Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

*** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread - Page 8

post #211 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by cafink
Surely the statute of limitations on unmarked spoilers has passed by now-- War of the Worlds is 110 years old!

Well, "spoilers" usually apply to (almost) every film, it´s just basic thing to do in the forums ("Better be safe than sorry"). Adding those tags will take 20 seconds, at least in this forum. I guess this is one reason why I don´t read these "new movies" threads before actually seeing the film myself. And probably all the other films by the same director, it seems..

But carry on. Not the end of the world...

Back to Indy4.
post #212 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Deleted because of unreliable source.
post #213 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

I never experienced audio dropouts when I saw the film. Where did the information come from that Paramount chose to use audio dropouts as a anti-piracy measure?

I think the idea is absurd. Even if it did identify the theatre where an illegal recording was made, so what? How can the theatre be held liable? It's not like theatres condon illegal recording by handycam. How do they stop someone who is determined to sneak a video camera into a theatre? Search everyone? I'll stop going to the theatre if they ever institute that practice.
post #214 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Just got home from a free viewing of this (my bank invited all of their customers). Nice bank

SPOILERS AND RANDOM THOUGHTS BELOW!

All in all I was pretty pleased with the movie. I really liked the dessert intro sequennce with the nuclear detonation. It was very compelling.

I do however think that many things were too far fetched even for an Indy flick: Surviving a nuclear blast in a refrigerator when houses are obliterated. The cliché of Indy dodging bullets when he was clearly and beyond doubt in their path just to mention a few.
The chase/fight scene in the jungle dragged on forever without carrying the story forward other than physically. Ok they are fighting and chasing, we get it already! It was dissappointing to see the amount of CGI used. It surely looked fake! Especially the vegetation hitting Mutt as he was ballancing on the two cars.

I also think the whole alien thing demanded a lot better explanation. Why did they come down here? What was their motivation? They were just sort of...there. Huh?!
I think the ending sequence was kind of a letdown. The movie spend quite some time setting up expectations for the big money shot of a huge golden city and what do we get - a stinking cave! Bummer.
The scenes I have always liked most about Indy are the ones where he is thinking out loud while piecing puzzles together, and there weren't too many of those. They need to put this franchise to rest and come up with something new now. But is Hollywood even capable of that anymore. There aren't even any superstars anymore. Where's the next Harrison Ford or Arnold? Shia Le...whatever as Indy....mmmkay
post #215 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Greetings Gents.

Crystal Skull...hmmm...disappointed in it. Kind of fun some of the time but you know some things I've stated in the past are used here: There's got to be a solid story that we care about or everything else is viewed with a harsher critical eye. Like alot of us here, we wanted to like it remembering how great the others were and how much they've meant to us over the years.

Nostalgia can only go so far though. I have similar feelings about Narnia-Prince Caspian. Not a terrible film but one that I found myself not really caring about. I need a reason to be concerned...get me sucked in and I'll forgive the flaws etc...

Indy 4 had me pulling for Ford, and found me pleasantly surprised how good Shia is...but the story didn't make a connection with me. When that happened early on, then the "cooler" stuff doesn't resonate like it's meant too.

Timobi
post #216 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Edwin, I heard the audio going funky at times. I thought it was just me but I didn't want to mention it with my Mum who was visiting with me. Sucks Paramount has gone to this low.
I agree with the sentiments the films needs to be seen again to fully appreciate it. I mean I did really enjoy KotCS but it was a nostalgia kick AND not getting a full nights rest.
Saw it on Tuesday with the thing in my brain saying, He's fought in World War II, experienced even more shit between LC and this film, it's the late 1950's with the big Red Scare going on, the Atomic Age, more paranoia in the country and other factors. AND the fact the "1930's-set" Trilogy was more based upon the 1930's serials of the time. Comparing to KotCS having elements of the 30's (timeframe)/80's (production) series, I looked at it as the film jumping almost two decades and more being based upon the 50's sci-fi low budget adventure.
I'm glad every film in the series is different. My gripes? Lemme tell you. The previous three films got longer in running time with each succesive one. So KotCS should've been the longest one in length, to go with that statement. Where the hell was Short Round? I was expecting a cameo or mention of Wan Li at least while Indy was talking with the Jim Broadbent character. In The Lost Journal, there's a telegram thing from him that he's tracked down The Peacock's Eye (that diamond Lao Che "gives" to Indy in exchange for the Ashes of Nurhachi) on an island in the Hawaiian Island Chain. Seeing as Shorty looked up to Indy and followed in his footsteps in becoming an archaeologist. Why is it throughout all four films the settings are more in warmer climates? I wanted to see Indy in colder climates i.e. Nepal in RotLA. Y'know, to break "formula" of the previous films.
Something about me being a bit tired and not feeling fully rested the day I saw it I think screwed with my inherent full judgment of the film. So for right now, the series in terms of order of preference are:

