Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › TV Programming › Lost: Season 5
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Lost: Season 5 - Page 10

post #271 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan K
OK - so the helicopter was on a specific course... wasn't the little Zodiac life raft also? Also, if that was the case the blown-up boat wreckage would've been in the radius. There has to be a different explanation.
The freighter and the helicopter weren't in the radius but everyone in the zodiac and Jin were in the radius. I'm sure they're cheating a little with Jin being close enough but like I said before, it seems like the island can control things outside its own area so I think it pulled Jin along for the ride and left the freighter.

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #272 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

How do we know that the blown-up boat wreckage isn't time traveling? As far as I recall, we only know the smoke from her stack is gone. In other words, the reason Sawyer and Juliette do not see the freighter is that she sank.
post #273 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dheiner
How do we know that the blown-up boat wreckage isn't time traveling? As far as I recall, we only know the smoke from her stack is gone. In other words, the reason Sawyer and Juliette do not see the freighter is that she sank.
I didn't really think of it until now but I guess it possible that the boat did leave with the island but since no one was alive on it to be touching it, it's gone (like their camp, etc.). That would sufficiently explain how Jin managed to come along too.
post #274 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR
I didn't really think of it until now but I guess it possible that the boat did leave with the island but since no one was alive on it to be touching it, it's gone (like their camp, etc.). That would sufficiently explain how Jin managed to come along too.

Sawyer didn't buy it

Quote:
SAWYER: What the hell was that?
JULIET: I don't know.
(Sawyer scans the horizon.)
SAWYER: Where's the freighter?
JULIET: Maybe it went down.
SAWYER: Unh-unh. No way. A minute ago, that boat was coughing black smoke. Now there's just nothin'?

I'm really not trying to argue here, I just think there has got to be some other explanation, as in what the island wants/controls - not the whole radius thing...
post #275 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

The explanation is pretty simple: neither the freighter nor the helicopter were within the radius, because they were not at sea level. The chopper was still in the air and the freighter had sunk. Presumably Jin threw himself overboard as the freighter exploded and he was submerged for a few moments. The undercurrents then took him towards the island, and he was just inside the radius when Ben turned the donkey wheel.

I'm not suggesting that only living objects at sea level were affected, but that the catchment area extended further horizontally than it did vertically. Perhaps.
post #276 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Or, it's a plot hole. A lot simpler than the excruciating logical contortions they always bring about from devoted fans.

--
H
post #277 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Young
The explanation is pretty simple: neither the freighter nor the helicopter were within the radius, because they were not at sea level.
For Jin to have been in the radius of the island moving, it makes more sense that the freighter dissapeared when the island moved.

The people and anything that they are touching (their clothes, the zodiac raft, the gun that Sawyer now has, the new boat they found on the beach) is what is time traveling. When they noticed that the freighter was gone, it was because they had time traveled. If they travel back to the moment when the island dissapears, the freighter will still be there sinking. If the Oceanic 6 helicopter had gone back to the spot where the freighter was, it would be gone with the island.
post #278 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

If it is a plot hole, it's one of the laziest ones I've seen. When the writers blew the freighter up, they clearly knew that Jin survived and would get involved in the time-hopping. Surely it crossed their minds that if the chopper was too far away (having turned back for the island moments after the explosion) then Jin would, without question, be too far away. They even had Faraday mention the concept of a radius. If they were going to simply gloss over this inconsistency, why make it so glaringly obvious?
post #279 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Young
If it is a plot hole, it's one of the laziest ones I've seen. When the writers blew the freighter up, they clearly knew that Jin survived and would get involved in the time-hopping. Surely it crossed their minds that if the chopper was too far away (having turned back for the island moments after the explosion) then Jin would, without question, be too far away. They even had Faraday mention the concept of a radius. If they were going to simply gloss over this inconsistency, why make it so glaringly obvious?

I agree, I'm sure there will be an explanation. I'm just not buying what has been theorized so far... but it's fun to see what people will come up with
post #280 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

I don't discount the possibility of a rational explanation in the show. Just that the explanations bravely offered here haven't been terribly convincing so far, to me anyway. I don't have a better one either so it will remain a mystery or a plot hole till something better comes along.

