Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › DVD › Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition - Page 3

post #61 of 87
10/10/08 at 4:04pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Pennington
I've just started watching this movie on Blu-Ray and am noticing some wild differences in color from shot to shot. One scene in particular stands out, and here are 4 captures from the new DVD from that scene. 3 of the 4 shots are back to back, while the last has a different shot in between. Still, should the colors (take notice of her blouse) change so much in between shots? Who did the color timing on this?
I believe the color is changing based on how much light is in the scene.
(showing though the trees)
Reply
post #62 of 87
10/10/08 at 4:06pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen_J_H
Lady and the Tramp is indeed 2.55:1. As for Around the World in 80 Days, like Oklahoma, it was shot twice because of the different frame rates between Todd-AO (30fps) and CinemaScope (24fps), the difference being that both versions were shot with 65mm cameras for ATWI80D. All references for ATWI80D indicated that 35mm prints ranged from 2.1:1 to 2.35:1, depending on which side of the Atlantic you were on. Hardly standardized.

Well, they must've figured something out in 1956 because CAROUSEL and THE KIND AND I weren't shot twice as had originally been planned. And 1958 brought about the Todd-AO SOUTH PACIFIC as well as the 2.35:1 35mm 'scope extractions. I did state around the time of ATWI80D, you know.

I'm worried about what the woman in the Disney article linked to above stated, that the new "restorations" that have been done for the past few years will be used on eventual Blu-Ray releases! I sure hope they go back and fix CINDERELLA before then instead of using their existing HD master!
Reply
post #63 of 87
10/10/08 at 4:07pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed St. Clair
I believe the color is changing based on how much light is in the scene.
(showing though the trees)

It's animation. There was no light shining through the trees, and the shots are back-to-back. It's poor color timing.
Reply
post #64 of 87
10/10/08 at 4:22pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Pennington
It's animation. There was no light shining through the trees, and the shots are back-to-back. It's poor color timing.
Oh right! I forgot... I thought it was REAL!!! :-0

Really (p.i.) watch the movie, not the stills. As characters move though the light and darkness, shades (the tint) of colors change.

The prince riding though the forest is a good scene to "see".
Does the shade of the white horse remain constant?
- - - - - - - -
Too all who posted pics:
BIG thanks for adding too the enjoyment of this flick for me!
Great job.
Reply
post #65 of 87
10/10/08 at 5:06pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

The colors didn't change like this in any previous version. If I'm looking at a character and individual colors change in shots that are back-to-back, my eyes is drawn to it and it pulls me out of the movie.
Reply
post #66 of 87
10/10/08 at 6:02pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

At first glance I thought the Blu-Ray was amazing, but in fact it makes the bad DVNR even easier to see. The images below are captured from the 2008 and the 2003 DVDs as I don't have the ability to offer a screen capture from the Blu-Ray version. Still, notice how in the 2008 version the lines are disappearing, with the cuff on Merryweather's sleeve all but disappearing and becoming the same color as the rest of her outfit, but only on her right hand!

Again, this doesn't stand out as much on the DVD as it does on the Blu-Ray.

2008
Photobucket

2003
Photobucket
Reply
post #67 of 87
10/10/08 at 7:23pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

It's too bad, but it's what happens when you do processing to this degree, and some of those errors are bound to slip through.

I think I saw some line art missing on the raven's foot in one of the shots in the DVD Beaver review, although that could have been from the original painting too.
Reply
post #68 of 87
10/11/08 at 4:20pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Pennington
Well, they must've figured something out in 1956 because CAROUSEL and THE KIND AND I weren't shot twice as had originally been planned. And 1958 brought about the Todd-AO SOUTH PACIFIC as well as the 2.35:1 35mm 'scope extractions. I did state around the time of ATWI80D, you know.

I'm worried about what the woman in the Disney article linked to above stated, that the new "restorations" that have been done for the past few years will be used on eventual Blu-Ray releases! I sure hope they go back and fix CINDERELLA before then instead of using their existing HD master!
The King & I and Carousel were both CinemaScope 55, which was designed for 35mm reduction prints as well as (never done) 55mm projection. South Pacific would have been extracted to 2.35:1, because by that time Todd-AO had abandoned 30fps projection.

