Re: A few words about...™ Carrie -- in Blu-ray
I'm actually not quite qualified to comment here, since the shift in economies has put a stop to all my Blu-Ray purchases (imports are too expensive and Australian prices are, I assume, intended as a joke ($50 for one disk?)
It is good to see a genuinely excellent audio-visual presentation. The price, however, is silly and the only plausible explanation I can suggest is that Fox is testing the waters with a deliberately ridiculous price, just to see how well it sells. (After all, if it's a choice between selling 100 DVDs at $10 each, and 60 DVDs at $20 each.... better to sell the 60 at $20)
I suspect something similar with their bizarre decision to release an upscaled "28 Days Later" last year. Just a question of seeing how much the consumers will accept.
As for value; it's worth what you'll pay for it. That simple. Some people on this thread, I'm sure, will complain about the $30 price and then go out and buy it. Well, you really have, in my opinion, no valid reason to complain.
Speaking for myself, I would have snapped this movie up, extras or no, at a 'movie only' price, say $15AUD, and I'm not even especially fond of the movie (I think I've seen it twice)
I will agree AV is definitely the crucial thing. While I'll pay as much as $15 for a great looking blu-ray with no extras, a flawed transfer makes any Blu-Ray a must-miss for me (I passed on HDDVD releases of 'Spartacus' and 'Lethal Weapon 2' even when prices were as low as $3.95 in the firesales)
I actually have a clumsy little economic theory that overpriced blu-rays is ultimately a good thing, for the opportunity it affords smaller companies. As long as studios are charging $20 - $40 for blu-rays, any smaller distributor that releases quality product at a reasonable price-point (like 'The Proposition' blu-ray) stands to make a lot of money.
(Of course, my idea of 'reasonable' is partly influenced by the added costs of postage to Australia and currency conversion which puts even a $20USD blu-ray outside of my spending range. So, take that with a further grain of salt (beyond the 'just one man's opinon' thing))
A word against high prices, though, in relation to "DVD vs VHS"
There's two crucial ingredients to DVD's success entirely absent from Blu-Ray...
- DVDs tended to be much cheaper than VHS, with most VHS priced for rental outlets.
- DVD happened to have an indefinite time to become popular.
Blu-Ray only has until 1080p download catch on. With decreasing costs on HDDs and broadband, that will be soon. Either provided by the studios or provided by the pirates (depending on prices and how much DRM is on the studio downloads) And, yes, I can almost here every person here shouting "I wouldn't pirate a movie!" but the majority of the public certainly would, once the technology allows, if Studios don't get their act together on prices & DRM (either on Blu-Ray or downloads) My point being, Blu-Ray has a very, very finite period of time to catch on with the public (unlike DVD) and that's were waiting too long to lower prices could ultimately hurt the studios in a fairly major way.