Re: Genius Press Release: The Little Rascals: The Complete Collection
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigshot
The separation between moving and static areas isn't DVNR. It's over compression. They crammed too many shorts on each disk. Any time you have grainy source material and over two hours on a dual layer disk, this will happen.
|
Basically, the shorts have a fairly high bitrate (around 9.800 Mbps) and 200 minutes might be pushing things a little, but I wouldn't say they're crammed on the dual-layer discs.. In fact, some of the shorts look pretty good, although they do show some excessive signs of wear.
The problem is that the folks who put this set together, relied far too heavily on some simple digital tools during the "restoration" process. Remember that even the press release touted the use of "DVNR technology" (to paraphrase a little), as a positive boon for this set.
And it does all add up since, of course, not all shorts in the set exhibit the morphing/bounce phenomenon. The ones that do, suffer from excessive gate weave and have had most of the grain and blemishes smoothed out to the extent that they look over-polished and lack sharpness and detail (evidence of DVNR). The result is that the noise reduction can't compensate for the bouncing picture and causes the image to "tear" and bounce. The same effect can be created with cheap ATI video capture software, using the maximum DVNR (what ATI called "video soap") settings.
What the folks at Genius have done is to try to smooth out all the blemishes, scratches and dirt on video masters that already existed prior to this set being created. The existing tapes/transfers have inherent problems that can only be solved with a new, re-telecine of the source material-- preferrably using something along the lines of a wet-gate transfer, followed by some extensive audio and video restoration.
Additionally, two shorts, for sure, exhibit horizontal, analog video dropouts, "Lazy Days" and "Bouncing Babies"-- Further evidence that the shorts are sourced from video masters and not film.
The real problem here, is that there's only so much that can be done with analog video. I haven't even mentioned that the shorts are interlaced, rather than progressive...