Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Other Diversions › After Hours Lounge › 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

2008 NBA Playoffs Thread - Page 2

post #31 of 99
5/18/08 at 4:47pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

Well, it's the Celtics vs. the Pistons, as has been anticipated for most of the season. I'm not as confident as Brandon, though. This should be a close matchup, and Boston's struggles on the road in the playoffs could benefit Detroit if they can steal one of the first two games in Boston. However, after the disappointment of the last two conference finals, I'm not getting my hopes up this time. I'll just be pleasantly surprised if the Pistons beat Boston.

It's too bad that Game 1 starts at 8:30pm due to the draft lottery (does anyone really care about this?). I'll probably be sleeping when the game ends. Come on, David Stern. Start the eastern games at a time that fans in the East can deal with!
Reply
post #32 of 99
5/21/08 at 10:48pm
Thread Starter 

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

There I go again, underestimating the Spurs. In Game 1, they controlled the tempo, dominated the first 30 minutes of the game, contained Odom, the final score was exactly the kind of number they like, and Tim Duncan was heroic. They should have won.

But Kobe is an assassin, Manu was a non-factor, and the Spurs scored 20 points in the last 18 minutes of the game. That's why they lost.

Make no mistake, this series is going to be a war. But damn, it's hard to see how the Lakers can play a worse overall game than this one, and they still won.
Reply
post #33 of 99
5/22/08 at 8:50pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

And poof goes the home court advantage for the Celtics. I think the fans of the NBA are going to be very lucky with the two conference finals as well as whoever ends up in the finals. Should be fun the whole way. Oh, by the way, IMHO, Doc Rivers=Not a good coach.
Reply
post #34 of 99
5/23/08 at 4:54am

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

The pressure is definitely on the Celtics these next two games since they have yet to win on the road in the playoffs. However, the Pistons have already proven this playoff season that they are capable of losing at home, just like they can win on the road. I'm expecting a split of the next two games at The Palace. This series is going at least 6 games.
Reply
post #35 of 99
5/23/08 at 7:29am

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

Another crazy stat for you: when Phil Jackson wins the first game of a playoff series, he is 40-0 in those series.

Having said that, I think tonight is a must-win for LA.
Reply
post #36 of 99
5/25/08 at 8:23pm
Thread Starter 

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

The Spurs played beautifully tonight, and the Lakers were atrocious in all phases of the game. If the Lakers don't come out with more aggression in Game 4, this series may go 7.

Wow, the Celtics won a road game. I'm actually kind of shocked. You Pistons fans know your team better than I do, but the Celtics have looked very mortal in the playoffs so far. Can/will the Pistons pull it off?
Reply
post #37 of 99
5/25/08 at 8:41pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

It's tough to tell. The game last night for the Pistons was due to the fact that they just couldn't hit the shot. I think it goes seven as well.
Reply
post #38 of 99
5/26/08 at 7:21am

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan H
Wow, the Celtics won a road game. I'm actually kind of shocked. You Pistons fans know your team better than I do, but the Celtics have looked very mortal in the playoffs so far. Can/will the Pistons pull it off?

Billups appears to still be injured, and he matched up well against Rondo when healthy. So, the Pistons have lost one of their favorable match-ups. Since Boston probably will no longer be pressing as much on the road now that they've actually won a game, I think the Celtics will end up winning the series. I hope the Pistons prove me wrong, though.
Reply
post #39 of 99
5/26/08 at 5:17pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

The Pistons MUST attack the rim, especially with Stucky and Rasheed. For me that is the key to this series, attack attack attack, draw fouls, hit your free throws and expose Rondo. Kevin Garnetts ability to hit long fade away jumpers still amazes me to this day. What a talent. I hope he gets his ring, but not this year.
Reply
post #40 of 99
5/27/08 at 9:33pm
Thread Starter 

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

The Lakers survived the Spurs in Game 4, and should close out the defending champs in 5 games. When Brent Barry is your go-to guy in a crucial playoff game moment, you're pretty much done. Manu ain't Manu, and Tony Parker and Tim Duncan are amazing players, but the Spurs are running on fumes. If the Spurs come back and win this series, we're talking '04 Red Sox. I'd bet the farm it ain't gonna happen.
Reply
post #41 of 99
5/27/08 at 10:01pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

Yeah, but wasn't Barry fouled?
Reply
post #42 of 99
5/28/08 at 5:27am
Thread Starter 

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

If Barry leans into Fisher while attempting to shoot, he goes to the line. He didn't, so it was a good non-call. Even Popovich said as much. I'm biased, of course, but it looked like the Spurs got the vast majority of favorable calls all game long, so maybe it was karma. But honestly, yes, the referees certainly could have called that a foul.
Reply
post #43 of 99
5/28/08 at 5:34am