I do agree that Disney needs to look @ their masters before porting over directly to BD. Good enough for a few years ago is not necessarily good enough for now. I never got around to getting the most recent release of Cinderella, but it sounds like that was a good thing.
Reply
post #69 of 87
10/11/08 at 4:34pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen_J_H
The King & I and Carousel were both CinemaScope 55, which was designed for 35mm reduction prints as well as (never done) 55mm projection. South Pacific would have been extracted to 2.35:1, because by that time Todd-AO had abandoned 30fps projection.

But when shooting started, CAROUSEL was being shot in both formats. It was early in the production that the second 35mm production was abandoned according to what I've read. That would've meant such reduction prints would have been possible in 1956, be it from 55mm or 70mm or Super Technirama 70.
Reply
post #70 of 87
10/11/08 at 4:48pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Pennington
But when shooting started, CAROUSEL was being shot in both formats. It was early in the production that the second 35mm production was abandoned according to what I've read. That would've meant such reduction prints would have been possible in 1956, be it from 55mm or 70mm or Super Technirama 70.

Perhaps the technology was there in 56 butfor 70mm reductions it was actually developed untill 1958 for Todd AO and 1959 for Super Technirama. They were used in 1956 to reduce 55mm to 35 as you state and also anamorphic 65 for Raintree County.
Reply
post #71 of 87
10/13/08 at 6:32pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Yellow Layer Failure, Vinegar Syndrome and Miscellaneous Musings by Robert A. Harris

RAH: What is the proper projected or viewing aspect ratio for Sleeping Beauty, and how was it ascertained?

TG: Well... there were multiple signs pointing us to presenting the film in a 2.55:1 aspect ratio for this Blu-ray release.

First and foremost - once our partners at Lowry Digital scanned the full image area on the Technirama negative and we started viewing dailies it became immediately apparent that we were not looking a 2.35 AR. We normally do not have any crop applied when screening dailies so we knew we were seeing everything possible that is on the negative.

In addition - when we were looking at surviving cels and backgrounds at the Studio's Animation Research Library (which is an invaluable resource), it was quite obvious that the layout design and camera marks were set for 2.55.

Then there is the fact that in a memo dated July 28, 1953, the Studio green lit the CinemaScope version of Lady and the Tramp, while it also established a "Standard Version" and a CinemaScope Version production number for Sleeping Beauty -- #2082 and #2083. As the CinemaScope standard at the time was 2.55, (and that is clearly evident in Lady and the Tramp) Sleeping Beauty too would have been designed at 2.55.

In the end, Lady was adapted for CinemaScope but it was truncated on the left side of the screen when it went out with an optical track since the CinemaScope presentation spec had changed by the time the film was ultimately released in 1955. Sleeping Beauty fared far better as it had been designed to be in CinemaScope and thus could be trimmed to meet the requirements of 2.35 CinemaScope 35mm prints. But in the final analysis, there is animation all the way out to the far edges of the frame that had not been seen. It is this full 2.55 version that is coming out on Blu-ray on October 7.
Reply
post #72 of 87
10/13/08 at 7:26pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Brandon you beat me to it. I was just going to post about that excellent interview by Robert Harris with Theo Gluck. Almost all the questions that were raised in the forums are answered. There is even a picture of actual original successive-exposure negatives that clearly show the space between the upper sprocket holes and the top of the picture. Now we know how technirama's 2.25:1 aspect ratio became 2.55:1 for this movie!
I'm also quite surprised to learn that successive-exposure was used right up to "Little Mermaid" and then was used again for "Beauty and the Beast"! Excellent informative interview!
Reply
post #73 of 87
10/13/08 at 9:12pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Despite some people's reservations about the new Platinum Edition release, I've seen the new release on DVD on a LG 52LG70 LCD panel at Circuit City recently and wow, the color quality is outstanding and even using an upscaling DVD player, the sharpness was excellent, too.
Reply
post #74 of 87
10/15/08 at 5:16pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Pennington
The colors didn't change like this in any previous version. If I'm looking at a character and individual colors change in shots that are back-to-back, my eyes is drawn to it and it pulls me out of the movie.
Don't know what too tell you; cause the shades of colors are supposed to change during scenes. Thanks goodness the colorist knew this; even tho you are bothered by it & thought it was because of bad or improper work.
When you say: "The colors didn't change like this in any previous version", does that mean you have recently gone back & checked? Or, are you only going by memory?
(your saying the horse only remains one shade of white in all previous releases?)
The 'changing' colors actually pulls me into the movie.
Makes it more real for me that the characters are actually in a realistic environment.
Too each his own.
Hope now you do realize there is indeed "light" in this animated feature. :-)
And thanks for my newest catch phrase: "There was no light!" ;-)
Reply
post #75 of 87
10/16/08 at 1:36am

