'm sure there's an ingenius motive here. I just have not figured it out yet. I'm working hard on it though.
post #73 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Harris
Attempting to compare a "fair" selling price of a DVD or BD, versus VHS doesn't quite tell the complete story. While millions of DVDs have been sold, and BD numbers increase along with the base of players, VHS was not originally set up as a sell-through market. Early in the format, prices were oriented more toward rentals. If someone wished to own, so be it, but at a price.

From the outset, DVD was organized toward sell-through. Some of the studios, along with independent publishers, have chosen to market their products at very low, attractive prices, while other seem somehow stuck in the laserdisc era. IMHO, the ultimate success of Blu-ray is dependent upon two functions. Reasonable player prices and software prices within relative means.

Thank you for your insight, Mr. Harris. I was unaware of the idea of a "sell-through" market.
post #74 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

I didn't realize how much this title was selling for. Fox gave it to us free during the Hollywood meet.

But I can back up RAH's comments on the pq. It looks fantastic. Probably the best I've seen since 1976 (or perhaps ever).

Rob
post #75 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Just saw Carrie and was really impressed. I've seen this on every other home video format - broadcast, VHS, Criterion laserdisc, DVD. Unfortunately, I never saw the film in theaters.

What I saw on Blu-ray was glorious. Finally, finally, I can see the detail through the fog filters and split diopter photography. I was so pleased to see the grain intact.

Correct me if I'm wrong, or if this was mentioned by RAH or earlier in this thread, but I don't believe the opening credits were window-boxed as has been before on home video.

Once again, looked *wonderful* on my 92 inch screen.

Alas, this title is simply not priced to own for me at this time, especially with the MIA exras. However, if this shows up on a 2-for-1 or some other sale, I'm in, because A/V-wise, this is a winner.
post #76 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

I'm actually not quite qualified to comment here, since the shift in economies has put a stop to all my Blu-Ray purchases (imports are too expensive and Australian prices are, I assume, intended as a joke ($50 for one disk?)

It is good to see a genuinely excellent audio-visual presentation. The price, however, is silly and the only plausible explanation I can suggest is that Fox is testing the waters with a deliberately ridiculous price, just to see how well it sells. (After all, if it's a choice between selling 100 DVDs at $10 each, and 60 DVDs at $20 each.... better to sell the 60 at $20)
I suspect something similar with their bizarre decision to release an upscaled "28 Days Later" last year. Just a question of seeing how much the consumers will accept.

As for value; it's worth what you'll pay for it. That simple. Some people on this thread, I'm sure, will complain about the $30 price and then go out and buy it. Well, you really have, in my opinion, no valid reason to complain.

Speaking for myself, I would have snapped this movie up, extras or no, at a 'movie only' price, say $15AUD, and I'm not even especially fond of the movie (I think I've seen it twice)

I will agree AV is definitely the crucial thing. While I'll pay as much as $15 for a great looking blu-ray with no extras, a flawed transfer makes any Blu-Ray a must-miss for me (I passed on HDDVD releases of 'Spartacus' and 'Lethal Weapon 2' even when prices were as low as $3.95 in the firesales)

I actually have a clumsy little economic theory that overpriced blu-rays is ultimately a good thing, for the opportunity it affords smaller companies. As long as studios are charging $20 - $40 for blu-rays, any smaller distributor that releases quality product at a reasonable price-point (like 'The Proposition' blu-ray) stands to make a lot of money.

(Of course, my idea of 'reasonable' is partly influenced by the added costs of postage to Australia and currency conversion which puts even a $20USD blu-ray outside of my spending range. So, take that with a further grain of salt (beyond the 'just one man's opinon' thing))

A word against high prices, though, in relation to "DVD vs VHS"
There's two crucial ingredients to DVD's success entirely absent from Blu-Ray...
- DVDs tended to be much cheaper than VHS, with most VHS priced for rental outlets.
- DVD happened to have an indefinite time to become popular.
Blu-Ray only has until 1080p download catch on. With decreasing costs on HDDs and broadband, that will be soon. Either provided by the studios or provided by the pirates (depending on prices and how much DRM is on the studio downloads) And, yes, I can almost here every person here shouting "I wouldn't pirate a movie!" but the majority of the public certainly would, once the technology allows, if Studios don't get their act together on prices & DRM (either on Blu-Ray or downloads) My point being, Blu-Ray has a very, very finite period of time to catch on with the public (unlike DVD) and that's were waiting too long to lower prices could ultimately hurt the studios in a fairly major way.
post #77 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

way back in 2001/2002, when bare bones Paramount catalog discs cost $25 (retail) , and Fox routinely charged $35 for SEs, I realized that my comfort zone was $15. That was the price point that facilitated impulse purchasing.
With Blu-ray and the matter of upgrades (which make up the majority of my Bd purchases), I've bumped that up to $20. Extras sweeten the pot and lessen the resistence, but if it's a favorite film and the A/V excel, I can fork over the $20 for a better library copy without that twinge of pain.
I've resigned myself to the fact that for 99% of releases, there's just no such thing as 'definitive'. Even a release as spectacular and satisfying as last years Blade Runner could be re-jiggered in a few years offering different extras (like a fully anotated gallery of Meads work for one thing) that would no longer make the previous release the last word..

