post #31 of 53
7/23/08 at 7:06am
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by Brandon Conway
As one of Lionsgate's first BD releases, I'm sure they could do much better now.
|
| For the German? |
|
Originally Posted by Clinton McClure
Before my purchase, I thought I read somewhere the German version had forced subtitles so I went with the French version which was cheaper.
|
|
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben
I often regret that Cameron and his team did so much to publicize the Super35 process. Now it's almost impossible to discuss T2 or The Abyss without someone trying to explain some visual element by referencing Super35. Funny how that rarely happens with films that people don't automatically associate with Super35, e.g., Black Rain, Ridley Scott's film from 1989, two years before T2; or Apollo 13 and Se7en from 1995; or (gasp!) The Fifth Element from 1997.
All of those are Super35 films. (And all of them were pre-DI, too.) M. |
|
Originally Posted by Dave H
Not sure if this is the same encode as the HD DVD or not, but the UK is getting a BD release.
Amazon.co.uk: Terminator 2 - Judgment Day [Blu-ray] [1991]: Arnold Schwarzenegger, S. Epatha Merkerson, Linda Hamilton, Robert Patrick, Edward Furlong, Joe Morton, Xander Berkeley, Earl Boen, Jenette Goldstein, Castulo Guerra, James Cameron: DVD |
|
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce
Silverado is one of my favorite movies and I think even to this day one of the best looking Super 35 movies ever made.
Doug |
|
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce
Older Super 35 films might appear a bit more grainy, but they should have considerably more detail than an SD DVD. Mid 80s films such as Silverado and Top Gun are likely to be fairly grainy, but T2 was made after Eastman introduced the t-grain film stocks and should look pretty darn good.
Doug |
| It´s actually the 2-disc French-version (HD DVD), which has "forced" subs with "Theatrical version". "Special Edition" version of the film has optional subs. |
|
Originally Posted by Vincent_P
"A bit more grainy" than what, though. Even "older" Super-35 should look better, all things considered, than a 1.85:1 movie from the same era in High Def, if we're going by the size of the negative as a deciding factor, since the 1.85:1 negative is only around 21mm wide and that will be spread completely across the HD frame, compared to 24mm for Super-35 spread across the same width.
Vincent |
|
Originally Posted by Ed St. Clair
BD25
MPEG2 lossy lack of special features this will go down in history as one of the weakess HDM's ever from a major |
|
Originally Posted by Jesse Blacklow
That's a bit of hyperbole IMO. There were a ton of discs on both sides that had essentially the same specs. For instance, Paramount's Jack Ryan Collection and "Top Gun"--or any Paramount catalog title, really--on HD DVD had poor PQ, no features, and lossy audio as well. Same goes for several early Warner BDs.
|
|
Originally Posted by Dave Moritz
My question now is how long will it take for Lionsgate to remaster Terminator 2 and give it the transfer it deserves? I am not saying the transfer looks horrid but there is room for improvement. And how long will it take them to remaster T2 with a lossless audio track? My reasons for it to be remastered is more for a better audio track, just being honest.
I would like to see T2 have both versions of the film via seamless branching and possibly a 5.1 or 7.1 DTS-HD Master Audio track. Hell I would be thrilled to get a LPCM track or even Dolby True HD. And while the lossy DTS track was good it could be better with lossless. |
|
Originally Posted by Dave H
Just an FYI...
However, it seems the HD DVD version is slightly compressed. They pretty much mirror Zylon's screenshots. High Definition / Standard Definition Battle |
|
Originally Posted by RobertR
Your terminology was a bit confusing. The HDDVD is compressed in the vertical dimension. The way you had expressed it, I thought perhaps you meant codec compression.
|