--
H
post #281 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR
For Jin to have been in the radius of the island moving, it makes more sense that the freighter dissapeared when the island moved.

The people and anything that they are touching (their clothes, the zodiac raft, the gun that Sawyer now has, the new boat they found on the beach) is what is time traveling. When they noticed that the freighter was gone, it was because they had time traveled. If they travel back to the moment when the island dissapears, the freighter will still be there sinking. If the Oceanic 6 helicopter had gone back to the spot where the freighter was, it would be gone with the island.
I'm a little confused... on the one hand you say that the freighter did not time travel (because Sawyer and Juliet noticed it was gone after the first time-hop) but on the other hand you say it did (because if the helicopter had returned to the spot where the freighter exploded, the wreckage would be gone). Which is it?
post #282 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holadem
I don't discount the possibility of a rational explanation in the show. Just that the explanations bravely offered here haven't been terribly convincing so far, to me anyway. I don't have a better one either so it will remain a mystery or a plot hole till something better comes along.

--
H

Well said. But it's still fun to see what people theorize
post #283 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Here's another mystery:

We're assuming that it's the Losties who are time-hopping rather than the island, in which case the island must have moved geographically. However, surely if the island has moved from its original spot, then when the Losties time-hopped into the future (from their perspective, i.e. post-freighter explosion) they'd just end up floating in the ocean!
post #284 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Young
I'm a little confused... on the one hand you say that the freighter did not time travel (because Sawyer and Juliet noticed it was gone after the first time-hop) but on the other hand you say it did (because if the helicopter had returned to the spot where the freighter exploded, the wreckage would be gone). Which is it?
I'm saying that the wreckage of the freighter is 'moving' exactly like the beach camp. It dissapeared with the island but it's the survivors (and what they are in contact with) that is what is moving through time. If the survivors were in a time period after the O6 left, they would be able to scuba dive to the place where it went down and see it there. The reason it dissapeared to Sawyer and Juliet is because there was no one alive on it and it didn't travel through time. Had the ship not blown up, it would be time traveling along with the people who were on it.

EDIT: Maybe a simpler way of trying to explain what I'm saying is to apply the same logic to the freighter that you would to the camp. If it's 2004 or later, the camp and freighter are there (but the freighter is sunk off the coast). If it's before 2004, the camp and freighter aren't there.
post #285 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

I try not even to make sense of the time travel stuff beyond the most cursory, but TravisR, somewhere in reading your first paragraph, I actually had a moment when I thought, "That makes sense." It snuck up on me.

That said, it seems to me (as someone said above) any theories have to account for not only people traveling in time, but the island itself moving geographically at least once, right? I can no longer remember exactly what happened, but this is what I THINK happened...

Helicopter leaves going to freighter, it's too heavy (?), Sawyer jumps, helicopter continues towards freighter, freighter explodes within eyesight of the helicopter, helicopter heads back to island, island disappears. Now, if what I said is what happened, weren't the people in the helicopter looking at the island when it disappeared? If so, we know a few things...

1) The island moved geographically. The island moving in time wouldn't do Ben much good as people know where it is. He needs it to be somewhere else. But most importantly, there's no way you can go back 20 years and an island is no longer in a given spot unless it can move geographically. That said, the concept of an island moving is one I can't wrap my head around. An island is just a land mass that is high enough to exceed sea level. It doesn't float.

2) There's no scenario where the freighter is within the event horizon where the helicopter isn't also within the event horizon because at all times, the helicopter is between the island and the freighter.

3) Jin is between the helicopter and the freighter.

island ---> helicopter ---> jin --> freighter

That's assuming jin jumped or something. Otherwise, he was on it and it's jin/freighter.