My copy of Carrie just came in two days ago from the DD sale. I've still got my old dvd for the extras, and if I didn't I'd likely be able to pick up a used copy dirt cheap...if I desperately needed to see them. After one thorough viewing of them though, my focus goes back to the feature. When it's sitting on the shelf, in anticipation of a future viewing someday, superior A/V will give me peace of mind...not a sprinkling of featurettes..
.In fact, there are dozens of catalog titles I would be ecstatic to have the opportunity right now to buy at $20 for a bare bones HD copy . The only thing that disappoints me is knowing for a lot of great stuff, I may not get that chance for years...if ever.
post #78 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankie108
Without a doubt, I'll take door #3. If this barebones policy results in more releases of catalog HD titles at easily affordable sales prices....I'll be buying like crazy. Just like I did when SD DVD offered pretty much the same strategy 10 years ago. If I'm interested in extras, I'll just watch my SD DVD disc.

All the same, I'd like to chuck my SDs for the most part when I replace them with BD. I'll tell you one thing -- if the recent James Bond Blu-ray discs did not have those extras carried over, I wouldn't be buying.
post #79 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Williams
Once again, on Blu-ray there is plenty of disc space, and it continues to baffle me that those who don't care about bonus features begrudge those that do. I have not heard one person claim they want bonus features at the compromise of video/audio quality. On Blu-ray we can have the very best picture and audio quality available as well as numerous quality bonus features. One only need look at Indiana Jones, the Pirates Trilogy, or of all things, Superbad and Hot Fuzz.

Like Travis and others, I'm a movie collector too, and like Travis, BECAUSE I am a movie collector, I'm also interested in the things that went into the movie. Movies I enjoy, I also enjoy knowing more about.

Like Travis has said repeatedly, like I have said repeatedly, and like others on other threads and forums have said repeatedly, we can have both.

Agreed. And I think that since Blu-ray is superior to SD, it should be so in every way... not just better A/V quality, but the prime place for extras and bells and whistles. If anything, at this stage of the game the studios ought to be abandoning their extra features on SD completely and saving them for BD, thus making blu the more attractive option. High Def is here and it is the future; there's no reason to continue catering to SD over BD.
post #80 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Lavender
.....My point being, Blu-Ray has a very, very finite period of time to catch on with the public (unlike DVD) and that's were waiting too long to lower prices could ultimately hurt the studios in a fairly major way.

You'd think that Fox and the rest would notice what gouge prices did for the music business! I supose greed is an irresistable force in the mind's of Fox's executives for now though. Even though Fox has lowered some list prices $5, the local retailers I have given a look-see stille have most of their titles stamped at $35. So, I share most of your sentiments. Downloads are not as eminent here in the U.S. Well, they are, but not for everybody. The country isn't wired up for that on the whole yet.

I stille have not purchased a copy of Carrie. This past week I did buy a copy of The Big White for $12.99 . That's what films on BD-25's can sell for. I presume that The Big White is a profit deal and not a marketing experiment.

Is $50 Australian roughly equivalent to the $35 U.S. that has caused so many Fox titles to collect dust on retailer's shelves?

$12.99 is the price I'd like to pay for Carrie.....
post #81 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Since I've come to view Blu-ray not as the "enemy of DVD", but rather "just the next technological improvement to DVD", there really is no further need for SD at all, IMO. The studios should start pushing BD and lowering the prices, maybe even only keeping bonus features on BD... make SD the less attractive choice. Perhaps even stop releasing key new titles (like THE DARK KNIGHT) on SD at all. Once the consumers understand that that they can still enjoy their present SD collections on a new BD player that's affordable (yes, they need to come down in price too), then we'll get somewhere. It just seems silly to me to continue to use the horse and carriage while BD is like the automobile.