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

That would have been a 2 point foul, so at best, Barry could have tied the game. But if the refs had called the previous play correctly (resetting the 24 second clock when Fisher hit the rim) it would have been a moot point. And with Kobe only going to the line once in 2 games (and never in game 4), the officiating has clearly been allowing a lot of contact to go as non-fouls.
Reply
post #44 of 99
5/28/08 at 2:12pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

First let me get this out of the way: I am not a Spurs fan. I do respect what they have accomplished and I think the way they have handled this "controversy" bears out their class. That said, a foul is a foul. Barry should've been at the line shooting two. Without the contact he would've gotten a pretty good look at a three point shot. The contact prevented that. From what I've heard, both Fischer and Phil Jackson said it was a foul. To George's point: it just shows you how badly the officials screwed up the end of that game and that is a shame.
Reply
post #45 of 99
5/29/08 at 5:42am
Thread Starter 

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

That game was poorly officiated from the get-go. Duncan was allowed to take 5 steps to the rim, they didn't reset the shot-clock when Fisher's shot hit the rim, Kobe got to the free-throw line NEVER, and the infamous non-call at the end of the game. It's a shame the game ended like that, it's a shame the Lakers allowed it to be that close after seemingly putting the Spurs away, and it's a shame the refs blew the game like that. I agree, David, the Spurs handled the situation with class. I hate the Spurs, but the way the franchise dealt with the situation was beyond reproach. They are a class bunch of guys. Phil and Kobe would've been howling at the moon if the situation were reversed.
Reply
post #46 of 99
5/29/08 at 12:17pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

I can't stand the spurs anymore. I can't stand how Duncan looks so surprised when a foul gets called on him. I can't stand their coach. And I really hate the "flop". I swear Tony Parker practices that at home.
Reply
post #47 of 99
5/29/08 at 9:19pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

What a poor end for the Spurs. Ginobili was clearly injured. It was painful watching him try to explode to the basket. He just physically could not do it.

When healthy, he can embarrass most NBA players with his agressive drives through the lane. In his current state of health, he was embarrassing himself and should have been on the bench. What ever happened to sitting injured players who cause more harm than good by being on the court?

I don't care if they had to play Matt Bonner or Damon Stoudamire. Watching Manu like that was like watching MJ's last season with Washington. That wasn't MJ, and this wasn't "Manu."

As big a Spurs fan as I am, this settles the "Are they a dynasty?" debate. The answer is no. Not because they didn't repeat, but because they played against LA in the playoffs 6 times during the past 10 years, and the Lakers won 4-2. You can't be a dynasty if a team has a winning record against you in the playoffs during your "reign."

Some people said the Spurs are "Team of the decade." But if LA wins the title, they'll have 4 titles this decade, and SA will have 3. Not that I'm complaining. The four titles have been great, with each title run and each Finals series unique (won in a sweep, 4-1, 4-2 and 4-3).

But the opportunity for immortality (the 5-peat) was lost on the .4 shot in '04 and on the Manu foul on Dirk in '06. Those were probably the only two times that I disagreed with the notion that "the best team always wins 7 game series." The Spurs were talented and experienced enough to win 5 in a row, but they just didn't get it done. Great run, though. Thanks, Spurs.
Reply
post #48 of 99
5/30/08 at 5:44am
Thread Starter 

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

The torch appears to have been passed in the West. The Lakers seem to be poised for a 3-5 year run of supremacy, but even if Bynum comes back strong, nothing is guaranteed. The Spurs need to retool, but I wouldn't write 'em off just yet. As long as they have Duncan, Parker, and Ginobli (when healthy), they'll still scare everyone. The Spurs are like Hillary Clinton, or like cockroaches in nuclear winter. Until their essence is gone, you can't pronounce them dead. They clearly need to get younger and more athletic.

For now, the King is dead, long live the King!
Reply
post #49 of 99
5/30/08 at 3:02pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

God, why did Vujacic have to take that meaningless 3-pointer with .2 seconds left? San Antonio was getting 7.5 points and ended up losing by 8. That's about as bad as it gets if you're on the wrong side.
Reply
post #50 of 99
5/30/08 at 3:19pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Perry
God, why did Vujacic have to take that meaningless 3-pointer with .2 seconds left? San Antonio was getting 7.5 points and ended up losing by 8. That's about as bad as it gets if you're on the wrong side.

Maybe it was more than just poor sportsmanship? Maybe he stood to gain personally because he bet on the game? Could have made himself a load of $$$.
Reply
post #51 of 99
5/30/08 at 8:38pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

Okay, we're all set with Lakers-Celtics. Lakers are currently favored 60-40 on the tradesports.com futures exchange. Should be a great series, and the NBA got what it wanted as far as the matchup goes.
Reply
post #52 of 99
5/30/08 at 8:44pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

Quote:
Maybe it was more than just poor sportsmanship? Maybe he stood to gain personally because he bet on the game? Could have made himself a load of $$$

I doubt that he had anything riding on it...it was just too spur-of-the-moment (pardon the pun).

