post #31 of 213
6/4/08 at 1:05pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by AL KEUNSTER
The upconversion with the new Oppo players bring out as much as I believe possible from the SDDVD's, not sure that Toshiba can do better!
|
|
Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein
John,
The political analogy was not necessary. I understand what you were trying to say, but I wish you did it without going there. |
| ...If you introduce a player that can produce picture quality that rivals BD, at a cheaper price, it could be a "Blu-ray killer" of sorts. |
| At this point, with Blu-ray being as expensive as it is, the public isn't looking to replace the large libraries of DVDs in their homes. |
| On the plus side, this new Toshiba entry will force Blu-ray to lower their prices on hardware and software ... |
| I really don't blame Toshiba for doing what they are doing. They have technology that will make standard DVDs look remarkably comparable to Blu-ray. Why would anyone not want something like this in their home? |
|
Originally Posted by Scooter
On another forum, someone mentioned something like this. Using the example of hybrid SACD's that would play on standard CD players. Thus a Super-DVD being backward compatible is feasible.
|
|
Originally Posted by Stephen_J_H
What is going to happen here is possible consumer confusion...
|
|
Originally Posted by Scooter
It is absolutely known as the HD format.....
The variable is....is it worth the expense. |
|
Originally Posted by Hanson Yoo
Don't be so quick to dismiss Toshiba's claims of "as good as HD". Think about this:
1080p is just a number. 1080p does not look any better (or even different) than 720p if you factor in typical display size and viewing distance. Unless you're display is greater than 60" or you sit closer than 8-9 feet, you will not be able to discern the difference between 720p and 1080p. Say you have a 40" display and sit 12 feet from it. I doubt that there is much perceived visual difference between 480p and 720p. The reall difference is the color -- HD color is much more vibrant and dyamic than SD. If Toshiba's chip can interpolate or even fake this color difference, most people won't see the difference without doing A/B tests or watching test patterns. If you put your nose against your 60" plasma, you may easily see the difference between 1080p and 480p through the Toshiba player. But 12' away from a 40" display? Not so much. Don't get too wrapped up in the numbers. |
|
Originally Posted by RickER
Well, jeez, i could say the same thing about video tape then. If i wanted to sit 1/2 mile from my TV.
|
|
Originally Posted by Scott-S
I watch a lot of older TV shows on DVD. There is no magic way to make them "High Def".
|
|
Originally Posted by Scott-S
There is absolutely no way to get a "better or equal" picture quality from a 480p source. Except maybe in Marketing land.
|
|
Originally Posted by Scott-S
All of the current BD players upconvert SD DVDs now so what is new about this toshiba announcement?
|
| so what is new about this toshiba announcement? |
|
Originally Posted by Stephen_J_H
It probably won't be, but the real question is whether it will be good enough to convince J6P and JWiaB that they don't need BD.
|
| See the thing is J6P still thinks he is getting HD from DVD, just cause he has an LCD. I am sure they think the cable has magically become HD as well. |
|
Originally Posted by Hanson Yoo
J6P has a 38" LCD set in his entertainment center and uses TV speakers. Is that Bluray player going to be that much better than his DVD player?
|
|
Originally Posted by Scott-S
Whatever "magic" they digitally pull, they will be guessing about what should be there. In essence, they are digitally enhancing it. I thought most here are apposed to digital enhancement.
|
|
Originally Posted by Scott-S
Also, the extra horsepower to do this magic guessing means more hardware costs. DSP and FPGAs are very expensive. By the time Toshiba had a product on the shelf, BD players will be under $200.
So I am not sure thier plan will ever work. Would you pay $189 for a "tru" HD blu-ray picture, or $399 for one that guesses about the missing information? |
|
Originally Posted by RickER
Cant say i am closed minded to it, just askin who is it for?
|
|
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben
I give this zero chance of going anywhere, because there are only two possibilities:
M. |
|
Originally Posted by Jason Seaver
once it's developed, it will likely also wind up in HDTVs (maybe making the digital channels on my cable system look less like complete ass)
|