Re: A few words about...™ The Longest Day -- in Blu-Ray
I posted this to another site within the past day, and realized that it belongs as an attachment here.
It is a direct link to Patton, but attempts to explain my general position at this point in time.
***************************
Blu-ray was, from the outset, designed to be a multi-functional system capable of serving many masters.
Combined with the PS3, it becomes a superlative gaming system.
Played back on that same PS3, or any Blu players, it can offer a totally immersive and perfectly honed rendition of film (cinema) as a digital video product.
Because of its huge data handling capabilities, compression becomes much less of a problem, and along with that the need to reduce, no less remove, the original grain structure of a motion picture.
If the consumer, as a matter of personal preference, determines that they like to view some or all older motion pictures encoded to Blu with a slightly softer appearance, the system can handle that request with the simple turn of a digital dial.
The Blu-ray system stands as a consummate achievement of modern technology in its ability to do many things, and to do them very, very well.
As I see it, the only thing that can damage or destroy its commercial image is a run of software that prohibits the system from doing the job that it was designed to do -- that being the replication of the theater experience in a home setting at the highest level of reproduction and purity.
And this is where some of the most current releases fail the system as well as the consumer.
Blu-ray discs are too expensive to allow the public to be complacent about quality, when quality is all to easy to achieve.
I believe that we've reached a plateau in development cycle, where transfers that are "good enough" or films that have been heavily digitized are no longer viable.
RAH