post #151 of 212
7/29/08 at 5:29pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by Joe_G
Maybe I'm just not seeing it, but has there been mention of how the box sets will be made up? Will each film have it's individual case or will they be like the Die Hard series - one case housing all of the discs included in the set.
|
| Since their official announcement last month, details and cover art for the upcoming James Bond Blu-ray discs have started to come in. The special features that will accompany the first six Bond titles (Dr. No, From Russia With Love and Thunderball, Live and Let Die, For Your Eyes Only and Die Another Day) have now been confirmed in a press release. The listing of extras should look pretty familiar to most 007 fans as it’s merely the special features that debuted on the Ultimate Edition DVDs carried over. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment did confirm to TheHDRoom that the special features would be presented in high-definition. |
|
Originally Posted by Jesse Blacklow
DVDTimes is reporting that the Director/Producer commentary will be Bonus View (i.e., PiP) on the new "Casino Royale" SE. It will also be a 2-disc set, which pretty much guarantees the special features (which are supposedly all of the ones from the DVD SE) will be in HD.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jesse Blacklow
DVDTimes is reporting that the Director/Producer commentary will be Bonus View (i.e., PiP) on the new "Casino Royale" SE. It will also be a 2-disc set, which pretty much guarantees the special features (which are supposedly all of the ones from the DVD SE) will be in HD.
|
|
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce
Unless the second disc is common to both sets ala Blade Runner and is just an SD DVD.
|
Extras for this release include:
|
| The James Bond Collection Volume One includes Dr. No, Live and Let Die, and Die Another Day. Click here to pre-order 007 Volume One from Amazon.com for only $62.95. The James Bond Collection Volume Two includes From Russia With Love, Thunderball, and For Your Eyes Only. Click here to pre-order 007 Volume Two from Amazon.com for only $62.95. |
|
Originally Posted by RobertR
That's AWFUL packaging. Why the hell did they split up the Connery films??
|
|
Originally Posted by Sam Favate
To get someone to buy the likes of A View To A Kill and Die Another Day.
|
|
Originally Posted by TravisR
I know it was a while back but I thought they had planned to release the movies by themselves too. The only reason I remember that is because I just assumed that they'd release them in sets at first (like every DVD release).
|
|
Originally Posted by TonyD
who said they aren't?
i have them in my cart on amazon, the 6 movie set is aout $30 cheaper then the individuals. |
|
Originally Posted by TravisR
Nobody did but no one has to buy the box sets if they don't want to either. Like Sam said, they split the Connery movies up in box set form to sell the less popular movies but at least you don't have to spend the extra money (even if it's not that much more money than the singles) on something you don't want.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jesse Blacklow
Are we now at the point that, if we can't bitch about the films being forced on us as a bundle, that we now have to bitch about them not being in a bundle?
|
|
Originally Posted by Jesse Blacklow
Let's not forget that Connery's relationship with the Bond series is rocky at best, up to and including making an unsanctioned Bond movie. There's a bunch of obstacles to jump in this case that were pretty unlikely to be resolved. |
| And of course, "desirable" is a completely subjective term that changes from person to person and film to film. |
|
Originally Posted by Zack Gibbs
Why not just put out chronological sets...
|
|
Originally Posted by RobertR
What the hell does that have to do with the choice of what movies to include in a box set? The "bitch", as you call it, is about price, not Connery's "relationship" or whether or not there should be box sets.
|
| Please. If you're trying to tell me that these particular bundles were chosen to satisfy the subjective desires of someone who wanted just that combination, I don't buy it for a millisecond. |
| The choice of movies does have to do with Connery's relationship, whether you like it or not. |
| I'm saying your subjective desires are pissing you off about the bundles, not anyone elses. |
|
Originally Posted by RobertR
Connery's relationship had nothing to do with the choice of these particular bundles. You know it and everyone else knows it.
|
| I think I'm hardly the only person who would prefer to have the Connerys together. |
| I'm saying that the Connery issue would affect any bundling, not these particular ones. |
| there's a lot of logistics standing in the way of making that happen. |
|
Originally Posted by Jesse Blacklow
Are we now at the point that, if we can't bitch about the films being forced on us as a bundle, that we now have to bitch about them not being in a bundle?
Let's not forget that Connery's relationship with the Bond series is rocky at best, up to and including making an unsanctioned Bond movie. There's a bunch of obstacles to jump in this case that were pretty unlikely to be resolved. Plus, a Connery package would have skipped over a movie. On top of that, if they did it for him, then everyone would have to have one, which would lead to "packs", none of which would be the same size: 6 (Bond), 1 (Lazenby), 7 (Moore), 2 (Dalton), and 4 (Brosnan). And of course, "desirable" is a completely subjective term that changes from person to person and film to film. The number of people who like Moore's run is probably close to that of Connery's for instance. |