Obviously, our understanding will change in the future, but am I outlining correctly what we've seen so far?
post #286 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikah Cerucco
1) The island moved geographically. The island moving in time wouldn't do Ben much good as people know where it is. He needs it to be somewhere else. But most importantly, there's no way you can go back 20 years and an island is no longer in a given spot unless it can move geographically. That said, the concept of an island moving is one I can't wrap my head around. An island is just a land mass that is high enough to exceed sea level. It doesn't float.

The island is almost certainly moving geographically- in addition to it disappearing right in front of the Oceanic 6 you can also see that the machine that Ms. Hawking was using in the premiere was showing different geographical places the island might appear in at a given time.

I expect that the tight time window the Oceanic 6 are operating under is that they have to be in the right place for the island to appear but at also at the right time. So that right before the 6 return to the island that the latest time flash will put Locke and Co. into 2007 so that everyone is once again at the same point in time and space.
post #287 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Here's another mystery

This is about quality control. Has anyone else had problems with audio in the center channel? It sounds as though the level of the center channel is too high and clipping ensues. It sounds terrible. To the point where it's hard to hear the dialogue. I must mention that this only happens during LOST on ABCs Wed night broadcast. I don't have the problem on any other channel, any other ABC program or even during LOSTs commercial breaks, only the program itself. This used to happen when I had Comcast and it still occurs with Verizon's FIOS. I first noticed it 2 seasons ago.

I thought I was the only one having issues until I went to lunch with a few coworkers today and they mentioned the same problem.

I've watched the HD reruns on Sci-Fi channel and there are no problems whatsoever.

I'm completely mystified.

FWIW I'm in S.E. PA near Philadelphia.
post #288 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

I did notice that this Wednesday's episode was much more difficult to hear/understand the dialog than normal. This has never happened to me before.
post #289 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Glad it's not just me. I stopped the DVR a couple of times, switched channels just to be sure -- other channels and recordings were fine. Something was up like 10 minutes into the episode. Dialog became very muffled.

--
H
post #290 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Well since it's come up, I normally don't have any issues with LOST but the other night the audio was totally funky, sorta muffled, upper freq. cut off, muted, also the video seemed dark.
post #291 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

I also had issues with slightly muffled centre channel audio during this week's LOST episode. I watching the east-coast feed, but I didn't bother to check if the west-coast or central/mountain Canadian feed (via CTV) was likewise muffled.
post #292 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
island ---> helicopter ---> jin --> freighter

Maybe (as has been suggested above) it's simply that the helicopter is higher.


..............helicopter
..................^
...................l
...................l
...................l
...................l
island ---> .........---> jin --> freighter
post #293 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Glad to hear I wasn't the only one with a muffled center channel. I just got a new receiver last week and I was worried it was something screwed up in the settings.
post #294 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob_Chase
Here's another mystery

This is about quality control. Has anyone else had problems with audio in the center channel? It sounds as though the level of the center channel is too high and clipping ensues. It sounds terrible. To the point where it's hard to hear the dialogue. I must mention that this only happens during LOST on ABCs Wed night broadcast. I don't have the problem on any other channel, any other ABC program or even during LOSTs commercial breaks, only the program itself. This used to happen when I had Comcast and it still occurs with Verizon's FIOS. I first noticed it 2 seasons ago.

I thought I was the only one having issues until I went to lunch with a few coworkers today and they mentioned the same problem.

I've watched the HD reruns on Sci-Fi channel and there are no problems whatsoever.

I'm completely mystified.

FWIW I'm in S.E. PA near Philadelphia.

Bob, my wife and I use wpvi too and we have been complainkng about the dialog channel for this show since day 1.
it sounds like they have their microphones under their clothes.
just awful.
this season has been worse then previous.

on the other hand surround sound is great.
during the scenes on desmond's boat last week, the creaking and
water sounds were amazing. I really had to be sure someone wasnt upstairs.


I also checked out Life on Mars right after and audio wasn't much better.
post #295 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Bryan
Maybe (as has been suggested above) it's simply that the helicopter is higher.


