Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › TV Programming › Star Trek The Next Generation appreciation thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Star Trek The Next Generation appreciation thread - Page 8

post #211 of 235
Thread Starter 

Thanks Josh, pretty much what I thought the producer did. I just thought the Executive Producer was like the Show Runner.

 

Regarding the Next Gen, I watched Nemesis last night. 

 

I liked it more this time, it was the first time I watched the Blu ray/ Looked great. Sounded great! Always funny to see Data in the films as his make-up is so metallic compared to the TV version. I don't think I can watch Generations. I might watch Insurrection.

 

The thing about these films, especially Nemesis is that they tried too hard to capture the glory of The Wrath of Khan. But more so, I've always said before that the Star Trek property just plays better as a weekly series. If the production values were as high as the films, that would be spectacular. 

 

The weekly format lets them do what TOS did best, explore more ideas and focus on characters. Rather then being a formulaic production of car chase, explosions. Then some space ships flying by, more explosions. Then a battle in a nebula or Bassen Rift or Briar Patch and they kill the bad guy.

 

I watched The Pegasis today, one of the better 7th season shows and that was a much better production! Pretty fun to see Terry O'Quinn before Lost too.

post #212 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson Au View PostThe thing about these films, especially Nemesis is that they tried too hard to capture the glory of The Wrath of Khan. But more so, I've always said before that the Star Trek property just plays better as a weekly series. If the production values were as high as the films, that would be spectacular. 

 


That's from the same studio mentality that gives you nothing but sequels and remakes. If you're not copying something successful, it's not getting funded. I grew very tired, very quickly of Rick Berman promoting every TNG film as having "the best villain since Khan." He said it in regard to Generations, First Contact, Insurrection and Nemesis. Come on, now. TWOK was a great movie, but imitating it over and over is not going to revive the franchise. The original series movies, to their credit, never tried to do that or hyped their other movies as such.

 

I agree that it works better as a weekly show. The realities of the box office make producers think every film that involves space ships must also involve battles and war (or war-like circumstances). What was the last Trek movie that didn't involve war? The Voyage Home? That and The Motion Picture are the only two I can think of, out of 11 movies. As someone who appreciated the original intent of Trek, I am very very tired of wars in space. But what studio is going to put up $200 million for a movie about peaceful discovery?

 

BTW, saw the preview for the new Hawaii 5-0. Can't say I am impressed. Why does every main character have to have a tortured past these days. (In the preview, McGarrett is shown being unable to prevent the murder of his father; he presumably sets out upon revenge. Why does every story these days have to have some deep personal angle? Don't people do anything out of any other motivation?)

post #213 of 235

Star Trek V tried to be about ideas and exploration, even though Paramount wussed out on the original concept for fear of offending anyone.

.

I don't think even something like the TAS episode where Kirk defends a being who looks a lot like Satan would fly today.

 

Nemesis seemed like it was trying to be a Star Wars film at times. That chamber on Shinzon's ship looked a lot like the Emperor's throne room in Jedi, and the phasers sounded like blasters.

 

A clone of Picard who wants to kill billions on Earth simply because he had a horrible childhood is lame. A Data vs.Lore plot would have been more interesting instead of rehashing Spock's death.

 

Not having a movie with Q seems a missed opportunity as well.

post #214 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverWook View Post

Not having a movie with Q seems a missed opportunity as well.


Well, the best Q episodes were usually of a philosophical nature, so it is not surprising that there was no feature. But you're right - I always anticipated that Q would be brought to the movies - after all, reviving a popular adversary from the show was always an effective element for the movies.

post #215 of 235

I see that Corey Allen passed away. He directed the TNG pilot, among other TNG and DS9 installments.

 

http://trekmovie.com/2010/06/29/encounter-at-farpoint-director-allen-dead-at-75/

post #216 of 235

I've decided to put off my DVD journey through the seven seasons of Voyager and go through TNG again first. Watched the premiere and the second episode this weekend. The decision to make the second episode a retread of an original series episode - and a comedy at that! - probably wasn't the best decision to make if they were trying to establish the show as being different from the original. I have to confess I still enjoyed it. 

