Re: Criterion announces first Blu-ray titles
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brandon Conway
It would indeed be bad for business, as other filmmakers would see that Criterion does not heed their wishes, and would be far less likely to work with Criterion. For the *one* title that had a filmmaker approved changed people wring their hands over (which is their right), you have dozens upon dozens of other titles with the participation of the fimmakers that have led to releases beyond criticism. It's no surprise that Criterion holds to the policy.
|
Well, not *all* possible alternative solutions would necessarily lead to that problem though.
For instance, consider what I suggested above. With that suggestion, *IF* Criterion felt *strongly* (that the filmmaker is wrong) about a particularly exceptional case, then they can always just choose to *not* release the title at all until some other time when agreement can be reached. IMO, there's nothing particularly wrong w/ that approach nor should it necessarily scare away other filmmakers from wanting to work w/ Criterion as long as they do that very rarely and very judiciously (and provide a good explanation to all in each such case).
And yes, your (underlying implication, whether intended or not) is correct. Criterion cannot really make everyone happy all the time. And that's not what I'm asking them to do. But I'm questioning the policy of trying to make the filmmakers happy *all* the time regardless of how wrong a particular filmmaker may be.
Basically, IMHO, what this boils down to is whether Criterion's ultimate goal is simply to *blindly* make filmmakers happy (in this process) or to actually do justice to the films themselves.
_Man_