Of course, the avergae J6P's will not like being "forced" into buying a BD player, but it's happening with TV going all-digital next year, and it happened when vinyl records were changed over to CDs rather quickly...
post #82 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
Perhaps even stop releasing key new titles (like THE DARK KNIGHT) on SD at all.
There's no way that what you propose will happen now. It makes no sense from a business standpoint. Why would any studio forgo the revenues from the still MUCH larger DVD market in order to force much smaller BR sales? Lowering software and hardware prices to grow the market makes sense. Abandoning a still huge DVD market at this point doesn't.
post #83 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael B
Is $50 Australian roughly equivalent to the $35 U.S. that has caused so many Fox titles to collect dust on retailer's shelves?

Currently, 50AUD=35USD sounds about accurate (Since about late August, the Australian dollar has gone right down in value against the USD for some reason (ditto, GBP vs USD))

Earlier in the year, the conversion was something like 1AUD = 0.93USD

One weird little detail I've noticed, is the relative lack of consistancy between countries. I've seen some Fox titles right down close to $30AU, while I've seen movies like The Fifth Element and Bram Stoker's Dracula (routinely selling on Amazon for $15US) selling here for $43AU.
post #84 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob LoVerde
I remember walking into a store one evening in 1988 or so and seeing the newly-released VHS of "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" selling for $100. A VHS of a film presented in "pan-and-scan" with no supplements whatsoever. In a paperboard box, to boot. Fans of the film bought it and were happy to have the film at all.


Not to drift too far off topic but I should point out that 'Rocky Horror' has never been presented panned and scanned. Like a huge percentage of 'flat' titles it was shot open-matte and the top and bottom of the frame were matted off in projection to get the intended 1:85 ratio on screen.
post #85 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

I have been quite pleased by the recent drop in Fox BD prices in Canada. I picked up a few old Fox catalog titles today for $13.50, about US$11. More recent "big" titles are $20 (US$16). I have no complaints about that. I was at 2 video-selling stores (BB and WM) earlier tonight and there were far more people looking at BD racks than DVD racks while I was there. Also many new title BDs were sold out. That's here, I guess not the same everywhere, but an encouraging sign.

[Our $ has also fallen wrt the US$, but I expect that is temporary while the "free tax money" is being doled out. Until things get back to normal, or less abnormal at least.]
post #86 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

pure highest end audio and video and forget the extras, that is simply my view

there is plenty room on a BD50 for all this stuff, and that is fine, but if it means higher prices for more special features then I don't want it, in fact I would love to see studios offer slightly cheaper film only and then special ed versions for those that want them

just my take

-Gary
post #87 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent_P

And to link a Peter Bracke review as evidence that this Blu-ray is bad- Michel, you of all DNR-hating folk should know better than this! You're quoting Peter Bracke, the man who praised the Blu-ray of SCARY MOVIE to high Heaven- as in, the SCARY MOVIE Blu-ray which is one of the greatest Blu-ray DNR abominations known to all mankind! This is NOT the type of reviewer who you want to throw your trust behind against Robert Harris when it comes to evaluating a proper, film-like presentation on Blu-ray.

Vincent

Scary Movie is the greatest abomination on a BD disc IMHO, DNR'd to hell, then slapped hard with EE, it looks like a really bad upconvert, in fact worse than the SD DVD upconverted via a scaler and a SDI DVD player

your point is dead on correct

-Gary
post #88 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Deep Discount DVD's 25% off sale finally allowed me to get Carrie at a price I was willing to pay. I was impressed by the PQ. I started out using the mono audio. It really seemed flat and lifeless. I switched to the DTS audio and it seemed better.

If the BD had extras, I likely would not have seen them yet. I really get a kick out of the film but I'm afraid my intrest wanes when the credits are done rolling. I really don't want to know what was in the bloody kettle or much of anything else about the production.
post #89 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Carrie can be had for $10 right now on Amazon's buy more and save sale if you are willing to buy nine other movies with it. I still didn't get it because I figure I'd watch it maybe once before a new edition with extras (and a more sensible codec) is out.
post #90 of 91

Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent_P
DAMN, where did you find the Blu-ray CLOSE ENCOUNTERS for $20-25 at? And here, I thought I got it at a bargain when I ordered it from Amazon for $32.95 a couple days ago...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR
I've never seen Close Encounters for $20 to $25 either.

(*ahem*): Amazon.com: Close Encounters of the Third Kind (30th Anniversary Ultimate Edition) [Blu-ray]: Norman Bartold, Shawn Bishop, Roberts Blossom, Robert Broyles, Adrienne Campbell, Merrill Connally, Luis Contreras, George DiCenzo, Melinda Dillon, Philip D

This is the third or fourth time I've seen this offer. I'm just sayin'...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Carrie [Blu-ray]