Re: Studio People Don't or Rarely Read the Forums Anymore?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RobertR
That doesn't change the fact that film should be the reference, not DVD or a 1080i broadcast.
|
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by RobertR
That doesn't change the fact that film should be the reference, not DVD or a 1080i broadcast.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jesse Blacklow
Just another overreaction those 3 little letters in a thread at AVS based on an import copy. The end result? While grain is minimized, there is little to no loss of detail.
Somebody ran the BD version through a "film grain generator" tool in Adobe After Effects and it's indistinguishable from the version the compared it to (1080i broadcast). Check it out for yourself: ImageShack - Hosting :: donniegraintf5.jpg ImageShack - Hosting :: brucegrainou7.jpg |
|
Originally Posted by RobertR
Saying there's no loss of detail compared to the 1080i broadcast says nothing about how detailed the 1080i broadcast is compared to how detailed it could have been on BR. After all, 1080i broadcast shouldn't be the quality reference any more than DVD. Film should be the reference.
|
|
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce
Adding artificial grain to an image won't return detail to an image that lacks detail. It will simply add a layer of grain over the top. I'm not really sure what the point of those captures is.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jesse Blacklow
The point was essentially what you just said. The grain and noise has been minimized, but not the detail. When people started bitching, someone took it upon themselves to show exactly what was wrong with the strident "OMG DNR is killing this! WAXY FACES!" crowd by showing them that the only removal was of the grain, not detail.
|