HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition - Page 5

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I'm not in the know, but if the Smilebox version was on the SD would it have required more Disks?

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

Just one extra, for the SmileBox version.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

Guys, I know this is a sore topic for many who would have loved the Smilebox version but can't get it because it's only available in Blu-ray, but let me just say, if you've been waiting for a good reason to get a Blu-ray player, this should be it. I imagine the letterbox version looks great in SD, but the Smilebox version is nothing short of astonishing.

I scanned through the letterbox version last night after watching the Smilebox version, and while it's without a doubt an amazing transfer, it just doesn't give you the sense of depth that the curved screen simulation provides.

I'd love to see THIS IS CINERAMA the same way, and of course, TWWOTBG, but I wouldn't hesitate to double-dip to see the 50's and 60's big screen epics in Smilebox HD, as well. I really hope this title is a big hit for Warners and that they decide to make Smilebox the next step in video presentation for large format epics like this one.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

That's for sure.

But how about BEN-HUR, RAINTREE COUNTY, 2001, GRAND PRIX, RYAN'S DAUGHTER and AROUND THE WORLD IN 80 DAYS in SB-HD?

(Just dreamin' here...)

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I'm sorry, I thought that one disc was used for the film, and one for the bonus material, instead of the film being split up.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

It was originally planned as a two disc set Brian, but it was switched to three (both the SE and UCE, despite internet scuttlebutt to the contrary) - two for the film, one for the extras.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I think you are right, Ken, for all the films you mention save 80 Days. The early Todd AO installations all had reasonably deeply curved screens although this was dropped from about "South Pacific" onwards. When this opened in London in April 1958, the depth of the curve had dropped to about 5 feet. Originally, it was much deeper.

I would love a smilebox 80 Days( although I wait patiently- well not really- for my HTWWW and have yet to see it), but given the poor state of the negs, this would appear unlikely.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I certainly appreciate the thought process here, but that would make this a $2000 movie for me.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

There were nine films that were filmed in a 3-strip process and promoted as being "In Cinerama" that could benefit from being shown in the Smilebox process. The five Cinerama travelogue films, Windjammer which was filmed in Cinemiracle, How The West Was Won, The Wonderful World of The Brothers Grimm and also Cinerama's Russian Adventure which was filmed in the Russian Kinopanorama 3-strip process.

There were also twenty films - It's a Mad, Mad, Mad World, Circus World , 2001: A Space Odyssey, etc. that were filmed in various 70mm and 35mm film formats that were later promoted as being "In Cinerama" and projected on the deeply curved Cinerama screen. I guess they could be released in the Smilebox process if people wanted to see what they would have looked like on a Cinerama screen. The Ultra Panavision films would look the best as they have a 2.76:1 aspect ratio and were cropped to 2.6:1 on a Cinerama screen. But the remaining films that were mostly in 70mm which were 2.2:1 would have to be stretched to 2.6:1 so, they would look distorted if Smileboxed.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I agree, but I think we'd have to admit that any - any- film projected onto a deeply curved screen, including true Cinerama films, are subject to a certain amount of distortion. HTWWW itself, whether shown flat or curved, distorts because of the very wide-angle lenses used by the Cinerama camera. I don't think these films ever meant to look realistic, otherwise they would have been shot and exhibited flat.

Personally, I hate watching modern scope movies at the Cinerama Dome because they are not shot to be shown on a deeply curved screen, so the distortions are ugly and unintended, to say the least.

But Ultra Panavision pictures like BEN-HUR, MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY, KHARTOUM and IAMMMMW definitely had deep curvatures in mind when shot. I think they'd be very appropriate in Smilebox, as would the early Todd-AO movies and 2001.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

Delete post

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I don't think Ben-Hur or Mutiny on The Bounty were shown on any Cinerama screens during their roadshow release. On the documentary for It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World, Stanley Kramer mentions it wasn't until they had completed or near completion of the film that UA decided to promote it as being 'In Cinerama'.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I saw Ben-Hur on a reissue at the Casino Cinerama theatre in London, circa 1970, and it looked terrible on that screen and I saw it again at a Cinerama theatre in Bristol, UK, and it didn't look right there, either. The only non three-panel films that looked OK on the deep curve were Mad World, Grand Prix and 2001. I guess we should also include The Bible and Patton which were also designed for the deep curve D-150 process.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

You'd have to wonder whether you saw an Ultra Panavision print or a flat 70mm print. I saw a flat 70mm print of BEN-HUR at the Cinerama Dome and it didn't look right, either. I imagine a wider UP print would be a different story, but I really don't know. Either way, the film would look a bit distorted but my whole point is that the Smilebox, whether in its extreme current form in the HTWWW DVD or in a softer (less "curved") form, would give the film some of its original giant screen oomph.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

Here are some possibilities (I hope these upload).