..............helicopter
..................^
...................l
...................l
...................l
...................l
island ---> .........---> jin --> freighter
That would make sense with the time travel wheel that Ben turned being deep down in the island. So maybe whatever causes time travel emanates from that point and goes up and out rather than going straight up from the middle of the island and going up and out (like a snow globe).
post #296 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR
I'm saying that the wreckage of the freighter is 'moving' exactly like the beach camp. It dissapeared with the island but it's the survivors (and what they are in contact with) that is what is moving through time. If the survivors were in a time period after the O6 left, they would be able to scuba dive to the place where it went down and see it there. The reason it dissapeared to Sawyer and Juliet is because there was no one alive on it and it didn't travel through time. Had the ship not blown up, it would be time traveling along with the people who were on it.

EDIT: Maybe a simpler way of trying to explain what I'm saying is to apply the same logic to the freighter that you would to the camp. If it's 2004 or later, the camp and freighter are there (but the freighter is sunk off the coast). If it's before 2004, the camp and freighter aren't there.
If I understand what you're saying, I think your explanation is more complex than need be. Basically, the camp and freighter aren't 'moving' - they simply stayed put in 2005. It's just like in Back To The Future when Marty first arrives in 1955. He drives past the street where his house is in 1985, only to discover it hasn't been built yet. His street hasn't moved, it just doesn't exist in 1955. The same logic applies to the time-travel shenanigans in Lost.

What's confusing about your theory is that you say the freighter disappeared with the island, yet you go on to say that it ain't time-travelling (because the people onboard were all killed in the explosion) and that the sunken remains are still in the same spot (albeit on the bottom of the ocean). Also, we know that the freighter wouldn't have time-travelled had it not exploded, as it was outside the radius that Daniel Faraday spoke of. How do we know this? Well, as Mikah Cerucco correctly pointed out, the chopper was closer to the island than the freighter was. Did the chopper time-travel? No, so we can presume it wasn't within the radius, meaning the freighter definitely wasn't either.

I think we're on the same page, but you just worded it poorly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikah Cerucco
1) The island moved geographically. The island moving in time wouldn't do Ben much good as people know where it is. He needs it to be somewhere else.
It's possible that it moved geographically. It could not have travelled back in time because then there'd be two islands occupying the same physical space as each other. Besides, we know that Richard and the remaining Others stay put on the island and don't time-hop. When he was removing the bullet from Locke's leg, Richard explained that Locke just disappeared. Maybe the island moving location has something to do with the remaining survivors becoming "dislodged" from time.

Assuming this is true, the thing that still puzzles me most is where they are when they re-appear in 2005. The camp looked dilapidated so it was clearly some time after the Oceanic Six left. But if the island moved geographically before that point, then how can it still be at that location?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikah Cerucco
But most importantly, there's no way you can go back 20 years and an island is no longer in a given spot unless it can move geographically.
Sorry, I don't follow. When have they gone back 20 years and found that the island is no longer there?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikah Cerucco
That said, the concept of an island moving is one I can't wrap my head around. An island is just a land mass that is high enough to exceed sea level. It doesn't float.
I tend to agree with you, but at the end of the day it's no less plausible than the island time-travelling! Both explanations have their problems, I think.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Grey
The island is almost certainly moving geographically- in addition to it disappearing right in front of the Oceanic 6 you can also see that the machine that Ms. Hawking was using in the premiere was showing different geographical places the island might appear in at a given time.