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

IT IS interesting that no one has commented (that ive seen) on the fact that the stylized 'Roman' Script used in the title "Sleeping Beauty" at the start of the 2003 disc has various little designs decorating the inside of each of the letters (as was the fashion in Mediaeval Times) that are totally blown out on the 2008 disc. They are just gone.

On the other hand the marked difference between the 2003 and 2008 version where we see Aurora on a floor so bright, youd swear it was from a just-shot Spic-n-Span™ commercial, vs 2003s dark -little detailed floor....which I suspect may be more correct.

And the end titles background details/scrolls/banners are again blown out chroma wise on the 2008 edition and the credits lettering is not at all sharp-while the those banners and end credits lettering on the 2003 disc look "crisper" and certainly more visible and desirable to my eyes.

Unbelievable that this is 2008s version of a 'UE'

Thus, the 2003 looks 'correct' (ie not just subjectively, but 'objectively' better -and was highly likely as Walt would have wanted these details seen. I havent studied all the comparisons but these two stood out glaringly-and it concerns me that no one seems to have noticed.

Is this a case of 'Its new so it must be better?'
Not if youve an objective eye and mind.

I dont know about the floor, but thats a huge contrast/brilliance jump from 2003 to 2008.
And I think Walt would have wanted the script used in the starting titles to have the little designs and decorations visible-which they are are not in the 2008 disc

So its the 2003 disc i'll be a 'keeping-thought the 2008 has some compelling things about it
Reply
post #76 of 87
10/16/08 at 6:21am

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Here is an image grabbed directly from the BD release. Now maybe you guys can see some of the problems of this "restoration" hidden by the resolution of the DVD. See how the ink lines start to disappear, or how she has a left cuff that doesn't match the right one now because of the harsh processing and smearing of color?

This image has NOT been altered in any way from the BD release. See the weird artifacts around lines? It looks AWFUL on any screen 42" or above. Also note the digital stair-stepping around the rim of her hat.

BTW - click on the image below to go to Photobucket where I uploaded it. When the image on that page loads, click on it to reveal the full resolution image.

Photobucket

And as for the post about how the color changes from back-to-back shots were intentional, I disagree. I'll post the captures again. How can anyone think this was intentional? I'll post pics from the previous versions if needed, but honestly, bad color timing and QC have no excuses.

For some more pics and info, check this out:

Sleeping Beauty on BD: (mostly) astonishing - Lyris Lite
Reply
post #77 of 87
10/16/08 at 6:27am

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed St. Clair
Don't know what too tell you; cause the shades of colors are supposed to change during scenes. Thanks goodness the colorist knew this; even tho you are bothered by it & thought it was because of bad or improper work.
When you say: "The colors didn't change like this in any previous version", does that mean you have recently gone back & checked? Or, are you only going by memory?
(your saying the horse only remains one shade of white in all previous releases?)
The 'changing' colors actually pulls me into the movie.

Colors are NOT supposed to change in shots that are back-to-back and in the same location with the same "lighting". I guess some people will do anything to justify their purchase....

These shots are back-to-back. Look how the color changes in her hair, blouse, skirt, skin... The strange thing is they don't all vary by the same degree either. I can't understand how you can state that this was intentional and that I'm the one seeing things.

Photobucket
Photobucket
Photobucket
There is one shot in between the previous capture and the following one. But note the location is the same.
Photobucket
Reply
post #78 of 87
10/16/08 at 7:21am

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Here is some more info you guys might be interested in:

Land of Whimsy
Reply
post #79 of 87
10/16/08 at 8:31am

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Pennington
I guess some people will do anything to justify their purchase....
I think it may have more to do with the fact that nearly every animated release has some horrible defect according to self proclaimed experts and hardcore fans. I fully expect them to bitch and moan about every release and I don't take anything they say seriously because they pull the fire alarm on everything. I bet I'm not the only one who writes them off because of that.
Reply
post #80 of 87
10/16/08 at 8:51am

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR
I think it may have more to do with the fact that nearly every animated release has some horrible defect according to self proclaimed experts and hardcore fans. I fully expect them to bitch and moan about every release and I don't take anything they say seriously because they pull the fire alarm on everything. I bet I'm not the only one who writes them off because of that.