However, it sounds as though as much as $100 million may have been made/lost due to that shot. Some casinos estimate that the worldwide "handle" (all bets placed) was $300 million or so and that 65% of the action was on the Spurs +7.5 (or +8 in some places). Those people either lost their bet (horrible for them) or pushed (bad for them and also terrible for the casinos, since all money is then returned and they don't collect their 10% juice).
Reply
post #53 of 99
5/30/08 at 11:50pm
Thread Starter 

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

The Celtics and the Lakers. Ahh, my mind wanders back to the days of yore: the McHale clothesline and Worthy passing the ball to Gerald Henderson in '84 (a series in which I shed tears over a sporting event for the only time in my life), Kareem's dominance in '85 and the Magic baby-hook in '87. The good old days.

Those times were great for basketball, and it's great for nostalgia and ratings this year, but I don't hate the Celtics anymore. That's a sad commentary on their lengthy absence from the basketball limelight. I would actually be happy for Kevin Garnett if he won a ring.

But the Lakers have a better player than KG, a better coach than Doc Rivers, a better bench and younger legs than the Celtics, and have beaten better teams in the playoffs. If they don't win, I will be pissed, because they are the better team.

On the other hand, the only thing that is as good in sports as being a Laker fan, is being a Celtics hater. It would be nice to relive those moments of unmitigated Boston hatred.

Lakers in 6.
Reply
post #54 of 99
5/31/08 at 5:13pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

I had an old college roommate back in the mid 90s who was the biggest Conspiracy Theory advocate with regards to sports. He believed all professional US sports of any betting magnitude fixed. Of course, as we all know, if you believe something hard enough, you will find enough instances of "proof" to support your theory. He kept equating football/baseball/basketball to WWE wrestling: orchestrated to go whichever way the betting lines went to favor the "powers that be".

Of course this pissed me off something fierce because I am a big sports fan and although I'm not naive to believe point shaving doesn't happen (it's been proven to happen), I don't think it's as widespread as he believed.

He now lives 350 miles away, and I think I could hear him screaming at the TV during Vujacic's shot!
Reply
post #55 of 99
6/1/08 at 1:10pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

Vujacic's improvement this year has been pretty amazing. For the last couple of years, he was the guy who would get off the bench and promptly attempt a long jumper every time he got the ball. The Laker announcers would be surprised if he ever drove into the lanes and attempted a layup. He was one of the better perimeter defenders on the team, but then again, those teams had Smush Parker playing big minutes. This season, he's become automatic from the 3, isn't afraid to get to the basket, and a really in-your-face tough defender. That 3 at the end of game 5 was pointless, but not totally surprising--in his heart of hearts, Vujacic is a big time gunner.

I'll take the Lakers in 7, but that would give me a heart attack. I hope Jan is closer to correct.
Reply
post #56 of 99
6/1/08 at 2:16pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

Boston in 7.
Reply
post #57 of 99
6/1/08 at 7:20pm

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

I didn't realize this, as my girlfriend's work conference has been scheduled since last year, and I'm going along with her. I just realized I'm going to be in enemy territory (Boston) for games 1 and 2. There will be a few Los Angelenos on this trip, so we'll have to find some place to watch it and band together so we don't get killed by Bostonians!
Reply
post #58 of 99
6/2/08 at 4:50am
Thread Starter 

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

I'm going to be in Barcelona during Game 6 and 7, should it go that far. It would be amazing to party with the locals celebrating Pau Gasol's NBA championship. Of course, if the Lakers win it in 5, I'll be able to celebrate in L.A. Either way works for me! GO LAKERS!!
Reply
post #59 of 99
6/2/08 at 5:54am

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

There is lots of speculation in the local media about what is going to happen with the Pistons this offseason. After three straight years of failing to win in the conference finals, Dumars may choose to shake up the core. The most likely change is at head coach, where rumors of assistant coach Michael Curry taking over for Flip are running rampant. Saunders has only one year left on his contract, and he probably will not be offered an extension. The remaining choices are to either get rid of Flip or retain him as a lame duck coach (which never works out).

Rasheed also only has one year left on his contract, so he could be attractive trade bait for a team looking for an expiring contract. Considering Wallace's penchant for disappearing in critical playoff games the past couple of years (including Game 6 Friday night), I think it's time for Detroit to get rid of him.

Good luck to the Lakers and Celtics fans here.
Reply
post #60 of 99
6/2/08 at 6:07am
Thread Starter 

Re: 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread

I just read something from Freep about the Pistons possibly moving Rip Hamilton to the Bulls for Deng and/or Gordon. Not sure that makes much sense, but unloading Wallace certainly does.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: After Hours Lounge
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Other Diversions › After Hours Lounge › 2008 NBA Playoffs Thread