Re: "DNR" Feature on Panasonic Players...
I always leave DNR systems off. They reduce noise, but at the expense of detail and fluid motion: two of the major advantages of Blu-ray.
But as I said, the DNR when playing DVDs seems to definitely work -- it takes out mosquito and block noise, and it makes it more enjoyable to my eyes -- perhaps I'm just not that sensitive to the detail and fluid motion you mention, but I just like it ON for DVD playback...
The issue comes in with BLU RAY playback...you say the "detail and fluid motion" could be taken out by DNR systems, but when I select ON on the 10A for DNR during BD playback, nothing seems to happen...it doesn't really remove artifacts from "noisy transfers" unless this is just the film grain baked into the signal that I'm seeing. Some seem like dirty "noise" to me though.
Although, I must say: Last night I rewatched
Resident Evil: Apacalypse on Blu ray and ran it with the DNR ON...it seemed (unless it was my eyes seeing something they wanted to see) on this go around with this disc, DNR ON seemed to "smooth" something here and there in some of the scenes -- nowhere near as dramatic as when watching DVDs with DNR ON, but I STILL cannot confirm if DNR works with Blu ray or not.
I used the 'Normal' picture mode and every setting at its neutral position, then made any adjustments in the display.
Normal is Panasonic's default mode and from what I understand is the way to send the video over from the player somewhat "untouched" and at "line level"...outside of that, once you're set in Normal mode, I don't believe there are any more picture settings to make "neutral"...would you recommend Normal over the other modes like Soft, Fine, Cinema or User?
You know what else I had a question about? What about the TRANSFER feature on the 10A? Should this be left on AUTO 1 or AUTO 2? I have been leaving it on AUTO 1 but maybe I should leave it on AUTO 2 so the player can convert the frame rates recorded on these discs?
I moved (involuntarily after a burglary, but it turned out to be a solid upgrade) from a BD10 to a Pioneer BDP-LX70A (that's the Elite BDP-95HD in the US), which has a significantly better Blu-ray picture than the BD10.
...now THIS is very interesting news...and something that has been bothering me about this technology for awhile now...I always wondered if all Blu ray players were "created equal"...that is, should every player simply put out a great high definition picture regardless of price or brand? Here you seem to answer that a little -- you saw a significant upgrade in quality on Blu ray playback by moving from the 10A to the Pioneer...can you give me more specific examples of what made the picture better? I keep thinking this player can do better on the Blu ray front too, as I experience a strange "twitchy, noisy dithering" on Blu rays that was confirmed by an online reviewer who found the same weird characteristic on this '10A player; I can't really put it into words, but the picture quality isn't spectacular even on high definition discs...
What would make players different in this regard? Which players are better than others in terms of outstanding Blu-ray performance? I started a thread on this in the High Definition Hardware section of the site, as I am getting ready to replace my 10A soon and want a new BD player with solid BD playback, good DVD upconversion AND bitstreams TrueHD and Master Audio...