All I ask is that people use their eyes. If the releases weren't so altered then there would be nothing to criticize, which would be wonderful. Certainly you don't expect people to be silent because the marketing machine tells us all is well and now everything is better than ever.
Reply
post #81 of 87
10/16/08 at 9:23am

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Pennington
All I ask is that people use their eyes. If the releases weren't so altered then there would be nothing to criticize, which would be wonderful. Certainly you don't expect people to be silent because the marketing machine tells us all is well and now everything is better than ever.
People can say whatever they want but when I hear complaints about nearly every animated release, either almost every DVD has some fatal flaw or sometimes animation fans are inventing problems just so they can have something to talk about. And I think that constant criticism has made people discount alot of what comes from the hardcore fans.
Reply
post #82 of 87
10/16/08 at 10:46am

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR
People can say whatever they want but when I hear complaints about nearly every animated release, either almost every DVD has some fatal flaw or sometimes animation fans are inventing problems just so they can have something to talk about. And I think that constant criticism has made people discount alot of what comes from the hardcore fans.

I want excellent releases of the Disney films. A lot of people do. I'm not inventing problems to have something to complain about. The images prove that. I, as well as a few other people, are bringing these problems to the surface because that is the only way that maybe the next releases won't be as mangled.

Check out what has happened to the animation lines in this capture from the BD.

sb5.jpg
Reply
post #83 of 87
10/16/08 at 1:15pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Chuck, would you mind enlightening us on how your captures were accomplished? We know that Gary Tooze over @ DVD Beaver is using the wrong colorspace for his captures, and I'm not saying that's the case with yours, but for curiosity's sake I'd like to know what you're using and the processing path. Thanks.
Reply
post #84 of 87
10/16/08 at 2:40pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen_J_H
Chuck, would you mind enlightening us on how your captures were accomplished? We know that Gary Tooze over @ DVD Beaver is using the wrong colorspace for his captures, and I'm not saying that's the case with yours, but for curiosity's sake I'd like to know what you're using and the processing path. Thanks.

For the DVD captures I'm using VLC with no modifications. The BD captures I have to thank Michael @ Land of Whimsy as I don't have a BD-ROM drive from which to make captures.

Do you have the BD release? If you do, you can go to this scene, pause any frame, and see the same distorted image. It is far more apparent on the HD release than the DVD because of the much higher resolution.
Reply
post #85 of 87
10/16/08 at 3:19pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

I have the BD release, but no BD player as of yet. I figured it was a better investment than buying the new DVD release, as it comes with disc 1 of the DVD release attached.
Reply
post #86 of 87
10/16/08 at 3:51pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen_J_H
I have the BD release, but no BD player as of yet. I figured it was a better investment than buying the new DVD release, as it comes with disc 1 of the DVD release attached.

I look forward to when you do have a BD player and HDTV so you can comment. I know you're going to find the pics accurate and perhaps you'll even be a little surprised. It looks far worse in motion, and I only have a 42" HDTV - I'll bet the weird aftereffects of the major processing that was done on the transfer are even more glaring on larger displays.
Reply
post #87 of 87
10/16/08 at 8:09pm

Re: Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition

I think the real problem about the complaints of animation fans is that too many of them suffer from what I like to call "Howard Dean Syndrome". They might have a legitimate gripe or a valid point, and may even be right, but the way they present themselves and drive their points home puts off people who are not animation fanatics (like that guy that Googled for random Peter Pan cel reproductions and screamed at the top of his lungs that the newest DVD didn't match them. Right or wrong, insinuating that people who don't agree with you are blind and/or ignorant does not help your cause.)

It's all very similar to the case of the rabid Star Wars people who aren't taken seriously by anyone anymore, least of all Lucas and those in his employ.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DVD
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › DVD › Sleeping Beauty: 2003 Special Edition vs. 2008 Platinum Edition