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

What I think most people don't realize is that when Cinerama converted from 3 strip to single strip, they also masked off a considerable amount of the sides of the screen. I know that at the Honolulu Cinerama, they moved both side masking panels inwards about 5 or 6 feet when they converted for single strip. Even with that change they still needed specially ground lenses to achieve reasonable focus across the entire image.

At the Cooper Cinerama in Denver and Minneapolis, the lenses used for 70mm single strip Cinerama must have weighed a good 20 pounds each. http://webserve.govst.edu/users/gaskrau/cinlens1.jpg

To the best of my knowlege, Ultra Panavision / Camera 65 were not usually presented on curved screens at all. I know that when I saw "Mutiny On The Bounty" in San Francisco at the Coronet or Baronet (I don't remember which) using 70mm anamorphic, I was very disappointed when the deeply curved curtains opened to reaveal a totally FLAT screen. Even then, they had focus problems due to lens drift from the heat of the arc lamps.

Vern

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

DVDBeaver has caps of both Blu-Ray versions in full resolution:

How the West Was Won Blu-ray - Henry Fonda* Gregory Peck Debbie Reynolds James Stewart John Wayne

In a stationary screenshot, the smilebox version looks quite odd to me. Things may be different with a moving picture though.

One big disadvantage of the smilebox transfer is the noticable cropping at both sides, which is hereby confirmed to exist not only in the clips from the Cinerama documentary but in the feature itsself.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

Ben-Hur and Mutiny on the Bounty were not Cinerama presentations and were not shot for the deeply curved screen. While Mad World was presented on Cinerama screens, it was shot the same as the other two. It required 70mm prints with optical rectification to avoid distortion.

Smilebox is meant to fix distortion and perspective issues with 3-panel Cinerama. The only other use would be for the sparse "bug-eye" lens shots in Oklahoma! and Around the World in 80 Days - maybe.


It's been confirmed that the "flat" version exposes far more on the sides than what would have been printed, so the Smilebox version isn't cropping valuable picture area.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I saw the same release and it was only a flat print not anamorphic.That's probably why it left a lot to be desired.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

Which explains why we were all confused when this title was announced since the long-held ratio for Cinerama was believed to be 2.55:1

EDIT: Also 2001 would look quite awful smileboxed. Film was shot 70mm flat and wasn't even supposed to be in the Cinerama format to begin with.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I have a comparison of the SD-DVD to the BD on this page - New Page 1 . Not only is the BD better in PQ but the Smilebox version does not remove as much information as the same Smilebox scene on Cinerama Adventure.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I don't think Smilebox is there to correct distortions, Patrick. In fact, you can see that the distortion and perspective problems inherent to Cinerama seem to be, for the most part, digitally fixed in the letterbox version. The Smilebox version actually distorts more than the letterbox version, especially on the side panels, and this happens throughout the video presentation, not just in selected shots.

It seems to me that the purpose of Smilebox is primarily to evoke the shape of the giant screen this film was meant to be shown on.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

Take a closer look, Gerardo. SmileBox does correct some issues, like sightlines. Also, notice that the image appears to recede from the viewer in the flat transfer, while in the SmileBox transfer, it appears to envelop the viewer. Gary Tozze's captures over at DVD Beaver show this quite clearly.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

Hi, Stephen, I was referring more to what seems to me to be the overall purpose of Smilebox, which I don't think is to deal with distortions but to present the film in a shape more akin to the original.

I still think that, shot by shot, there's more distortion in the Smilebox, and yet it looks better to me.

As usual with these discussions, we tend to get lost in the tangents of the argument we're trying to make. I was just trying to defend why I'd love to see more 50's and 60's epics in this format, that's all. Cheers.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I beg to differ here. The original MGM press release for 2001, then called Journey Beyond the Stars, and released to the press on 23 Feb 1965, stated the film would be released in Cinerama. On-set pictures of Kubrick also feature 65mm cameras bearing the Cinerama logo. I also remember early posters for 2001 appearing in 1966 (!) at the Coliseum Cinerama theatre in London.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

I wouldn't call 5% "noticeable". The letterboxed image is 2.89:1 and the smilebox is 2.75:1. Even with the smilebox, you are seeing more picture information on the sides than was shown at Cinerama theatres as Cinerama was 2.59:1.

Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition

See this comparison on the DVDBEAVER web site -

http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDRe...ay/large/7.jpg

and

http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDRe...0911190657.jpg

On the letterboxed image, the log on the raft in the lower left corner appears to be bent to the left which is wrong. It is straight as it should be in the smilebox image.