Raiders of the Lost Ark
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (Nearly tops Raiders for the pure chemistry between Harrison and Sean. First one I saw in cinemas when I was 10 back in 1989 so I think I'm biased. I did see Raiders on a friends Betamax player though. Asked him if there were anymore Adventures of Indy on film. Then we watched Temple of Doom.)
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (My biggest complaint is the film should've taken place in 1934 instead of 1935. That way it'd give the series an in two year chronological gap between them. I do of course highly enjoy ToD but it also has to do with it feeling like a natural successor to GUNGA DIN.)
Oh, I felt Mutt was a fairly cool character and didn't come off as annoying. Might be his phobia are scorpions compared to Indiana, Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
his father
, fear of snakes? Should've had Indy mention to Jim Broadbents character, in 1945 and 1946 respectively, of going after the Spear of Destiny with his Father and the Iron Phoenix-related thing. Being as Indiana, in The Iron Phoenix comic and also The Infernal Machine videro game, his adversaries were Russians. Meaning I would've liked a little nod towards the other media in a throwaway during a conversation.

I think I'm also biased towards the first three since they feel like an old glove that's comfortable. I did grin ear-to-ear at times for the Indiana Jones stuff but it felt weird seeing him on the silver screen again. I did see a Midnight showing of RotLA, ToD and LC awhile ago. Even did an Indiana Jones marathon the two days leading up to me going seeing KotCS.
So right now, I'll give it a 4/5 with a more accurate score when I go see it again. Oh, trust me when I'll buy the DVD I'll do marathons with the series.
Now I've had a few days to reflect on it, damn I had a great time and literally can't wait to see it again. I felt like I was 10 again seeing Indy on the big screen for the first time. And of course the prints for those midnight showing had bits of scenes which aren't on the 2003 OAR set I own.
Here's hoping the three get together for an Indy V. Hopefully this time a prequel to KotCS AND more colder climates dammit!

Anyone else get the feeling this ought've been the fifth Indiana Jones film? I mean if Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis were also made into a high quality film, KotCS would've had a slightly tighter script and of course the longest running time in the series.
For the running time thing I mentioned. Here it goes for each one in the series:
Raiders of the Lost Ark - 115
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom - 118
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade - 126
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull - 124

So in fact, since the next film in the series has longer running times, KotCS should've clocked in at 130 minutes. Of course to keep in the series theme the next film has a longer running time compared to the previous. IF FoA were made into a film back in 1992, it would've been delegated into the 130m approximate mark. Then KotCS would've been more along the lines of nearing 135m. So FoA could've been 130m and KotCS 134m. Since each succesive film in the series compared to the previous is only longer by a few minutes. Bit overgeeky but oh well. So in those terms, KotCS should've been slightly longer in running time comparing to Last Crusade and not the other way around where in fact KotCS is actually shorter by two minutes.
So in fact it does ring true when I said it should've been slightly longer in running time compared to The Last Crusade.

Indiana Jones 5? Colder climates, prequel with it being a few years before KotCS, probably a mystical Buddhist or Asiatic artifact, Russkies again, Sophia Hapgood (maybe?), Babylonian mebbe? (Infernal Machine with Marduk) and a more cold weather gear Indiana. And film outside of the US again! Well, this could be more suitable for a possible Animated Adventures of Indiana Jones series. The only other adventure we've had with Indiana in the 1950's were the bookends for The Mystery of the Blues. And you honestly wanna know? Indy and other characters mentioning all that different stuff for World War II has me Jonesing, pun VERY intended, to see in media form those missions and stuff. I've always wondered what Indiana Jones did in WWII. Of course there are a few comics and such from the 1990's but I'd love to see Dark Horse tackle a story with Indiana Jones in an adventure in WWII as per mentioned in the film. Hell, I'd love the new 3D Indy game LucasArts is working on to go in that direction.

Oh! And my second viewing will be on this upcoming Monday. I'll get a full nights rest too!

