Re: Star Trek The Next Generation appreciation thread
Nelson Au wrote (post #103):
Quote:
A few thoughts on the fifth Season and favorite episodes; it really felt like a continuation of the fourth, but at a slightly higher level at times. . . .
I think the series peaked here. I've already started to watch Season 6 and it has a lot of favorite episodes, but they seems to deal more with the characters and less with what is Star Trek. What do you guys think?
|
Actually, I believe it peaked in its 4th season (my personal favorite). But it is clear to me that seasons 3, 4, and 5 together form the apex of the seven-year series, which is appropriate (if not most desirable) because these are the seasons right in the middle.
Quote:
|
Darmok is where we see Star Trek for the first time deal with language and communication with an alien race. It's been done before in earlier shows, like the Dixon Hill episode, but this one was much smarter and you get the fullness of character of captain Dathon.
|
Good dramatic story, good monster,
totally faulty premise¹, ². Written, if I recall correctly, by
Joe Menosky, later to become one of the
ST: Voyager regular writing-staffers. He specialized in anthropology-themed, cultural-confrontational stories (including the much maligned "Masks").
Quote:
|
The Game was really well done and a nice show for Wesley's return. Too bad Robin Lefler wasn't used again.
|
The actress, Ashley Judd, went on to a movie career just after this was done. Since Lefler was primarily present to be a coëval cohort of Wesley, who himself was no longer a regular, there wasn't much need of her.
Quote:
|
Reunification is of course a major event in this season.
|
Except that the title of the episode is "Unification".
Quote:
|
Conundrum and Powerplay were both fun episodes where we see the crew behave badly or are taken over. Conundrum was fun, but a sort of weaker version of The Game.
|
"Powerplay" is, again, a near "
creep-classic", but is also an example where "
scientific rationalism" may actually
hurt the story.
Quote:
|
The Outcast I recall was a terrific study of relationships and they finally address the gay issue.
|
And the conclusion is: "
Hurray for 'normalcy'!"
Quote:
|
Cause and Effect was a fun idea . . . .
|
"Cause and Effect"---that's [
ahem!] a Brannon Braga baby---more than any "fun idea", is (action-oriented) "
sci-fi"-tv at its finest. It's "
creepy". It's intelligent. It features specific regular characters in a genuine
sf-context. It's excellently and interestingly directed by Jonathan Frakes. This is what
sf-tv ought to be like at least 50% of the time:
(scientific-)theme- and subject-oriented. (I'd be "in heaven", if I could get this even 1/3 of the time.)
Quote:
|
. . . . one wonders if they could have really sent themselves a message from the other timelines so they could break the pattern.
|
Use of "
mnemonic feedback" in a "temporal loop" to break the cycle seems plausible enough, if you keep in mind all instantiations of repeated events involve near-identical selves, presumably occupying the same or microclose-approximate space in each occurrence, which should facilitate the capability of leaving some kind of electrical impulse, such as a planted thought, in the same space for the next instantiation of the self to intercept. This doesn't strike me as particularly farfetched at all. As with so-called "
directed dreaming", you, the sender, transmit an electric impulse to yourself (or, as in this case, to the next
instantiation of yourself), the receiver, who will shortly come along to occupy the same space and, in high probability, to encounter and receive the transmission. Done recursively, it finally gets through.
That has become a sort of standard "solution" in what has become a
stock "sci-fi" plot (e.g., in the similarly themed
X-Files episode, "
Monday", the
Stargate SG-1 story, "
Window of Opportunity", etc.)
(I could never stay awake during the recursive story of
Groundhog Day (1993), so I don't know how that story is resolved.)
Quote:
|
I thought the Perfect Mate was a really cool concept and was well acted here as the "Mate" imprints herself to Picard, but follows duty and marries the intended leader as a peace offering. But I we learn he has no interest in her, ironic ending.
|
A thematic rehash of "Elaan of Troyus".
Quote:
|
I thought I Borg was pretty good. But I can see now that it looks like the beginnings of the de-clawing of the once mighty Borg.
|
"I was a Teenage(d) Borg."
Quote:
|
The Next Phase was one of my favorites . . .
|
"Bad ol' Braga" strikes again.
Quote:
|
. . . we see Ro and Geordi trying to figure out why they can't be seen by the crew and find they are cloaked.
|
Despite some glaring holes in the science, a very enjoyable episode. Mr. Braga would return to this theme a few times too many for my taste, however, both in
ST:TNG and in series that followed.
Quote:
|
Time's Arrow was a terrific story. I really enjoyed how they use the time travel idea and involve Samuel Clemens and Jack London. The idea of finding Data's head in the future and using it to reattach to Data later was one of those fun time loop ideas that would certainly mess with your brain.
|
Part I promises much as
science fiction: the vista of an alien culture situated in a nonwelcoming asynchronous environment where humans are the "invisible invaders", but part II utterly fails to deliver. It just lapses back into that same old same-old (
SoSo) tired lazy writers' gimmick: "Oh, let's go back to Earth in (American) history and have some fun meeting a bunch of whacky famous-named characters (Jack London, Samuel Clemens,
ad nauseum) in
comforting, familiarly dull surroundings.
One might also mention episode #
122, "Imaginary Friend", for its weird space effects and some creepy moments in anticipation of "when the others come". It, however, "whimps out", as well. [
sigh] Too bad.