 

One thing that is apparent though is that the show is badly in need of a video upgrade. Watching these DVDs from 2002, with the show transferred from videotape, shows the limitations of both DVD and videotape. The show appears murky and soft, especially in the darker sequences. If Paramount/CBS wants to keep this (and DS9 and Voyager) around for the ages, it really should invest the time and money into upgrading to HD, even if it means redoing the effects like with TOS. Because 10 or 15 years from now, when everything is in HD, no one is going to want to look at these shows. Even now, barely two years after Blu-Ray won the high def format war, these shows look a bit like a relic. 

post #217 of 235

I have to agree regarding the video.  While it slowly improves throughout the seven year run -- and even looks "pretty good" in seasons 6 and 7 -- it remains "soft" compared with even TV shows from the sixties shot on film.  (Like the initial Star Trek:TOS release to DVD.)  Without a complete remastering which would entail going all the way back to the film source and then re-editing the video and sound for each ep, TNG -- along with DS9 and VOY -- will be ignored by the next generation.  (Ironic, huh?)

 

post #218 of 235

We watched Power Play last night. (That particular disc has some gems on it -- The Masterpiece Society, Ethics, Conundrum, and Power Play.) Brent Spiner, in this episode and in those in which he plays Lore -- really does give the viewer a chill. He's particularly good when he plays an evil character IMO.

post #219 of 235
Thread Starter 

Scott,

 

I think Spiner is an underrated actor! I agree, he was very good in TNG, not to take away from the other actors in Trek.

 

I also think the Star Trek actors were unfortunately getting a raw deal because they were in Star Trek, it seems unless they really stood out, they didn't get the respect they were due. And as such, the work.

 

I think Spiner is also a very funny actor! His take in Data's Day always cracks me up! Especially the stupid face he makes as he tries to dance! 

 

Here's a really funny outtake of Spiner in the TNG blooper reel in case you've not seen it before. Check out the part at 5 mins:30 secs into it.

 

post #220 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson Au View Post


Here's a really funny outtake of Spiner in the TNG blooper reel in case you've not seen it before. Check out the part at 5 mins:30 secs into it.

 

 


Hah!  Awesome.

post #221 of 235

Nelson,

 

Those are some funny clips.  I actually own the TNG blooper reel (on VHS tape), which includes what you've posted here.  I recall years ago that Patrick Stewart wasn't thrilled at having them released.  And if I recall correctly, they were released quite early on during the run of the series.

post #222 of 235
Thread Starter 

Hey Scott, I recall I got that tape in the late 80's too. I had not known Patrick Stewart was not happy about that, but I can see that. You don't want people to see you mess up.

 

The part I really remembered was Spiner doing Jimmy Stewart, that was really good!

post #223 of 235

Have a peek at this TNG Cast Memorandum.  Fun stuff. :)

 

CastofTNG.jpg

 

The Memo That Never Was To Be Seen
November 1, 2006 by Sam Sloan

We were able to get our hands on this little nugget (don’t ask us how) that reveals some interesting behind-the-scenes casting goings-on when STAR TREK: The Next Generation was first proposed back in the late 1980’s. This information might be nearly 20 years old but it still makes for interesting coffee table chat.

This memo was not suppose to ever see the light-of-day, but after almost 20-years who could possibly get their feelings hurt?

The Memo That Never Was To Be Seen

November 1, 2006 by Sam Sloan || Category: TV News We were able to get our hands on this little nugget (don’t ask us how) that reveals some interesting behind-the-scenes casting goings-on when STAR TREK: The Next Generation was first proposed back in the late 1980’s. This information might be nearly 20 years old but it still makes for interesting coffee table chat.

This memo was not suppose to ever see the light-of-day, but after almost 20-years who could possibly get their feelings hurt?

It should be noted that Eric Menyuk did star in episodes of TNG as the Traveler who ended up tutoring Wesley Crusher. Rosalind Chao ended up on TNG and DS9 playing Miles O’Brien’s wife. Cheryl McFadden is the same actress who portrayed Doctor Beverly Crusher, her full name being Cheryl Gates McFadden. Tim Russ went on to star in the motion picture “Star Trek VII: Generations” and became Commander Tuvok on the “Star Trek: Voyager” series.

Several of the other stars listed as possible candidates for main cast parts ended up guest starring in the seven year history of the show.
 
post #224 of 235
Thread Starter 

Yeah, I saw that list on Trekmovie yesterday.That's a real treat to see now!

 

What is puzzling is who is Reggie Jackson, the ball player? 

 

We know the story of how Troi and Tasha Yar's actresses swapped roles so Crosby became Yar instead of Troi and Sirtis became Troi. I can't see Chao as Yar! 

 

And I can't see Wesley Snipes as Geordi. But that's easy to say given we're so used to LeVar Burton! Kevin Peter Hall is a surprise too.