EDIT: Last but not least. If I were to be given the choice for either watching Star Wars or Indiana Jones, I pick Indy every single time. Yes, my preference leans far more toward Indiana Jones in comparison to Star Wars. Too bad there's just a glut of SW recently and it makes me have zero interest to watch that Clone Wars movie in cinemas. I'd rather rent it on Netflix. Yes, I'm much more of a fan of Indiana Jones compared to Lucasfilms other series. But it's a close preference where at the end of the day, I still go for Indiana Jones in terms of my collecting.
post #217 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Great to have you back, Tim!
post #218 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Thanks Larry.
post #219 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Holy shit WTF you been.

--
H
post #220 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holadem
Holy shit WTF you been.
Ditto, sucker.
post #221 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Mayer
Ditto, sucker.
Can this be kept to After Hours please? This thread is aboot the new Indiana Jones movie/film/jobby!

By the way, maybe he went on a super long vacation? After hours please!

And maybe some comments about my topics I brought up?
post #222 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray_R
Can this be kept to After Hours please? This thread is aboot the new Indiana Jones movie/film/jobby!

By the way, maybe he went on a super long vacation? After hours please!

And maybe some comments about my topics I brought up?
Being an ass is certainly not gonna help in that regard (neither does using a tiny font.) Timobi is an esteemed member here and a few posts welcoming him back aren't gonna ruin the thread.

--
H
post #223 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Thanks guys. To make this 'thread' related I've actually been away for awhile working with GL on the script for Indiana Jones. Obviously, he didn't use my draft.
post #224 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Glover
Thanks guys. To make this 'thread' related I've actually been away for awhile working with GL on the script for Indiana Jones. Obviously, he didn't use my draft.
NO YOU WEREN'T TIM! You were abducted by and party hardied! Don't lie! Had fun though?

So, uh, what do people think is gonna be on the DVD and Blu-ray in terms of extras? I'm pondering the first disc is of course gonna be the film with lossless audio with some subtitled trivia track. Disc two should be the extras, including all the storyboards, concept art, set designs and such. Of course having it in three main sections would be great too. First more for the film and the action with the production. Second with the special effects and such. Third just everything else.
Here's hoping it'll have the poster art! Oh, and how about a booklet while we're at it?
post #225 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Welcome back, Tim.
post #226 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent M
Welcome back, Tim.
djtto ditto
post #227 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Welcome back to one of the very nicest HTF members.
post #228 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Man I can't tell you how nice it is to be back and to have such warm posts about my return. Seriously, it's very, very kind. This is my first time to be back on the HTF since last October so I just read this entire thread. And no, I am not dead. Zach's post was a tad freaky though.

My absence wasn't as long as Indy's though to make this thread related. Just so there are no misconceptions: I was not banned or asked to leave, just had a litte trouble logging on. No juicy story to tell. I was going to say that I went back and watched Attack Of The Clones another 32 times but then Zach would have been correct about my death. hehehehe

Seriously, I have GREATLY missed the passionate, polite, & intelligent discussions about The Movies with you all. Talk about a personal movie discussion void? Hey I need to trademark that statement! PMDV syndrome.

Wonderful to be among fellow film lovers again.

Tim
post #229 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Tim, glad to have you back. Your review aptly sums up my feelings of the film after one viewing. I did warm up to it after viewing number 2.
post #230 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Thanks Chris. I plan on taking in another viewing this weekend.

Let me add on to what Chuck M. wrote regarding Karen Allen. She did look out of place. Just didn't look right. I was excited in learning she was returning and on paper it probably worked. But something about her affect wasn't natural?

I do think Harrison still has IT though. Regardless of the poor script, Ford is still a Screen Gem.
post #231 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Glover
Let me add on to what Chuck M. wrote regarding Karen Allen. She did look out of place. Just didn't look right. I was excited in learning she was returning and on paper it probably worked. But something about her affect wasn't natural?

I blame the script. I just don't think her dialogue matched the character from the first movie.
post #232 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Glover
I do think Harrison still has IT though..

I have to agree. He didn´t "fail" IMO. Age didn´t matter that much.

It´s just, that probably several other actors were somewhat "underused" (is that the correct word?). Karen Allen was slightly rusty and they didn´t fully used the great potential of Ray Winstone (same thing with "The Departed", IMO). Cate Blanchett was good, but not very memorable villain (usually you´ll at least remember the villains) and Shia LaBeouf did his "own thing" (not THAT special). John Hurt was pretty good, but his character was a bit odd (in more ways than one.. ).

