Re: The Fugitive, Season Two Volume 1 - Reviews
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Carabimero
I guess all we're left with is source credibility. And why not? An argument could be made for believing a CBS spokesperson over a reporter from Variety. Having said that, an argument could be made for believing a Variety reporter over, say, me for example, especially if I constantly repeated myself in posts, or incessantly tried to "one-up" other posters or felt compelled to continually clarify their posts, or if I came into a thread having never seen the show or the modifications made to it and presumed to discuss them with authority.
The great thing about a message board is that, over time, the sum of a person's posts eventually speaks for itself. |
Thank you for saying it. I'm not responding to him. I received a very nice PM warning me about this guy - apparently this is his M.O.
However, just to reiterate, no composer of TV music EVER retained rights to the use of his music in that show. EVER. It's not a guess, it's not a supposition - work for hire is very simple - no rights except the writer's share of the royalties. I'm not the one guessing - I called ASCAP and spoke to an acquaintance there just to reiterate and make certain I wasn't losing my sanity to some guy who just comes on and posts the same thing over and over and over without any knowledge whatsoever. This poster didn't even know what Unart was - he thought it might be Rugolo's publishing company and he didn't know Capitol had a production music library of underscoring cues. He's never seen the show, but on and on he posts. But it obviously gives him pleasure to bleat out the same line. As you say, over time, the sum of a person's posts speaks for itself. Time is the great leveler.




