Re: Alfred Hitchcock Premiere Collection - Oct 14, 2008
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rich_d
Russell, I'm happy that you're happy but your post is way off the mark.
Criterion didn't have the distribution rights to Rebecca, Spellbound and Notorious they purchased the rights. If MGM HAD just released these films many a Hitchcock fan would have had a quality release of these films at a lot lower price point. Why should we give MGM a pass on that? So saying that MGM didn't double dip on these titles is nonsense. They just got our money through a transaction with another company, nothing more.
|
Exactly, the old owners of this part of the MGM catalog licensed the titles to Criterion, which means that a huge sweeping chunk of the public probably never knew these were out in the first place. It sucks for YOU, cause your a hobbyist. It's great for those of us who were late to jump on and those same Criterions are now being sold by hobbyists at greatly and irrationally inflated prices. For the new distributors of this catalog, this is a first time release. You'll note that previous distributors were more notorious for just sitting on titles instead of releasing them. I don't think we should fault the new rights owners for doing a kitchen sink release like this.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rich_d
When Universal released their Masterpiece set of Hitchcock titles in 2005, Hitch fans BLASTED them for not releasing those titles individually. Now Universal is trolling for suckers by releasing the big titles yet again before the eventual Blu-Ray release and some of us have commented on that as well.
|
Allot of those complaints stopped when it was seen that there were new transfers being used that improved on the previous editions. Uni also eventually released many of those titles seperately. Most companies will do a deluxe edition of their big sellers so those legacy editions aren't too surprising.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rich_d
It would be one thing if the vast majority of this Hitchcock set was new AND the customer won't regret paying a good chunk of change for it a year later. But, hells bells some for sure are already regretting it with individual releases coming out before six months have gone by. How are they going to feel when this stuff gets released in Blu-Ray?
Face it. There is only one reason that Notorious and some of their other big titles are not being released on Blu-Ray now. That's to hoover some more sucker change before they do.
|
As far as Blu-Ray, everything gets double dipped to Blu-Ray, So get used to it. And no ones forcing anyone to buy any of these titles. Don't be angry with the studios just because you decide to buy every version of every title released.
The studios could be doing this:
Hmm... looks like sales are stagnant on Hitchcock. It would be nice to get more money out of these titles, especially with remasters done for HDTV but the fans hate double dips, let's just sit on these.
Also, it worked out to about $9 a title for me. In the land of double dips, this is hardly the rack of pain screw job that it's being portrayed as.