 

Kotto might have been interesting as a Captain, but not Picard.

post #225 of 235

Don't think this has been mentioned around here yet. Someone has posted the "Journey's End" tv special from 1994 on Youtube. AFAIK, this never made it to home video, except in one of the Japanese Laserdisc box sets!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cUNCzu-o9k

post #226 of 235

That is a great find.  I hadn't seen that since it originally aired. 

post #227 of 235
Thread Starter 

Thanks for posting the link. I wonder if I taped that at the time! 

post #228 of 235

If I remember right, between the second to last episode and "All good things" there was a week of no new eps.. our local station ran a marathon, every day at 6, there was an episode, they did the "countdown" of the five most popular episodes ever or something.   But before that, the Saturday before, they aired this.

 

Just a great find.  I'm hoping it shows up on a DVD/BD somewhere.  I also miss the little "behind the scenes" inserts that accompanied each of those five episodes and introductions.  I wish I could find those somewhere.

post #229 of 235

I remember watching this; awesome find, thanks!

post #230 of 235

Wasn't this released on videotape back around '94 or so, before Generations? It certainly was never issued on DVD, but I think it was on VHS.

post #231 of 235
Thread Starter 

I posted this link in the Music section. Here's a preview of the Ron Jones TNG score CD set.

 

http://trekmovie.com/2010/08/31/first-look-at-fsm-ron-jones-project-14-cd-tng-music-box-set-available-for-pre-order/

post #232 of 235

Well, after 12 months (or, 5 months longer than I expected it would take), I finished re-watching TNG on DVD. It was a very enjoyable experience, and you can really appreciate how a show evolves and changes when you watch it straight through on a regular basis. It seems to have started out with low expectations of itself, only to really burst out in the middle of its second year and then again in its third season and beyond. But by the seventh year, the show really slowed down. Far too many retreads on the "what is reality" (a favorite of one of the writers) and other weak storylines. I think Rick Berman summed it up well in one of the documentary features on the 7th season set: He said by TNG's last season, they were producing not just TNG, but DS9 as well, on a weekly basis, were in pre-production on Generations and were developing Voyager. It's no wonder the work suffered. The studio may have simply been asking too much of the creative people behind the shows.

 

I came out of this viewing with renewed appreciation for Stewart, Frakes and Spiner, who are consistently good. Sadly, Burton, McFadden and Sirtis are never really given enough to do (but are very good when they are). And Dorn really shows the greatest growth on the show, starting out as pretty much a one-note background character, and quickly growing into part of the ensemble and eventually becoming the most complex and interesting character on the show. It is further a shame that he was never given a chance to shine in the feature films (although I suppose they felt he was doing that on DS9).

 

There's a thread in the blu-ray TV section about TNG being remastered and coming to BD. That can only be a good thing. Maybe it will shake loose CBS/Paramount into one last voyage of this crew.

post #233 of 235
Sam,

We just started both TNG and ENT again. We're about four or five episodes into both series at this time.

Did you watch the show in production or air order? Just curious. I am choosing to watch them in production order, although I've been told over the years that it really does not matter all that much with TNG.
post #234 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ockeghem View Post

Sam,

We just started both TNG and ENT again. We're about four or five episodes into both series at this time.

Did you watch the show in production or air order? Just curious. I am choosing to watch them in production order, although I've been told over the years that it really does not matter all that much with TNG.


Watched them in broadcast order, but you're right - it doesn't matter much (unless you consider that Unification II was before Unification I). We watched the whole of Enterprise last year, before TNG. I really enjoyed that - it left me with a much greater appreciation for that show than I had when it aired. In a few weeks, I will start watching Voyager, a show I haven't seen at all since it aired and one that I didn't care for the first time. We'll see if this changes my opinion at all; I am hoping it will. Watched TOS-remastered and all of DS9 a few years ago, and am eager to do so again. 

 

 

post #235 of 235
Sam,

I too had a much greater appreciation for ENT when I watched it again a few years after it first aired. That series (IMO) really is a show one ought to view on DVD. The network airing of the show did not do it justice. Besides the obligatory screen clutter, I didn't find the audio all that satisfying at the time. The DVDs seem to clean up and/or enhance both aspects nicely.

Yeah, once we're through with ENT and TNG, we'll probably move on to viewing DS9 and VOY again. (I watch an episode of TOS just about every night before I hit the sack, and I also watch that series and TAS with my children on a regular basis. So there's really no need for me to go through those two series systematically all that often.)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: TV Programming
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › TV Programming › Star Trek The Next Generation appreciation thread