Re: Lost: Season 5
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TravisR
I'm saying that the wreckage of the freighter is 'moving' exactly like the beach camp. It dissapeared with the island but it's the survivors (and what they are in contact with) that is what is moving through time. If the survivors were in a time period after the O6 left, they would be able to scuba dive to the place where it went down and see it there. The reason it dissapeared to Sawyer and Juliet is because there was no one alive on it and it didn't travel through time. Had the ship not blown up, it would be time traveling along with the people who were on it.
EDIT: Maybe a simpler way of trying to explain what I'm saying is to apply the same logic to the freighter that you would to the camp. If it's 2004 or later, the camp and freighter are there (but the freighter is sunk off the coast). If it's before 2004, the camp and freighter aren't there.
|
If I understand what you're saying, I think your explanation is more complex than need be. Basically, the camp and freighter aren't 'moving' - they simply stayed put in 2005. It's just like in
Back To The Future when Marty first arrives in 1955. He drives past the street where his house is in 1985, only to discover it hasn't been built yet. His street hasn't moved, it just doesn't exist in 1955. The same logic applies to the time-travel shenanigans in
Lost.
What's confusing about your theory is that you say the freighter disappeared with the island, yet you go on to say that it ain't time-travelling (because the people onboard were all killed in the explosion) and that the sunken remains are still in the same spot (albeit on the bottom of the ocean). Also, we know that the freighter wouldn't have time-travelled had it not exploded, as it was outside the radius that Daniel Faraday spoke of. How do we know this? Well, as Mikah Cerucco correctly pointed out, the chopper was closer to the island than the freighter was. Did the chopper time-travel? No, so we can presume it wasn't within the radius, meaning the freighter definitely wasn't either.
I think we're on the same page, but you just worded it poorly.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mikah Cerucco
1) The island moved geographically. The island moving in time wouldn't do Ben much good as people know where it is. He needs it to be somewhere else.
|
It's possible that it moved geographically. It could not have travelled back in time because then there'd be two islands occupying the same physical space as each other. Besides, we know that Richard and the remaining Others stay put on the island and don't time-hop. When he was removing the bullet from Locke's leg, Richard explained that Locke just disappeared. Maybe the island moving location has something to do with the remaining survivors becoming "dislodged" from time.
Assuming this is true, the thing that still puzzles me most is where they are when they re-appear in 2005. The camp looked dilapidated so it was clearly some time after the Oceanic Six left. But if the island moved geographically before that point, then how can it still be at that location?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mikah Cerucco
But most importantly, there's no way you can go back 20 years and an island is no longer in a given spot unless it can move geographically.
|
Sorry, I don't follow. When have they gone back 20 years and found that the island is no longer there?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mikah Cerucco
That said, the concept of an island moving is one I can't wrap my head around. An island is just a land mass that is high enough to exceed sea level. It doesn't float.
|
I tend to agree with you, but at the end of the day it's no less plausible than the island time-travelling! Both explanations have their problems, I think.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kevin Grey
The island is almost certainly moving geographically- in addition to it disappearing right in front of the Oceanic 6 you can also see that the machine that Ms. Hawking was using in the premiere was showing different geographical places the island might appear in at a given time.
I expect that the tight time window the Oceanic 6 are operating under is that they have to be in the right place for the island to appear but at also at the right time. So that right before the 6 return to the island that the latest time flash will put Locke and Co. into 2007 so that everyone is once again at the same point in time and space.
|
I think you're probably correct. However, it's possible that the computer was calculating the correct bearing for re-entering the island safely. Faraday said he must calculate a new bearing in order for them to leave the island, which suggests the bearing changes over time. When Michael left with Walt, it was 325 degrees. When the helicopter was flying to the freighter, it had changed to 305 degrees. Who knows what the bearing would be after three years. All I'm saying is that Ms. Hawking's device isn't total proof of the island moving.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bob_Chase
This is about quality control. Has anyone else had problems with audio in the center channel? It sounds as though the level of the center channel is too high and clipping ensues. It sounds terrible. To the point where it's hard to hear the dialogue. I must mention that this only happens during LOST on ABCs Wed night broadcast. I don't have the problem on any other channel, any other ABC program or even during LOSTs commercial breaks, only the program itself. This used to happen when I had Comcast and it still occurs with Verizon's FIOS. I first noticed it 2 seasons ago.
|
I can't say I've noticed it before, but the audio on Wednesday night's episode was dreadful. Not just the centre channel, either - there seemed to be a lack of surround info, and some out-of-phase effects across the front soundstage. I assumed it was a one-off due to a broadcast fault.