Re: Studio People Don't or Rarely Read the Forums Anymore?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jari K
Interesting. Only "unhappy" people are motivated to post in the forums? You sometimes puzzle me, Robert.
|
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by Jari K
Interesting. Only "unhappy" people are motivated to post in the forums? You sometimes puzzle me, Robert.
|
|
Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein
Case in point: We were very close to securing a chat with a studio,
but thanks to a group of members ripping them a new a-hole over a recent release, all hope was lost in obtaining their cooperation. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
I'm not with a studio but I read the threads here in this section everyday and I really can't recall too many "happy" posts. It seems the movies have been forgotten and that people just post about things they are unhappy with.
It's certainly not just here. It seems every HD forum is full of unhappy people that are upset about this, that or both. |
|
Originally Posted by Paul Arnette
I'm not denying the forums are negative just commenting on the irony and hypocrisy of studio folks blaming the format war for making it worse when they're the ones responsible for the format war in the first place.
|
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
If a studio releases a great disc then you might have a few posts saying so but this is all forgotten whenever someone mentions that the Turkey trailer isn't included. A wildfire breaks out and Hell is put on the company.
|
| Again, maybe I'm wrong but it seems some people here are very unhappy, which is why I wonder if they just watch movies any more or if they simply want to complain about the video and audio quality. Perhaps it's naive as me but coming from someone with a HD player but haven't bought anything yet, it gets me a little worried about all these complaints. I often ask myself if the format is really that bad or is it just people throwing a fit over every little thing. |
| I don't think studios will ever be able to meet the standards of a lot of those thread posters. |
| And I'll apologize right now if I'm wrong but I never hear ANYTHING about how people love this format. The only positive posts come when HD owners want to say how much better their format is to SD. If a studio releases a great disc then you might have a few posts saying so but this is all forgotten whenever someone mentions that the Turkey trailer isn't included. A wildfire breaks out and Hell is put on the company. Again, maybe I'm wrong but it seems some people here are very unhappy, which is why I wonder if they just watch movies any more or if they simply want to complain about the video and audio quality. Perhaps it's naive as me but coming from someone with a HD player but haven't bought anything yet, it gets me a little worried about all these complaints. I often ask myself if the format is really that bad or is it just people throwing a fit over every little thing. |
|
Originally Posted by Walter Kittel
(And I especially love the critical comments from folks who don't own HD playback equipment and have to add their 2 cents to the discussion. But, I digress.)
|
|
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben
Or their close relations, the folks who go wild over a disc they haven't actually viewed. At most they've seen some screen captures.
(And no, I don't think you're digressing. It's true that everyone's entitled to an opinion, but a lot of people in these discussions aren't entitled to have their opinions taken seriously.) M. |
|
Originally Posted by AL KUENSTER
Cees, I agree: most of the films that may or may not have problems that I have seen I usually didn't notice them until I read a post here or another site. Yes there are some obvious errors, but I get engrossed in a film I just don't notice them for the most part.
It's all about the movies! An escape from reality for a short time. Enjoy! Al |
|
Originally Posted by Cees Alons
In my opinion there should also be a (linear) relation between the extent of an error in a released movie and the amount of fuss made about it.
When a rather general problem, say the application of too much DNR, or a wrong aspect ratio, affects a whole movie, I think harsh negative critique is warranted. The studios should even be glad to get problems like that pointed out. If however it's a minimal or rare error (we're all fallible) and only present in one or two scenes we're discussing: it's still an error, alright, but it should hardly or only casually be mentioned, let alone be made into a major glitch, covered by numerous posts and overshadowing any other discussion of the film. I find it suspicious already if someone needs to post a screencap to demonstrate the problem to people who own the movie themselves, or has to give the exact location ("scene 56, at 73 mins, 20 secs, you clearly see the EE above the shoulder of the actor at the left, for three seconds, well two at least!") to make other viewers aware of it. If it's a real and serious problem, you'd see it right away, I would think. Cees |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
And I'll apologize right now if I'm wrong but I never hear ANYTHING about how people love this format. The only positive posts come when HD owners want to say how much better their format is to SD.
|
|
Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein
BTW, just to avoid any confusion, Warner is still interested in
a chat with us at some future date. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
And I'll apologize right now if I'm wrong but I never hear ANYTHING about how people love this format. The only positive posts come when HD owners want to say how much better their format is to SD. If a studio releases a great disc then you might have a few posts saying so but this is all forgotten whenever someone mentions that the Turkey trailer isn't included. A wildfire breaks out and Hell is put on the company. |
|
Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein
Obvious problems aside, the studios can't seem to please anyone
so why should they try. |
| I don't know what you mean by "love for this format", but when people are pleased with a given release, they have no problem saying so. |
|
Originally Posted by AL KUENSTER
Cees, I agree: most of the films that may or may not have problems that I have seen I usually didn't notice them until I read a post here or another site. Yes there are some obvious errors, but I get engrossed in a film I just don't notice them for the most part.
It's all about the movies! An escape from reality for a short time. Enjoy! Al |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
I don't see many posts talking about great discs. Going down the first twenty posts in this very thread shows mostly complaints and people upset about one thing or another.
|
| I'll apologize right now if I'm wrong but I never hear ANYTHING about how people love this format. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
I'm not with a studio but I read the threads here in this section everyday and I really can't recall too many "happy" posts. It seems the movies have been forgotten and that people just post about things they are unhappy with.
It's certainly not just here. It seems every HD forum is full of unhappy people that are upset about this, that or both. |
|
Originally Posted by David Wilkins
As I stated in a post a couple of months ago: I had to revisit the SD forum in order to hear actual discussion about movies.
|
|
Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein
BTW, just to avoid any confusion, Warner is still interested in
a chat with us at some future date. |
| or some other as yet unconsidered method of contact. |