I expect that the tight time window the Oceanic 6 are operating under is that they have to be in the right place for the island to appear but at also at the right time. So that right before the 6 return to the island that the latest time flash will put Locke and Co. into 2007 so that everyone is once again at the same point in time and space.
I think you're probably correct. However, it's possible that the computer was calculating the correct bearing for re-entering the island safely. Faraday said he must calculate a new bearing in order for them to leave the island, which suggests the bearing changes over time. When Michael left with Walt, it was 325 degrees. When the helicopter was flying to the freighter, it had changed to 305 degrees. Who knows what the bearing would be after three years. All I'm saying is that Ms. Hawking's device isn't total proof of the island moving.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob_Chase
This is about quality control. Has anyone else had problems with audio in the center channel? It sounds as though the level of the center channel is too high and clipping ensues. It sounds terrible. To the point where it's hard to hear the dialogue. I must mention that this only happens during LOST on ABCs Wed night broadcast. I don't have the problem on any other channel, any other ABC program or even during LOSTs commercial breaks, only the program itself. This used to happen when I had Comcast and it still occurs with Verizon's FIOS. I first noticed it 2 seasons ago.
I can't say I've noticed it before, but the audio on Wednesday night's episode was dreadful. Not just the centre channel, either - there seemed to be a lack of surround info, and some out-of-phase effects across the front soundstage. I assumed it was a one-off due to a broadcast fault.
post #297 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Thanks guys. Sucks that others are having problems too but at least we have confirmation that it's not an isolated incident. I'll tune into ABC to re-check if its an issue on other programs but I could have sworn it was just LOST.

And yes Tony, surround is excellent (I noticed it on Des's boat too ) it's just that effin' center channel .
post #298 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Young
If I understand what you're saying, I think your explanation is more complex than need be. Basically, the camp and freighter aren't 'moving' - they simply stayed put in 2005. It's just like in Back To The Future when Marty first arrives in 1955. He drives past the street where his house is in 1985, only to discover it hasn't been built yet. His street hasn't moved, it just doesn't exist in 1955. The same logic applies to the time-travel shenanigans in Lost.
Yes.

Quote:
What's confusing about your theory is that you say the freighter disappeared with the island, yet you go on to say that it ain't time-travelling (because the people onboard were all killed in the explosion) and that the sunken remains are still in the same spot (albeit on the bottom of the ocean). Also, we know that the freighter wouldn't have time-travelled had it not exploded, as it was outside the radius that Daniel Faraday spoke of. How do we know this? Well, as Mikah Cerucco correctly pointed out, the chopper was closer to the island than the freighter was. Did the chopper time-travel? No, so we can presume it wasn't within the radius, meaning the freighter definitely wasn't either.
Not if the source of time travel comes up from The Orchid station and spreads up and outward from the wheel that Ben turned. Like Micah said, "An island is just a land mass that is high enough to exceed sea level." so if the freighter is above where the island begins underwater then it could come with it and not take the helicopter.

Rather than the time travel 'force' enveloping the island like a snow globe, maybe it is more like a cup where it comes up and under it all.
post #299 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob_Chase
Thanks guys. Sucks that others are having problems too but at least we have confirmation that it's not an isolated incident. I'll tune into ABC to re-check if its an issue on other programs but I could have sworn it was just LOST.

And yes Tony, surround is excellent (I noticed it on Des's boat too ) it's just that effin' center channel .
I think there are two things happening here. A lot of the dialogue on Lost sounds muffled because it's recorded on location with lots of background noise (ocean, wind in trees, nearby traffic) and they try to fix it in post with varying degrees of success. Even on Blu-ray in uncompressed PCM, some of it is quite hard to make out. I'm sure if they had the time, they'd loop more dialogue.

However, Wednesday night's episode was far worse than normal. I suspect the error was in the broadcast and not in the source material.
post #300 of 1412

Re: Lost: Season 5

I had problems with muffled dialogue on Wednesday, too. Glad to know it wasn't just me. I didn't even watch it with a surround receiver.

Those of you worrying about the specific "blast radius" and "blast logic" of the island's time effect may be falling down the rabbit hole. The biggest problem I have so far is the idea that they are carrying "things" with them... clothes, the boat, the camp... unless of course there is an intelligence behind their travel.

Think of it this way. If the island is in trouble because it can "discern" that specific people are no longer there, who's to say that that this special island and its immediate radius cannot pick what travels with it?

I'm not saying we have to turn off our brains, just that the show is more enjoyable (and "makes more sense") when we look for explanations like psychologists rather than like scientists.

Such large plot points (as Jin's escape, or the specific geography of time travel) are going to be explained in some manner or another, whether we accept the explanation or not. Right now they're as natural as holes in swiss cheese... just part of the mystery plot topography.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: TV Programming

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › TV Programming › Lost: Season 5