Like I said, don´t get me wrong, this was pure entertainment and I was being entertained, but there were minor issues here-and-there that could´ve been polished - script wise, at least. The truth probably is, that in the end they chose the "more mediocre" script (kinda got "blind" to these various screenplays over the years).

But I guess I´m not following my "own rule". With certain films, it´s probably best not to "over-analyse" too much...

(I still blame Lucas.. )
post #233 of 434

Re: Interesting new Indiana Jones 4 news

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jari K
No spoilers tags? I mean you tell the whole ending of the film... And this is "Indy4"-thread after all (people come to read the thread after seeing the film, but they might not have seen WotW..)

Sorry. I didn't realize after 110 years that there was anyone who didn't know the ending of the novel.

Doug
post #234 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray_R
NO YOU WEREN'T TIM! You were abducted by and party hardied! Don't lie! Had fun though?

So, uh, what do people think is gonna be on the DVD and Blu-ray in terms of extras? I'm pondering the first disc is of course gonna be the film with lossless audio with some subtitled trivia track. Disc two should be the extras, including all the storyboards, concept art, set designs and such. Of course having it in three main sections would be great too. First more for the film and the action with the production. Second with the special effects and such. Third just everything else.
Here's hoping it'll have the poster art! Oh, and how about a booklet while we're at it?

I imagine all the video content from indianajones.com will be on the DVD/blu-ray.

Doug
post #235 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Welcome back, Tim.

I haven't seen IJ4 yet, but I'm glad it's basically what I expected: entertaining and fun as always.
Keep the opinions coming, guys! Happy to read your experiences.


Cees
post #236 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
I never experienced audio dropouts when I saw the film. Where did the information come from that Paramount chose to use audio dropouts as a anti-piracy measure?

That was the explanation from the theater manager I complained to when I saw the film opening day and it had drop-outs. He claimed to have an email from Paramount saying this was the case.

Fact of the matter is that he was either lying or didn't know what he was talking about. As I pointed out, his theater had sound drop-outs during the previews too, so it wasn't just the print of the movie. Also, I have since seen the movie elsewhere, and there were no drop-outs. The theater manager was honest enough to refund my money for the 7 tickets I purchased for opening day.
post #237 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Favate
That was the explanation from the theater manager I complained to when I saw the film opening day and it had drop-outs. He claimed to have an email from Paramount saying this was the case.

Fact of the matter is that he was either lying or didn't know what he was talking about. As I pointed out, his theater had sound drop-outs during the previews too, so it wasn't just the print of the movie. Also, I have since seen the movie elsewhere, and there were no drop-outs. The theater manager was honest enough to refund my money for the 7 tickets I purchased for opening day.

Sounds like he was handing you a load of B.S. so he wouldn't have to refund your money for a technical problem. He probably already knew that they were having a problem, and wouldn't have a tech out to fix it for several days, so they have a "story" to tell people who complain. I remember being told one time that Spartacus was out of focus because it was "an old film".

The studio might put a particular sound on the prints that is almost inaudible, but they wouldn't put a full out drop out.

Doug
post #238 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

RE: the jungle chase.

Can someone explain to me why they still had roads to drive/chase on after Indy obliterated the jungle cutter with an RPG?
post #239 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Just saw my second viewing last night. Still holds up fine for me. Really, there are only a couple issues I have with it:

a) Harrison's weak readings in the opening - does not "sound like Indy"
b) Too much apparent cooperation between Indy and the Russians (opening scene and at the jungle camp)

Other than that, I like the movie just fine. It doesn't have anymore "issues" for me than does ToD or TLC.
post #240 of 434

Re: *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Atkins
RE: the jungle chase.

Can someone explain to me why they still had roads to drive/chase on after Indy obliterated the jungle cutter with an RPG?

They had roads because of the timing of the flux capacitor, in relation to the gyroscopic stabilization of the dingus. You see the roads are created via the energy released from the vortex.

This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. The broadcasters of your area in voluntary cooperation with the Federal, State and local authorities have developed this system to keep you informed in the event of an emergency.

If this had been an actual emergency, the Attention Signal you just heard would have been followed by official information, news or instructions. This concludes this test of the Emergency Broadcast System.

Doug
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › *** Official Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Discussion Thread